UP - logo
E-resources
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Peripherally Inserted Centr...
    Ullman, Amanda J; August, Deanne; Kleidon, Tricia; Walker, Rachel; Marsh, Nicole M; Bulmer, Andrew; Pearch, Benjamin; Runnegar, Naomi; Schults, Jessica A; Leema, Joanne; Lee-Archer, Paul; Biles, Cathy; Southam, Katrina; Gibson, Victoria; Byrnes, Joshua; Ware, Robert S; Chopra, Vineet; Coulthard, Alan; Mollee, Peter; Rickard, Claire M; Harris, Patrick N A

    BMJ open, 04/2021, Volume: 11, Issue: 4
    Journal Article

    IntroductionPeripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are vital for the delivery of medical therapies, but up to 30% of PICCs are associated with complications such as deep vein thrombosis or infection. The integration of antimicrobial and hydrophobic catheter materials, and pressure-activated valves, into polyurethane PICCs are innovations designed to prevent infective and/or thrombotic complications.Methods and analysisA multicentre, parallel group, superiority randomised controlled trial with two experimental arms ((1) hydrophobic PICC (with pressure-activated valve); (2) chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated PICC (with external clamp)) and one control group ((3) conventional polyurethane PICC (with external clamp)). Recruitment of 1098 adult and paediatric patients will take place over 2 years at three tertiary-referral hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Patients are eligible for inclusion if their PICC is to be inserted for medical treatment, with a vascular size sufficient to support a 4-Fr PICC or larger, and with informed consent. The primary outcome is PICC failure, a composite of thrombotic (venous thrombosis, breakage and occlusion) and infective complications (PICC-associated bloodstream infection and local infection). Secondary outcomes include: all-cause PICC complication; thrombotic complications; infective complications; adverse events (local or systemic reaction); PICC dwell time; patient/parent satisfaction; and healthcare costs. Differences between both intervention groups and the control group will be compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. Effect estimates will be presented as HRs with corresponding 95% CI.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval from Queensland Health (HREC/QCHQ/48682) and Griffith University (Ref. No. 2019/094). Results will be published.Trial registration numberACTRN12619000022167.