Randomized trials and observational cohorts reported higher rates of virological suppression after highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) including efavirenz (EFV), compared with boosted ...protease inhibitors (PIs). Correlations with immunological and clinical outcomes are unclear. Patients of the Italian MASTER cohort who started HAART from 2000 to 2010 were selected. Outstanding outcome (composite outcome for success (COS)) was introduced. We evaluated predictors of COS (no AIDS plus CD4+ count >500/mm3plus HIV-RNA <500 copies/mL) and of eight single outcomes either at month 6 or at year 3. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted. There were 6259 patients selected. Patients on EFV (43%) were younger, had greater CD4+ count, presented with AIDS less frequently, and more were Italians. At year 3, 90% of patients had HIV RNA <500 copies/mL, but only 41.4% were prescribed EFV, vs. 34.1% prescribed boosted PIs achieved COS (p <0.0001). At multivariable analysis, patients on lopinavir/ritonavir had an odds ratio of 0.70 for COS at year 3 (p <0.0001). Foreign origin and positive hepatitis C virus-Ab were independently associated with worse outcome (OR 0.54, p <0.0001 and OR 0.70, p 0.01, respectively). Patients on boosted PIs developed AIDS more frequently either at month 6 (13.8% vs. 7.6%, p <0.0001) or at year 3 (17.1% vs. 13.8%, p <0.0001). At year 3, deaths of patients starting EFV were 3%, vs. 5% on boosted PIs (p 0.008). In this study, naïve patients on EFV performed better than those on boosted PIs after adjustment for imbalances at baseline. Even when virological control is achieved, COS is relatively rare. Hepatitis C virus-positive patients and those of foreign origin are at risk of not obtaining COS.
Objective: Enfuvirtide is the first of a new class of antiretroviral agents. The drug is safe and well tolerated; injection site reactions are the most common adverse events. The aim of this study ...was the clinical and histopathological evaluation of injection site reactions in patients treated for 80 weeks. Materials and methods: Six patients were evaluated. Five of them underwent cutaneous biopsies using a 4 mm punch. Sections were stained with haematoxylin–eosin, periodic acid-Schiff stain and Verhoeff’s stain. Moreover, immunohistochemical studies were carried out using CD20, CD45Ro and CD34 antibodies. Results: Four different macroscopic patterns were presented: (a) no evidence of cutaneous lesions; (b) transient infiltrative lesions which auto-resolved within 24 h; (c) transient nodular lesions which auto-resolved within 7–15 days; and (d) stable lesions after more than 30 days with a scleroderma-like aspect. Histological examination showed three patterns: (1) an acute urticaria/vasculitis-like pattern with inflammation of the fat tissue; (2) a sub-acute pattern with an initial dermal sclerosis; (3) a chronic scleroderma-like pattern with connective tissue disposed around the adnexa, whose structure was intact. The immunohistochemical study evidenced a prevalence of T lymphocytes and a moderate neoangiogenesis. Conclusions: In our experience, after a rather long period of treatment, cutaneous reactions comprised a variety of features largely independent of the virological and immunological outcome. The adnexa was unaltered in all patients, this indicating a tendency to a possible regression of the sclerotic lesions. Therefore, patients should be encouraged to rotate the sites of injection thus permitting the tissues to regenerate.
Reply to van der Pas et al Mendeni, Monia; Focà, Emanuele; Gotti, Daria ...
Clinical infectious diseases,
09/2011, Letnik:
53, Številka:
6
Journal Article
We evaluated the relationship between the seminal HIV-1 viral load and the efficiency of a standardized sperm-washing procedure in removing HIV-1 RNA from semen samples. The results obtained indicate ...that the amount of virus present in the original sample affects the efficiency of the procedure and suggest that the seminal viral load should be preevaluated before enrolling an HIV-serodiscordant couple in an assisted reproduction protocol.
Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) plays a critical role in the effectiveness of HIV treatment. Nevertheless, the complexity of regimens and frequent side effects make HAART ...extraordinarily difficult to take, and many HIV-infected persons fail to adhere. The current study offers an overview of the relationship between adherence and antiretroviral treatment-related variables. As for other chronic diseases, medication regimen complexity also has an impact on adherence in the management of HIV infection. In particular, the authors discuss the effect of pill burden, dosing frequency, dietary instructions, number and type of different medications prescribed, short- and long-term side effects, convenience, and ability to incorporate the treatment regimen into a daily routine. Medication side effects are common in HAART-treated persons and are associated with concurrent and future nonadherence. Simplification of regimens, adjustment of the drug schedule to the patient's specific lifestyle, and anticipation and self-management of side effects are treatment-based strategies to optimize HAART adherence and ensure the most effective, convenient, safe, and well-tolerated antiretroviral treatment.
The aim of this study was to assess the risk of liver enzyme elevation (LEE) associated with different ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r) in a large cohort of HIV-infected subjects, with ...high rates of hepatitis C (HepC) coinfection. HIV-1-infected patients initiating or switching to a new PI/r-containing antiretroviral treatment between 1998 and 2012 were enrolled, provided that transaminases and HepC status (using HCVAb and/or HCV RNA) were assessed before treatment initiation/switch. Occurrence of hepatotoxicity was a relatively rare finding among HepC-negative patients and it was not influenced by the type of PI/r. Possible increased risk of liver enzyme elevation among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients using ATV/r compared with other PI/r merits further investigations.
