Molibresib (GSK525762), an orally bioavailable small molecule with 2 major equipotent active metabolites, is being developed for the treatment of cancers. Molibresib is a substrate of cytochrome P450 ...(CYP) 3A4 and P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp). To enable administering safe doses of molibresib to healthy volunteers, this 2‐part randomized, open‐label, crossover drug‐drug interaction trial was conducted as an adaptive design study using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation to predict the lowest doses of molibresib that could be safely administered alone (10 mg) or with itraconazole and rifampicin (strong inhibitors and inducers of CYP3A and P‐gp, respectively). PBPK simulation guided the molibresib dose (5 mg) to be administered along with itraconazole in part 1. Itraconazole increased total exposure (AUC) of molibresib by 4.15‐fold with a 66% increase in Cmax, whereas the total AUC and Cmax for the 2 major active metabolites of molibresib decreased by about 70% and 87%, respectively. A second PBPK simulation was conducted with part 1 data to also include the active metabolites to update the recommendation for the molibresib dose (20 mg) with rifampicin. With rifampicin, the AUC and Cmax of molibresib decreased by approximately 91% and 80%, respectively, whereas the AUC of the 2 active metabolites decreased to a lesser extent (8%), with a 2‐fold increase in Cmax. The results of this study confirmed the in vitro data that molibresib is a substrate for CYP3A4. The adaptive design, including Simcyp simulations, allowed evaluation of 2 drug interactions of an oncology drug in a single trial, thus minimizing time and exposures administered to healthy subjects.
Momelotinib—approved for treatment of myelofibrosis in adults with anemia—and its major active metabolite, M21, were assessed as drug–drug interaction (DDI) victims with a strong cytochrome P450 ...(CYP) 3A4 inhibitor (multiple‐dose ritonavir), an organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1/1B3 inhibitor (single‐dose rifampin), and a strong CYP3A4 inducer (multiple‐dose rifampin). Momelotinib DDI perpetrator potential (multiple‐dose) was evaluated with CYP3A4 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) substrates (midazolam and rosuvastatin, respectively). DDI was assessed from changes in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration–time curve (AUC), time to reach Cmax, and half‐life. The increase in momelotinib (23% Cmax, 14% AUC) or M21 (30% Cmax, 24% AUC) exposure with ritonavir coadministration was not clinically relevant. A moderate increase in momelotinib (40% Cmax, 57% AUC) and minimal change in M21 was observed with single‐dose rifampin. A moderate decrease in momelotinib (29% Cmax, 46% AUC) and increase in M21 (31% Cmax, 15% AUC) were observed with multiple‐dose rifampin compared with single‐dose rifampin. Due to potentially counteracting effects of OATP1B1/1B3 inhibition and CYP3A4 induction, multiple‐dose rifampin did not significantly change momelotinib pharmacokinetics compared with momelotinib alone (Cmax no change, 15% AUC decrease). Momelotinib did not alter the pharmacokinetics of midazolam (8% Cmax, 16% AUC decreases) or 1′‐hydroxymidazolam (14% Cmax, 16% AUC decreases) but increased rosuvastatin Cmax by 220% and AUC by 170%. Safety findings were mild in this short‐term study in healthy volunteers. This analysis suggests that momelotinib interactions with OATP1B1/1B3 inhibitors and BCRP substrates may warrant monitoring for adverse reactions or dose adjustments.
Belantamab mafodotin is an antibody–drug conjugate comprising a humanized anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA) monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) via a ...protease‐resistant maleimidocaproyl linker. Single‐agent belantamab mafodotin showed clinically meaningful activity and manageable safety in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the phase I DREAMM‐1 and phase II DREAMM‐2 studies and is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for RRMM treatment. To support monotherapy dose selection, the relationship between Cycle 1 exposure (derived using a population pharmacokinetic model) and clinical response (for multiple efficacy and safety end points) was explored. In DREAMM‐2, efficacy end points (probability of response (PoR) and progression‐free survival (PFS)) were associated with exposure in univariate evaluation; however, once disease burden factors were included in the model (e.g., baseline soluble BCMA, ß2‐microglobulin), exposure was no longer significant. Patients with higher disease burden had lower exposure. In DREAMM‐1, belantamab mafodotin exposure was the only variable to correlate with PoR and PFS. Probability of corneal events (keratopathy), but not dry eye or blurred vision, was strongly associated with belantamab mafodotin exposure (DREAMM‐2). Higher cys‐mcMMAF maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and lower baseline platelet count were associated with increased probability of thrombocytopenia (DREAMM‐1 and DREAMM ‐2). In general, safety end points were more strongly associated with belantamab mafodotin exposure than efficacy end points, particularly after disease factors and patient characteristics were taken into account. Overall, these findings supported the monotherapy dose recommendation of belantamab mafodotin as 2.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks in patients with RRMM who have received four or more prior therapies.
Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) is an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) targeting B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA). Nonlinear mixed‐effects models were developed to characterize the population ...pharmacokinetics (PopPK) of ADC, total monoclonal antibody (mAb), and cysteine‐maleimidocaproyl‐MMAF (cys‐mcMMAF) after 0.03–4.6 mg/kg dosing every 3 weeks in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM; DREAMM‐1, n = 73; DREAMM‐2, n = 218). Sequential modeling methodology was used. Individual post hoc parameter estimates from the final ADC model were used to develop total mAb and cys‐mcMMAF models. Formal covariate selection used a modified stepwise forward inclusion method with backward elimination. A linear, two‐compartment PopPK model with a time‐varying clearance (CL) described ADC PK. Initial ADC typical value for CL for a DREAMM‐2 patient was 0.936 L/day with a half‐life of 11.5 days, over time CL was reduced by 28% resulting in a half‐life of 14.3 days. Time to 50% maximal CL change was ~ 50 days. Baseline soluble BCMA (sBCMA), immunoglobulin (IgG), albumin, and bodyweight impacted ADC CL. Cys‐mcMMAF concentrations were described with a linear two‐compartment model linked to ADC; input rate was governed by deconjugation/intracellular proteolytic degradation of ADC represented by an exponentially decreasing MMAF:mAb (drug antibody ratio DAR) after each dose. Time to 50% DAR reduction was 10.3 days. Baseline sBCMA and IgG impacted cys‐mcMMAF central volume of distribution. In conclusion, ADC, total mAb, and cys‐mcMMAF concentration–time profiles in RRMM were well‐described by PopPK models, and exposure was most strongly impacted by disease‐related characteristics.
Molibresib is an orally bioavailable, selective, small molecule BET protein inhibitor. Results from a first time in human study in solid tumors resulted in the selection of a 75 mg once daily dose of ...the besylate formulation of molibresib as the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Here we present the results of Part 2 of our study, investigating safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity of molibresib at the RP2D for nuclear protein in testis carcinoma (NC), small cell lung cancer, castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), triple‐negative breast cancer, estrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The primary safety endpoints were incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs; the primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included plasma concentrations and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Molibresib 75 mg once daily demonstrated no unexpected toxicities. The most common treatment‐related AEs (any grade) were thrombocytopenia (64%), nausea (43%) and decreased appetite (37%); 83% of patients required dose interruptions and 29% required dose reductions due to AEs. Antitumor activity was observed in NC and CRPC (one confirmed partial response each, with observed reductions in tumor size), although predefined clinically meaningful response rates were not met for any tumor type. Total active moiety median plasma concentrations after single and repeated administration were similar across tumor cohorts. GSEA revealed that gene expression changes with molibresib varied by patient, response status and tumor type. Investigations into combinatorial approaches that use BET inhibition to eliminate resistance to other targeted therapies are warranted.
What's new?
Molibresib is a BET inhibitor currently being tested against various solid tumors. Part 1 of this study, published previously, established a recommended dosage in patients with nuclear protein in testis carcinoma. Here, the authors present part 2, reporting on the safety and efficacy of molibresib in a wider array of tumor types. While they found no unexpected toxicities, adverse events caused 83% of patients to pause treatment, and 29% to lower their dosage. Molibresib showed some anti‐tumor activity, although clinically meaningful response rates were not observed by the end of the trial.
Molibresib (GSK525762) is an investigational, orally bioavailable, small‐molecule bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) protein inhibitor for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. Molibresib was ...initially evaluated in a first‐time‐in‐human (FTIH) study BET115521 consisting of two parts: Part 1 of the study (dose escalation) was conducted in 94 patients with nuclear protein in testis midline carcinoma and other solid tumors, and Part 2 (expansion cohort) was conducted in 99 patients with different solid tumor types. Molibresib is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 enzymes to produce two major active metabolites that are equipotent to the parent molecule. The metabolites are measured together after full conversion of one to the other and reported as an active metabolite composite (GSK3529246). The molibresib pharmacokinetic (PK) profile has been characterized by a decrease in exposure over time, with the decrease more pronounced at higher doses, and accompanied by a slight increase of the metabolite concentrations. Autoinduction of molibresib metabolism was suspected and confirmed in vitro. Here we report the development of a semimechanistic liver‐compartment population PK model using PK data from the FTIH study, which adequately describes the autoinduction of molibresib clearance and the PK of both molibresib and GSK3529246. Covariate analysis indicated body weight had a significant effect on the volume of distribution of molibresib and GSK3529246, and higher levels of aspartate aminotransferase resulted in the lower clearance of GSK3529246. This model was used to simulate individual patient exposures based on covariate information for use in future alternative dosing strategies and exposure–response analyses.
