To compare the clinical manifestations, disease activity and disease burden between patients with radiographic (r-axSpA) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) over a 5-year ...follow-up period in the Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifferénciées Récentes (DESIR) cohort.
Patients from the DESIR cohort who had X-ray images of the sacroiliac joints available at baseline and did not leave the study during the 5-year follow-up period because of a diagnosis other than axSpA were included. A unilateral rating of 'obvious sacroiliitis' by the local reader was considered sufficient for classification as r-axSpA. The incidence of first episodes of peripheral and extra-rheumatic manifestations was compared between the two groups using the incidence rate ratio and Cox regressions adjusted for sex, age and tumour necrosis factor blocker (TNFb) intake. Mean values of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and days of sick leave over 5 years of follow-up were compared using mixed models adjusted for sex, age, TNFb intake and baseline values.
In total, 669 patients were included, of whom 185 (27.7%) and 484 (72.3%) were classified as r-axSpA and nr-axSpA, respectively. At baseline, the r-axSpA patients showed a significantly higher prevalence of males. After adjusting for age, sex and TNFb intake, Cox regressions for peripheral and extra-rheumatic manifestations did not show any significant differences between groups. Mixed models also showed similar mean levels in PROs and days of sick leave between groups over time.
The incidence of peripheral and extra-rheumatic manifestations as well as the disease burden over time remained similar between r-axSpA and nr-axSpA groups after adjusting for intermediate variables.
NCT01648907.
To determine the factors associated with the presence of peripheral manifestations in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) from the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society ...(ASAS)-COMOSPA study, and to evaluate the effect of these symptoms on treatment and patient-reported outcomes (PRO).
All patients from the ASAS-COMOSPA study were included. All patients had an SpA diagnosis according to the rheumatologist. Patients and disease characteristics associated with the presence of these peripheral manifestations (peripheral arthritis, peripheral enthesitis, or dactylitis) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Patients who reported peripheral manifestations were divided into 3 categories: current, history, and no history. The effect of peripheral involvement on PRO was evaluated through the use of 1-factor ANOVA.
Out of the 3984 patients included in ASAS-COMOSPA, 2562 (64.3%) reported at least 1 peripheral manifestation, with a prevalence of 51.5%, 37.8%, and 15.6% for peripheral arthritis, peripheral enthesitis, and dactylitis, respectively. Being from South America, having a history of uveitis, having a current case or history of psoriasis, and the absence of HLA-B27 were associated with higher prevalence of peripheral manifestations. Patients with peripheral involvement showed greater use of drugs, and those with "current" peripheral manifestations showed higher levels in all PRO, in contrast to those with past or no history.
Peripheral manifestations appear in 64% of patients with SpA. Psoriasis and the absence of HLA-B27 are associated with the development of peripheral symptoms. The presence of any peripheral symptom at the time of the visit was associated with higher scores in all PRO.
Axial spondyloarthritis is a heterogeneous inflammatory condition with variable clinical presentations and outcomes. The complexity of its diagnosis and absence of biomarkers hamper the development ...of diagnostic criteria with the risk of misuse of the available classification criteria in clinical practice and its consequences. Axial spondyloarthritis should be regarded as a continuum in which some patients, but not all, will have a more severe phenotype characterized by progression into new bone formation and joint fusion. Growing understanding of the factors that might drive disease progression and treatment response will allow for better characterization of treatment options and outcome for each affected individual. The aim of this review is to update the current evidence of what is axial spondyloarthritis and to highlight the need to focus on the concept rather than its classification.
To update the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).
Following the EULAR Standardised Operating ...Procedures, two systematic literature reviews were conducted on non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment of axSpA. In a task force meeting, the evidence was presented, discussed, and overarching principles and recommendations were updated, followed by voting.
Five overarching principles and 15 recommendations with a focus on personalised medicine were agreed: eight remained unchanged from the previous recommendations; three with minor edits on nomenclature; two with relevant updates (#9, 12); two newly formulated (#10, 11). The first five recommendations focus on treatment target and monitoring, non-pharmacological management and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as first-choice pharmacological treatment. Recommendations 6-8 deal with analgesics and discourage long-term glucocorticoids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for pure axial involvement. Recommendation 9 describes the indication of biological DMARDs (bDMARDs, that is, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i)) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs, ie, Janus kinase inhibitors) for patients who have Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score ≥2.1 and failed ≥2 NSAIDs and also have either elevated C reactive protein, MRI inflammation of sacroiliac joints or radiographic sacroiliitis. Current practice is to start a TNFi or IL-17i. Recommendation 10 addresses extramusculoskeletal manifestations with TNF monoclonal antibodies preferred for recurrent uveitis or inflammatory bowel disease, and IL-17i for significant psoriasis. Treatment failure should prompt re-evaluation of the diagnosis and consideration of the presence of comorbidities (#11). If active axSpA is confirmed, switching to another b/tsDMARD is recommended (#12). Tapering, rather than immediate discontinuation of a bDMARD, can be considered in patients in sustained remission (#13). The last recommendations (#14, 15) deal with surgery and spinal fractures.
