•Patients with cervical spine disease suffer from upper limb functional impairment.•No clinical benchmarks exist that define meaningful improvement in the upper limb function following cervical spine ...surgery.•Disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) is a validated outcome measure indicating upper limb disability.•This study aimed to establish minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of the DASH score following cervical spine surgery.•The MCID of the DASH was –8 points and the SCB was –18 points. These metrics can be used to evaluate minimal and substantial improvement in the upper limb function following cervical spine surgery.
Patients with cervical spine disease suffer from upper limb disability. At present, no clinical benchmarks exist for clinically meaningful change in the upper limb function following cervical spine surgery.
Primary: to establish clinically meaningful metrics; the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper limb functional improvement in patients following cervical spine surgery. Secondary: to identify the prognostic factors of MCID and SCB of upper limb function following cervical spine surgery.
Retrospective cohort study.
Adult patients ≥18 years of age who underwent cervical spine surgery from 2012 to 2016.
Patient-reported outcomes: Neck disability index (NDI) and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH).
MCID was defined as minimal improvement and SCB as substantial improvement in the DASH score at last follow-up. The anchor-based methods (ROC analyses) defined optimal MCID and SCB thresholds with area under curve (AUC) in discriminating improved vs. non-improved patients. The MCID was also calculated by distribution-based methods: half standard-deviation (0.5-SD) and standard error of the mean (SEM) method. A multivariable logistic regression evaluated the impact of baseline factors in achieving the MCID and SCB in DASH following cervical spine surgery.
Between 2012 and 2016, 1,046 patients with average age of 57±11.3 years, 53% males, underwent cervical spine surgery. Using the ROC analysis, the threshold for MCID was –8 points with AUC of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67–0.79) and the SCB was –18 points with AUC of 0.88 (95% confidence interval CI: 0.85–0.91). The MCID was –11 points by 0.5–SD and –12 points by SEM-method. On multivariable analysis, patients with myelopathy had lower odds of achieving MCID and SCB, whereas older patients and those with ≥6 months duration of symptoms had lower odds of achieving DASH MCID and SCB respectively.
In patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, MCID of –8 points and SCB of –18 points in DASH improvement may be considered clinically significant. These metrics may enable evaluation of minimal and substantial improvement in the upper extremity function following cervical spine surgery.
Price transparency is an increasingly popular solution for high healthcare expenditures in the United States, but little is known about its potential to facilitate patient price shopping. Our ...objective was to analyze interhospital and interpayer price variability in spine surgery and spine imaging using newly public payer-specific negotiated charges (PNCs). We selected a subset of billing codes for spine surgery and spine imaging at 12 hospitals within a Saint Louis metropolitan area healthcare system. We then compared PNCs for these procedures and tested for significant differences in interhospital and interinsurer IQR using the Mann–Whitney
U
Test. We found significantly greater IQRs of PNCs as a factor of the insurance plan than as a factor of the hospital for cervical spinal fusions (interinsurer IQR $8256; interhospital IQR $533;
P
< .0001), noncervical spinal fusions (interinsurer IQR $28 423; interhospital IQR $5512;
P
< .001), computed tomographies of the lower spine (interinsurer IQR $595; interhospital IQR $113;
P
< .0001), and MRIs lower spinal canal (interinsurer IQR $1010; interhospital IQR $158;
P
< .0001). There was no significant difference between the interinsurer IQR and the interhospital IQR for lower spine x-rays (interinsurer IQR $107; interhospital IQR $67;
P
= .0543). Despite some between-hospital heterogeneity, we show significantly higher price variability between insurers than between hospitals. Our single system analysis limits our ability to generalize, but our results suggest that savings depend more on hospital and provider negotiations than patient price shopping, given the difficulty of switching insurers.
