The aim of this Phase 1, open-label study (NCT01395420) was to measure and compare concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam in bronchial epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and plasma, following ...administration of two different dosing regimens in healthy subjects.
Healthy volunteers received 2000 mg of ceftazidime + 500 mg of avibactam (n = 22) or 3000 mg of ceftazidime + 1000 mg of avibactam (n = 21), administered intravenously every 8 h for 3 days (total of nine doses). Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage was performed once per subject, 2, 4, 6 or 8 h after the last infusion. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from individual plasma concentrations and the composite ELF concentration-time profile. Safety was assessed.
Forty-three subjects received treatment (2000 mg of ceftazidime + 500 mg of avibactam, n = 22; 3000 mg of ceftazidime + 1000 mg of avibactam, n = 21). Plasma and ELF concentrations increased dose-proportionally for both drugs, with 1.5- and 2-fold increases in AUCτ, for respective components. Ceftazidime Cmax and AUCτ in ELF were ∼ 23%-26% and 31%-32% of plasma exposure. Avibactam Cmax and AUCτ in ELF were ∼ 28%-35% and 32%-35% of plasma exposure. ELF and plasma elimination were similar for both drugs. No serious adverse events were observed.
Both ceftazidime and avibactam penetrated dose-proportionally into ELF, with ELF exposure to both drugs ∼ 30% of plasma exposure.
•Ceftaroline achieved PTA >99.9% against Staphylococcus aureus at the MIC90 from recent surveillance.•The other antibiotics generally failed to achieve PTAs >90%, even at high doses.•Some cSSTI drugs ...do not achieve high PTAs relative to contemporary MIC90 estimates.
For recently licensed antibiotics, such as the cephalosporin ceftaroline fosamil, probability of target attainment (PTA) curves, showing the percentage of patients reaching a predefined pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) target at different bacterial minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), have been used to support and justify dose recommendations across patient populations. However, information on PTA for older antibiotics is limited. A retrospective analysis was conducted to construct PTA curves for 4 antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). PK models for vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftriaxone were selected from the literature based on large numbers of subjects with covariates representative of patients in Europe and/or the United States. An existing model was available for ceftaroline fosamil. Standard and high-dosage regimens were used to compare the PTA of each antibiotic at MIC values 0.03 to 64 mg/L for a simulated set of patients with cSSTI caused by S. aureus. These were compared to proportions of S. aureus isolates at each MIC from global surveillance data. Ceftaroline achieved PTAs >99.9% for bacteriostatic and bactericidal targets at the MIC90 (1 mg/L), whereas the comparators failed to achieve PTAs >90%, at bacteriostatic or bactericidal targets, even when clinical doses were increased beyond those recommended. PTA analysis can be used to compare different drugs with the same simulated patient dataset, subject to availability of an appropriate PK model and robust exposure targets. This analysis shows that some antibiotics commonly used to treat cSSTIs may fail to reach high PTAs relative to contemporary MIC90 estimates.
Purpose
Ceftazidime–avibactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved in Europe and the USA for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ...ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), among other indications. In the phase III REPROVE trial (NCT01808092), ceftazidime–avibactam demonstrated non-inferiority to meropenem for the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including VAP. As ceftazidime–avibactam was not studied in patients with NP prior to REPROVE, selecting an appropriate dosage regimen in the “perfect storm” of NP required careful consideration of potential determinants and confounders of response specific to the NP patient population.
Methods
This review describes the series of preclinical studies and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses that supported ceftazidime–avibactam dosage selection for patients with NP/VAP (2000/500 mg by 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h, adjusted for renal function). In parallel, important considerations for antibiotic dosage selection in patients with NP are highlighted, including adequate drug penetration into the lungs, the suitability of murine-derived plasma PK/PD targets, evaluation of MIC distributions against clinical bacterial isolates from patients with NP, and consideration of PK in patients with NP, who are often critically ill. These analyses also supported the European approval of ceftazidime–avibactam for adults with HAP, including VAP, before the completion of REPROVE.
Conclusions
This work serves as a successful practical example of dosage design for a new antibacterial drug therapy in the indication of NP, including VAP, where previous drug therapies have failed, possibly as a result of evaluation of too few variables, thereby limiting the accuracy of pharmacodynamic predictions.
