Summary Background Neurite outgrowth inhibitor A (Nogo-A) is thought to have a role in the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A monoclonal antibody against Nogo-A showed a ...positive effect in the SOD1G93A mouse model of ALS, and a humanised form of this antibody (ozanezumab) was well tolerated in a first-in-human trial. Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with ALS. Methods This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was done in 34 centres in 11 countries. Patients aged 18–80 years with a diagnosis of familial or sporadic ALS were randomly assigned (1:1), centrally according to a computer-generated allocation schedule, to receive ozanezumab (15 mg/kg) or placebo as intravenous infusions over 1 h every 2 weeks for 46 weeks, followed by assessments at week 48 and week 60. Patients and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was a joint-rank analysis of function (ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised) and overall survival, analysed at 48 weeks in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01753076 , and with GSK-ClinicalStudyRegister.com , NOG112264, and is completed. Findings Between Dec 20, 2012, and Nov 1, 2013, we recruited 307 patients, of whom 303 were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=151) or ozanezumab (n=152). The adjusted mean of the joint-rank score was −14·9 (SE 13·5) for the ozanezumab group and 15·0 (13·6) for the placebo group, with a least squares mean difference of −30·0 (95% CI −67·9 to 7·9; p=0·12). Overall, reported adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation of study drug or withdrawal from study were similar between the treatment groups, except for dyspepsia (ten 7% in the ozanezumab group vs four 3% in the placebo group), depression (11 7% vs five 3%), and diarrhoea (25 16% vs 12 8%). Respiratory failure was the most common serious adverse event (12 8% vs seven 5%). At week 60, the number of deaths was higher in the ozanezumab group (20 13%) than in the placebo group (16 11%), mainly as a result of respiratory failure (ten 7% vs five 3%). Two deaths were considered related to the study drug (bladder transitional cell carcinoma in the ozanezumab group and cerebrovascular accident in the placebo group). Interpretation Ozanezumab did not show efficacy compared with placebo in patients with ALS. Therefore, Nogo-A does not seem to be an effective therapeutic target in ALS. Funding GlaxoSmithKline.
Summary Background The epidemiological, prognostic, and therapeutic features of child and adolescent meningioma are poorly defined. Clinical knowledge has been drawn from small case series and ...extrapolation from adult studies. This study was done to pool and analyse the clinical evidence on child and adolescent meningioma. Methods Searches of PubMed, Medline, and Embase identified 35 case series of child and adolescent meningioma completed over the past 21 years. Individual patient data were obtained from 30 studies via direct communication with investigators. Primary outcomes were relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival. Prognostic variables were extent of initial surgery, use of upfront radiotherapy, age, sex, presence of neurofibromatosis, tumour location, and tumour grade. RFS and overall survival were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression models. Findings From a total of 677 children and adolescents with meningioma, 518 were eligible for RFS analysis and 547 for overall survival analysis. Multivariable analysis showed that patients who underwent initial gross-total resection had better RFS (hazard ratio 0·16, 95% CI 0·10–0·25; p<0·0001) and overall survival (0·21, 0·11–0·39; p<0·0001) than those who had subtotal resection. No significant benefit was seen for upfront radiotherapy in terms of RFS (0·59, 0·30–1·16; p=0·128) or overall survival (1·10, 0·53–2·28; p=0·791). Patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) had worse RFS than those without neurofibromatosis (2·36, 1·23–4·51; p=0·010). There was a significant change in overall survival with time between patients with NF2 compared with those without neurofibromatosis (1·45, 1·09–1·92; p=0·011); although overall survival was initially better for patients with NF2 than for those without neurofibromatosis, overall survival at 10 years was worse for patients with NF2. Patients with WHO grade III tumours had worse RFS than those with WHO grade I (3·90, 2·10–7·26; p<0·0001) and grade II tumours (2·49, 1·11–5·56; p=0·027). Interpretation Extent of initial surgical resection is the strongest independent prognostic factor for child and adolescent meningioma. No benefit for upfront radiotherapy was noted. Hence, aggressive surgical management, to achieve gross-total resection, is the initial treatment of choice. In the event of a subtotal resection, repeat resection is recommended to achieve maximum extirpation. Close observation is warranted for patients who have a subtotal resection or who have WHO grade III tumours. Patients without neurofibromatosis should have a minimum 10-year follow-up, whereas patients with NF2 should be considered a special risk category, necessitating life-long follow-up. Funding None.
Summary Background The safety and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy has not been demonstrated. The aim of the randomised Comparison of ...Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid and low REctal cancer After Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN) trial was to compare open surgery with laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods Between April 4, 2006, and Aug 26, 2009, patients with cT3N0–2 mid or low rectal cancer without distant metastasis after preoperative chemoradiotherapy were enrolled at three tertiary-referral hospitals. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either open surgery (n=170) or laparoscopic surgery (n=170), stratified according to sex and preoperative chemotherapy regimen. Short-term outcomes assessed were involvement of the circumferential resection margin, macroscopic quality of the total mesorectal excision specimen, number of harvested lymph nodes, recovery of bowel function, perioperative morbidity, postoperative pain, and quality of life. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population. Patients continue to be followed up for the primary outcome (3-year disease-free survival). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00470951. Findings Two patients (1·2%) in the laparoscopic group were converted to open surgery, but were included in the laparoscopic group for analyses. Estimated blood loss was less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (median 217·5 mL 150·0–400·0 in the open group vs 200·0 mL 100·0–300·0 in the laparoscopic group, p=0·006), although surgery time was longer in the laparoscopic group (mean 244·9 min SD 75·4 vs 197·0 min 62·9, p<0·0001). Involvement of the circumferential resection margin, macroscopic quality of the total mesorectal excision specimen, number of harvested lymph nodes, and perioperative morbidity did not differ between the two groups. The laparoscopic surgery group showed earlier recovery of bowel function than the open surgery group (time to pass first flatus, median 38·5 h 23·0–53·0 vs 60·0 h 43·0–73·0, p<0·0001; time to resume a normal diet, 85·0 h 66·0–95·0 vs 93·0 h 86·0–121·0, p<0·0001; time to first defecation, 96·5 h 70·0–125·0 vs 123 h 94·0–156·0, p<0·0001). The total amount of morphine used was less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (median 107·2 mg 80·0–150·0 vs 156·9 mg 117·0–185·2, p<0·0001). 3 months after proctectomy or ileostomy takedown, the laparoscopic group showed better physical functioning score than the open group (0·501 n=122 vs −4·970 n=128, p=0·0073), less fatigue (−5·659 n=122 vs 0·098 n=129, p=0·0206), and fewer micturition (−2·583 n=122 vs 4·725 n=129, p=0·0002), gastrointestinal (−0·400 n=122 vs 4·331 n=129, p=0·0102), and defecation problems (0·535 n=103 vs 5·327 n=99, p=0·0184) in repeated measures analysis of covariance, adjusted for baseline values. Interpretation Laparoscopic surgery after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for mid or low rectal cancer is safe and has short-term benefits compared with open surgery; the quality of oncological resection was equivalent. Funding The National Cancer Center, South Korea.
PDF
