BackgroundIn CheckMate 9LA, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression or histology. We report updated ...efficacy and safety in all randomized patients with a minimum 4-year follow-up and an exploratory treatment-switching adjustment analysis in all treated patients who received chemotherapy and subsequent immunotherapy.MethodsAdults with stage IV/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations, and ECOG performance status ≤1 were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks with chemotherapy (two cycles) or chemotherapy (four cycles, with optional maintenance pemetrexed for the nonsquamous population). Assessments included OS, progression-free survival, and objective response rate. Exploratory analyses included efficacy by tumor PD-L1 expression and histology and in patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and a treatment-switching adjustment analysis using inverse probability of censoring weighting.ResultsWith a 47.9-month minimum follow-up for OS, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy continued to prolong OS over chemotherapy in all randomized patients (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.87; 4-year OS rate: 21% versus 16%), regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression (HR (95% CI): PD-L1<1%, 0.66 (0.50 to 0.86) and ≥1%, 0.74 (0.60 to 0.92)) or histology (squamous, 0.64 (0.48 to 0.84) and non-squamous, 0.80 (0.66 to 0.97)). In patients who discontinued all components of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy due to TRAEs (n=61), the 4-year OS rate was 41%. With treatment-switching adjustment for the 36% of patients receiving subsequent immunotherapy in the chemotherapy arm, the estimated HR of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy was 0.66 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.80). No new safety signals were observed.ConclusionsIn this 4-year update, patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy continued to have long-term, durable efficacy benefit over chemotherapy regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression and/or histology. A greater estimated relative OS benefit was observed after adjustment for subsequent immunotherapy use in the chemotherapy arm. These results further support nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic/recurrent NSCLC, including those with tumor PD-L1<1% or squamous histology, populations with high unmet needs.
In CheckMate 9LA (NCT03215706), first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy (2 cycles) significantly improved overall survival versus chemotherapy (4 cycles) in patients with metastatic ...non-small cell lung cancer and no known sensitising epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase alterations. We present exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs; minimum follow-up, 2 years).
In patients (N = 719) randomised 1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone, disease-related symptom burden and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L). Treatment-phase changes in LCSS average symptom burden index (ASBI), LCSS three-item global index (3-IGI) and EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (VAS) and utility index (UI) over time were analysed descriptively and using mixed-effect model repeated measures. Time-to-deterioration/improvement analyses were conducted.
Treatment-phase PRO questionnaire completion rates were >80%. Mean treatment-phase changes showed no deterioration from baseline in both arms for LCSS ASBI/3-IGI and EQ-5D-3L VAS/UI; however, minimally important differences were not met. Mixed-effect model repeated measures analyses showed overall reduction in symptom burden from baseline for both arms; changes from baseline for LCSS 3-IGI and EQ-5D-3L VAS/UI were numerically improved with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, but minimally important differences were not met. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy delayed time-to-definitive-deterioration versus chemotherapy (LCSS ASBI: hazard ratio, 0.62 95% confidence interval, 0.45–0.87); results were similar across PRO measures.
At 2-year minimum follow-up, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy reduced the risk of definitive deterioration in disease-related symptom burden and health-related quality of life versus chemotherapy and maintained QoL in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03215706.
•Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale and EQ-5D in CheckMate 9LA.•Risk of symptom deterioration was lower with nivolumab + ipilimumab + chemo versus chemo.•1L nivolumab + ipilimumab + chemo maintained quality of life in patients versus chemo.•Data confirm clinical benefit of 1L nivolumab + ipilimumab + chemo in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Nivolumab was the first anti-programmed cell death 1 drug approved in Argentina for non–small-cell lung cancer treatment in the second-line setting.
The present study was a multicenter, ...observational, retrospective study of patients with progression to stage IV NSCLC during platinum-based chemotherapy who had received nivolumab monotherapy in a drug-expanded access program in Argentina.
The data from 109 patients were assessed retrospectively for safety and clinical outcomes. The follow-up period was 8.83 months (interquartile range, 3.4-12.67); 57.8% were men, 29.4% were current smokers, and 78.0% had a diagnosis of nonsquamous cell cancer. The median number of chemotherapy lines before nivolumab was 2 (range, 1-4). Also, 59.6% had received radiotherapy and 89% had received platinum-based chemotherapy. The drug-related toxicity rate was 78.9%, the grade 2-3 toxicity rate was 28.4%, and 33.9% of patients had required corticosteroids. The treatment response was evaluated in 104 patients. The best response was a complete response in 2 (2%), partial response in 28 (27%), stable disease in 33 (32%), and progressive disease in 41 (39%). Univariate analysis revealed that the absence of corticosteroid use (P = .034), toxicity grade 1-3 (P = .0025), and performance status of ≤ 1 (P = .049) were associated with longer disease-free survival, performance status of ≤ 1 (P < .001), and toxicity grade 1-3 (P = .001) were associated with longer overall survival. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, toxicity grade 1-3 (hazard ratio HR, 0.44; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.24-0.81; P = .008) and age ≤ 50 years (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.61; P = .001) were associated with longer progression-free survival and corticosteroid use was associated with shorter progression-free survival (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.22-3.48; P = .007).
The use of nivolumab in the real world setting in patients with heavily pretreated NSCLC was well tolerated and showed promising clinical efficacy. The performance status, use of corticosteroids, and immune-mediated toxicity seem to be the conditions that can affect the clinical outcomes.
The retrospective data from 109 patients with previously treated non–small-cell lung cancer in Argentina in a drug-expanded program were analyzed. The overall response rate was 28.57%, progression-free survival was 6.1 months, and overall survival was 12.1 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that grade 1-3 toxicity, younger age (≤ 50 years), and no concomitant corticosteroid use were associated with longer progression-free survival.
Identification of EML4-ALK rearrangement by FISH test has become standard in advanced NSCLC patients. There is limited information about the prevalence and clinical characteristics of ALK ...translocation in Latin America. The aim of our study was to evaluate this lung cancer subtype features in Argentinian patients and the factibility of FISH test with different methods used for obtaining tissue samples.
Between August 2014 and February 2017, 183 non-squamous NSCLC patients were prospectively enrolled from five Argentinian institutions. Different techniques and procedures were used to obtained tissue samples material. ALK determination was performed by FISH and immunohistochemistry (IHC).
Correlation with clinico-pathological information and different biopsy procedures was assessed.
From 183 non-squamous NSCLC samples, 131 could perform FISH test, finding 123 (93.9%) negative and 8 (6.1%) positive patients. Fifty-one samples were not evaluable by FISH, 35 because of technical problems and 16 due to not/weak signal.
The difficulties in obtaining adequate FISH tests were observed significantly more frequently for fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core-needle biopsy than for excisional and incisional biopsy (p = 0.009). Regarding the procedures, surgery was the most efficient, obtaining only 12.7% (10/79) of not evaluable samples for FISH, while CT guided biopsy and transbronchial biopsy (TBB) failed in 43.8% (21/48) and 41.3% (19/46) of patients respectively (p < 0.001). We observed a significant association between ALK translocation and never smoking habit (p = 0.004).
Our ALK rearrangements frequency (6.1%) was similar to the reports worldwide. One of the major determinants for the ALK FISH test success is the quality of the tissue sample obtained.
•Frequency of ALK rearrangements was 6.1% (8/131).•We have 28% of not-evaluable samples by FISH.•FNA and core-needle biopsy were the two most frequent procedure presenting fails.
PDF
