Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are among the most serious complications associated with systemic rheumatic diseases, and lead to significant morbidity and mortality; they may also be the first ...manifestation of connective tissue diseases (CTDs). The aim of this narrative review is to summarise the data concerning the pathogenesis of CTD/ILD and its distinguishing features in different rheumatic diseseas. Areas covered: The pathogenesis, clinical aspects and treatment of ILD associated with rheumatic systemic diseases and CTDs were reviewed by searching the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases for papers published between 1995 and February 2017 using combinations of words or terms. Articles not written in English were excluded. Expert commentary: The management of CTD-ILD is challenging because of the lack of robust data regarding the treatments used, the heterogeneity of the diseases themselves, and the scarcity of well-defined outcome measures. Treatment decisions are often made clinically on the basis of functional, radiographic progression, and exacerbating factors such as age and the burden of comorbidities. Given the complexities of diagnosis and the paucity of treatment trials, the management of CTD patients with ILD requires multidisciplinary collaboration between rheumatologists and pulmonologists in CTD-ILD clinics.
Pregnancy in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients is no more an infrequent event as it used to be, but literature data on pregnancy outcomes in women with SSc are scarce. The rate of preterm deliveries ...and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) seems to be increased, while the risk of miscarriages is controversial. Moreover, no study compared pregnancy outcomes in SSc with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We performed a retrospective study to compare the pregnancy and disease outcomes of women with SSc with a cohort of age-matched women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and healthy controls (HC).
A total of 154 pregnancies from SSc, SLE, APS patients, and HC were prospectively followed at the High-Risk Pregnancy Unit of our center from 2008 to 2019. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of miscarriages, fetal deaths, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preeclampsia, neonatal deaths, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns. Single adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) represented secondary endpoints. SSc activity variations in relation to pregnancy were assessed.
The risk of APO was significantly higher in SSc patients compared to HC (60.6% vs 10.0%; OR = 14.42; 95% CI 3.70-56.18, p = 0.001) and SLE patients (60.6% vs 37.5%; OR = 3.56; 95% CI 1.29-9.83, p = 0.014). Compared to HC, women with SSc had an increased frequency of first trimester miscarriage (15% vs 0 %; p = 0.016), preeclampsia (12% vs 0%, p = 0.038), and SGA newborns (21.2% vs 0%; p = 0.003). Preterm deliveries were more frequent in SSc pregnancies in comparison with HC (24.2% vs 5%; OR = 6.08; 95% CI 1.19-31.02, p = 0.036) and SLE patients (24.2% vs 7.5%, OR = 5.68; 95% CI 1.1-29.38, p = 0.038). Disease remained stable in all SSc patients during pregnancy and up to 1 year after delivery.
We found an increased risk of APO in our SSc cohort in comparison with HC (with higher rates of miscarriages, preeclampsia, SGA newborns, and preterm deliveries) and SLE patients (presenting a higher rate of preterm deliveries). High-risk multidisciplinary management of SSc pregnant women is highly recommended.
Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome (SN-APS) is often defined as the presence of APS criteria manifestations, negative antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), and coexistence of APS non-criteria ...manifestations. Nevertheless, the impact of these non-criteria features is still unclear. On a different note, the relevance of one single aPL positive determination in patients with APS manifestations is another domain with limited evidence. We aim to compare the course of SN-APS and single-positive aPL (SP-aPL) patients with that of individuals with APS manifestations without non-criteria features/aPL positivity (controls).
Retrospective analysis of patients with thrombosis/obstetric morbidity assessed in two European hospitals between 2005 and 2020. Patients were divided into SN-APS, SP-aPL, and control groups. Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and therapies were compared.
A total of 82 patients were included in the SN-APS group, 88 in the SP-aPL group, and 185 in the control group. In Cox regression model, SN-APS displayed more thrombosis recurrence than controls (HR 3.8, 95% CI 2.2-6.5, p < 0.001) even when adjusting for the presence of hereditary thrombophilia, systemic lupus erythematosus, or contraceptive hormonal treatment. In SP-aPL, the difference in thrombosis recurrence did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.078). Indefinite anticoagulation (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) use (p < 0.001 in both cases) were more common in SN-APS/SP-aPL.