Tebipenem pivoxil HBr (TBPM-PI-HBr) is a novel orally bioavailable carbapenem. The active moiety is tebipenem. Tebipenem pivoxil is licensed for use in Japan in children with ear, nose, and throat ...infections and respiratory infections. The HBr salt was designed to improve drug substance and drug product properties, including stability. TBPM-PI-HBr is now being developed as an agent for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) in adults. The pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of tebipenem were studied in a well-characterized neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Plasma drug concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Dose fractionation experiments were performed after establishing dose-response relationships. The magnitude of drug exposure required for stasis was established using 11 strains of
(
,
= 6;
,
= 5) with a variety of resistance mechanisms. The relationship between drug exposure and the emergence of resistance was established in a hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Tebipenem exhibited time-dependent pharmacodynamics that were best described by the free drug area under the concentration-time curve (
AUC
)/MIC corrected for the length of the dosing interval (
AUC
/MIC · 1/tau). The pharmacodynamics of tebipenem versus
and
were comparable, as was the response of strains possessing extended-spectrum β-lactamases versus the wild type. The median
AUC
/MIC · 1/tau value for the achievement of stasis in the 11 strains was 23. Progressively more fractionated regimens in the HFIM resulted in the suppression of resistance. An
AUC
/MIC · 1/tau value of 34.58 to 51.87 resulted in logarithmic killing and the suppression of resistance. These data and analyses will be used to define the regimen for a phase III study of adult patients with cUTI.
Background: Vaccines against COVID-19 plays an important role in limiting the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections and also in curbing mortality and morbidity due to COVID-19. Objective: To estimate the ...anti-spike antibody response after receiving the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines amongst health care workers of a tertiary care hospital in Tripura, India. Materials and Method: A cross- sectional study was conducted from 1 July to 20 August 2021 at Agartala Government Medical College and GBP Hospital, Agartala among 561 health care workers who had received first and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and had completed 14 days after receiving the second dose. Results: The present study showed that health care workers who had received both doses of COVID-19 vaccine had 99.5% seropositivity to anti-spike antibody. The median SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody titter was 250 with an IQR (211.55-250). Seropositivity rate was higher among Covishield recipients (99.8% 550/551) as compared to Covaxin recipients (80% 8/10) and it was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.000). Conclusion: The present study suggests that a good immune response was elicited against spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 after two complete doses of Covishield (ChAdOx1-nCoV-19) or Covaxin (BBV152).
Neonatal sepsis causes up to an estimated 680,000 deaths annually worldwide, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A significant and growing proportion of bacteria causing ...neonatal sepsis are resistant to multiple antibiotics, including the World Health Organization-recommended empiric neonatal sepsis regimen of ampicillin/gentamicin. The Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership is aiming to develop alternative empiric antibiotic regimens that fulfil several criteria: (1) affordable in LMIC settings; (2) activity against neonatal bacterial pathogens, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers, gentamicin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus
(MRSA); (3) a licence for neonatal use or extensive experience of use in neonates; and (4) minimal toxicities. In this review, we identify five antibiotics that fulfil these criteria: amikacin, tobramycin, fosfomycin, flomoxef, and cefepime. We describe the available characteristics of each in terms of mechanism of action, resistance mechanisms, clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicity profile. We also identify some knowledge gaps: (1) the neonatal pharmacokinetics of cefepime is reliant on relatively small and limited datasets, and the pharmacokinetics of flomoxef are also reliant on data from a limited demographic range and (2) for all reviewed agents, the pharmacodynamic index and target has not been definitively established for both bactericidal effect and emergence of resistance, with many assumed to have an identical index/target to similar class molecules. These five agents have the potential to be used in novel combination empiric regimens for neonatal sepsis. However, the data gaps need addressing by pharmacokinetic trials and pharmacodynamic characterisation.
Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, commonly caused by
. Meropenem is a commonly used therapeutic agent, although emergent resistance occurs during ...treatment. We used a rabbit HAP infection model to assess the bacterial kill and resistance pharmacodynamics of meropenem. Meropenem 5 mg/kg administered subcutaneously (s.c.) q8h (±amikacin 3.33-5 mg/kg q8h administered intravenouslyi.v.) or meropenem 30 mg/kg s.c. q8h regimens were assessed in a rabbit lung infection model infected with
, with bacterial quantification and phenotypic/genotypic characterization of emergent resistant isolates. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic output was fitted to a mathematical model, and human-like regimens were simulated to predict outcomes in a clinical context. Increasing meropenem monotherapy demonstrated a dose-response effect to bacterial kill and an inverted U relationship with emergent resistance. The addition of amikacin to meropenem suppressed the emergence of resistance. A network of porin loss, efflux upregulation, and increased expression of AmpC was identified as the mechanism of this emergent resistance. A bridging simulation using human pharmacokinetics identified meropenem 2 g i.v. q8h as the licensed clinical regimen most likely to suppress resistance. We demonstrate an innovative experimental platform to phenotypically and genotypically characterize bacterial emergent resistance pharmacodynamics in HAP. For meropenem, we have demonstrated the risk of resistance emergence during therapy and identified two mitigating strategies: (i) regimen intensification and (ii) use of combination therapy. This platform will allow pre-clinical assessment of emergent resistance risk during treatment of HAP for other antimicrobials, to allow construction of clinical regimens that mitigate this risk.IMPORTANCEThe emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) during antimicrobial treatment for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a well-documented problem (particularly in pneumonia caused by
) that contributes to the wider global antimicrobial resistance crisis. During drug development, regimens are typically determined by their sufficiency to achieve bactericidal effect. Prevention of the emergence of resistance pharmacodynamics is usually not characterized or used to determine the regimen. The innovative experimental platform described here allows characterization of the emergence of AMR during the treatment of HAP and the development of strategies to mitigate this. We have demonstrated this specifically for meropenem-a broad-spectrum antibiotic commonly used to treat HAP. We have characterized the antimicrobial resistance pharmacodynamics of meropenem when used to treat HAP, caused by initially meropenem-susceptible
, phenotypically and genotypically. We have also shown that intensifying the regimen and using combination therapy are both strategies that can both treat HAP and suppress the emergence of resistance.
Abstract Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that has been shown to restore the in vitro activity of ceftazidime against pathogens producing Ambler class A, C, and some class D ...β-lactamases. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of avibactam alone or with ceftazidime in healthy Japanese subjects. In this Phase I, double-blind study ( NCT01291602 ), 16 healthy Japanese males, mean age 28.8 years, were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to receive avibactam 500 mg ( n = 6), ceftazidime 2000 mg plus avibactam 500 mg ( n = 7), or placebo ( n = 3), each administered as a 100 ml intravenous infusion over 2 h, once on Day 1, every 8 h on Days 3–6, and once on Day 7. There were no deaths or serious adverse events. Nine treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in three subjects in the avibactam group – including one elevation in transaminase levels, and three vital signs events (tachycardia, palpitations, and orthostatic hypotension) – and one in the ceftazidime–avibactam group. All events were considered mild. After single or multiple dosing, plasma concentrations of avibactam and ceftazidime declined in a multi-exponential manner. No plasma concentration accumulation was observed, and the majority of avibactam was excreted unchanged in urine within 24 h. No clinically relevant changes in intestinal bacterial flora were observed. In conclusion, avibactam alone and ceftazidime–avibactam were generally well tolerated in healthy male Japanese subjects, and avibactam pharmacokinetics were comparable whether administered alone or in combination with ceftazidime.
Avibactam is a non‐β‐lactam β‐lactamase inhibitor intended for use as a fixed‐dose combination with ceftazidime for the treatment of certain serious Gram‐negative infections. As avibactam is ...primarily excreted unchanged in the urine, renal impairment may affect its pharmacokinetics. This phase 1 study investigated the effect of renal impairment and hemodialysis on avibactam pharmacokinetics and safety. Healthy controls and subjects with increasing degrees of renal impairment received a single 30‐minute intravenous (IV) infusion of avibactam (100 mg). Anuric subjects requiring hemodialysis received the same infusion pre‐ and posthemodialysis, separated by a 7‐ to 14‐day washout. Blood and urine samples were collected, and pharmacokinetics were analyzed using noncompartmental methods. The relationships between avibactam total plasma clearance (CL) or renal clearance (CLR) and creatinine clearance (CrCL) were evaluated by linear correlation analysis. Safety was also monitored. Increasing severity of renal impairment was associated with decreasing CL and CLR and increasing exposure and terminal half‐life (t1/2). Avibactam CL and CLR demonstrated an approximately linear relationship with CrCL comparable to that previously observed for ceftazidime. In patients requiring hemodialysis, >50% of the administered avibactam was removed during a 4‐hour hemodialysis session, demonstrating that avibactam should be administered after hemodialysis. No new safety findings were reported. To conclude, avibactam dose adjustment is warranted in patients with renal impairment based on the severity of impairment. Because the slope of the linear relationship between avibactam total plasma CL and CrCL is similar to that of ceftazidime, renal impairment dose adjustments should maintain the currently advised 4:1 ratio of ceftazidime:avibactam.
PDF
