Abstract In the first place, the literary theory is about finding an answer to the question on what makes a verbal message into a work of art . This is related to the particular distinction of ...Lingual arts from other arts, and other types of Lingual behaviors . That is why literary theory is in the first position among literary studies. (Ahmadi, 1996: 1st volume/77) One of the fundamental aspects of literary studies is interpreting ancient texts from the perspective of the poet or writer’s own literary theory . On this basis, this article aims to discuss the literary theory and poetry structure of Anvari . Indisputably, Anvari’s structure is special and it is certainly based on the perspective, insight and cultural and social conditions in which it grew and formed. Each poet is the composer of their poetry and oratory and Anvary, himself, is the most informed person about his elocution method. He mentioned the elocution method in several places in his Divan: However, you looking into poetry styles All taken into account the best style is mine (Anvari, 1958: 1st volume/85) Accordingly, his Divan has been subjected to scrutiny, and judgment criteria have been derived from the verses of the poet . Anvari believed that poetry is the result of integrating content with discourse whose output is captured hearts . He called poets the granters of speech and in composing poetry, he believed content is prior to discourse. He has an opinion that the container of discourse does accommodate content that on this basis he approached the ideas of " modern hermeneutics ”. He praised original meaning- which was not adopted by other poems- and he described proper poetry using graceful and delicate characteristic. In fact, in his viewpoint, a poem which has original meaning and graceful and delicate verse is a literary discourse which influences the reader . From his viewpoint: 1- Improvisation and spontaneity 2- Composing in any literary style 3- Composing in all prosody meters 4- Proper use of rhyme They are the most important criteria according to which the poetry capability of a poet is measured , In his view, the poet can benefit from techniques which make poetry more musical in order to be more effective, Including the use of a narrator that reflects that music promotes the rhetorical aspect of a work of art. Anvari believed that composing Ghazals is rooted in lust , eulogy is rooted in greed and epigram comes from wrath. His goal of writing poetry was to make a living out of it , and in this way he attributes the worst labels to poetry, Of course, it depends on the level of reward which the appraised person bestows that sometimes it was timely and exactly the amount which the poet wanted, but sometimes he was given little reward or even no reward. As a result of the degree of magnitude of the poetry from his perspective swings according to whether the poet received a reward. Finally Anvari believed that as long as a poem is written for noble objectives including praisi ng religious figures, it is the the result of divine inspiration and approval and it is a twin of wisdom and it is the best benignity of God towards people. He is fascinated by this kind of poetry . The ultimate aim of art is to affect hearts, its reader revel in it and it sticks to memories and it would not be removed from minds and language after artist's death. Anvari art is no exception to this, too. Anvari poems were renowned among friends, poets and intellectuals in his life time and long after his death. Some of his couplets are still etched in memories which show his poetry power and skills. Anvari interpreted taste, mind, science , and art as poetry tools ; as a result he considered poetry as a simultaneous try and ebullition, he studied the divans of poets and writers contemporary with him , and before that. He is aware of all the principles of prosody and rhyme ; he had an honor not to commit plagiarizing former or contemporary poetry. And quoting great poets is permitted only in order to revive the tradition of great figures . Furthermore, he tries to take full advantage of all the existing cultural capacities .