SN-APS displayed more thrombosis recurrence, indefinite anticoagulation, and VKA use than controls without non-criteria manifestations. The presence of such features in patients with thrombosis and negative aPL may negatively impact their clinical course.
Background/Purpose
APS ACTION Registry was created to study the outcomes of patients with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) with or without other systemic autoimmune disease ...(SAIDx). Given that immunosuppression (IS) is used for certain aPL manifestations, for example, thrombocytopenia (TP), our primary objective was to describe the indications for IS in aPL-positive patients without other SAIDx. Secondly, we report the type of IS used in patients with selected microvascular or non-thrombotic aPL manifestations.
Methods
An online database is used to collect clinical data. The inclusion criteria are positive aPL based on the laboratory section of the APS Classification Criteria, tested at least twice within one year prior to enrollment. Patients are followed every 12 ± 3 months. For this descriptive retrospective and prospective analysis, we included aPL-positive patients without other SAIDx and excluded those with new SAIDx classification during follow-up. For each patient, we retrieved clinical data at baseline and follow-up including selected aPL manifestations (diffuse alveolar hemorrhage DAH, antiphospholipid-nephropathy aPL-N, livedoid vasculopathy LV-related skin ulcers, TP, autoimmune hemolytic anemia AIHA, cardiac valve disease VD), and IS medications.
Results
Of 899 patients enrolled, 537 were included in this analysis (mean age 45 ± 13 years, female 377 70%, APS Classification in 438 82%, and at least one selected microvascular or non-thrombotic aPL manifestation in 141 (26%)). Of 537 patients, 76 (14%) were reported to use IS (ever), and 41/76 (54%) received IS primarily for selected aPL manifestation. In six of 8 (75%) DAH patients, 6/19 (32%) aPL-N, 4/28 (14%) LV, 25/88 (28%) TP, 6/11 (55%) AIHA, and 1/43 (2%) VD, the IS (excluding corticosteroids/hydroxychloroquine) indication was specific for selected aPL manifestation.
Conclusion
In our international cohort, 14% of aPL-positive patients without other SAIDx were reported to receive IS; the indication was at least one of the selected microvascular and/or non-thrombotic aPL-related manifestations in half. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent among those selected aPL-related manifestations; however, approximately one-third received IS specifically for that indication. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage was frequently treated with IS followed by AIHA and aPL-N. Systematic controlled studies are urgently needed to better define the role of IS in APS.
A prospectively study of pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome, or non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome was conducted to describe the ...characteristics of women followed in a referral unit and to derive a predictive tool for adverse pregnancy outcome (APO). Demographic characteristics, treatments, SLE activity, and flares were recorded. Laboratory data included a complete blood cell count, protein-to-creatinine urinary ratio (Pr/Cr ratio), complement, anti dsDNA, anti-SSA/Ro, anti-SSB/La, and antiphospholipid antibodies status. A stepwise regression was used to identify baseline characteristics available before pregnancy and during the 1st trimester that were most predictive of APO and to create the predictive model. A total of 217 pregnancies were included. One or more APO occurred in 45 (20.7%) women. A baseline model including non-Caucasian ethnicity (OR 2.78; 95% CI 1.16-6.62), smoking (OR 4.43; 95% CI 1.74-11.29), pregestational hypertension (OR 16.13; 95% CI 4.06-64.02), and pregestational corticosteroids treatment OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.30-6.87) yielded an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86). Among first-trimester parameters, only Pr/Cr ratio improved the model fit, but the predictive performance was not significantly improved (AUC of 0.78 vs. 0.81;
= 0.16). Better biomarkers need to be developed to efficiently stratify pregnant women with the most common autoimmune diseases.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a promising strategy to break COVID-19 transmission. Although hydroxychloroquine was evaluated for treatment and post-exposure prophylaxis, it is not evaluated for ...COVID-19 PrEP yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PrEP with hydroxychloroquine against placebo in healthcare workers at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection during an epidemic period.
We conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial in three hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. From 350 adult healthcare workers screened, we included 269 participants with no active or past SARS-CoV-2 infection (determined by a negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR and a negative serology against SARS-CoV-2). Participants allocated in the intervention arm (PrEP) received 400 mg of hydroxychloroquine daily for the first four consecutive days and subsequently, 400 mg weekly during the study period. Participants in the control group followed the same treatment schedule with placebo tablets.