One hundred and ninety-two
pol sequences of drug-naïve and drug-experienced subjects infected with non-B HIV-1 subtypes were analyzed to identify treatment-related amino acid changes which might be ...relevant for drug-resistance and possibly not included in the accepted mutation list for the B subtype. The correspondence analysis identified non-B-specific and subtype-specific polymorphisms which should not be mistaken for mutations. Multiple
χ
2 were performed to detect the differences between naïve vs treated subjects and between different subtypes. To verify the contribution of each single mutation to the resistance levels as predicted by the
Virtual Phenotype™—LM, simple univariate linear regression was used with fold resistance as a dependent variable and individual mutations as predictors. Commonly accepted protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) positions along with mutants at RT positions 118 and 90 were significantly associated with treatment. Two unusual PR (K14R and I66F) and five RT positions (E28K, S68G, H221Y, L228R/H and P294A) were also associated with treatment (
p
<
0.01). Only minimal variations were observed with respect to commonly accepted amino acid changes. All amino acid changes correlated with treatment influenced the resistance levels to each single drug. Our findings demonstrate that there are no substantial differences regarding known resistance-associated mutations and the newly emergent substitutions between non-B and B subtype strains.
The independent role of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 in liver transaminase elevation following highly active antiretroviral regimens is still controversial.
Analysis of data from a cohort of ...492 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients was conducted using an intention-to-treat approach. Incidence of grade > or = III liver transaminase elevation was estimated per 100 patient-years of follow-up. Univariate and multiple proportional hazards regression analysis of factors that may predict liver enzyme elevation was performed.
The incidence of grade > or = III hepatotoxicity was 25 per 100 patient-years among patients coinfected with HCV genotype 3 and 11 per 100 patient-years among those with other genotypes. On multiple proportional hazard regression analysis, time-to-grade > or = III liver enzyme elevation was directly correlated with HCV genotype 3 (hazards ratio HR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3 to 2.9; P = 0.001), male gender (HR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.3 to 5.7; P = 0.007), chronic hepatitis B virus infection (HR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.5 to 5.9; P = 0.002), and alanine aminotransferase level at baseline (per 10 IU/L HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.15; P < 0.001). In the same model, higher CD4 T-cell counts at baseline were inversely correlated with risk of hepatotoxicity (HR: 0.998; 95% CI: 0.997 to 0.999; P = 0.036). Moreover, among patients experienced to antiretroviral drugs, previous grade > or = III hepatotoxicity (HR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.8 to 4.3; P < 0.001) was an adjunctive independent risk factor.
HIV-positive patients coinfected with HCV genotype 3 displayed a higher risk of relevant hepatotoxicity, independently from other clinical variables. The impact of HCV genotype outweighed the role of drugs in determining hepatotoxicity.
We compared viroimmunologic response after real phenotype (r-PHT) versus virtual phenotype (v-PHT) in patients failing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). A total of 201 patients with >2 ...years of exposure, more than six experienced drugs, >1000 HIV RNA copies/mL, and on stable HAART for >6 months were randomized to the r-PHT or v-PHT arm. The primary end point was the proportion of HIV plasma viral load (pVL) <400 copies/mL. Secondary end points were absolute pVL change, proportion of pVL reduction >0.5 log(10) copies/mL, and absolute CD4 cell change. In the intention-to-treat-last observation carried forward analysis, study outcomes were not significantly different between arms over 48 weeks of follow-up: 20% and 24% pVL <400 copies/mL; 58% and 61% pVL reduction >0.5 log(10) copies/mL; -0.92 and -0.94(10) log copies/mL mean pVL decrease; and +41.6 and +94.4 cells/mm(3) mean absolute CD4 increase in the r-PHT and v-PHT arms, respectively. On-treatment analyses gave similar results. In the multivariate analysis of pVL <400 copies/mL, the following covariates were independent predictors at week 48: adherence (OR p= 0.25; p=.002), baseline CD4 (OR = 4.39; p=.007), intravenous drug use as risk factor for HIV acquisition (OR = 0.33; p=.024), and sensitivity score of the new regimens by biologic cut-offs (OR = 1.84; p=.029). Prescribed drugs for which patients were naive resulted in marginal prediction (OR = 1.93; p=.054). In conclusion, virologic and immunologic outcomes did not differ when r-PHT or v-PHT was used in this cohort of heavily pretreated patients. Several factors should be considered to take better advantage of resistance testing, including treatment history, clinical status, and patients' ability to adhere to treatment.
Objective: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study compared the virological and immunological responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy containing either efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir ...in previously antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients. Patients and methods: A total of 472 patients were selected (348 efavirenz and 124 lopinavir/ritonavir). The primary endpoint of this study was virological success (HIV RNA <50 copies/mL). The immunological response was assessed on the basis of either CD4+ T cell count variations (absolute and percentage) with respect to baseline values or categorical endpoints (defined as either a CD4+ T cell increase of ≥1;50 cells/mm3 at week 24 or of ≥1;75 cells/mm3 at week 48). Results: At intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the adjusted odds ratio of virological success for patients who started lopinavir/ritonavir, compared with those who started efavirenz, was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.33–0.89, P = 0.016) at week 24 and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.33–0.89, P = 0.002) at week 48. However, patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir had a more pronounced CD4+ T cell recovery, demonstrating both a mean absolute and percentage increase up to week 48 (MANOVA P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Although comparisons of drug efficacy in non-randomized studies should be viewed with caution, from a virological point of view efavirenz-containing regimens performed as well (on-treatment analysis) or better (ITT analysis) than those containing lopinavir/ritonavir. In contrast, immunological outcome appeared to favour lopinavir/ritonavir.
PDF
