Abstract
Background
Antibiotics are no longer the primary approach for treating all travellers’ diarrhoea (TD): most cases resolve without antibiotics and using them predisposes to colonization by ...multidrug-resistant bacteria. Data are accumulating on increasing resistance among TD pathogens, yet research into the most common agents, diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (DEC), remains limited.
Methods
A total of 413 travellers to the (sub)tropics were analyzed for travel-acquired diarrhoeal pathogens and ESBL-PE. To identify ESBL-producing DEC, ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-EC) isolates were subjected to multiplex qPCR for various DEC pathotypes: enteroaggregative (EAEC), enteropathogenic (EPEC), enterotoxigenic (ETEC), enteroinvasive (EIEC) and enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC) E. coli.
For a literature review, we screened studies among travellers and locals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) on the frequency of ESBL-producing DEC, and among travellers, also DEC with resistance to ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, and rifamycin derivatives.
Results
Our rate of ESBL-EC among all DEC findings was 2.7% (13/475); among EAEC 5.7% (10/175), EPEC 1.1% (2/180), ETEC 1.3% (1/80) and EHEC (0/35) or EIEC 0% (0/5). The literature search yielded three studies reporting ESBL-EC frequency and thirteen exploring resistance to TD antibiotics among travel-acquired DEC. For EAEC and ETEC, the ESBL-EC rates were 10–13% and 14–15%, resistance to fluoroquinolones 0–42% and 0–40%, azithromycin 0–29% and 0–61%, and rifaximin 0% and 0–20%. The highest rates were from the most recent collections. Proportions of ESBL-producing DEC also appear to be increasing among locals in LMICs and even carbapenemase-producing DEC were reported.
Conclusion
ESBL producers are no longer rare among DEC, and the overall resistance to various antibiotics is increasing. The data predict decreasing efficacy of antibiotic treatment, threatening its benefits, for disadvantages still prevail when efficacy is lost.
•In total, 47.2 % of physicians and nurses had participated in HIS development.•Respondents (85.1 %) considered developers unresponsive to HIS-related feedback.•Physicians and nurses had similar ...experiences regarding participation.•No major changes in physicians’ experiences between years 2010, 2014, and 2017.•Suitable methods to effectively participate need to be developed further.
End-user participation is essential to the development of health information systems (HIS) that are useful for clinicians and support their routine work. However, few studies have investigated end users’ experiences with HIS development and their preferred ways of participation in it.
This study examined the participation experiences of physicians and nurses with HIS development.
National cross-sectional surveys on end users’ experiences with HIS development were conducted in Finland among physicians in 2010, 2014, and 2017 and nurses in 2017. For the purposes of this study, we selected and analyzed the statements concerning participation and end users’ experiences on HIS development and their preferred ways of participation in it.
A total of 3013 physicians and 2685 nurses working in public hospitals and health centers were included in this study. In total, 48.4 % of physicians and 45.4 % of nurses reported that they had participated in HIS development; however, 85.1 % of respondents regarded that software vendors are not interested in end users’ viewpoints and development ideas. Most respondents (53.4 %) preferred to participate by communicating with a person responsible for HIS development within the organization. Few participants reported that the proposed improvements took place in the desired manner (10.0 %) or quickly enough (6.9 %). Younger clinicians were more willing to participate in HIS development than older clinicians. During the follow-up period (2010, 2014, 2017), the physicians’ experiences did not improve.
While physicians and nurses are willing to participate in HIS development, suitable methods to effectively include them and their feedback seem to be lacking or underutilized. Crucially, physicians and nurses, who make up the largest groups of end users, are not able to influence HIS development in their preferred ways. Healthcare organizations must recognize the importance of clinician participation; these clinicians should have the opportunity to continue clinical work.
•We examined user experiences of physicians, nurses and social welfare professionals on their ISs.•The various professional groups had poor overall experiences with HISs/CISs.•ISs should be further ...developed to support the routine tasks of the professional groups.•ISs should provide better support for inter- and cross-organizational collaboration.•Special focus should be given to IS’ ability to bolster patient/client-centered care.
