Neuraminidase inhibitors are effective for the treatment of acute uncomplicated influenza. However, there is an unmet need for intravenous treatment for patients admitted to hospital with severe ...influenza. We studied whether intravenous zanamivir was a suitable treatment in this setting.
In this international, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 16 years or older with severe influenza admitted to 97 hospitals from 26 countries. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1 stratified by symptom onset ≤4 days or 5-6 days) to receive 300 mg or 600 mg intravenous zanamivir, or standard-of-care (75 mg oral oseltamivir) twice a day for 5-10 days; patients were followed up for 28 days. The randomisation schedule, including stratification, was generated using GlaxoSmithKline's RandAll software. Patients, site study staff, and sponsor were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical response-a composite of vital sign stabilisation and hospital discharge-in the influenza-positive population. The trial was powered to show an improvement of 1·5 days or greater with 600 mg intravenous zanamivir. Pharmacokinetic, safety, and virology endpoints were also assessed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01231620.
Between Jan 15, 2011, and Feb 12, 2015, 626 patients were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg intravenous zanamivir (n=201), 600 mg intravenous zanamivir (n=209), or 75 mg oral oseltamivir (n=205) twice a day; 11 patients discontinued the study before receiving any study treatment. 488 (78%) of 626 patients had laboratory-confirmed influenza. Compared with a median time to clinical response of 5·14 days in the 600 mg intravenous zanamivir group, the median time to clinical response was 5·87 days (difference of -0·73 days, 95% CI -1·79 to 0·75; p=0·25) in the 300 mg intravenous zanamivir group and 5·63 days (difference of -0·48 days, 95% CI -2·11 to 0·97; p=0·39) in the oseltamivir group. Four patients with influenza A/H1N1pdm09 in the oseltamivir group developed H275Y resistance mutations. Adverse events were reported in 373 (61%) of treated patients and were similar across treatment groups; the most common adverse events (300 mg intravenous zanamivir, 600 mg intravenous zanamivir, oseltamivir) were diarrhoea (10 5%, 15 7%, 14 7%), respiratory failure (11 5%, 14 7%, 11 5%), and constipation (7 3%, 13 6%, 10 5%). 41 (7%) treated patients died during the study (15 7%, 15 7%, 11 5%); the most common causes of death were respiratory failure and septic shock.
Time to clinical response to intravenous zanamivir dosed at 600 mg was not superior to oseltamivir or 300 mg intravenous zanamivir. All treatments had a similar safety profile in hospitalised patients with severe influenza.
GlaxoSmithKline.
Patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are at risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and disease, which results in increased morbidity and mortality. Although ...universal antiviral prophylaxis against CMV improves outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients, data have been conflicting regarding such prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic HCT. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials of prophylactic antivirals against CMV after allogeneic HCT to summarize the evolution of the field over the last 35 years and evaluate the prophylactic potential of antiviral agents against CMV after allogeneic HCT. Electronic databases were queried from database inception through 31 December 2017. For included studies, incidence of CMV infection and all-cause mortality were collected as primary outcomes; CMV disease incidence, use of preemptive therapy, and drug toxicities were collected as secondary outcomes. Nineteen clinical trials conducted between 1981 and 2017 involving a total of 4173 patients were included for review. Prophylactic strategies included use of acyclovir, valacyclovir, ganciclovir, maribavir, brincidofovir, and letermovir compared with placebo or a comparator antiviral. Fourteen trials that compared antiviral prophylaxis with placebo demonstrated overall effectiveness in reducing incidence of CMV infection (odds ratio OR, 0.49; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.42-0.58), CMV disease (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.80), and use of preemptive therapy (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.42-0.62; 6 trials); however, none demonstrated reduction in all-cause mortality (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78-1.18) except the phase 3 trial of letermovir (week-24 OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98). Additional research is warranted to determine patient groups most likely to benefit from antiviral prophylaxis and its optimal deployment after allogeneic HCT.
Abstract
Background
Presatovir significantly reduced nasal viral load, signs, and symptoms of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in a human challenge study. We evaluated presatovir in ...hematopoietic-cell transplant (HCT) recipients with RSV lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI).
Methods
Patients with confirmed RSV in upper and lower respiratory tract and new chest X-ray abnormalities were randomized (1:1), stratified by supplemental oxygen and ribavirin use, to receive oral presatovir 200 mg or placebo every 4 days for 5 doses. The primary endpoint was time-weighted average change in nasal RSV viral load through day 9. Secondary endpoints included supplemental oxygen-free days, incident respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality.
