The treatment landscape in metastatic renal cell carcinoma has changed fundamentally over the last decade by the development of antiangiogenic agents, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and ...immunotherapy. Outside of the context of a clinical trial, the treatments are used sequentially. We describe results under real‐life conditions of a sequential treatment strategy, before the era of immunotherapy. All patients were treated according to their prognostic score (either Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center or International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium) for advanced renal cell carcinoma. A treatment strategy involving 1 to 4 lines was determined including a rechallenge criterion for the repeat use of a treatment class. Three hundred forty‐four patients were included over 3 years. Overall survival was 57 months in patients with good or intermediate prognosis and 19 months in patients with poor prognosis. In the former group, the proportions of patients treated with 2 to 4 treatment lines were 70%, 38% and 16%, respectively. The best objective response rates for lines 1 to 4 were 46%, 36%, 16% and 17%, respectively. Grade III/IV toxicity did not appear to be cumulative. The recommended strategy was followed in 68% of patients. A large proportion of patients with good or intermediate prognosis who progress after two lines of treatment still have a performance status good enough to receive a systemic treatment, which justifies such a strategy. Overall survival of patients with good and intermediate prognosis was long, suggesting a benefit from the applied approach. These results might be used as selection criterion for the treatment of patients in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
What's new?
Metastatic renal cancer is a notoriously relapsing disease that can be treated with anti‐angiogenic treatments, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, inhibitors of the mammalian Target of Rapamycin or immune checkpoint inhibitors. The authors performed a “real‐life” study testing a sequential strategy of the first three treatments applied to 344 patients with relapsing metastatic renal cancer before the era of immunotherapy. They found that the overall survival of patients with good and intermediate prognosis was long, almost 5 years, and plan a new study including immunotherapy in the future.
Data regarding characteristics, safety and survival outcomes of patients aged 80 or older treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in routine oncology practice are limited.
We retrospectively ...collected data of patients aged 80 and older with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma treated with anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 regardless of the treatment line, in 14 institutions, between January 2014 and June 2017. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan Meier method. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE 5.0. Multivariate analyses were performed with the Cox model.
Eighty-two patients were included (36 with NSCLC, 45 with melanoma). Their median age was 82 years (range 80-93). Nivolumab and pembrolizumab were mainly used. In the NSCLC group, median PFS and OS were 2.3 months (95%CI 1.8-6.1) and 8.8 months (95%CI 5.5-18.1), respectively. In the melanoma group, median PFS and OS were 10.2 months (95%CI 4.5-20.0) and 24.5 months (95%CI 14.1-NR), respectively. The albumin level was found to be independently associated with a better OS in both groups. Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred in 15 patients (18.5%). One patient died from ICI-induced pulmonary toxicity.
Our study findings suggest that treatment with ICI in elderly patients with NSCLC and melanoma has a risk-benefit ratio that supports its use. However, we report in this cohort that one in five patients has a grade 3-4 IRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Geriatric assessment prior to initiation of therapy and during therapy should be routine in patients aged 80 years and older.
Background/Aims: The Bretagne-Pays de la Loire cancer observatory, an oncology network created by the French Ministry of Health, is specifically dedicated to assess the use of new targeted anticancer ...therapies in routine practice. In line with the French National Cancer III program, our cancer network set up a real-life cohort, which is independent of the pharmaceutical industry, for patients with colorectal cancer to monitor patient safety and quality of care and promote pharmacovigilance. Materials and Methods: Panitumumab monotherapy was assessed in 243 patients with wild-type Kirsten rat sarcoma who were treated for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) between July 2008 and December 2010 after prior chemotherapy using oxaliplatine and irinotecan. This was a post-European medicine agency marketing (EMA-M) study Results: This study shed light on the best practices, strategic adaptations, clinical results (treatment objective responses, 13%; progression free survival, 2.99 months 2.73-3.15; and overall survival, 6.8 months 5.49-8.38) as well as expected or unexpected (grade 3 or 4:11.5%) secondary effects in the phase IV panitumumab treatment of mCRC. Conclusion: Our results are similar to those by Amado whose phase III study led to obtaining EMA-M for panitumumab and tend to confirm the antitumor activity of this antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody in the treatment of mCRC. In addition, our results opened avenues to further assessment of panitumumab use as monotherapy as well as its benefit-risk ratio while taking into account the patients' general and clinical characteristics. In 2012, the French National Authority for Health appended these data to the panitumumab transparency committee report. Keywords: Panitumumab, gastrointestinal neoplasm, neoplasm metastasis, survival, safety, aged
PDF
