Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is an effective treatment for allergic rhinitis, asthma and venom hypersensitivity and has the potential of producing serious life-threatening anaphylaxis. ...Adverse reactions are generally classified into 2 categories: local reactions, which can manifest as redness, pruritus, and swelling at the injection site, and systemic reactions (SRs). SRs can range in severity from mild rhinitis to fatal cardiopulmonary arrest. Early administration of epinephrine, which is the treatment of choice to treat anaphylaxis, may prevent the progression of an SR to a more serious life-threatening problem. Although there is little debate about using epinephrine to treat a SCIT SR, there is a lack of consensus about when it should be first used. A uniform classification system for grading SCIT SRs will be helpful in assessing more accurately when epinephrine should be administered. The primary purpose of this article is to discuss the proposed grading system for SCIT SRs.
30 years of sublingual immunotherapy Passalacqua, Giovanni; Bagnasco, Diego; Canonica, Giorgio Walter
Allergy,
20/May , Letnik:
75, Številka:
5
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) was introduced in clinical practice on an empirical basis more than 100 years ago. Since the first attempts, AIT was administered subcutaneously. Indeed, other routes of ...administration were proposed and studied, in particular to improve the safety, but only the sublingual route (SLIT) achieved a credibility based on evidence and was then accepted as a viable “alternative” option to the subcutaneous route. SLIT was largely used in clinical trials and clinical practice in this last 30 years. Thus, a large amount of data is available, coming from either controlled trials and postmarketing surveillance studies. It is clear that SLIT is overall effective, but it is also clear that the efficacy is not “class‐related,” as derived from meta‐analyses, but restricted to each specific product. The 30‐year lasting use of SLIT allowed to clarify many clinical aspects, such as efficacy, safety, use in asthma, regimens of administration, and optimal doses. In parallel, the mechanisms of action of AIT were elucidated, and new indications were proposed (eg food allergy, atopic dermatitis). In addition, the introduction of molecular‐based diagnosis, allowed to better refine the prescription of SLIT, based on specific sensitization profiles. The present article will describe the origin and evolution of SLIT for respiratory allergy, taking into account the clinical context that suggested this form of treatment, the recently developed aspects, the future perspectives and unmet needs, This is not, therefore, a systematic review, rather a narrative historical description of the past history, and a look forward to the future opportunities.
Background Data on the long-term effects of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are sparse, and the optimal duration of treatment is a matter of debate. Objective We sought to prospectively evaluate the ...long-term effect of SLIT given for 3, 4, or 5 years and to compare the effect of those different durations. Methods In this prospective open controlled study we followed up patients with respiratory allergy who were monosensitized to mites for 15 years. The subjects were divided in 4 groups receiving drug therapy alone or SLIT for 3, 4, or 5 years. Clinical scores, skin sensitizations, methacholine reactivity, and nasal eosinophil counts were evaluated every year during the winter months. The clinical effect was considered to persist until clinical scores remained at less than 50% of the baseline value, and then patients underwent another course of SLIT. Results Seventy-eight patients were enrolled, and 59 completed the study. In the 12 control subjects no relevant change in clinical scores was seen throughout the study. In the patients receiving SLIT for 3 years, the clinical benefit persisted for 7 years. In those receiving immunotherapy for 4 or 5 years, the clinical benefit persisted for 8 years. New sensitizations occurred in all the control subjects over 15 years and in less than a quarter of the patients receiving SLIT (21%, 12%, and 11%, respectively). The second course of vaccination induced a benefit more rapidly than the first course. The behavior of bronchial hyperreactivity and nasal eosinophils paralleled the clinical score. Conclusion Under the present conditions, it can be suggested that a 4-year duration of SLIT is the optimal choice because it induces a long-lasting clinical improvement similar to that seen with a 5-year course and greater than that of a 3-year vaccination.
