Background Renal infarction is a rare condition resulting from an acute disruption of renal blood flow, and the cause and outcome of renal infarction are not well established. Study Design Case ...series. Setting & Participants 438 patients with renal infarction in January 1993 to December 2013 at 9 hospitals in Korea were included. Renal infarction was defined by radiologic findings that included single or multiple wedge-shaped parenchymal perfusion defects in the kidney. Predictor Causes of renal infarction included cardiogenic (n = 244 55.7%), renal artery injury (n = 33 7.5%), hypercoagulable (n = 29 6.6%), and idiopathic (n = 132 30.1%) factors. Outcomes We used recurrence, acute kidney injury (AKI; defined as creatinine level increase ≥ 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or an increase to 150% of baseline level within 7 days during the sentinel hospitalization), new-onset estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (for >3 months after renal infarction in the absence of a history of decreased eGFR), end-stage renal disease (ESRD; receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis because of irreversible kidney damage), and mortality as outcome metrics. Results Treatment included urokinase (n = 19), heparin (n = 342), warfarin (n = 330), and antiplatelet agents (n = 157). 5% of patients died during the initial hospitalization. During the median 20.0 (range, 1-223) months of follow-up, 2.8% of patients had recurrent infarction, 20.1% of patients developed AKI, 10.9% of patients developed new-onset eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 , and 2.1% of patients progressed to ESRD. Limitations This was a retrospective study; it cannot clearly determine the specific causal mechanism for certain patients or provide information about the causes of mortality. 16 patients were excluded from the prognostic analysis. Conclusions Cardiogenic origins were the most important causes of renal infarction. Despite aggressive treatment, renal infarction can lead to AKI, new-onset eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 , ESRD, and death.
Abstract Objectives This study investigated the role of fractional myocardial mass (FMM), a vessel-specific myocardial mass, in the evaluation of physiological severity of stenosis. Using computed ...tomography angiography, the study investigated fractional myocardial mass, a concept of myocardial mass subtended by specific vessel, which could reduce anatomical-physiological mismatch. Background Discordance between anatomical stenosis and physiological severity is common but remains poorly understood. Methods This multicenter study enrolled 463 patients with 724 lesions, who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. FMM was assessed by allometric scaling analysis of arterial tree length and myocardial mass from CCTA. Results FFR <0.80, a criteria for vessel-specific physiological stenosis, was found in 281 vessels (39%). FMM decreased consistently according to the vessel downstream (p < 0.001, all). The frequency of FFR <0.80 increased in proportion to FMM and inverse proportion to angiographic minimal luminal diameter (MLD) (p < 0.001). In per-vessel analysis, FMM per MLD (FMM/MLD) showed good correlation with FFR (r = 0.61) and was superior to diameter stenosis (DS) for FFR <0.80 by receiver operating characteristic and reclassification analysis (C-statistics = 0.84 versus 0.74, net reclassification improvement NRI = 0.63, integrated discrimination improvement IDI = 0.18; p < 0.001, all). The optimal cutoff of FMM/MLD was 29 g/mm, with sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 77%, positive predictive value = 68%, negative predictive value = 83%, and accuracy = 77%. Addition of FMM/MLD to DS could further discriminate vessels with FFR <0.80 (C-statistic = 0.86 vs. 0.84, NRI = 0.34, IDI = 0.03; p < 0.005, all). In per-range classification analysis, agreement between FFR and FMM/MLD maintained >80% when the severity of disease was away from cutoff. Conclusions FMM/MLD could find physiological severity of coronary artery with higher accuracy than anatomical stenosis. FMM may explain the anatomical-physiological discordance.
