To investigate the sequence effect of irinotecan and a 48-hour infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by leucovorin (LV) on the plasma pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites, the ...toxicity profile of this combination, and irinotecan's maximum-tolerated dose (MTD).
Thirty-three metastatic colorectal cancer patients were randomized to receive a 60-minute infusion of irinotecan before or after a 48-hour infusion of 5-FU modulated by LV. The reverse sequence was used after 21 days for the second cycle. 5-FU 3,500 mg/m2 was preceded by l-LV 250 mg/m2. Irinotecan 150 mg/m2 (starting dose) was administered to the first three patients. The dose was escalated by 50 mg/m2 in subsequent groups of three to six patients to determine the MTD for both sequences. Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan and its metabolites was performed after each cycle.
Toxicities were affected by the sequence of administration of irinotecan and 5-FU, with an improved tolerability for irinotecan followed by 5-FU. The irinotecan MTD was reached at 300 mg/m2 when irinotecan followed 5-FU and at 450 mg/m2 when it preceded 5-FU. In seven of 23 patients who received both sequences at identical irinotecan doses, the dose-limiting toxicity was observed only when irinotecan followed 5-FU. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the administration sequence significantly affected the SN-38 area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), which was 40.1% lower (P <.05) when irinotecan preceded 5-FU.
The sequence of treatment with irinotecan and infusional 5-FU affects the tolerability of this combination. This can be explained in part by a reduced SN-38 AUC when irinotecan preceded infusional 5-FU. Well-defined 5-FU/irinotecan regimens are needed because the administration sequence or the interval between the agents might affect treatment tolerance and perhaps also activity.
Design of irreversible inhibitors is an emerging and relatively less explored strategy for the design of protein kinase inhibitors. In this paper, we present a computational workflow that was ...specifically conceived to assist such design. The workflow takes the form of a multi-step procedure that includes: the creation of a database of already known reversible inhibitors of protein kinases, the selection of the most promising scaffolds that bind one or more desired kinase templates, the modification of the scaffolds by introduction of chemically reactive groups (suitable cysteine traps) and the final evaluation of the reversible and irreversible protein–ligand complexes with molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy predictions. Most of these steps were automated. In order to prove that this is viable, the workflow was tested on a database of known inhibitors of ERK2, a protein kinase possessing a cysteine in the ATP site. The modeled ERK2-ligand complexes and the values of the estimated binding free energies of the putative ligands provide useful indicators of their aptitude to bind reversibly and irreversibly to the protein kinase. Moreover, the computational data are used to rank the ligands according to their computed binding free energies and their ability to bind specific protein residues in the reversible and irreversible complexes, thereby providing a useful decision-making tool for each step of the design. In this work we present the overall procedure and the first proof of concept results.
Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that the circadian modulation of 5-FU delivery may reduce toxicities and improve antitumor activity. However, the relative importance of the timing ...of 5-FU delivery has not been clinically addressed. The aims of this study were to determine the toxicities, the maximum tolerable doses and the activity of a regimen with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) administered as a 14-day continuous infusion according to a flat or three different chronomodulated rhythms in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal carcinomas. A total of 113 patients entered the study and their characteristics were comparable among the four groups. Toxicities included mainly stomatitis and diarrhea, and a reduced toxicity was observed in all the three chronogroups that allowed the delivery of higher dose intensities. Response rates were not significantly different among the four groups. These results suggest that a reduction in 5-FU+LV toxicity and an increase in 5-FU dose intensity can be obtained by a nonsinusoidally circadian modulated infusion. However, the reduction in toxicity observed seems to be dependent mainly on the quasi-intermittency and not on the timing of 5-FU+LV delivery.
The primary objective of this trial was to determine the objective response of two regimens with CDDP administered every 2 weeks immediately before or after an 'optimal' 48-hour chronomodulated ...infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated with leucovorin (LV) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, 5-FU and its metabolites, plasma pharmacokinetics and progression-free and overall survival.
Metastatic colorectal cancer patients with measurable disease who were chemotherapy-naive or pretreated only with a 5-FU-bolus-based chemotherapy were eligible for this study. The study was designed as a randomized phase II clinical trial.
Eighty-three patients were entered into the study. Forty-two were randomized to CDDP given before 5-FU and 41 to CDDP given after 5-FU. Patient characteristics were similar among the two groups. Toxicities were also similar among the two arms and the most frequent WHO grade III-IV toxicities were stomatitis (14%) and neutropenia (39-50%). Plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of 5-FU and 5-FUH2 were not significantly affected by the sequence of CDDP and 5-FU administration. Antitumor activity was similar in the two arms and was very promising both in pretreated patients (response rate 29%; 95% confidence interval 15-46%) and in chemotherapy-naive patients (response rate 56%, complete response 9%, 95% confidence interval 40-71%). Median survival of the patients with and without pretreatment was 12 and 16 months, respectively.
These results do not suggest a sequence dependence of the synergism between CDDP and 5-FU. However, they challenge the need of oxaliplatin to improve 5-FU/LV activity in advanced colorectal cancer. In fact, our results with an 'optimal' 5-FU dose and scheduling are very similar to those obtained with oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV. However, only a randomized phase III study will be able to give an answer to the hypotheses raised by this study.
Suramin has been shown to be of interest as a potential new anticancer agent because of its capacity to inhibit the binding of several growth factors to their receptors and to inhibit the growth of ...cancer cells in vitro. Since multi-autocrine loops involving growth factors which are antagonized by suramin have been demonstrated in colorectal cancer, we previously evaluated the activity of suramin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Interestingly, in this study three patients who had received 5-FU+LV after suramin, although heavily pretreated with fluoropyrimidines, obtained an objective response. This observation was intriguing as it might have been that suramin had changed the biology of the tumor, making it sensitive to 5-FU+LV. We therefore conducted the present study to investigate the possibility that suramin might overcome the resistance to 5-FU+LV.
Only colorectal cancer patients with metastatic and progressive disease during 5-FU+LV-based chemotherapy were eligible for this study. Suramin was administered for eight weeks at doses determined by means of a computer-assisted dosing algorithm that used Bayesian pharmacokinetics to maintain suramin plasma concentrations of 200-250 microg/ml. 5-FU was administered weekly at a dosis of 450 mg/m2 halfway through a two-hour infusion of I-LV 250 mg/m2 starting one week after the initiation of suramin for a maximum of 26 weeks.
Treatment was relatively well tolerated, but no objective responses were observed after the accrual of 13 patients in the first stage of the trial. Consequently, the trial was interrupted according to the initial two-stage sampling design.
The present study does not support the hypothesis that suramin might overcome resistance to 5-FU+LV and its use in colorectal cancer is not recommended.
PDF
