The large full-thickness abdominal wall defect has to be treated by considering anatomical and functional requirements. The abdominal wall must regain total physiological function, which means that ...the full thickness abdominal wall defect must be reconstructed anatomically, not only according to the anatomical requirements but also maintaining the functional dynamic voluntary movement. Defects in the abdominal wall alter respiratory mechanics and can impair the diaphragm function. Additionally, muscles of the anterolateral abdominal wall increase the stability of the lumbar region of the vertebral column by tensing the thoracolumbar fascia and by increasing intraabdominal pressure.
The timing and method of reconstruction must be chosen depending upon the etiology of the defect. Severe traumatic injuries, abdominal wall infections, necrotizing soft tissue loss, or sepsis needs to undergo staged reconstruction following adequate debridement to control the infectious process, establish the zone of injury, and for proper treatment of intraabdominal pathology, thereby achieving temporary primary closure using split-thickness skin grafting to the viscera. At the time of definitive reconstruction, deep skin graft dermabrasion give us a facial-like layer with adequate strength to stabilize the static abdominal wall. This dermal layer is supported by free functional (innervated) latissimus dorsi muscle (fLDM), giving full anatomical coverage and functional stability. After oncologic resections full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction was performed immediately with a combination of fLDM flaps and meshes.
A total of 14 patients underwent abdominal wall reconstruction using the fLDM flap. Staged reconstruction was applied in 8 cases. In the remaining six cases, two had no mesh support, three had synthetic mesh, and one had a fascial graft, which were covered with fLDM flap. There were no free flaps failure. One flap revision due to venous anastomosis thrombosis was performed. Donor site seromas occurred in 5 cases and were treated with punction and direct doxycycline injection. Electromyographic testing postoperatively confirmed reinnervation of transplanted LDM.
Using fLDM as a definitive solution, we are not only able to repair soft tissue defects, but also reconstruct voluntary contractility and dynamic natural functional abdominal wall. Transplanted LDM offers enough contractile capacity and strength to replace the function of the missing abdominal wall muscles.
Hand-transplantation and improvements in the field of prostheses opened new frontiers in restoring hand function in below-elbow amputees. Both concepts aim at restoring reliable hand function, ...however, the indications, advantages and limitations for each treatment must be carefully considered depending on level and extent of amputation. Here we report our findings of a multi-center cohort study comparing hand function and quality-of-life of people with transplanted versus prosthetic hands.
Hand function in amputees with either transplant or prostheses was tested with Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand measure (DASH). Quality-of-life was compared with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36).
Transplanted patients (n = 5) achieved a mean ARAT score of 40.86 ± 8.07 and an average SHAP score of 75.00 ± 11.06. Prosthetic patients (n = 7) achieved a mean ARAT score of 39.00 ± 3.61 and an average SHAP score of 75.43 ± 10.81. There was no significant difference between transplanted and prosthetic hands in ARAT, SHAP or DASH. While quality-of-life metrics were equivocal for four scales of the SF-36, transplanted patients reported significantly higher scores in "role-physical" (p = 0.006), "vitality" (p = 0.008), "role-emotional" (p = 0.035) and "mental-health" (p = 0.003).
The indications for hand transplantation or prosthetic fitting in below-elbow amputees require careful consideration. As functional outcomes were not significantly different between groups, patient's best interests and the route of least harm should guide treatment. Due to the immunosuppressive side-effects, the indication for allotransplantation must still be restrictive, the best being bilateral amputees.
Patients who have lost a hand or upper extremity face many challenges in everyday life. For some patients, reconstructive hand transplantation represents a reasonable option for anatomic ...reconstruction, restoring prehensile function with sensation and allowing them to regain daily living independence. The first clinical case of bilateral hand transplantation at University Hospital Innsbruck was realized on March 17th, 2000. A decade later, a total of 7 hands and forearms were transplanted in 4 patients. This article review the clinical courses of 3 bilateral hand transplant recipients and highlights psychological aspects on reconstructive hand transplantation with special regard to unilateral/bilateral transplantation.
The first successful hand transplant in the modern era of reconstructive transplantation was performed in 1998. Since then, more than 65 hand and upper limb transplantations have been performed ...around the globe, with encouraging results. The main goal of all upper limb transplantations is to enhance the patient's quality of life. The transplant must be successfully integrated into the patient's body and self-image and the recipient should be satisfied with the recovery of sensitivity and muscle function of the new limb. To achieve these goals, a proper and thorough design of the rehabilitation regimen is of critical importance.
An original surgical technique for the correction of drop foot is demonstrated.
Eighteen patients with drop foot underwent transfer of the lateral, medial, or both heads of the gastrocnemius muscle ...to the tendons of the anterior and/or lateral muscle group of the lower leg. The transferred muscle was reinnervated by nerve coaptation between the undamaged proximal part of the deep peroneal nerve and the motor branch of the tibial nerve supplying the gastrocnemius muscle.
