Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) treatments improve outcomes for metastatic melanoma; however, up to 60% of treated patients do not respond to ICI and/or develop immune‐related adverse events ...(irAEs). Currently, robust and reliable biomarker to predict response and/or occurrence of irAEs to ICI are missing. Herein, we wanted to explore whether germline variants (SNPs) could predict the clinical outcomes of melanoma patients treated with ICIs. We performed a whole exome sequencing using gDNA isolated from blood, from a discovery cohort of 57 patients with metastatic melanoma. The top associations were then tested in a validation cohort of 57 patients. Our work suggests that individual germline genetic variants have no or weak impact on the response to ICIs. Only, variants in IL1RL1 have a significant impact in treatment response. The role of IL1RL1 in the immune response against melanoma and as a theranostic marker warrants further investigations.
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer, associated with high mortality. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated long‐lasting efficiency ...for treating advanced MCC. Despite a good safety profile, ICI remain associated with non‐negligible risk of immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), which may require treatment discontinuation if they are severe. We report the case of a long‐lasting complete response to Avelumab after rechallenge in a patient with a metastatic MCC who became resistant to this anti‐Programmed cell Death Ligand 1 (anti‐PD‐L1) treatment and who presented severe neuromuscular toxicity during anti‐PD‐1 treatment with Pembrolizumab, without recurrence of the irAE. The potential specificity of therapeutic properties and irAEs of each ICI supports a personalized management of antitumoral immunogenic response and its adverse effects.
Background
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape for patients with ...metastatic MCC (mMCC). In mMCC, the response duration after cessation of ICIs treatment for complete response (CR) is unknown.
Observation
We report a case of a woman in her 70s with metastatic MCC treated in first‐line with avelumab. The treatment was stopped after 2 years of CR. The patient relapsed after 11 months of cessation of treatment and rechallenge with avelumab at the same dosing regimen was decided. The first tumour assessment at 3 months after reintroduction revealed a CR.
Discussion
In contrast with observations made for patients who have discontinued ICIs in the metastatic melanoma setting, disease progression is observed after ICIs cessation in mMCC including for patients with low tumour burden and who achieve a CR.
Conclusion
The case of our patient underlines this risk of relapse and suggests great caution before stopping ICIs in patients treated for mMCC, even when they are in CR.
Resistances to immunotherapies remains a major hurdle towards a cure for melanoma in numerous patients. An increase in the mesenchymal phenotype and a loss of differentiation have been clearly ...associated with resistance to targeted therapies. Similar phenotypes have been more recently also linked to resistance to immune checkpoint therapies. We demonstrated here that the loss of MIcrophthalmia associated Transcription Factor (MITF), a pivotal player in melanocyte differentiation, favors the escape of melanoma cells from the immune system. We identified Integrin beta-like protein 1 (ITGBL1), a secreted protein, upregulated in anti-PD1 resistant patients and in MITF
melanoma cells, as the key immunomodulator. ITGBL1 inhibited immune cell cytotoxicity against melanoma cells by inhibiting NK cells cytotoxicity and counteracting beneficial effects of anti-PD1 treatment, both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, MITF inhibited RUNX2, an activator of ITGBL1 transcription. Interestingly, VitaminD3, an inhibitor of RUNX2, improved melanoma cells to death by immune cells. In conclusion, our data suggest that inhibition of ITGBL1 might improve melanoma response to immunotherapies.
Although its incidence has increased over the last decades, conjunctival melanoma (CM) remains a rare but challenging periocular malignancy. While there is currently no recognized standard of care, ...“no-touch” surgical excision followed by adjuvant treatments is usually recommended. Despite its small size, managing CM is challenging for clinicians. The first challenge is the high risk of tumour local recurrence that occurs in about one third of the patients. The management of locally advanced CM (≥T2) or multiple recurrences may require mutilating surgeries such as orbital exenteration (OE). The second challenge is the metastatic spread of CM that occurs in about one quarter of patients, regardless of whether complete surgical excision is performed or not. This highlights the infiltrative and highly aggressive behaviour of CM. Recently, attention has been directed towards the use of eye-sparing strategies to avoid OE. Initially, wide conservative surgeries followed by customized brachytherapy or radiotherapy have appeared as viable strategies. Nowadays, new biological insights into CM have revealed similarities with cutaneous melanoma. These new findings have allowed clinicians to reconsider the management of locally advanced CM with “medical” eye-sparing treatment as well as the management of metastatic spread. The aim of this review was to summarize the current and future perspectives of treatment for CM based on recent biological findings.