The 2022 ASAS-EULAR recommendations provide up-to-date guidance on the management of patients with axSpA.
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is the prototype of a class of a rheumatic chronic inflammatory disease named spondyloarthritis (SpA).
The prevalence of axSpA ranges between 0.1% and 1.4% globally, ...hence showing geographic differences that can be explained mostly by the prevalence of the HLA-B27 antigen. However, not many studies have evaluated the incidence of this disease.
Inflammation may be initiated in the enthesis as a consequence of the action of IL-23, which can activate resident T cells. The elevated expression of IL-23 has been explained by three hypotheses: the presence of HLA-B27, variations in the gut microbiome and the biomechanical stress at the enthesis. However, the role of IL-23 in this whole context is still unclear.
In axSpA, the presence of syndesmophytes at baseline, systemic inflammation, and smoking may promote the spinal radiographic damage in these patients. The most frequent comorbidity in these patients is osteoporosis, which is directly associated with ankylosis and inflammation.
(a) To describe the prevalence and incidence of peripheral arthritis during 5 years of follow-up in recent axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), (b) to evaluate factors associated with their appearance ...and (c) to assess their impact on treatment, patient-reported outcomes and sick leave after follow-up.
Data from the early axSpA patients from the DESIR cohort (first 5 years of follow-up) were analysed. Prevalence and incidence of peripheral arthritis at each study visit were calculated. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate baseline factors associated with the development of the arthritis. The use of drugs, the impact on patient-reported outcomes and days of sick leave were compared in both groups over time.
Out of the 708 patients included in DESIR, 255 (36.0%) showed at least one episode of arthritis (151 before the inclusion visit and 104 during the follow-up), with an incidence of 3.7 cases per 100 person-years. Patients with peripheral arthritis were more likely (OR, 95%CI) to be aged ≥ 33 years (1.60, 1.12-2.27), non-smokers (1.58, 1.10-2.27) and HLAB27 negative (1.47, 1.04-2.08) and have presented with at least one episode of dactylitis (8.50, 4.96-14.60) and enthesitis (2.00, 1.41-2.84). Patients with peripheral arthritis showed a significant greater use of TNFb, csDMARDs and corticosteroids over follow-up; higher levels on BASDAI (40.46 vs. 34.28) and BASFI (27.89 vs. 22.52); poorer quality of life; and higher number of days of sick leave (17.97 vs. 12.78) over time.
In recent axSpA, 36% of patients reported peripheral arthritis at any time of the disease, being associated with negative HLAB27, non-smokers and with other peripheral manifestations. Patients with arthritis showed a higher burden of disease.
Peripheral spondyloarthritis: What have we learned? Puche-Larrubia, María Ángeles; López-Medina, Clementina; Ziadé, Nelly
Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology,
09/2023, Letnik:
37, Številka:
3
Journal Article
Recenzirano
The peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) entity remains poorly defined in comparison with axial SpA and psoriatic arthritis, as the clinical symptoms have low specificity, the biological markers are ...virtually lacking, and dedicated randomized controlled trials in this specific indication remain scarce. In addition, clinical similarities between pSpA and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been described, partly explained by a resemblance in the pathophysiology of both entities. Thus, diagnosing pSpA can be challenging because of the overlap with other entities and the absence of a specific test or imaging study that can definitively diagnose the condition. The aim of this review is to summarize the current understanding of pSpA, its epidemiology, physiopathology, clinical diagnosis, and classification criteria. In addition, we present patient-reported outcomes used in pSpA clinical studies, available evidence on therapies, and future directions.
The aim of our study is to identify the potential distinct phenotypes within a broad Spondyloarthritis (SpA) population.
We conducted a cross-sectional study using the REGISPONSER registry with data ...from 31 specialist centres in Spain including patients with SpA who fulfilled the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) criteria. A latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to identify the latent classes underlying SpA according to a set of predefined clinical and radiographic features, independently of expert opinion.