Many European countries are integrating healthcare and social welfare services; some also include joint information systems (ISs) in this process. Despite this, large national survey studies examining and comparing the experiences of the major professional groups regarding the usability of their health (HISs) and client information systems (CISs) are lacking.
We combined the responses from three national cross-sectional surveys conducted among physicians and nurses in 2017, and social welfare professionals (SWPs) in 2019 in Finland. We selected the responses of 1,826 physicians and 774 nurses working in outpatient clinics in specialized and primary care, and 669 social workers and other SWPs working in open services. The questionnaires were adjusted from a validated instrument. In this study, we analyzed 11 usability-related statements.
The healthcare professionals (HPs) were more critical of the stability and responsiveness of their ISs than the SWPs (27–48% vs 58–65% agreed). The physicians were most dissatisfied with IS support for routine tasks (24–26% agreed). Less than half of all respondents agreed with statements concerning the ease of documentation, arrangement of fields, and terminology. While the HPs were satisfied with IS support for collaboration and information exchange between professionals in the same organization, all professional groups were dissatisfied with cross-organizational support and communication with patients and clients. Almost half of the HPs considered that HISs improve the quality of care, but 80% of the SWPs disagreed that CISs help improve the quality of services.
Overall, the physicians, nurses, and SWPs were dissatisfied with the usability of their HISs and CISs. Based on our findings, ISs should be further developed to support routine tasks, inter- and cross-organizational collaboration, and information exchange. ISs for the integration of care and services should be designed to accommodate various professional groups’ different work contexts and needs.
Antimicrobial drug treatment of travelers' diarrhea is known to increase the risk for colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Among 288 travelers with travelers' ...diarrhea, the colonization rate without medications was 21%. For treatment with loperamide only, the rate was 20%; with antimicrobial drugs alone, 40%; and with loperamide and antimicrobial drugs, 71%.
Usability associates with patient safety and quality of care. This article reports results from nation-wide usability-focused survey studies for physicians and nurses in Finland. Earlier research has ...shown dissatisfaction and serious deficiencies, which hamper the efficient use of health information systems (HIS); however, evaluation studies covering the viewpoints of both user groups are practically lacking. Our study aimed at comparing end-users’ experiences on the usability of electronic health record (EHR) systems by employment sector and EHR brand.
To measure usability, we used the validated National Usability-focused HIS Scale (NuHISS). For this study, we selected 11 usability statements that relate to technical quality (n = 3), ease of use (n = 6), benefits (n = 1) and collaboration (n = 1), and were identical in both surveys. We report the responses from 3013 physicians and 2560 nurses working in public sector hospitals or primary care health centers in 2017.
Results in total and by healthcare sector showed notable differences between nurses’ and physicians’ experiences on usability of their EHR systems. Physicians were more satisfied than nurses on technical quality and learnability of the EHR-systems, while nurses experienced the ease of use better and were more satisfied with collaboration aspects than physicians. Two EHR brands used in hospitals appeared to have succeeded in supporting physician workflows, while two others used in health centers were more suitable for nurses’ needs.
Nurses’ and physicians’ experiences on EHR usability appear to vary more by EHR brand and employment sector rather than either professional group being generally more satisfied. Development of EHR systems should consider the perspectives of these two main user groups and their working contexts.
Highlights • Usability is essential in order to optimize the benefits of use of EHR systems. • The Finnish survey is the first national eHealth observatory survey focused on usability. • Physicians’ ...assessments of the usability of their EHR system remain as critical as they were in 2010. • Usability of EHRs has not improved between the years 2010 and 2014 in Finland. The main concerns are related to the efficiency of EHR use and intuitiveness of user interfaces.
Diarrhoea remains a major cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in low-income countries (LICs). The frequency of diarrhoeal episodes may vary by season, yet few prospective cohort studies have ...examined seasonal variation among various diarrhoeal pathogens using multiplex qPCR to analyse bacterial, viral and parasitic pathogens.