Mobile health (mHealth) technology has assumed a pervasive role in healthcare and society. By capturing real-time features related to spine health, mHealth assessments have the potential to transform ...multiple aspects of spine care. Yet mHealth applications may not be familiar to many spine surgeons and other spine clinicians. Consequently, the objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the technology, analytical considerations, and applications of mHealth tools for evaluating spine surgery patients. Reflecting their near-ubiquitous role in society, smartphones are the most commonly available form of mHealth technology and can provide measures related to activity, sleep, and even social interaction. By comparison, wearable devices can provide more detailed mobility and physiological measures, although capabilities vary substantially by device. To date, mHealth evaluations in spine surgery patients have focused on the use of activity measures, particularly step counts, in an attempt to objectively quantify spine health. However, the correlation between step counts and patient-reported disease severity is inconsistent, and further work is needed to define the mobility metrics most relevant to spine surgery patients. mHealth assessments may also support a variety of other applications that have been studied less frequently, including those that prevent postoperative complications, predict surgical outcomes, and serve as motivational aids to patients. These areas represent key opportunities for future investigations. To maximize the potential of mHealth evaluations, several barriers must be overcome, including technical challenges, privacy and regulatory concerns, and questions related to reimbursement. Despite those obstacles, mHealth technology has the potential to transform many aspects of spine surgery research and practice, and its applications will only continue to grow in the years ahead.
Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) causes devastating loss of upper limb function and independence. Restoration of upper limb function can have a profound impact on independence and quality of life. ...In low-cervical SCI (level C5-C8), upper limb function can be restored via reinnervation strategies such as nerve transfer surgery. The translation of recovered upper limb motor function into functional independence in activities of daily living (ADLs), however, remains unknown in low cervical SCI (i.e., tetraplegia). The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of patterns in upper limb motor recovery with functional independence in ADLs. This will then inform prioritization of reinnervation strategies focused to maximize function in patients with tetraplegia. This retrospective study performed a secondary analysis of patients with low cervical (C5-C8) enrolled in the SCI Model Systems (SCIMS) database. Baseline neurological examinations and their association with functional independence in major ADLs-i.e., eating, bladder management, and transfers (bed/wheelchair/chair)-were evaluated. Motor functional recovery was defined as achieving motor strength, in modified research council (MRC) grade, of ≥ 3 /5 at one year from ≤ 2/5 at baseline. The association of motor function recovery with functional independence at one-year follow-up was compared in patients with recovered elbow flexion (C5), wrist extension (C6), elbow extension (C7), and finger flexion (C8). A multi-variable logistic regression analysis, adjusting for known factors influencing recovery after SCI, was performed to evaluate the impact of motor function at one year on a composite outcome of functional independence in major ADLs. Composite outcome was defined as functional independence measure score of 6 or higher (complete independence) in at least two domains among eating, bladder management, and transfers. Between 1992 and 2016, 1090 patients with low cervical SCI and complete neurological/functional measures were included. At baseline, 67% of patients had complete SCI and 33% had incomplete SCI. The majority of patients were dependent in eating, bladder management, and transfers. At one-year follow-up, the largest proportion of patients who recovered motor function in finger flexion (C8) and elbow extension (C7) gained independence in eating, bladder management, and transfers. In multi-variable analysis, patients who had recovered finger flexion (C8) or elbow extension (C7) had higher odds of gaining independence in a composite of major ADLs (odds ratio OR = 3.13 and OR = 2.87, respectively,
< 0.001). Age 60 years (OR = 0.44,
= 0.01), and complete SCI (OR = 0.43,
= 0.002) were associated with reduced odds of gaining independence in ADLs. After cervical SCI, finger flexion (C8) and elbow extension (C7) recovery translate into greater independence in eating, bladder management, and transfers. These results can be used to design individualized reinnervation plans to reanimate upper limb function and maximize independence in patients with low cervical SCI.
Hospital readmission is a common but controversial quality measure increasingly used to influence hospital compensation in the US. The objective of this study was to evaluate the causes for 30-day ...hospital readmission following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) to determine the appropriateness of this performance metric and to identify potential avenues for improved patient care.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who received surgical or endovascular treatment for aneurysmal SAH at Barnes-Jewish Hospital between 2003 and 2013. Two senior faculty identified by consensus the primary medical/surgical diagnosis associated with readmission as well as the underlying causes of rehospitalization.