Background α-Klotho is reported to have protective effects against kidney injury, and its renal expression is decreased in many experimental models of kidney disease. However, circulating α-klotho ...levels in human chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the relationship to progression are unknown. Study Design Post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study. Setting & Participants 243 of 301 participants from a CKD cohort at our institution between January 2006 and December 2011 were eligible for the study. Predictor Baseline α-klotho levels. Outcomes Primary outcome was the composite of doubling of baseline serum creatinine concentration, end-stage renal disease, or death. End-stage renal disease was defined as onset of treatment by renal replacement therapy. Measurements Serum α-klotho and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Lower serum α-klotho levels were associated with more severe CKD stage in the cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data ( P for trend < 0.001). In the adjusted multivariable linear regression model, log(α-klotho) was associated independently with estimated glomerular filtration rate (β = 0.154; P = 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that baseline α-klotho level independently predicted the composite outcome after adjustment for age, diabetes, blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, parathyroid hormone level, and FGF-23 level (HR per 10-pg/mL increase, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98; P < 0.001). When patients were categorized into 2 groups according to baseline median α-klotho value, 43 (35.2%) patients with α-klotho levels ≤396.3 pg/mL reached the primary composite outcome compared with 19 (15.7%) with α-klotho levels >396.3 pg/mL (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.07-3.85; P = 0.03). Limitations Uncontrolled dietary phosphorus intake and use of frozen samples. Conclusions This observational study showed that low circulating α-klotho levels were associated with adverse kidney disease outcome, suggesting that α-klotho is a novel biomarker for CKD progression. More data from larger prospective longitudinal studies are required to validate our findings.
Background Soluble inflammatory mediators are known to exacerbate sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been suggested to play a part in ...immunomodulation by cytokine removal. However, the effect of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) dose on inflammatory cytokine removal and its influence on patient outcomes are not yet clear. Study Design Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial. Setting & Participants Septic patients with AKI receiving CVVHDF for AKI. Intervention Conventional (40 mL/kg/h) and high (80 mL/kg/h) doses of CVVHDF for the duration of CRRT. Outcomes Patient and kidney survival at 28 and 90 days, circulating cytokine levels. Results 212 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Mean age was 62.1 years, and 138 (65.1%) were men. Mean intervention durations were 5.4 and 6.2 days for the conventional- and high-dose groups, respectively. There were no differences in 28-day mortality (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.73-1.43; P = 0.9) or 28-day kidney survival (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.48-1.93; P = 0.9) between groups. High-dose CVVHDF, but not the conventional dose, significantly reduced interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-1b, and IL-10 levels. There were no differences in the development of electrolyte disturbances between the conventional- and high-dose groups. Limitations Small sample size. Only the predilution CVVHDF method was used and initiation criteria were not controlled. Conclusions High CVVHDF dose did not improve patient outcomes despite its significant influence on inflammatory cytokine removal. CRRT-induced immunomodulation may not be sufficient to influence clinical end points.
Abstract Purpose Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of monthly oral ibandronate in Korean women with rheumatoid arthritis and reduced bone mineral density (BMD) receiving long-term ...glucocorticoids. Methods Patients (n = 167 women) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ibandronate 150 mg or placebo every 4 weeks. Patients had taken glucocorticoid (equivalent of daily prednisolone ≥5 mg) for 3 or more consecutive months before enrollment, and had a lumbar spine 1 to 4 (L1–L4) T-score of < −1.0 and ≥ −2.5. Both groups were provided with daily calcium carbonate and cholecalciferol. The primary end point was the L1 to L4 BMD percent changes at 48 weeks compared with baseline. Findings Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. BMD percent changes in L1 to L4 at 48 weeks were significantly different between the ibandronate versus the placebo group (+3.7% 5.1% vs −1.9% 4.4%, respectively; P < 0.0001). BMD percent changes at 48 weeks in femur neck and total hip also had similar results ( P = 0.0073 and P = 0.0031, respectively). Decrease of serum type 1 collagen C-terminal telopeptide was significant at both 24 and 48 weeks in the ibandronate group. There was no incident of fragility fracture in both groups during the study period. Safety profiles, including adverse events, were comparable between the 2 groups. Implications Monthly oral ibandronate for 48 weeks is well tolerated and effective in reducing bone mineral loss in women with rheumatoid arthritis on long-term glucocorticoid therapy. Longer follow-up studies are needed to investigate the benefit of ibandronate on fracture rate reduction in this subset of patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01287533.