We combined our recent qPCR data of diarrhoeal pathogens (nine bacterial, five viral and four parasitic) among Guinea-Bissauan children under five years old with individual background data, dividing by season. The associations of season (dry winter and rainy summer) and the various pathogens were explored among infants (0-11 months) and young children (12-59 months) and those with and without diarrhoea.
Many bacterial pathogens, especially EAEC, ETEC and Campylobacter, and parasitic Cryptosporidium, prevailed in the rainy season, whereas many viruses, particularly the adenovirus, astrovirus and rotavirus proved common in the dry season. Noroviruses were found constantly throughout the year. Seasonal variation was observed in both age groups.
In childhood diarrhoea in a West African LIC, seasonal variation appears to favour EAEC, ETEC, and Cryptosporidium in the rainy and viral pathogens in the dry season.
Antibiotics predispose travellers to acquire multidrug-resistant bacteria, such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE). Although widely used in antimalarial ...prophylaxis, doxycycline has scarcely been studied in this respect.
We explored the impact of doxycycline on rates of traveller's diarrhoea (TD), ESBL-PE acquisition and, particularly, doxycycline co-resistance among travel-acquired ESBL-PE in a sample of 412 visitors to low- and middle-income countries.
We reviewed the literature on traveller studies of doxycycline/tetracycline resistance among stool pathogens and the impact of doxycycline on TD rates, ESBL-PE acquisition, and doxycycline/tetracycline resistance.
The TD rates were similar for doxycycline users (32/46; 69.6%) and non-users (256/366; 69.9%). Of the 90 travel-acquired ESBL-PE isolates, 84.4% were co-resistant to doxycycline: 100% (11/11) among users and 82.3% (65/79) among non-users.
The literature on doxycycline's effect on TD was not conclusive nor did it support a recent decline in doxycycline resistance. Although doxycycline did not increase ESBL-PE acquisition, doxycycline-resistance among stool pathogens proved more frequent for users than non-users.
Our prospective data and the literature review together suggest the following: 1) doxycycline does not prevent TD; 2) doxycycline use favours acquisition of doxy/tetracycline-co-resistant intestinal bacteria; 3) although doxycycline does not predispose to travel-related ESBL-PE acquisition per se, it selects ESBL-PE strains co-resistant to doxycycline; 4) doxycycline resistance rates are high among stool bacteria in general with no evidence of any tendency to decrease.
Childhood diarrhoea, a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low-income regions, remains scarcely studied in many countries, such as Guinea-Bissau. Stool sample drying enables later qPCR analyses ...of pathogens without concern about electricity shortages.
Dried stool samples of children under five years treated at the Bandim Health Centre in Bissau, Guinea-Bissau were screened by qPCR for nine enteric bacteria, five viruses, and four parasites. The findings of children having and not having diarrhoea were compared in age groups 0-11 and 12-59 months.
Of the 429 children- 228 with and 201 without diarrhoea- 96.9% and 93.5% had bacterial, 62.7% and 44.3% viral, and 52.6% and 48.3% parasitic pathogen findings, respectively. Enteroaggregarive Escherichia coli (EAEC; 60.5% versus 66.7%), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC; 61.4% versus 62.7%), Campylobacter (53.2% versus 51.8%), and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC; 54.4% versus 44.3%) were the most common bacterial pathogens. Diarrhoea was associated with enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC)/Shigella (63.3%), ETEC (54.4%), astrovirus (75.0%), norovirus GII (72.6%) and Cryptosporidium (71.2%). The only pathogen associated with severe diarrhoea was EIEC/Shigella (p<0.001). EAEC was found more frequent among the infants, and EIEC/Shigella, Giardia duodenalis and Dientamoeba fragilis among the older children.
Stool pathogens proved common among all the children regardless of them having diarrhoea or not.
Highlights ► The objective of the study was to research the usability of clinical ICT systems. ► The context of the study was clinical work, where numerous systems are in use. ► Nearly 4000 Finnish ...physicians responded to the tailored usability questionnaire. ► Results show that physicians’ estimates are very critical, particularly for EHRs. ► The compatibility between current systems and physician's tasks was regarded poor.