Timely access to maternity care is critical to saving lives. Digital health may serve to bridge the care chasm and advance health equity. Conducted in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, this ...cross-sectional mixed-methods study assessed the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in healthcare facilities in nine Latin American and Caribbean countries to understand the landscape of ICT use in maternity care and the barriers and facilitators to its adoption.
Between April 2021 and September 2022, we disseminated an online survey in English and Spanish among, mainly public, healthcare institutions that provided maternity care in Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guyana, Honduras, Paraguay and Peru. We also interviewed 27 administrators and providers in ministries of health and healthcare institutions.
Most of the 1877 institutions that answered the survey reported using ICTs in maternity care (N = 1536, 82%), ranging from 96% in Peru to 64% in the Dominican Republic. Of institutions that used ICTs, 59% reported using them more than before or for the first time since the pandemic began. ICTs were most commonly used to provide family planning (64%) and breastfeeding (58%) counseling, mainly by phone (82%). At the facility level, availability of equipment and internet coverage, coupled with skilled human resources, were the main factors associated with ICT use. At country level, government-led initiatives to develop digital health platforms, alongside national investments in the digital infrastructure, were the determining factors in the adoption of ICTs in healthcare provision.
Digital health for maternity care provision relied on commonly available technology and did not necessitate highly sophisticated systems, making it a sustainable and replicable strategy. However, disparities in access to digital health remain and many facilities in rural and remote areas lacked connectivity. Use of ICTs in maternity care depended on countries' long-term commitments to achieving universal health and digital coverage.
In Latin American, there is currently a regional action with the main purposes of putting the concept of severe neonatal morbidity in practice and formulating proposals for interventions. A general ...overview of neonatal health conditions, including morbidity and mortality, is provided to update regional knowledge on the topic. An example of the development and implementation of the concept of maternal near miss is also provided, followed by results from a systematic review covering all previously published studies on Neonatal Near Miss. Finally, some proposals for building a common concept on the topic and for launching a prospective surveillance study are presented. A Neonatal Near Miss is a neonate who had a severe morbidity (organ dysfunction or failure) but who survived this condition within the first 27 days of life. The pragmatic criteria recommended to be used are as follows: birth weight below 1700 g, Apgar score below 7 at 5 minutes of life and gestational age below 33 weeks. As a proxy for organ dysfunction, the following management criteria are also confirmed: parenteral therapeutic antibiotics; nasal continuous positive airway pressure; any intubation during the first 27 days of life; phototherapy within the first 24 h of life; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; the use of vasoactive drugs, anticonvulsants, surfactants, blood products and steroids for refractory hypoglycemia and any surgical procedure. Although this study starts from a regional perspective, this topic is clearly globally relevant. All nations, especially low and middle-income countries, could benefit from the proposed standardization.
•Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a cause of life-threatening infection in neonates.•Neonatal GBS can be prevented by intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis.•The Perinatal Information System collects ...maternal and neonatal health data in Latin America.•Most countries in our study screened less than 15% of pregnant women for GBS.•We found region-wide sociodemographic disparities in maternal GBS screening.
To determine rates and results of maternal Group B streptococcus (GBS) screening during pregnancy and identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with GBS screening in Latin American countries.
GBS is a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates and is prevented by screening pregnant women for GBS before delivery and intrapartum antibiotic treatment. Yet, data regarding national GBS screening practices and the epidemiology of maternal GBS colonization in Latin America are limited.
We conducted a retrospective observational study using de-identified records of pregnant women in six Latin American countries from a regional database. 460,328 collected from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2012 met study criteria and were included. Maternal screening rates for GBS were determined, association of demographic variables (ethnicity, age, education level, and civil status) with maternal GBS screening was determined using logistic regression, odds ratios were calculated comparing incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes (sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis) between countries with high and low rates of GBS screening, maternal GBS colonization prevalence was determined by year and association of demographic variables with maternal GBS colonization was determined using logistic regression.
Maternal GBS screening was less than 15% in each country, except Uruguay which screened greater than 65% of women. The final regression model examining maternal screening rates and demographic variables included the covariates ethnicity, maternal age group, education level and civil status. Countries with lower rates of maternal GBS screening had increased odds of neonatal sepsis OR 23.3; 95% CI (15.2–35.9) and pneumonia OR 19.9; 95% CI (12.1–32.6). In Uruguay, GBS prevalence over the study period was 18.5%. Black women, older women and women without a primary education had higher rates of GBS colonization (21.3%, 20.4% and 21.9% respectively).
Our study highlights the need for national policy and investments to increase maternal GBS screening and better understand the prevalence of maternal GBS colonization in Latin America. Further research on the burden of neonatal GBS disease within Latin America is needed to inform the introduction of a maternal GBS vaccine, when available.
COVID-19 and newborn health: systematic review Duran, Pablo; Berman, Stephen; Niermeyer, Susan ...
Revista panamericana de salud pública,
01/2020, Letnik:
44, Številka:
54
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
To describe perinatal and neonatal outcomes in newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2.