Results
From January 31, 2015, to March 20, 2017, 60 patients from 17 centers were randomized (31 presatovir, 29 placebo); 59 received study treatment (50 allogeneic, 9 autologous HCT). In the efficacy population (29 presatovir, 28 placebo), presatovir treatment did not significantly reduce time-weighted average change in viral load (−1.12 vs −1.09 log10 copies/mL; treatment difference −0.02 log10 copies/mL, 95% confidence interval: −.62, .57; P = .94), median supplemental oxygen-free days (26 vs 28 days, P = .84), incident respiratory failure (10.3 vs 10.7%, P = .98), or all-cause mortality (0 vs 7.1%, P = .19) versus placebo. Adverse events were similar between arms (presatovir 80%, placebo 79%). Resistance-associated substitutions in RSV fusion protein emerged in 6/29 presatovir-treated patients.
Conclusions
Presatovir treatment was well tolerated in HCT patients with RSV LRTI but did not improve virologic or clinical outcomes versus placebo.
Clinical Trials Registration
www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02254421; EudraCT, #2014-002475-29
Presatovir treatment was safe but did not improve viral or clinical outcomes in hematopoietic-cell transplant recipients with respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection. Future studies in this population should incorporate novel methods to evaluate virus-related injury and treatment effects.
Letermovir, a cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase‐complex inhibitor, is indicated for prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in adult CMV‐seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell ...transplantation (HCT). In a phase III, double‐blind, randomized trial, letermovir significantly reduced the risk of clinically significant CMV infection (CS‐CMVi) vs placebo through Week 24 post‐HCT. This analysis investigated outcomes in participants with detectable CMV DNA at randomization, who were excluded from the primary efficacy analysis. In total, 70 of 565 randomized participants had detectable CMV DNA at randomization (letermovir 48; placebo 22). Study treatment completion rates were greater in letermovir‐treated participants compared with placebo (52.1% vs 9.1%). The incidence of CS‐CMVi or imputed primary endpoint events through Week 24 were 64.6% and 90.9% in the letermovir and placebo groups, respectively (treatment difference −26.1%; P = .010). Kaplan‐Meier event rates for CS‐CMVi onset through Week 14 (end‐of‐treatment period) were 33.1% for letermovir and 86.6% for placebo (P < .001). Median viral loads at the CS‐CMVi events was similar in both treatment arms. All‐cause mortality through Week 24 posttransplant was 15.0% for letermovir and 18.2% for placebo; through Week 48, mortality rates were 26.5% and 40.9%, respectively (P = .268). Overall, clinical outcomes were similar to those reported for participants with undetectable CMV DNA at randomization.
Among 70 patients who had detectable cytomegalovirus DNA at the time of randomization and were not part of the primary efficacy analysis population of the phase 3 letermovir prophylaxis trial in hematopoietic cell transplantation, 33.1% of letermovir‐treated patients developed cytomegalovirus disease or DNAemia requiring preemptive treatment compared to 86.6% patients who received placebo by end of the prophylaxis period.
Missing the Target Iriarte, Christopher; Zambrotta, Marina; Vaitkevicius, Henrikas ...
The New England journal of medicine,
2020-Mar-26, Letnik:
382, Številka:
13
Journal Article
•Information about viral hepatitis and NSCLC under ICIs therapy is scarce.•In our experience, ICIs appear to be safe, with no high-grade hepatic irAEs.•Prospective trials are needed to assess the ...safety of ICIs in this population.
The safety and efficacy of immunotherapy among patients with history of hepatitis B (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear as this population has traditionally been excluded from clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
We retrospectively evaluated treatment toxicities and clinical outcomes in nineteen patients with NSCLC and history of past or chronic HBV (16 cases, two of these had HCV co-infection) or chronic HCV infection (five cases), who received a programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway inhibitor.
The overall response rate to immunotherapy was 35 %, and the median progression-free survival was 4.5 months. After ICI initiation, increases in liver function tests (LFTs) from baseline were infrequent and mild, and no patients experienced grade 3 or 4 hepatic immune-related adverse events or required ICI discontinuation or corticosteroid administration for management of hepatic toxicity. There were no significant changes in viral load or cases of HBV reactivation or HCV flare while on ICI therapy.
In this case series, treatment with immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC and past or chronic viral hepatitis appears to be safe, and responses to ICIs can be durable in this population. Additional studies are needed in larger cohorts of patients to determine the safety of immunotherapy in patients with chronic viral infections.
PDF
