In the latest issues of Cell Host & Microbe and Cell, three articles describe new mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike receptor binding domain that escape neutralizing responses. These highlight the ...importance of surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 evolution to anticipate and manage new variants that could impact reinfection, vaccine efficacy, and immunotherapies.
In the latest issues of Cell Host & Microbe and Cell, three articles describe new mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike receptor binding domain that escape neutralizing responses. These highlight the importance of surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 evolution to anticipate and manage new variants that could impact reinfection, vaccine efficacy, and immunotherapies.
During HIV-1 entry into target cells, binding of the virus to host receptors, CD4 and CCR5/CXCR4, triggers serial conformational changes in the envelope glycoprotein (Env) trimer that result in the ...fusion of the viral and cell membranes. Recent discoveries have refined our knowledge of Env conformational states, allowing characterization of the targets of small-molecule HIV-1 entry inhibitors and neutralizing antibodies, and identifying a novel off-pathway conformation (State 2A). Here, we provide an overview of the current understanding of these conformational states, focusing on (i) the events during HIV-1 entry; (ii) conformational preferences of HIV-1 Env ligands; (iii) evasion of the host antibody response; and (iv) potential implications for therapy and prevention of HIV-1 infection.
In primary HIV-1, Env exists in a metastable pretriggered state (State 1). Broadly neutralizing antibodies predominantly target this conformation. Receptor binding drives Env from State 1 to downstream conformations on the virus entry pathway.A recently discovered off-pathway Env conformation (State 2A) is recognized by antibodies against Env epitopes induced by CD4 binding that efficiently mediate antibody-dependent killing of HIV-1-infected cells.Current soluble Env trimers are stabilized in State-2-default conformations. Characterizing the structure of State-1 Envs and testing immunogens stabilized in State 1 are worthy goals.The efficacy of CD4-mimetic compounds in protecting gp120-vaccinated monkeys from simian HIV infection highlights the potential of modulating Env conformation for prevention approaches.
The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein trimer (Env) is exposed on the surfaces of both virions and infected cells. Thus, Env is the principal target for neutralizing ...antibodies and antibodies able to mediate antibodydependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). The HIV-1 Env is a flexible molecule known to exist in at least three different conformational states: states 1, 2 and 3. Before interacting with the primary receptor, CD4, Env preferentially adopts a compact, "closed" conformation (state 1) that is largely antibody-resistant. The CD4 binding "opens" Env increasing the vulnerability of infected cells to ADCC mediated by non-neutralizing antibodies, as these easily-elicited antibodies preferentially recognize epitopes exposed in the open conformational states (states 2/3). These antibodies include the anti-coreceptor binding site and the anti-cluster A families of antibodies that, in combination with small CD4-mimetic compounds, stabilize a new asymmetric Env conformation (state 2A) that is vulnerable to ADCC. Approaches aimed at stabilizing this "open" conformation represent new interventional approaches to fight HIV-1 infection.
SERINC5 is able to restrict HIV-1 infection by drastically impairing the infectivity of viral particles. Studies have shown that the HIV-1 Nef protein counters SERINC5 through downregulating SERINC5 ...from the cell surface and preventing the virion incorporation of SERINC5. In addition, the Env proteins of some HIV-1 strains can also overcome SERINC5 inhibition. However, it is unclear how HIV-1 Env does so and why HIV-1 has two mechanisms to resist SERINC5 inhibition. The results of this study show that neither Env nor Nef prevents high levels of ectopic SERINC5 from being incorporated into HIV-1 particles, except that Env, but not Nef, is able to resist inhibition by virion-associated SERINC5. Testing of a panel of HIV-1 Env proteins from different subtypes revealed a high frequency of SERINC5-resistant Envs. Interestingly, although the SERINC5-bearing viruses were not inhibited by SERINC5 itself, they became more sensitive to the CCR5 inhibitor maraviroc and some neutralizing antibodies than the SERINC5-free viruses, which suggests a possible influence of SERINC5 on Env function. We conclude that HIV-1 Env is able to overcome SERINC5 without preventing SERINC5 virion incorporation.