The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma document was first published in 2001. Since then, new data on specific immunotherapy have appeared. This review is intended as an update to the original ...document. MedLine (2001 to June 2006) was searched with appropriate key words, and panelists were asked to identify further relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials were considered for the evaluation of efficacy. For the evaluation of safety and additional effects, studies with lower grades of evidence were included. The clinical efficacy of injection immunotherapy in rhinitis and asthma was confirmed, as well as the safety, provided that recommendations are followed. Studies have demonstrated the long-term efficacy and the preventive effect of immunotherapy in reducing the onset of new sensitizations. One randomized open trial demonstrated that in children with allergic rhinitis, injection immunotherapy may reduce the risk of developing asthma. There is strong evidence that sublingual immunotherapy is effective in allergic rhinitis in adults. Recent meta-analyses demonstrated its efficacy in allergic rhinitis in children and in asthma, although more definitive trials are required. Current data indicate that sublingual immunotherapy is safe and the rate of adverse reactions is not greater below 5 years of age. One randomized open trial showed that in children with allergic rhinitis, sublingual immunotherapy reduced the onset of asthma. Further studies are needed to identify the optimal maintenance dose and to elucidate the mechanism of action. Novel approaches for immunotherapy are currently under evaluation, including the use of adjuvants, peptides, and DNA-conjugated and recombinant allergens.
Asthma is a high-prevalence disease, still accounting for mortality and high direct and indirect costs. It is now recognized that, despite the implementation of guidelines, a large proportion of ...cases remain not controlled. Certainly, adherence to therapy and the education of patients remain the primary objective, but the increasingly detailed knowledge about the pathogenic mechanisms and new biotechnologies offer the opportunity to better address and treat the disease. Interleukin (IL)-13 and IL-4 appear as the most suitable targets to treat the T helper 2 (TH2)-mediated forms (endotypes) of asthma. IL-13 and IL-4 partly share the same receptor and signaling pathways and both are deeply involved in immunoglobulin E (IgE) synthesis, eosinophil activation, mucus secretion and airways remodeling. Several anti-IL-13 strategies have been proposed (anrukinzumab, lebrikizunab and tralokinumab), with relevant clinical results reported with lebrikizumab. Such studies facilitate better definition of the possible predictive markers of response to a specific treatment (e.g. eosinophils, total IgE, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide and periostin). In parallel, anti-IL-4 strategies have been attempted (pascolizumab, pitakinra and dupilumab). So far, dupilumab was reported capable of reducing the severity of asthma and the rate of exacerbations. IL-13 and IL-4 are crucial in TH2-mediated inflammation in asthma, but it remains clear that only specific endotypes respond to these treatments. Although the use of anti-IL-14 and anti-IL-13 strategies is promising, the search for appropriate predictive biomarkers is urgently needed to better apply biological treatments.
Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is increasingly used worldwide. Despite its safety being well ascertained, there is no universally accepted system to grade and classify its adverse events (AEs). ...According to the literature, it seems reasonable to classify and grade systemic side effects by using the previously published World Allergy Organization recommendations. On the other hand, local side effects are the most frequent with SLIT, sometimes leading to its discontinuation. Therefore grading of the severity of local side effects was perceived as necessary for the purpose of uniform reporting, classification, and quantification of this aspect. A World Allergy Organization Taskforce, after examining the available literature and the postmarketing surveillance data, proposed a clinically based grading of the severity of local AEs caused by SLIT. The use of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities nomenclature for AEs was also included in this context. The proposed grading system for SLIT-induced local reactions is expected to improve and harmonize surveillance and reporting of the safety of SLIT.
The efficacy of specific immunotherapy always has been evaluated by clinical scores (symptoms or medication intake). Nonetheless, specific immunotherapy possesses some special or "additional" ...effects, including the carryover effect and the preventive actions, which are unique. Those effects are the consequence of the complex mechanism of action, which induces profound and persistent modifications in the immune response to allergens. The literature is reviewed to evaluate the available experimental data on this.
The main databases (EmBase, Medline, Scopus) were searched.
Clinical trials of immunotherapy, either randomized or not, including placebo-controlled trials, were selected.