In all patients, the transferred gastrocnemius muscle showed signs of reinnervation within an average of 6 months after operation. Ten patients achieved excellent results, having regained stable, fully automatic walking without foot inversion/eversion and active range of foot movement of at least 40 degrees. Four patients achieved good results with active range of movement of less than 40 degrees but very stable functional gait. Satisfactory results were presented in three cases with stable ankle motion. Two of three cases had dual transfer of the gastrocnemius muscle and had a very stable ankle joint. In one fair case, the treatment improved stability and the patient was able to walk.
To compensate for the loss of function of the anterior muscle compartment, neuromusculotendinous transfer of the gastrocnemius muscle has proved to be highly successful. Voluntary movement of the transferred muscle and fully automatic walking was achieved in the majority of patients treated. In contrast to the commonly used treatment of tibialis posterior muscle transfer, no reeducation of the transferred muscle was needed.
The main goal of reconstructive microsurgery must be an optimal functional and esthetic reconstruction meeting the individual trauma site requirements with minimal donor site morbidity. The authors ...discuss new microsurgical options for extremity salvage: indications for reconstruction versus amputation, timing of free tissue transfer, reconstruction of soft tissue and bone, and functional muscle transfer. They discuss indications and contraindications for these procedures, along with emphasizing the important points of each.
The aims of this study were to apply for the first time the Action Research Arm Test for functional assessment of an allotransplanted upper extremity (hand or forearm), to describe any adaptations ...required to this test system for the abovementioned purpose, and to use this test to record any changes in outcome over time.
A structured approach to the Action Research Arm Test was adopted including interrater and intrarater reliability assessment at the very beginning of its use and ongoing comprehensive monitoring of patients through regular checkups. Four male patients who had undergone hand or forearm allotransplantations, in the authors' center, were examined. All 19 items in the Action Research Arm Test were reviewed, and the total score was calculated, taking into account the given time limits for each item.
All patients showed a marked clinical improvement in their test results over time. They continued to have difficulties with performing items in the pinch subtest. The intrarater and interrater assessment achieved consistent results.
The data of this study indicate that the Action Research Arm Test is suitable for assessing the level of upper extremity function. The test can be used to compare functional outcomes after hand and forearm allotransplantation between different centers, providing objective information concerning the quality of reconstruction.
Summary
Between 2000 and 2014, five patients received bilateral hand (n = 3), bilateral forearm (n = 1), and unilateral hand (n = 1) transplants at the Innsbruck Medical University Hospital. We ...provide a comprehensive report of the long‐term results at 20 years. During the 6–20 years follow‐up, 43 rejection episodes were recorded in total. Of these, 27.9% were antibody‐related with serum donor‐specific alloantibodies (DSA) and skin‐infiltrating B‐cells. The cell phenotype in rejecting skin biopsies changed and C4d‐staining increased with time post‐transplantation. In the long‐term, a change in hand appearance was observed. The functional outcome was highly depending on the level of amputation. The number and severity of rejections did not correlate with hand function, but negatively impacted on the patients´ well‐being and quality of life. Patient satisfaction significantly correlated with upper limb function. One hand allograft eventually developed severe allograft vasculopathy and was amputated at 7 years. The patient later died due to progressive gastric cancer. The other four patients are currently rejection‐free with moderate levels of immunosuppression. Hand transplantation remains a therapeutic option for carefully selected patients. A stable immunologic situation with optimized and individually adopted immunosuppression favors good compliance and patient satisfaction and may prevent development of DSA.
Summary
The aim of this work is to compare disabilities of the upper limb before and after hand allograft transplantation (HAT), and to describe the side effects of immunosuppressive (IS) agents ...given to recipients of hand allografts. Clinical cases of HAT published between 1999 and 2011 in English, French, or German were reviewed systematically, with emphasis on comparing disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores before and after transplantation. Duration of ischemia, extent of amputation, and time since amputation were evaluated for their effect on intrinsic musculature function. Infectious, metabolic, and oncological complications because of IS therapy were recorded. Twenty‐eight patients were reported in 56 clinical manuscripts. Among these patients, disabilities of the upper limb dropped by a mean of 27.6 (±19.04) points on the DASH score after HAT (P = 0.005). Lower DASH scores (P = 0.036) were recorded after secondary surgery on hand allografts. The presence of intrinsic muscle function was observed in 57% of the recipients. Duration of ischemia, extent of transplantation, and time since amputation were not associated statistically with the return of intrinsic musculature function. Three grafts were lost to follow‐up because of noncompliance with immunosuppression, rejection, and arterial thrombosis, respectively. Fifty‐two complications caused by IS agents were reported, and they were successfully managed medically or surgically. HAT recipients showed notable functional gains, but most complications resulted from the IS protocols.
PDF