HIV-1 Nef is known to enhance the infectivity of HIV-1 particles and to contribute to the maintenance of high viral loads in patients. However, the underlying molecular mechanism remained elusive until the recent discovery of the antiviral activity of SERINC5. SERINC5 profoundly inhibits HIV-1 but is antagonized by Nef, which prevents the incorporation of SERINC5 into viral particles. Here, we show that HIV-1 Env, but not Nef, is able to resist high levels of SERINC5 without excluding SERINC5 from incorporation into viral particles. However, the virion-associated SERINC5 renders HIV-1 more sensitive to some broadly neutralizing antibodies. It is possible that, under the pressure of some neutralizing antibodies in vivo, HIV-1 needs Nef to remove SERINC5 from viral particles, even though viral Env is able to resist virion-associated SERINC5.
Impact of HIV-1 Envelope Conformation on ADCC Responses Richard, Jonathan; Prévost, Jérémie; Alsahafi, Nirmin ...
Trends in microbiology (Regular ed.),
April 2018, 2018-04-00, 20180401, Letnik:
26, Številka:
4
Journal Article
Recenzirano
HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins (Env) represent the only virus-specific antigen exposed at the surface of infected cells. In its unliganded form, Env from primary viruses samples a ‘closed’ conformation ...(State 1), which is preferentially recognized by broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). CD4 engagement drives Env into an intermediate ‘partially open’ (State 2) and then into the ‘open’ CD4-bound conformation (State 3). Emerging evidence suggests a link between Env conformation and Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). HIV-1-infected cells exposing Env in the CD4-bound conformation are susceptible to ADCC mediated by CD4-induced Abs and HIV+sera. Cells exposing State 1 Env are susceptible to ADCC mediated by bNAbs. Here, we discuss how Env conformation affects ADCC responses and in vitro measurements.
bNAbs preferentially recognize Env in its ‘closed’ conformation, while non-neutralizing CD4-induced Abs target the ‘open’ CD4-bound conformation.
Env tightly controls its transition from the unbound to the CD4-bound conformation to avoid recognition by host CD4-induced Abs.
Nef and Vpu accessory proteins protect HIV-1-infected cells from ADCC by preventing Env–CD4 interactions and by reducing the expression levels of cell surface NKG2D ligands.
Gp120 shed from infected cells binds CD4 on uninfected bystander CD4+ T cells, sensitizing them to ADCC and influencing in vitro ADCC measurements.
Targeting the Env ‘closed’ conformation with bispecific Abs and/or proteins or exposing vulnerable ADCC-mediating epitopes using CD4 mimetics are emerging approaches to eliminate HIV-1-infected cells.
: Interactions between the Fc segment of IgG and its receptors (FcγRs) found on cells such as natural killer cells, monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils can potentially mediate antiviral effects in ...the setting of HIV and related infections. We review the potential role of FcγR interactions in HIV, SIV and SHIV infections, with an emphasis on antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Notably, these viruses employ various strategies, including CD4 down-regulation and BST-2/tetherin antagonism to limit the effect of ADCC. Although correlative data suggest that ADCC participates in both protection and control of established infection, there is little direct evidence in support of either role. Direct evidence does, however, implicate an FcγR-dependent function in augmenting the beneficial in vivo activity of neutralizing antibodies.
Infection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is subject to restriction by cellular factors. Serine incorporator 5 (SERINC5) and interferon-inducible transmembrane 3 (IFITM3) proteins ...represent two of these restriction factors, which inhibit HIV-1 entry into target cells. Both proteins impede fusion of the viral membrane with the cellular membrane and the formation of a viral fusion pore, and both are countered by the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env). Given the immense and lasting pressure which Env endures from host adaptive immune responses, it is important to understand whether and how HIV-1 Env is able to maintain the resistance to SERINC5 and IFITM3 throughout the course of infection. We have thus examined a panel of HIV-1 Env clones that were isolated at different stages of viral infection-transmission, acute, and chronic. While HIV-1 Env clones from the transmission stage are resistant to both SERINC5 and IFITM3, as infection progresses into the acute and chronic stages, the resistance to IFITM3 but not to SERINC5 is gradually lost. We further discovered a significant correlation between the resistance of HIV-1 Env to soluble CD4 inhibition and the resistance to SERINC5 but not to IFITM3. Interestingly, the miniprotein CD4 mimetic M48U1 sensitizes HIV-1 Env to the inhibition by SERINC5 but not IFITM3. Together, these data indicate that SERINC5 and IFITM3 exert differential inhibitory pressures on HIV-1 Env over different stages of HIV-1 infection and that HIV-1 Env uses varied strategies to resist these two restriction factors.
