UP - logo
E-resources
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Combination gemcitabine plu...
    Morizane, C.; Okusaka, T.; Mizusawa, J.; Katayama, H.; Ueno, M.; Ikeda, M.; Ozaka, M.; Okano, N.; Sugimori, K.; Fukutomi, A.; Hara, H.; Mizuno, N.; Yanagimoto, H.; Wada, K.; Tobimatsu, K.; Yane, K.; Nakamori, S.; Yamaguchi, H.; Asagi, A.; Yukisawa, S.; Kojima, Y.; Kawabe, K.; Kawamoto, Y.; Sugimoto, R.; Iwai, T.; Nakamura, K.; Miyakawa, H.; Yamashita, T.; Hosokawa, A.; Ioka, T.; Kato, N.; Shioji, K.; Shimizu, K.; Nakagohri, T.; Kamata, K.; Ishii, H.; Furuse, J.

    Annals of oncology, December 2019, 2019-12-01, 2019-12-00, Volume: 30, Issue: 12
    Journal Article

    Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, it causes nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, and requires hydration. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) reportedly has equal to, or better, efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC in terms of overall survival (OS). We undertook a phase III randomized trial in 33 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0−1, and adequate organ function. The calculated sample size was 350 with a one-sided α of 5%, a power of 80%, and non-inferiority margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.155. The primary end point was OS, while the secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), and clinically significant AEs defined as grade ≥2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, or diarrhea. Between May 2013 and March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. GS was found to be non-inferior to GC median OS: 13.4months with GC and 15.1months with GS, HR, 0.945; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78–1.15; P=0.046 for non-inferiority. The median PFS was 5.8months with GC and 6.8months with GS (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.70–1.07). The RR was 32.4% with GC and 29.8% with GS. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Clinically significant AEs were observed in 35.1% of patients in the GC arm and 29.9% in the GS arm. GS, which does not require hydration, should be considered a new, convenient standard of care option for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC. This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm), number UMIN000010667.