The effects of less-tight versus tight control of hypertension on pregnancy complications are unclear.
We performed an open, international, multicenter trial involving women at 14 weeks 0 days to 33 ...weeks 6 days of gestation who had nonproteinuric preexisting or gestational hypertension, office diastolic blood pressure of 90 to 105 mm Hg (or 85 to 105 mm Hg if the woman was taking antihypertensive medications), and a live fetus. Women were randomly assigned to less-tight control (target diastolic blood pressure, 100 mm Hg) or tight control (target diastolic blood pressure, 85 mm Hg). The composite primary outcome was pregnancy loss or high-level neonatal care for more than 48 hours during the first 28 postnatal days. The secondary outcome was serious maternal complications occurring up to 6 weeks post partum or until hospital discharge, whichever was later.
Included in the analysis were 987 women; 74.6% had preexisting hypertension. The primary-outcome rates were similar among 493 women assigned to less-tight control and 488 women assigned to tight control (31.4% and 30.7%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.77 to 1.35), as were the rates of serious maternal complications (3.7% and 2.0%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.84), despite a mean diastolic blood pressure that was higher in the less-tight-control group by 4.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.4). Severe hypertension (≥160/110 mm Hg) developed in 40.6% of the women in the less-tight-control group and 27.5% of the women in the tight-control group (P<0.001).
We found no significant between-group differences in the risk of pregnancy loss, high-level neonatal care, or overall maternal complications, although less-tight control was associated with a significantly higher frequency of severe maternal hypertension. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; CHIPS Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN71416914; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01192412.).
This executive summary presents in brief the current evidence assessed in the clinical practice guideline prepared by the Canadian Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Working Group and published by ...Pregnancy Hypertension (http://www.pregnancyhypertension.org/article/S2210-7789(14)00004-X/fulltext) to provide a reasonable approach to the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in March 2012 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., pregnancy, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, pregnancy toxemias) and key words (e.g., diagnosis, evaluation, classification, prediction, prevention, prognosis, treatment, postpartum follow-up). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published in French or English between January 2006 and February 2012. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to September 2013. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.
The quality of evidence in the guideline summarized here was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care (Table 1).
Summary Background Placenta-mediated pregnancy complications include pre-eclampsia, late pregnancy loss, placental abruption, and birth of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate. These ...complications are leading causes of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. Affected women are at high risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies; however, effective strategies to prevent recurrence are absent. Findings from our previous study-level meta-analysis suggested that low-molecular-weight heparin reduced the risk of recurrent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications. However, we identified significant heterogeneity in the results, possibly due to trial design or inclusion criteria. To identify which patients benefit from, and which outcomes are prevented by, low-molecular-weight heparin, we did an individual patient data meta-analysis. Methods We did a systematic review in May, 2013, which identified eight eligible randomised trials done between 2000 and 2013 of low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent recurrent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications. We excluded studies on the basis of the wrong population, the study being ongoing, inability to confirm eligibility of participants, intervention stopped too early, and no response from the principal investigator. We requested individual patient data from the study authors for eligible women (women pregnant at the time of the study with a history of previous pregnancy that had been complicated by one or more of the following: pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, birth of an SGA neonate <10th percentile, pregnancy loss after 16 weeks' gestation, or two losses after 12 weeks' gestation) and recoded, combined, and analysed the data for our meta-analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of early-onset (<34 weeks) or severe pre-eclampsia, birth of an SGA neonate (<5th percentile), late pregnancy loss (≥20 weeks' gestation), or placental abruption leading to delivery, assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. We assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42013006249. Findings We analysed data from 963 eligible women in eight trials: 480 randomly assigned to low-molecular-weight heparin and 483 randomly assigned to no low-molecular-weight heparin. Overall, the risk of bias was not substantial enough to affect decisions regarding trial inclusion. Participants were mostly white (795/905; 88%) with a mean age of 30·9 years (SD 5·0) and 403/963 (42%) had thrombophilia. In the primary analysis, low-molecular-weight heparin did not significantly reduce the risk of recurrent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications (low-molecular-weight heparin 62/444 14% versus no low-molecular-weight heparin 95/443 (22%) absolute difference −8%, 95% CI −17·3 to 1·4, p=0·09; relative risk 0·64, 95% CI 0·36–1·11, p=0·11). We noted significant heterogeneity between single-centre and multicentre trials. In subgroup analyses, low-molecular-weight heparin in multicentre trials reduced the primary outcome in women with previous abruption (p=0·006) but not in any of the other subgroups of previous complications. Interpretation Low-molecular-weight heparin does not seem to reduce the risk of recurrent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications in at-risk women. However, some decreases in event rates might have been too small for the power of our study to explore. Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
To present an approach, based on current evidence, for the diagnosis, treatment, and thromboprophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and postpartum.