Abstract Objectives This study describes the characteristics of a real-world Asian patient population treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and evaluates their clinical outcomes. ...Background No previously reported randomized or observational studies adequately assess the safety and efficacy of TAVR in an Asian population. Methods The Asian TAVR registry is an international multicenter study that enrolled patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR in Asian countries. Results In total, 848 patients with mean STS score of 5.2 ± 3.8% were enrolled between March 2010 and September 2014 at 11 centers in 5 countries. The Edwards Sapien or Medtronic CoreValve was implanted in 64.7% and 35.3% of patients, respectively. The procedural success rate was 97.5%. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 2.5% and 10.8%, respectively. There was no difference in 1-year mortality between devices (Sapien: 9.4%; CoreValve: 12.2%; log-rank p = 0.40). The rates of stroke, life-threatening bleeding, major vascular complications and acute kidney injury (stage 2 to 3) were 3.8%, 6.4%, 5.0% and 3.3%, respectively. Moderate or severe paravalvular leakage was significantly more common with the CoreValve than Sapien (14.4% vs. 7.3%; p = 0.001). According to the multivariate model, a higher STS score, lower body mass index, New York Heart Association functional class III–IV symptoms, diabetes mellitus, prior cerebrovascular accident, low mean gradient at baseline, and moderate or severe paravalvular leakage were significantly associated with reduced survival. Conclusions Despite anatomical features of concern, the clinical outcomes of TAVR in our Asian population were favorable in comparison with those of previously published trials and observational studies. (The Asian Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Registry Asian TAVR; NCT02308150 )
Stent length has been considered an important predictor of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention, even with the first-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). The introduction of ...newer-generation DES has further reduced the rates of adverse clinical events such as restenosis, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of stent length on the long-term clinical outcomes between first- and newer-generation DESs. The effects of stent length (≥32 vs <32 mm) on the clinical outcomes were evaluated in 8,445 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using either a first-generation DES (sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents, n = 6,334) or a newer-generation DES (everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents, n = 2,111) from January 2004 to December 2009. The 3-year adverse outcomes (composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis) were compared using the inverse probability of treatment-weighted method according to the stent length. After adjustment for differences in the baseline risk factors, a stent length of ≥32 mm was significantly associated with higher cumulative rates of target vessel revascularization and stent thrombosis in the patients treated with a first-generation DES (adjusted hazard ratio 1.875, 95% confidence interval 1.531 to 2.297, p <0.001; adjusted hazard ratio 2.964, 95% confidence interval 1.270 to 6.917, p = 0.012), but it was not associated with the clinical outcomes in patients treated with a newer-generation DES. In conclusion, stent length might not be associated with long-term clinical outcomes in newer-generation DES era, whereas stent length might be associated with long-term clinical outcomes in the first-generation DESs.
Abstract Purpose The standard 60-mg dose of fimasartan, a newly developed selective angiotensin II receptor blocker, is effective and safe for use in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. This ...study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose (30 mg) fimasartan and placebo or valsartan (80 mg) for 8 weeks in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Methods In this randomized trial, 293 patients (219 men; mean age, 54.24 9.77 years) with mild to moderate hypertension were enrolled. After randomization to receive 30-mg fimasartan (n = 115), placebo (n = 117), or 80-mg valsartan (n = 61), the treatment dose was kept constant without dose escalation for 8 weeks. The primary end point was improvement in sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) from baseline to 8 weeks that was compared between treatments with low-dose fimasartan and placebo. The secondary end point was the overall efficacy and safety of low-dose fimasartan compared with that of placebo or valsartan. Findings At week 8, SiDBP changed by –9.93 (8.86) mm Hg in the fimasartan group and by –2.08 (9.47) mm Hg in the placebo group, which indicated significant antihypertensive efficacy ( P < 0.0001). Efficacy was shown at week 4 as measured by SiDBP (–9.96 7.73 vs –2.27 7.85 mm Hg; P < 0.0001) or sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) (–16.18 14.44 vs –1.95 13.48 mmHg; P < 0.0001) and at week 8 as determined by SiSBP (–15.35 16.63 vs –2.30 14.91 mm Hg; P < 0.0001). The fimasartan group exhibited more potent antihypertensive efficacy than the valsartan group both at week 4 (SiDBP, –9.96 7.73 vs –6.53 9.58 mm Hg P = 0.0123; SiSBP, –16.18 14.4 vs –7.65 12.89 mm Hg P = 0.0002) and at week 8 (SiDBP, –9.93 8.86 vs –5.47 8.96 mm Hg P = 0.0021; SiSBP, –15.35 16.63 vs –7.49 13.68 mm Hg P = 0.0021). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild (89 of 95), and there were no serious TEAEs. The incidence of TEAEs was 19.1% in the fimasartan group, 22.6% in the placebo group, and 13.6% in the valsartan group, with no significant differences. Implications Low-dose fimasartan (30 mg) was well tolerated during the study period with no significant TEAEs. Low-dose fimasartan had an effective blood pressure–lowering effect that was greater than that of 80-mg valsartan in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01672476.
Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the lercanidipine/valsartan combination compared with lercanidipine monotherapy in patients with hypertension. ...Methods Part 1 of this study was the randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel group, Phase III, 8-week clinical trial to compare superiority of lercanidipine 10 mg/valsartan 80 mg (L10/V80) and lercanidipine 10 mg/valsartan 160 mg (L10/V160) combinations with lercanidipine 10 mg (L10) monotherapy. At screening, hypertensive patients, whose diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was >90 mm Hg after 4 weeks with L10, were randomized to 3 groups of L10, L10/V80, and L10/V160. The primary end point was the change in the mean sitting DBP from baseline (week 0) after 8 weeks of therapy. Patients who were randomly assigned to L10/V160 and whose mean DBP was still ≥ 90 mm Hg in part 1 were enrolled to the up-titration extension study with lercanidipine 20 mg/valsartan 160 mg (L20/V160) (part 2). Findings Of 772 patients screened, 497 were randomized to 3 groups (166 in the L10 group, 168 in the L10/V80 group, and 163 in the L10/V160 group). Mean (SD) age was 55 (9.9) years, and male patients comprised 69%. The mean (SD) baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP)/DBP were 148.4 (15.1)/94.3 (9.5) mm Hg. No significant differences were found between groups in baseline characteristics except the percentages of previous history of antihypertensive medication. The primary end points, the changes of mean (SD) DBP at week 8 from the baseline were −2.0 (8.8) mm Hg in the L10 group, −6.7 (8.5) mm Hg in L10/V80 group, and −8.1 (8.4) mm Hg in L10/V160 group. The adjusted mean difference between the combination groups and the L10 monotherapy group was −4.6 mm Hg (95% CI, −6.5 to −2.6; P < 0.001) in the L10/V80 group and −5.9 mm Hg (95% CI, −7.9 to −4.0, P < 0.001) in the L10/V160 group, which had significantly greater efficacy in BP lowering. A total of 74 patients were enrolled in the part 2 extension study. Changes of mean (SD) DBP and SBP from week 8 to week 12 and week 16 were −5.6 (7.9)/−8.0 (12.0) mm Hg and −5.5 (7.0)/−8.5 (11.3) mm Hg, respectively. For evaluation of the safety profile, the frequencies of adverse events between groups were also not significantly different. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache (6 cases, 20.7%) in the L10 group, dizziness (8 cases, 16.3%) in L10/V80 group, and nasopharyngitis (3 cases, 9.4%) in L10/V160 group, and the incidences of adverse events were not different between groups. Implications Treatment of L10/V80 or L10/V160 combination therapy resulted in significantly greater BP lowering compared with L10 monotherapy. Moreover, the L20/V160 high dose combination had additional BP lowering effect compared with nonresponders with the L10/V160 combination. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01928628.
Few studies have compared the ability of sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and sodium chloride plus NAC to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in diabetic patients with impaired ...renal function undergoing coronary or endovascular angiography or intervention. Diabetic patients (n = 382) with renal disease (serum creatinine ≥1.1 mg/dl and estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) were randomly assigned to receive prophylactic sodium chloride (saline group, n = 189) or sodium bicarbonate (bicarbonate group, n = 193) before elective coronary or endovascular angiography or intervention. All patients received oral NAC 1,200 mg 2 times/day for 2 days. The primary end point was CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine >25% or an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dl within 48 hours after contrast exposure. There were no significant between-group differences in baseline characteristics. The primary end point was met in 10 patients (5.3%) in the saline group and 17 (9.0%) in the bicarbonate group (p = 0.17), with 2 (1.1%) and 4 (2.1%), respectively, requiring hemodialysis (p = 0.69). Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke did not differ significantly at 1 month and 6 months after contrast exposure. In conclusion, hydration with sodium bicarbonate is not superior to hydration with sodium chloride in preventing CIN in patients with diabetic nephropathy undergoing coronary or endovascular angiography or intervention.
PDF
