Igor Raatz; Natascha Anchieta; William Galle Dietrich
Revista eletrônica de direito processual,
12/2020, Volume:
21, Issue:
3
Journal Article
The essay has as its theme the investigation of the meaning of the adjective "scientific" within the "scientific" processualism as well as the content of the "new methodological phases". The investigation is delimited within the Legal Science and its tripartite division. The objective is to demonstrate that the adjective “scientific” is not related to the methodological requirements from Legal Science. The existence of methodological phases is questioned. The hypothesis is that the adjective “scientific” and the “new phases” were used, respectively, as a discursive strategy to disqualify a theory with different epistemological bases and to claim for the “new” phases an authority that is not justified.
It was not necessary to add the material to the shelf.
Bibliographic material was successfully added on shelf.
Adding bibliographical material on shelf was not successful.
Material is already on the shelf.
Permalink
URL:
Impact factor
Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.
Year
Impact factor
Edition
Category
Classification
JCR
SNIP
JCR
SNIP
JCR
SNIP
JCR
SNIP
Select the library membership card:
DRS,
in which the journal is indexed
Database name
Field
Year
Links to authors' personal bibliographies
Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system