The management of periocular skin malignant tumours is challenging. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for localised eyelid cancers. For more locally advanced cancers, especially those ...invading the orbit, orbital exenteration has long been considered the gold standard; however, it is a highly disfiguring and traumatic surgery. The last two decades have been marked by the emergence of a new paradigm shift towards the use of 'eye-sparing' strategies. In the early 2000s, the first step consisted of performing wide conservative eyelid and orbital excisions. Multiple flaps and grafts were needed, as well as adjuvant radiotherapy in selected cases. Although being incredibly attractive, several limitations such as the inability to treat the more posteriorly located orbital lesions, as well as unbearable diplopia, eye pain and even secondary eye loss were identified. Therefore, surgeons should distinguish 'eye-sparing' from 'sight-sparing' strategies. The second step emerged over the last decade and was based on the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Their advantages include their potential ability to treat almost all tumours, regardless of their locations, without performing complex surgeries. However, several limitations have been reported, including their side effects, the appearance of primary or secondary resistances, their price and the lack of consensus on treatment regimen and exact duration. The aim of this article was to review the evolution of the management of locally advanced periocular malignant tumours over the last three decades and highlight the new paradigm shift towards the use of 'eye-sparing' strategies.
BackgroundDespite significant progress with antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy, a substantial fraction of metastatic melanoma patients show upfront therapy resistance. Biomarkers for ...outcome are missing and the association of baseline immune function and clinical outcome remains to be determined. We assessed the in vitro nonspecific stimulation of immune response at baseline and during anti-PD-1 therapy for metastatic melanoma.MethodsPreviously untreated metastatic melanoma patients received nivolumab and radiotherapy as part of the multicentric phase II trial NIRVANA (NCT02799901). The levels of Th1, Th2 and Th17 cytokines on in vitro non-specific stimulation of innate and adaptive immune cells were measured in patient sera before treatment, and at week 2 and week 6 after the beginning of the treatment, and correlated with tumorous response, progression-free survival (PFS) and occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The results in melanoma patients were compared with those of a cohort of 9 sex and age-matched healthy donors.ResultsSeventeen patients were enrolled in this ancillary study. Median follow-up was 16 months (2.2–28.4). The 12-month PFS rate was 67.7%. The incidence of irAEs of any grade was 58.8%. Without in vitro stimulation no differences in cytokines levels were observed between responders and non-responders. On in vitro stimulation, metastatic patients had lower Th1 cytokine levels than healthy donors at baseline for tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (1136 pg/mL vs 5558 pg/mL, p<0.0001; and 3894 pg/mL vs 17 129 pg/mL, p=0.02, respectively). Responders exhibited increasing cytokine levels from baseline to week 6. Non-responders had lower interleukin 17A (IL-17A) levels at baseline than responders (7 pg/mL vs 32 pg/mL, p=0.03), and lower IFN-γ levels at week 6 (3.3 ng/mL vs 14.5 ng/mL, p=0.03). A lower level of IL-17A at week 2 and a lower level of IFN-γ at week 6 correlated with worse PFS (p=0.04 and p=0.04 respectively). At baseline, patients who developed irAEs had higher IL-6 levels (19.3 ng/mL vs 9.2 ng/mL, p=0.03) and higher IL-17A levels (52.5 pg/mL vs 2.5 pg/mL, p=0.009) than those without irAEs.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that cytokine levels after in vitro non-specific stimulation could be a promising biomarker to predict the outcome of PD-1 inhibition therapy.
The outcome of patients with cutaneous melanoma has been strongly modified by recent advances obtained with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). However, despite this breakthrough, durable response ...to ICIs is limited to a subset of patients. We investigated whether the expression of TRF2, which preserves telomere integrity, and have an effect on tumor immunosurveillance notably by directly recruiting and activating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), could be a prognostic biomarker in patients with relapsed or metastatic melanoma based on different treatment regimens. We evaluated retrospectively the association of TRF2 expressed in melanoma cells in combination with intratumoral CD33+ CD15+ CD14- MDSCs, as detected by immunohistochemistry and quantified by digital analysis, to clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) among 48 patients treated with ICIs and 77 patients treated with other treatment options. The densities/mm
2
of TRF2+ cells (P=.003) and CD33+ cells (P=.004) were individually significantly related to poor OS. In addition, only the combined expression of CD33+/CD15+/CD14- cells/mm
2
was significantly correlated to poor OS (P=.017) in the whole study population as well as in patients treated by ICIs (P=.023). There was no significant difference in OS when analyzing the other markers individually or in combination according to the treatment regimen. The pre-treatment assessment of TRF2 expression and CD33+ cells/mm
2
along with the density of CD33+/CD15+/CD14- cells/mm
2
could assess OS and better predict clinical response of patients with melanoma treated by ICIs.