 Abstract  In the first place, the literary theory is about finding an answer to the question on what makes a verbal message into a work of art . This is related to the particular distinction of ...Lingual arts from other arts, and other types of Lingual behaviors . That is why literary theory is in the first position among literary studies. (Ahmadi, 1996: 1st volume/77) One of the fundamental aspects of literary studies is interpreting ancient texts from the perspective of the poet or writerâs own literary theory . On this basis, this article aims to discuss the literary theory and poetry structure of Anvari . Indisputably, Anvariâs structure is special and it is certainly based on the perspective, insight and cultural and social conditions in which it grew and formed. Each poet is the composer of their poetry and oratory and Anvary, himself, is the most informed person about his elocution method. He mentioned the elocution method in several places in his Divan:  However, you looking into poetry styles  All taken into account the best style is mine (Anvari, 1958: 1st volume/85)  Accordingly, his Divan has been subjected to scrutiny, and judgment criteria have been derived from the verses of the poet .  Anvari believed that poetry is the result of integrating content with discourse whose output is captured hearts . He called poets the granters of speech and in composing poetry, he believed content is prior to discourse. He has an opinion that the container of discourse does accommodate content that on this basis he approached the ideas of " modern hermeneutics â. He praised original meaning- which was not adopted by other poems- and he described proper poetry using graceful and delicate characteristic. In fact, in his viewpoint, a poem which has original meaning and graceful and delicate verse is a literary discourse which influences the reader .  From his viewpoint: 1- Improvisation and spontaneity  2- Composing in any literary style  3- Composing in all prosody meters  4- Proper use of rhyme  They are the most important criteria according to which the poetry capability of a poet is measured , In his view, the poet can benefit from techniques which make poetry more musical in order to be more effective, Including the use of a narrator that reflects that music promotes the rhetorical aspect of a work of art. Anvari believed that composing Ghazals is rooted in lust , eulogy is rooted in greed and epigram comes from wrath. His goal of writing poetry was to make a living out of it , and in this way he attributes the worst labels to poetry, Of course, it depends on the level of reward which the appraised person bestows that sometimes it was timely and exactly the amount which the poet wanted, but sometimes he was given little reward or even no reward. As a result of the degree of magnitude of the poetry from his perspective swings according to whether the poet received a reward. Finally Anvari believed that as long as a poem is written for noble objectives including praisi ng religious figures, it is the the result of divine inspiration and approval and it is a twin of wisdom and it is the best benignity of God towards people. He is fascinated by this kind of poetry . The ultimate aim of art is to affect hearts, its reader revel in it and it sticks to memories and it would not be removed from minds and language after artist's death. Anvari art is no exception to this, too. Anvari poems were renowned among friends, poets and intellectuals in his life time and long after his death. Some of his couplets are still etched in memories which show his poetry power and skills. Anvari interpreted taste, mind, science , and art as poetry tools ; as a result he considered poetry as a simultaneous try and ebullition, he studied the divans of poets and writers contemporary with him , and before that. He is aware of all the principles of prosody and rhyme ; he had an honor not to commit plagiarizing former or contemporary poetry. And quoting great poets is permitted only in order to revive the tradition of great figures . Furthermore, he tries to take full advantage of all the existing cultural capacities .
The present article examines the concept of "Wilayat" in the works of Iraqi and al-Nabulsi, as one of the important elements of Islamic mysticism and Sufism, and the purpose of comparing their votes ...is to express their similarities and differences. The result of this comparative study is the concept of Wilayat in Iraqi and Nablusi’s works, which has been done by descriptive-analytical method, expresses this main resemblance that in Iraqi’s and Nablusi’s thought, "Wali/Vali" means two real "al-Insān al-Kāmil" and "Pir" who have attained the rank of Fana, the status of a lover and intuition. From this point of view, it can be said that in Nablusi’s and Iraqi’s thought, the Wilayat is more focused on the ideas of ibn Arabi and this intellectual commonality of theirs is, above all, the result of the description of Ibn Arabi's works, especially Fusus al-Hakam by them. But the most important difference between the two mentioned, and their dynasty in the concept in question is that in the Iraqi and Suhrawardi works, the wilayat is "Wahhabi" by God, and in Nablusi's and Naqshbandi's thought, it has an "acquired" aspect. From this perspective, Iraqi and Suhrawardiyeh believe that for the Wilayat, divine care must be taken; also it will be from the charter of Khatam al-Anbiya. But in Nablusi's and Naqshbandiyya's thought, first of all, anyone can reach the position of Wilayat, and secondly, special Wilayat is the result of the immediate manifestation of the God's Wilayat after the realization of individual annihilation.
Stylistics of a work to recognize the individual and distinct style of a writer or poet is called personal/individual stylistics. This kind of stylistics is very important, but unfortunately, in Iran ...has been less scientifically addressed. One of the stylistic approaches stemming from structural linguistics is a layer stylistics which analyzes different layers such as phonetic, lexical, syntactic, rhetorical and ideological ones in an artwork. This type of stylistics can be considered the most complete and accurate method of this science. In this research, the poems of Kamal-al-Din Ismail and Athir Umani (6-7 Hijri century) have been surveyed in layer stylistics. Because of all layers of their poems do not fit in this article, only phonetic layer of poems has been analyzed and style of two poets in this layer has been compared. This study demonstrates that these two poets in this layer have a special style, and they have attended particularly to smooth weights, row processing, using a variety of verbal innovative and sometimes special rhyme array.