Establishing a dosing regimen that maximizes clinical benefit and minimizes adverse effects for novel therapeutics is a key objective for drug developers. Finding an optimal dose and schedule can be ...particularly challenging for compounds with a narrow therapeutic window such as in oncology. Modeling and simulation tools can be valuable to conduct in silico evaluations of various dosing scenarios with the goal to identify those that could minimize toxicities, avoid unscheduled dose interruptions, or minimize premature discontinuations, which all could limit the potential for therapeutic benefit. In this tutorial, we present a stepwise development of an adaptive dose simulation framework that can be used for dose optimization simulations. The tutorial first describes the general workflow, followed by a technical description with basic to advanced practical examples of its implementation in mrgsolve and is concluded with examples on how to use this in decision‐making around dose and schedule optimization. The adaptive simulation framework is built with pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (i.e., biomarkers, activity markers, target engagement markers, efficacy markers), and safety models that include evaluations of unexplained interindividual and intraindividual variability and covariate impact, which can be replaced and expanded (e.g., combination setting, comparator setting) with user‐defined models. Subsequent adaptive simulations allow investigation of the impact of starting dose, dosing intervals, and event‐driven (exposure or effect) dose modifications on any end point. The resulting simulation‐derived insights can be used in quantitatively proposing dose and regimens that better balance benefit and adverse effects for further evaluation, aiding dose selection discussions, and designing dose modification recommendations, among others.
Background Dihydrotestosterone is the main androgen causative of androgenetic alopecia, a psychologically and physically harmful condition warranting medical treatment. Objective We sought to compare ...the efficacy and safety of dutasteride (type 1 and 2 5-alpha reductase inhibitor) with finasteride (type 2 5-alpha reductase inhibitor) and placebo in men with androgenetic alopecia. Methods Men aged 20 to 50 years with androgenetic alopecia were randomized to receive dutasteride (0.02, 0.1, or 0.5 mg/d), finasteride (1 mg/d), or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was hair count (2.54-cm diameter) at week 24. Other assessments included hair count (1.13-cm diameter) and width, photographic assessments (investigators and panel), change in stage, and health outcomes. Results In total, 917 men were randomized. Hair count and width increased dose dependently with dutasteride. Dutasteride 0.5 mg significantly increased hair count and width in a 2.54-cm diameter and improved hair growth (frontal view; panel photographic assessment) at week 24 compared with finasteride ( P = .003, P = .004, and P = .002, respectively) and placebo (all P < .001). The number and severity of adverse events were similar among treatment groups. Limitations The study was limited to 24 weeks. Conclusions Dutasteride increased hair growth and restoration in men with androgenetic alopecia and was relatively well tolerated.
Molibresib (GSK525762) is an investigational orally bioavailable small‐molecule bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) protein inhibitor for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. In the ...first‐time‐in‐human BET115521 study of molibresib in patients with solid tumors, thrombocytopenia was the most frequent treatment‐related adverse event (AE), QT prolongation was an AE of special interest based on preclinical signals, and gastrointestinal (GI) AEs (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and dysgeusia) were often observed. The aims of this analysis were the following: (i) develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model capable of predicting platelet time courses in individual patients after administration of molibresib and identify covariates of clinical interest; (ii) evaluate the effects of molibresib (and/or its two active metabolites GSK3529246) exposure on cardiac repolarization by applying a systematic modeling approach using high‐quality, intensive, PK time‐matched 12‐lead electrocardiogram measurements; (iii) evaluate the exposure–response (ER) relationship between molibresib and/or GSK3529246 exposures and the occurrence of Grade 2 or higher GI AEs. Overall, the PK/PD model (including a maximal drug effect model and molibresib concentration) adequately described platelet counts following molibresib treatment and was used to simulate the impact of molibresib dosing on thrombocytopenia at different doses and regimens. ER analyses showed no clinically meaningful QT interval prolongation with molibresib at up to 100 mg q.d., and no strong correlation between molibresib exposure and the occurrence of Grade 2 or higher GI AEs. The models described here can aid dosing/schedule and drug combination strategies and may support a thorough QT study waiver request for molibresib.
Belantamab mafodotin, a monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF)-containing monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), demonstrated deep and durable responses in the DRiving Excellence in Approaches to Multiple ...Myeloma (DREAMM)-1 and pivotal DREAMM-2 studies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. As with other MMAF-containing ADCs, ocular adverse events were observed. To predict the effects of belantamab mafodotin dosing regimens and dose-modification strategies on efficacy and ocular safety end points, DREAMM-1 and DREAMM-2 data across a range of doses were used to develop an integrated simulation framework incorporating two separate longitudinal models and the published population pharmacokinetic model. A concentration-driven tumor growth inhibition model described the time course of serum M-protein concentration, a measure of treatment response, whereas a discrete time Markov model described the time course of ocular events graded with the GSK Keratopathy and Visual Acuity scale. Significant covariates included baseline β
-microglobulin on growth rate, baseline M-protein on kill rate, extramedullary disease on the effect compartment rate constant, and baseline soluble B cell maturation antigen on maximal effect. Efficacy and safety end points were simulated for various doses with dosing intervals of 1, 3, 6, and 9 weeks and various event-driven dose-modification strategies. Simulations predicted that lower doses and longer dosing intervals were associated with lower probability and lower overall time with Grade 3+ and Grade 2+ ocular events compared with the reference regimen (2.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks), with a less-than-proportional reduction in efficacy. The predicted improved benefit-risk profiles of certain dosing schedules and dose modifications from this integrated framework has informed trial designs for belantamab mafodotin, supporting dose-optimization strategies.
PDF