A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed Central, LILACS, and Google Scholar using the keywords 'covid ' ...AND 'newborn' OR 'child' OR 'infant,' on 18 March 2020, and again on 17 April 2020. One researcher conducted the search and extracted data on demographics, maternal outcomes, diagnostic tests, imaging, and neonatal outcomes.
Of 256 publications identified, 20 met inclusion criteria and comprised neonatal outcome data for 222 newborns whose mothers were suspected or confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2 positive perinatally (17 studies) or of newborns referred to hospital with infection/pneumonia (3 studies). Most (12 studies) were case-series reports; all were from China, except three (Australia, Iran, and Spain). Of the 222 newborns, 13 were reported as positive for SARS-CoV-2; most of the studies reported no or mild symptoms and no adverse perinatal outcomes. Two papers among those from newborns who tested positive reported moderate or severe clinical characteristics. Five studies using data on umbilical cord blood, placenta, and/or amniotic fluid reported no positive results. Nine studies reported radiographic imaging, including 5 with images of pneumonia, increased lung marking, thickened texture, or high-density nodular shadow. Minor, non-specific changes in biochemical variables were reported. Studies that tested breast milk reported negative SARS-CoV-2 results.
Given the paucity of studies at this time, vertical transmission cannot be confirmed or denied. Current literature does not support abstaining from breastfeeding nor separating mothers and newborns. Further evidence and data collection networks, particularly in the Americas, are needed for establishing definitive guidelines and recommendations.
From 2014 to 2017, the World Health Organization convened a working group to evaluate influenza disease burden and vaccine efficacy to inform estimates of maternal influenza immunization program ...impact. The group evaluated existing systematic reviews and relevant primary studies, and conducted four new systematic reviews. There was strong evidence that maternal influenza immunization prevented influenza illness in pregnant women and their infants, although data on severe illness prevention were lacking. The limited number of studies reporting influenza incidence in pregnant women and infants under six months had highly variable estimates and underrepresented low- and middle-income countries. The evidence that maternal influenza immunization reduces the risk of adverse birth outcomes was conflicting, and many observational studies were subject to substantial bias. The lack of scientific clarity regarding disease burden or magnitude of vaccine efficacy against severe illness poses challenges for robust estimation of the potential impact of maternal influenza immunization programs.
•Definite risks were not identified for any vaccine and outcome.•Influenza and pertussis vaccination monopolized most of the available evidence.•Much of the evidence was based on observational ...studies with a high degree of overlap.•LBW, microcephaly, maternal death, chorioamnionitis were rarely considered/reported.
Maternal immunization is aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and their newborns. Updated evidence synthesis of maternal-fetal outcomes is constantly needed to ensure that the risk-benefit of vaccination during pregnancy remains positive.
An overview of systematic reviews (OoSRs) was performed. We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for SRs including recommended vaccines for maternal immunization reporting the following: abortion, stillbirth, chorioamnionitis, congenital anomalies, microcephaly, neonatal death, neonatal infection, preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), maternal death and small for gestational age (SGA) from 2010 to April 2019. Quality and overlap of SRs was assessed.
Seventeen SRs were identified, eight of them included meta-analysis; quality was high in three SRs, moderate in six SRs, low in two SRs, and critically low in six SRs. Stillbirth and PTB were the most frequently reported outcomes by 15 and 13 SRs, respectively, followed by abortion (9 SRs), congenital anomalies (9 SRs), SGA (8 SRs), neonatal death (8 SRs), LBW (4 SRs), chorioamnionitis (3 SRs), maternal death (1 SR). SRs included mainly observational evidence for influenza and Tdap vaccines (11 SRs and 4 SRs, respectively); limited evidence was found for hepatitis (1 SR), yellow fever (1 SR), and meningococcal (1 SR) vaccines. Most of the SRs found no effect. Eight SRs found benefit/protection of influenza vaccine (for stillbirth, neonatal death, preterm birth, LBW), or Tdap vaccine (for preterm birth and SGA); one found a probable risk (chorioamnionitis/Tdap). The SRs for Hepatitis B, meningococcal and yellow fever vaccines were inconclusive.
Definite risks were not identified for any vaccine and outcome; however better evidence is needed for all outcomes and vaccines. The available evidence in the SRs to support vaccine safety was based mainly on observational data. More RCTs with adequate reporting of maternal-fetal outcomes and larger high-quality observational studies are needed.
ABSTRACT Objective. To assess changes in reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health (RMNCAH) in Haiti from August 2018 to September 2021, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. ...Methods. A retrospective study using surveillance data from the Haitian Unique Health Information System, examining two periods: pre- and peri-COVID-19 pandemic. Health indicators at the national level in the two periods were compared using two-sample t -tests for proportions, and average absolute monthly changes were calculated using variance-weighted regression. Results. There was a statistically significant decline in the proportion of most of the indicators assessed from the pre- to the peri-COVID-19 pandemic period. However, the most affected indicators were the proportions of pregnant women with four antenatal care visits, with five antenatal care visits or more, and those who received a second dose of tetanus vaccine, which decreased by over 4 percentage points during the two periods. Likewise, the proportions of children who received diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTaP), BCG, polio, pentavalent, and rotavirus vaccines also all declined by over 8 percentage points. In contrast, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine increased by over 4 percentage points. A statistically significant decrease was also observed in the average absolute monthly changes of several reproductive and child health indicators assessed. Conclusions. The COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to the decline observed in several RMNCAH indicators in Haiti. However, the role played by the sociopolitical crisis and control exercised by armed groups over the population in the last three years cannot be ruled out.