Published literature was retrieved ...through searches of PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library from November 2011 to July 2013 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g. pregnancy, venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary thrombosis) and key words (e.g., maternal morbidity, pregnancy complications, thromboprophylaxis, antithrombotic therapy). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published in English or French. There were no date restrictions. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.
The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care (Table 1).
Our aim was to assess the strength of the controversial association between thrombophilia and fetal loss, and to examine whether it varies according to the timing or definition of fetal loss.
We ...searched Medline and Current Contents for articles published between 1975 and 2002 and their references with terms denoting recurrent fetal and nonrecurrent fetal loss combined with various thrombophilic disorders. We included in our meta-analysis case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies published in English, the methodological quality of which was rated as moderate or strong. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were generated by random effects models with Cochrane Review Manager software.
We included 31 studies. Factor V Leiden was associated with early (OR 2·01, 95% CI 1·13–3·58) and late (7·83, 2·83–21·67) recurrent fetal loss, and late nonrecurrent fetal loss (3·26, 1·82–5·83). Exclusion of women with other pathologies that could explain fetal loss strengthened the association between Factor V Leiden and recurrent fetal loss. Activated protein C resistance was associated with early recurrent fetal loss (3·48, 1·58–7·69), and prothrombin G20210A mutation with early recurrent (2·56, 1·04–6·29) and late non-recurrent (2·30, 1·09–4·87) fetal loss. Protein S deficiency was associated with recurrent fetal loss (14·72, 0·99–218·01) and late non-recurrent fetal loss (7·39, 1·28–42·63). Methylenetetrahydrofolate mutation, protein C, and antithrombin deficiencies were not significantly associated with fetal loss.
The magnitude of the association between thrombophilia and fetal loss varies, according to type of fetal loss and type of thrombophilia.
What is already known about this subject
• Cholesterol is known to be essential for fetal development.
• Statins, which inhibit cholesterol production, have therefore been considered as potential ...teratogens and are contraindicated in pregnancy.
• Data available thus far on the risks of congenital anomalies associated with statin therapy have come from non‐analytic postmarketing surveillance studies.
• Given the increasing use of statins in women of childbearing age, there is a need for a population‐based study on the risks of congenital anomalies associated with gestational statin use.
What this study adds
• In this pharmacoepidemiological study, we determined the risk of congenital anomalies in women who filled prescriptions for statins during the first trimester of pregnancy, compared with women who had stopped statins before pregnancy or those who used fibrates during pregnancy.
• We found no evidence of an increased risk of fetal anomalies among first‐trimester statin users, or any discernable pattern of congenital anomalies among live births.
• However, in the absence of outcome data on nonlive births, conclusions remain uncertain.
Aims
Evidence from animal studies suggests that statin medications should not be taken during pregnancy. Our aim was to examine the association between the use of statins in early pregnancy and the incidence of congenital anomalies.
Methods
A population‐based pregnancy registry was built. Three study groups were assembled: women prescribed statins in the first trimester (group A), fibrate/nicotinic acid in the first trimester (group B) and statins between 1 year and 1 month before conception, but not during pregnancy (group C). Among live‐born infants, we selected as cases infants with any congenital anomaly diagnosed in the first year of life. Controls were defined as infants with no congenital anomalies. The rate of congenital anomalies in the respective groups was calculated. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were also calculated.
Results
Our study group consisted of 288 pregnant women. Among women with a live birth, the rate of congenital anomalies was 3/64 (4.69%; 95% CI 1.00, 13.69) in group A, 3/14 in group B (21.43%; 95% CI 4.41, 62.57) and 7/67 in group C (10.45%; 95% CI 4.19, 21.53). The adjusted OR for congenital anomalies in group A compared with group C was 0.36 (95% CI 0.06, 2.18).