Currently, the carryover effect (persistence of the benefit after stopping the treatment) is well ascertained for injection immunotherapy, whereas fewer data are available for the sublingual route. On the contrary, the demonstration of the prevention of asthma onset relies on 2 randomized studies for sublingual immunotherapy, and 1 single study for subcutaneous immunotherapy.
Although additional confirmatory data are needed, possibly obtained with a rigorous methodology, the long-lasting and preventive effects of specific immunotherapy always should be taken into account when the efficacy is evaluated. The additional effects also may have relevant socioeconomic implications.
Allergic rhinitis induced by house dust mites (HDMs) is a highly prevalent but often underdiagnosed and undertreated/untreated chronic disease. It often has a negative impact on sleep, work, leisure ...activities, and health-related quality of life. Allergen immunotherapy is a proven, safe treatment for respiratory allergies.
We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of a 300 index of reactivity (IR) sublingual tablet formulation of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus:Dermatophagoides farinae 1:1 extract in adolescents (aged ≥12) and adults with moderate to severe HDM-induced allergic rhinitis.
In a phase III, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, participants received approximately 12 months of treatment with placebo or the 300 IR tablet. The primary end point was the average total combined score during 4 weeks at the end of the treatment period.
A total of 1607 participants were randomized, and 1476 (including 555 37.6% with concomitant mild controlled asthma at inclusion) comprised the full analysis set. Over the primary evaluation period, the least squares mean average total combined score in the 300 IR group (3.62) was significantly lower (P < .0001) than in the placebo group (4.35), with a relative least squares mean difference of −16.9% (95% CI, −24.0% to −9.2%). All prespecified secondary end points were consistently improved in the 300 IR group, relative to placebo. The 300 IR tablet was generally well tolerated. Treatment-related adverse events (mainly mild or moderate local reactions) were reported for 51.0% of the patients in the 300 IR group and 14.9% in the placebo group.
The 300 IR sublingual HDM tablet is an effective, safe treatment for HDM-induced allergic rhinitis.
Display omitted
...in the case of SLIT, medical supervision is usually limited to control visits or to prescription renewals. ...sales data provided by manufacturers show an alarming rate of SLIT discontinuation, ...which is approximately 90% at 3 years after prescription.
Background Anaphylaxis after Hymenoptera stings has been reported in subjects with mastocytosis, but few data exist regarding disease prevalence in populations allergic to these insects. Objective ...The incidence of clonal mast cell (MC) disorders in subjects with both systemic reactions to Hymenoptera stings and increased serum baseline tryptase (sBT) levels was assessed by using bone marrow (BM) aspirates and biopsy specimens. Methods Subjects with a history of a systemic reaction caused by a Hymenoptera sting underwent the standard diagnostic work-up for Hymenoptera allergy, and sBT levels were measured. Subjects with an increased sBT level had BM evaluation that included histology/cytology, flow cytometry, and detection of KIT mutations. Results Forty-four (11.6%) of 379 subjects with systemic reactions had increased sBT levels (>11.4 ng/mL), and 31 (70.5%) of these had a history of anaphylaxis. Thirty-four subjects with increased sBT levels underwent a BM analysis. Histology detected diagnostic or subdiagnostic MC infiltrates in 22 (65%) of 34 patients. Abnormal MCs were identified by means of flow cytometry and cytology in 26 (78.8%) of 33 and 20 (58.8%) of 34 subjects, respectively. A KIT mutation was detected in 17 (54.8%) of 31 subjects. The diagnosis was indolent systemic mastocytosis in 21 (61.7%) of 34 subjects and monoclonal MC activation syndrome in 9 (26.5%) of 34 subjects. All subjects with anaphylaxis had one of those 2 disorders. Conclusion The concomitant presence of systemic reactions (especially anaphylaxis) after Hymenoptera stings and increased sBT levels strongly suggests that a BM examination is indicated for the diagnosis of clonal MC disease.
PDF