The enduring threat of maternal mortality to health worldwide and in the Americas has been recognized in the global and regional agendas and their targets to 2030. To inform the direction and amount ...of effort needed to meet those targets, a set of equity-sensitive regional scenarios of maternal mortality ratio (MMR) reduction based on its tempo or speed of change from baseline year 2015 was developed.
Regional scenarios by 2030 were defined according to: i) the MMR average annual rate of reduction (AARR) needed to meet the global (70 per 100,000) or regional (30 per 100,000) targets and, ii) the horizontal (proportional) or vertical (progressive) equity criterion applied to the cross-country AARR distribution (i.e., same speed to all countries or faster for those with higher baseline MMR). MMR average and inequality gaps -absolute (AIG), and relative (RIG)- were scenario outcomes.
At baseline, MMR was 59.2 per 100,000; AIG was 313.4 per 100,000 and RIG was 19.0 between countries with baseline MMR over twice the global target and those below the regional target. The AARR needed to meet the global and regional targets were -7.60% and -4.54%, respectively; baseline AARR was -1.55%. In the regional MMR target attainment scenario, applying horizontal equity would decrease AIG to 158.7 per 100,000 and RIG will remain invariant; applying vertical equity would decrease AIG to 130.9 per 100,000 and RIG would decrease to 13.5 by 2030.
The dual challenge of reducing maternal mortality and abating its inequalities will demand hefty efforts from countries of the Americas. This remains true to their collective 2030 MMR target while leaving no one behind. These efforts should be mainly directed towards significantly speeding up the tempo of the MMR reduction and applying sensible progressivity, targeting on groups and territories with higher MMR and greater social vulnerabilities, especially in a post-pandemic regional context.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women's satisfaction with health services. To better ...understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was conducted with members of a midwifery virtual community of practice and with key informants, aiming to identify: 1) existing regulatory instruments related to companion of choice in the countries where the members are practicing; and, 2) key characteristics of implementation of companion of choice, where regulation exists. Responses (
= 112) were received from representatives of 20 of the 43 countries of LAC. Respondents reported existence of a national policy or legislation in seven countries, ministerial norms or institutional protocols in five countries, and no existing policy/protocol in eight countries. Respondents from the same country often provided contradictory responses. Responses differed from information provided by ministries of health in a WHO-led global policy survey in 11 instances. These variations may reflect that midwives were not always aware of the national policy/guideline in their country. We propose that a more robust effort should be undertaken to understand the status of companion of choice for labor and birth in LAC countries, at national, regional, and local level, in public and private facilities. It is important to know if policies exist, at what level of the system, and if key stakeholders, maternity-care health providers, and women are aware of their existence. Efforts should also be made to understand barriers to implementing companion of choice.
Resumen: Los resultados en salud materna se miden principalmente por un indicador negativo como lo es la razón de mortalidad materna (RMM). Muchos países presentan dificultades a la hora de medir ...este indicador, que requiere una buena cobertura en la identificación y registro de los nacidos vivos, así como una buena capacidad para identificar, reportar y clasificar a las muertes maternas. Si los casos identificados no responden a estos atributos, es posible que, los datos publicados no sean confiables por subregistro y/o por mala clasificación. Múltiples inconvenientes en la correcta vigilancia de la mortalidad materna han posicionado la aparición de un indicador positivo que pone su mirada no en las mujeres que murieron, sino en aquellas que en condiciones habituales debieron morir y sobrevivieron. Esto corresponde al llamado Near Miss Materno (NMM) de la literatura sajona cuya denominación en español es Morbilidad Materna Extremadamente Grave (MMEG). En el presente artículo se analizan varios aspectos de la MMEG, a saber: su definición, clasificación, ventajas de su vigilancia, como contribuye a reducir la mortalidad materna, así como indicadores para la comparabilidad de los datos. Abstract: Re***sults in maternal health are mainly measured by a negative indicator such as the maternal mortality ratio (MMR). Many countries present difficulties when measuring this indicator, which requires good coverage with regards to the identification and registration of live births, as well as a good capacity to identify, report and classify maternal deaths. If the identified cases do not respond to these attributes, it is possible that the published data will not be reliable due to underreporting and/or misclassification. Multiple inconveniences in the correct monitoring of maternal mortality have positioned the appearance of a positive indicator that focuses not on the women who died, but on those who in normal conditions should have died and, in turn, survived. This corresponds to what is known as Maternal Near Miss (MNM) in English language literature, and as Morbilidad Materna Extremadamente Grave (MMEG) in Spanish. In this article, various aspects of the MNM are analyzed, namely: its definition, classification, advantages of its surveillance, how it contributes to reducing maternal mortality, as well as indicators for data comparability.
PDF