Conclusion
We did not detect a pattern in fetal congenital anomalies or evidence of an increased risk in the live‐born infants of women filling prescriptions for statins in the first trimester of pregnancy. Conclusions, however, remain uncertain in the absence of data from nonlive births.
Objective To evaluate the screening accuracy of pregnancy hypertensive disorders by maternal serum biomarkers and uterine artery Doppler in the first trimester. Study Design Prospectively enrolled ...nulliparous women had uterine artery Doppler and serum measured at 11-13 weeks. Maternal characteristics, uterine artery Doppler, and serum placental biomarkers (pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, Inhibin-A, placental protein 13, A disintegrin and metalloprotease 12, free β-hCG, placental growth factor) were recorded. Results Among 893 women, 20 (2.2%) had gestational hypertension developed and 40 (4.5%) had preeclampsia developed, including 9 (1.0%) early-onset preeclampsia and 16 (1.8%) severe preeclampsia. A combined screening model with clinical characteristics, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, Inhibin-A, and placental growth factor could detect 75% of early-onset preeclampsia at a 10% false-positive rate. After adjustment for clinical variables, uterine artery Doppler, placental protein 13, and A disintegrin and metalloprotease 12 did not improve the diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion A combination of clinical characteristics and first-trimester maternal serum biomarkers (pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, Inhibin-A, and placental growth factor) provides an accurate screening for early-onset preeclampsia in nulliparous women.
Introduction:
Preeclampsia develops due to placental insufficiency and systemic proinflammatory and antiangiogenic mediator release, with ensuing systemic endothelial dysfunction. Nephrotic-range ...proteinuria appears to be associated with worse pregnancy outcomes. The relationship between differing degrees of proteinuria and the severity of placental alterations has not been studied.
Methods:
This is a single-centre retrospective comparison of 150 singleton pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and varying degrees of proteinuria. Maternal demographic, obstetrical and fetal outcome data were obtained from chart review. The placental histologic evaluations were performed by a placental pathologist blinded to all other clinical information.
Results:
Preeclamptic women with massive proteinuria had evidence of more severe maternal vascular malperfusion lesions. The severity of the lesions was progressive through mild, moderate and massive proteinuria. Women with massive proteinuria had a higher incidence of renal dysfunction and severe hypertension, and had earlier preterm deliveries compared to preeclamptic women with mild and moderate proteinuria (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Preeclampsia with more severe proteinuria is associated with a higher prevalence of placental maternal vascular malperfusion.
Postpartum preeclampsia (PPPE) is an under-diagnosed condition, developing within 48 hours to 6 weeks following an uncomplicated pregnancy. The etiology of PPPE is still unknown, leaving patients ...vulnerable and making the identification and treatment of patients requiring postpartum care an unmet need. We aimed to understand the immune contribution to PPPE at the time of diagnosis, as well as uncover the predictive potential of perinatal biomarkers for the early postnatal identification of high-risk patients.
Placentas were collected at delivery from uncomplicated pregnancies (CTL) and PPPE patients for immunohistochemistry analysis. In this initial study, blood samples in PPPE patients were collected at the time of PPPE diagnosis (48h-25 days postpartum; mean 7.4 days) and compared to CTL blood samples taken 24h after delivery. Single-cell transcriptomics, flow cytometry, intracellular cytokine staining, and the circulating levels of inflammatory mediators were evaluated in the blood.
Placental CD163+ cells and 1
trimester blood pressures can be valuable non-invasive and predictive biomarkers of PPPE with strong clinical application prospects. Furthermore, changes in immune cell populations, as well as cytokine production by CD14+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells, suggested a dampened response with an exhausted phenotype including decreased IL1β, IL12, and IFNγ as well as elevated IL10.
Understanding maternal immune changes at the time of diagnosis and prenatally within the placenta in our sizable cohort will serve as groundwork for pre-clinical and clinical research, as well as guiding clinical practice for example in the development of immune-targeted therapies, and early postnatal identification of patients who would benefit from more thorough follow-ups and risk education in the weeks following an uncomplicated pregnancy.
PDF