Among 778 patients treated for aneurysmal SAH, 89 experienced a total of 97 readmission events, yielding a readmission rate of 11.4%. The median time from discharge to readmission was 9 days (interquartile range 3-17.5 days). Actual hydrocephalus or potential concern for hydrocephalus (e.g., headache) was the most frequent diagnosis (26/97, 26.8%), followed by infections (e.g., wound infection 5/97, 5.2%, urinary tract infection 3/97, 3.1%, and pneumonia 3/97, 3.1%) and thromboembolic events (8/97, 8.2%). In most cases (75/97, 77.3%), we did not identify any treatment lapses contributing to readmission. The most common underlying causes for readmission were unavoidable development of SAH-related pathology (e.g., hydrocephalus; 36/97, 37.1%) and complications related to neurological impairment and immobility (e.g., thromboembolic event despite high-dose chemoprophylaxis; 21/97, 21.6%). The authors determined that 22/97 (22.7%) of the readmissions were likely preventable with alternative management. In these cases, insufficient outpatient medical care (for example, for hyponatremia; 16/97, 16.5%) was the most common shortcoming.
Most readmissions after aneurysmal SAH relate to late consequences of hemorrhage, such as hydrocephalus, or medical complications secondary to severe neurological injury. Although a minority of readmissions may potentially be avoided with closer medical follow-up in the transitional care environment, readmission after SAH is an insensitive and likely inappropriate hospital performance metric.
Purpose
Intracranial hypertension (ICH) is a common and treatable complication after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) in children. Describing the incidence and risk factors for developing ICH ...after sTBI could impact clinical practice.
Methods
Retrospective cohort study from 2006 to 2015 at two university-affiliated level I pediatric trauma centers of children admitted with accidental or abusive TBI, a post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 8 or less, and an invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to identify demographic, injury, and imaging characteristics in patients who received ICP directed therapies for ICH (ICP > 20 mmHg).
Results
Eight to 5% (271/321) of monitored patients received ICP directed therapy for ICH during their PICU stay. Ninety-seven percent of patients had an abnormality on CT scan by either the Marshall or the Rotterdam score. Of the analyzed clinical and radiologic variables, only presence of hypoxia prior to PICU arrival, female sex, and a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) were associated with increased risk of ICH (
p
< 0.05).
Conclusions
In this retrospective study of clinical practice of ICP monitoring in children after sTBI, the vast majority of children had an abnormal CT scan and experienced ICH requiring clinical intervention. Commonly measured clinical variables and radiologic classification scores did not significantly add to the prediction for developing of ICH and further efforts are needed to define low-risk populations that would not develop ICH.
The appropriate treatment of children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and intracranial injury (ICI) on computed tomographic imaging remains unclear. Evidence-based risk assessments may ...improve patient safety and reduce resource use.
To derive a risk score predicting the need for intensive care unit observation in children with mTBI and ICI.
This retrospective analysis of the prospective Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) head injury cohort study included patients enrolled in 25 North American emergency departments from 2004 to 2006. We included patients younger than 18 years with mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale GCS score, 13-15) and ICI on computed tomography. The data analysis was conducted from May 2015 to October 2016.
The primary outcome was the composite of neurosurgical intervention, intubation for more than 24 hours for TBI, or death from TBI. Multivariate logistic regression was used to predict the outcome. The C statistic was used to quantify discrimination, and model performance was internally validated using 10-fold cross-validation. Based on this modeling, the Children's Intracranial Injury Decision Aid score was created.
Among 15 162 children with GCS 13 to 15 head injuries who received head computed tomographic imaging in the emergency department, 839 (5.5%) had ICI. The median ages of those with and without a composite outcome were 7 and 5 years, respectively. Among those patients with ICI, 8.7% (n = 73) experienced the primary outcome, including 8.3% (n = 70) who had a neurosurgical intervention. The only clinical variable significantly associated with outcome was GCS score (odds ratio OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.5-7.4 for GCS score 13 vs 15). Significant radiologic predictors included midline shift (OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 3.4-13.8), depressed skull fracture (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 3.7-11.4), and epidural hematoma (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.8-6.2). The model C statistic was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88); the 10-fold cross-validated C statistic was 0.83. Based on this modeling, we developed the Children's Intracranial Injury Decision Aid score, which ranged from 0 to 24 points. The negative predictive value of having 0 points (ie, none of these risk factors) was 98.8% (95% CI, 97.3%-99.6%).
Lower GCS score, midline shift, depressed skull fracture, and epidural hematoma are key risk factors for needing intensive care unit-level care in children with mTBI and ICI. Based on these results, the Children's Intracranial Injury Decision Aid score is a potentially novel tool to risk stratify this population, thereby aiding management decisions.
PDF