52.8% (142/269) of participants were in the hydroxychloroquine arm and 47.2% (127/269) in the placebo arm. Given the national epidemic incidence decay, only one participant in each group was diagnosed with COVID-19. The trial was stopped due to futility and our study design was deemed underpowered to evaluate any benefit regarding PrEP efficacy. Both groups showed a similar proportion of participants experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) (p=0.548). No serious AEs were reported. Almost all AEs (96.4%, 106/110) were mild. Only mild gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly higher in the hydroxychloroquine arm compared to the placebo arm (27.4% (39/142) vs 15.7% (20/127), p=0.041).
Although the efficacy of PrEP with hydroxychloroquine for preventing COVID-19 could not be evaluated, our study showed that PrEP with hydroxychloroquine at low doses is safe.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04331834 . Registered on April 2, 2020.
To assess long‐term clinical, radiological, and functional follow‐up of patients hospitalized for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) pneumonia of different grades of ...severity. Two‐hundred‐thirty and three patients (Group 1, patients needed invasive mechanical ventilation, n = 69; Group 2, patients needed noninvasive mechanical ventilation, n = 78; Group 3, patients needed <12 L/min of O2 supply, n = 96) with a postdischarge follow‐up >12 months were studied. Follow‐up visits, chest computed tomography (CT) scan and pulmonary function tests (diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide DLCO, 6‐min walking tests 6MWT, spirometry) were done at 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge. Male sex was more frequent in Group 1 (n = 50, 72.5%) compared with Group 2 (n = 49, 62.5%) and Group 3 (n = 44, 51.2%), p = 0.024. Group 2 patients had more comorbidities and higher BMI compared with others. At Month 12, the main reported symptoms were fatigue (mainly in Group 3) and dyspnea; most symptoms resolved during follow‐up, except brain fog, memory loss, and anosmia/dysgeusia that, when present at Month 3, usually persisted at Month 12. DLCO and 6MWT normalized at Month 12 in almost all patients. Only nine patients (13%) in Group 1 had a normal chest CT at Month 12, while 20 (29%) had >3 abnormalities, compared with 14 (17.9%) in Group 2 and 11 (11.4%) in Group 3, respectively (p = 0.04). Different clinical symptoms persist up to 12 months in patients hospitalized for SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia. Despite the persistence of abnormalities at chest CT scan after 12 months, an impairment of pulmonary function persists only in a minority of subjects. A longer follow‐up is needed to assess the evolution of radiological abnormalities in COVID‐19 population.
To analyse the association between the average 'adjusted' Global APS Score (aGAPSS) over time, as a surrogate of disease activity, and change in Damage Index for APS (DIAPS) during follow-up in ...patients with thrombotic and non-thrombotic APS.
Two hundred APS patients (138 primary, 62 associated to other autoimmune diseases) were included. DIAPS change was calculated as the difference between basal DIAPS and DIAPS at the end of follow-up. The aGAPSS was calculated for each patient at baseline and on a yearly basis for up to 6 years (minimum 3 years). The average score per patient was computed and considered the reference aGAPSS. Linear regression models were designed to analyse the association between mean aGAPSS and DIAPS change. Moreover, factors associated to high (increase of DIAPS ≥1 during follow-up) vs low (increase of DIAPS <1 during follow-up) damage accrual were assessed.
A higher mean aGAPSS value was associated to a DIAPS increase during follow-up (b = 0.04, P < 0.001) in the multivariate analysis. Higher mean aGAPSS values were found in patients with a DIAPS increase ≥1 during follow-up compared with patients with an increase of <1 point 9.22 (95% CI 7.58, 10.86) vs 6.72 (95% CI 6.0, 7.43), P = 0.003. aGAPSS increased the odds a DIAPS increment of ≥1 point during follow-up OR = 1.12 (95% CI 1.04, 1.21), P = 0.003.
Our data support the utility of longitudinal assessing of the aGAPSS score in predicting damage accrual, measured by DIAPS, in APS.
PDF