HIV-1 Env protein is exposed to the inhibition not only by humoral response, but also by host restriction factors, including serine incorporator 5 (SERINC5) and interferon-inducible transmembrane 3 (IFITM3). This study investigates how HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) manages to overcome the pressures from all these different host inhibition mechanisms over the long course of viral infection. HIV-1 Env preserves the resistance to SERINC5 but becomes sensitive to IFITM3 when infection progresses into the chronic stage. Our study also supports the possibility of using CD4 mimetic compounds to sensitize HIV-1 Env to the inhibition by SERINC5 as a potential therapeutic strategy.
In the absence of effective vaccines and with limited therapeutic options, convalescent plasma is being collected across the globe for potential transfusion to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ...patients. The therapy has been deemed safe, and several clinical trials assessing its efficacy are ongoing. While it remains to be formally proven, the presence of neutralizing antibodies is thought to play a positive role in the efficacy of this treatment. Indeed, neutralizing titers of ≥1:160 have been recommended in some convalescent plasma trials for inclusion. Here, we performed repeated analyses at 1-month intervals on 31 convalescent individuals to evaluate how the humoral responses against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike glycoprotein, including neutralization, evolve over time. We observed that the levels of receptor-binding-domain (RBD)-specific IgG and IgA slightly decreased between 6 and 10 weeks after the onset of symptoms but that RBD-specific IgM levels decreased much more abruptly. Similarly, we observed a significant decrease in the capacity of convalescent plasma to neutralize pseudoparticles bearing wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S or its D614G variant. If neutralization activity proves to be an important factor in the clinical efficacy of convalescent plasma transfer, our results suggest that plasma from convalescent donors should be recovered rapidly after resolution of symptoms.
While waiting for an efficient vaccine to protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection, alternative approaches to treat or prevent acute COVID-19 are urgently needed. Transfusion of convalescent plasma to treat COVID-19 patients is currently being explored; neutralizing activity in convalescent plasma is thought to play a central role in the efficacy of this treatment. Here, we observed that plasma neutralization activity decreased a few weeks after the onset of the symptoms. If neutralizing activity is required for the efficacy of convalescent plasma transfer, our results suggest that convalescent plasma should be recovered rapidly after the donor recovers from active infection.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike (S) mediates viral entry into cells and is critical for vaccine development against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). ...Structural studies have revealed distinct conformations of S, but real-time information that connects these structures is lacking. Here we apply single-molecule fluorescence (Förster) resonance energy transfer (smFRET) imaging to observe conformational dynamics of S on virus particles. Virus-associated S dynamically samples at least four distinct conformational states. In response to human receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2), S opens sequentially into the hACE2-bound S conformation through at least one on-path intermediate. Conformational preferences observed upon exposure to convalescent plasma or antibodies suggest mechanisms of neutralization involving either competition with hACE2 for binding to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) or allosteric interference with conformational changes required for entry. Our findings inform on mechanisms of S recognition and conformations for immunogen design.
Display omitted
•SARS-CoV-2 S protein dynamically samples at least 4 distinct conformational states•hACE2 activates S from the ground state to the activated state via an intermediate•Proteolytic processing of S accelerates hACE2-dependent activation•Antibodies can antagonize S by two different mechanisms of neutralization
The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has been observed to adopt different structural states. Lu et al. directly visualize the conformational dynamics of spike protein on the surface of virus particles and describe how the conformational landscape changes upon activation by the host receptor or antagonism by antibodies.
PDF