In a population of 2319 SpA patients, a 5 classes LCA model yielded the best fit. Classes named 'axial with spine involvement' and 'axial with isolated SIJ involvement" show a primarily axial SpA phenotype defined by inflammatory back pain and high HLA-B27 prevalence. Patients in class 'axial + peripheral' show similar distribution of manifest variables to previous classes but also have a higher likelihood of peripheral involvement (peripheral arthritis/dactylitis) and enthesitis, therefore representing a mixed (axial and peripheral) subtype. Classes 'Peripheral + psoriasis' and 'Axial + peripheral + psoriasis' are indicative of peripheral SpA (and/or PsA) with high likelihood of psoriasis, peripheral involvement, dactylitis, nail disease, and low HLA-B27 prevalence, while class 'Axial + peripheral + psoriasis' also exhibits increased probability of axial involvement both clinically and radiologically.
The identification of 5 latent classes in the REGISPONSER registry with significant overlap between axial and peripheral phenotypes is concordant with a unifying concept of SpA. Psoriasis and related features (nail disease and dactylitis) influence the phenotype of both axial and peripheral manifestations.
To compare the benefits of a tight-control/treat-to-target strategy (TC/T2T) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with those of usual care (UC).
Pragmatic, prospective, cluster-randomised, controlled, ...open, 1-year trial (NCT03043846). 18 centres were randomised (1:1). Patients met Axial Spondylo Arthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for axSpA, had an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥2.1, received non-optimal treatment by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and were biologic-naive.
(1)
: visits every 4 weeks and prespecified strategy based on treatment intensification until achieving target (ie, ASDAS <2.1); (2)
visits every 12 weeks and treatment at the rheumatologist's discretion.
Percentage of patients with a ≥30% improvement on the ASAS-Health Index (ASAS-HI). Other efficacy outcomes and adverse events were recorded. A health economic evaluation was performed.
Two-level mixed models were used to estimate efficacy outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for TC/T2T versus UC.
160 patients were included (80/group). Mean (SD) age was 37.9 (11.0) years and disease duration was 3.7 (6.2) years; 51.2% were men. ASDAS at inclusion was 3.0 (0.7), and ASAS-HI was 8.6 (3.7). ASAS-HI improved by ≥30% in 47.3% of the TC/T2T arm and in 36.1% of those receiving UC (non-significant). All secondary efficacy outcomes were more frequent in the TC/T2T arm, although not all statistically significant. Safety was similar in both arms. From a societal perspective, TC/T2T resulted in an additional 0.04 QALY, and saved €472 compared with UC.
TC/T2T was not significantly superior to UC for the primary outcome, while many secondary efficacy outcomes favoured it, had a similar safety profile and was favourable from a societal health economic perspective.
NCT03043846.
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between individual-level and country-level socio-economic (SE) factors and health outcomes across SpA phenotypes.
Methods
...Patients with axial SpA (axSpA), peripheral SpA (pSpA) or PsA from the ASAS-perSpA study (in 23 countries) were included. The effect of individual-level (age, gender, education and marital status) and country-level e.g. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) SE factors on health outcomes Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥ 2.1, ASDAS, BASFI, fatigue and the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS-HI) was assessed in mixed-effects models adjusted for potential confounders. Interactions between SE factors and disease phenotype were tested. A mediation analysis was conducted to explore whether the impact of country-level SE factors on ASDAS was mediated through biologic/targeted synthetic (b/ts) DMARD uptake.
Results
In total, 4185 patients (61% males, mean age 45) were included (65% axSpA, 25% PsA, 10% pSpA). Female gender β= 0.14 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.23), lower educational level β = 0.35 (0.25, 0.45)) and single marital status β = 0.09 (0.01, 0.17) were associated with higher ASDAS. Living in lower GDP countries was also associated with higher ASDAS β = 0.39 (0.16, 0.63), and 7% of this association was mediated by b/tsDMARD uptake. Higher BASFI was similarly associated with female gender, lower education and living alone, without the effect of country-level SE factors. Female gender and lower educational level were associated with worse ASAS-HI, while more fatigue was associated with female gender and higher country-level SE factors lower GDP, β = −0.46 (−0.89 to −0.04). No differences across disease phenotypes were found.
Conclusions
Our study shows country-driven variations in health outcomes in SpA, independently influenced by individual-level and country-level SE factors and without differences across disease phenotypes.
PDF
