E-resources
-
Foster, Nadine E; Anema, Johannes R; Cherkin, Dan; Chou, Roger; Cohen, Steven P; Gross, Douglas P; Ferreira, Paulo H; Fritz, Julie M; Koes, Bart W; Peul, Wilco; Turner, Judith A; Maher, Chris G; Buchbinder, Rachelle; Hartvigsen, Jan; Cherkin, Dan; Foster, Nadine E; Maher, Chris G; Underwood, Martin; van Tulder, Maurits; Anema, Johannes R; Chou, Roger; Cohen, Stephen P; Menezes Costa, Lucíola; Croft, Peter; Ferreira, Manuela; Ferreira, Paulo H; Fritz, Julie M; Genevay, Stéphane; Gross, Douglas P; Hancock, Mark J; Hoy, Damian; Karppinen, Jaro; Koes, Bart W; Kongsted, Alice; Louw, Quinette; Öberg, Birgitta; Peul, Wilco C; Pransky, Glenn; Schoene, Mark; Sieper, Joachim; Smeets, Rob J; Turner, Judith A; Woolf, Anthony
The Lancet (British edition), 06/2018, Volume: 391, Issue: 10137Journal Article
Many clinical practice guidelines recommend similar approaches for the assessment and management of low back pain. Recommendations include use of a biopsychosocial framework to guide management with initial non-pharmacological treatment, including education that supports self-management and resumption of normal activities and exercise, and psychological programmes for those with persistent symptoms. Guidelines recommend prudent use of medication, imaging, and surgery. The recommendations are based on trials almost exclusively from high-income countries, focused mainly on treatments rather than on prevention, with limited data for cost-effectiveness. However, globally, gaps between evidence and practice exist, with limited use of recommended first-line treatments and inappropriately high use of imaging, rest, opioids, spinal injections, and surgery. Doing more of the same will not reduce back-related disability or its long-term consequences. The advances with the greatest potential are arguably those that align practice with the evidence, reduce the focus on spinal abnormalities, and ensure promotion of activity and function, including work participation. We have identified effective, promising, or emerging solutions that could offer new directions, but that need greater attention and further research to determine if they are appropriate for large-scale implementation. These potential solutions include focused strategies to implement best practice, the redesign of clinical pathways, integrated health and occupational interventions to reduce work disability, changes in compensation and disability claims policies, and public health and prevention strategies.
Author
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Shelf entry
Permalink
- URL:
Impact factor
Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.
Year | Impact factor | Edition | Category | Classification | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Select the library membership card:
If the library membership card is not in the list,
add a new one.
DRS, in which the journal is indexed
Database name | Field | Year |
---|
Links to authors' personal bibliographies | Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system |
---|
Source: Personal bibliographies
and: SICRIS
The material is available in full text. If you wish to order the material anyway, click the Continue button.