•This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing myelodysplastic syndromes.•It covers diagnosis, classification, staging and risk assessment of myelodysplastic ...syndromes.•Treatment recommendations for lower- and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes are also provided.•All recommendations were compiled by a multidisciplinary group of experts.•Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors' expert opinions.
The heterogeneity of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) has made evaluating patient response to treatment challenging. In 2006, the International Working Group (IWG) proposed a revision to previously ...published standardized response criteria (IWG 2000) for uniformly evaluating clinical responses in MDSs. These IWG 2006 criteria have been used prospectively in many clinical trials in MDSs, but proved challenging in several of them, especially for the evaluation of erythroid response. In this report, we provide rationale for modifications (IWG 2018) of these recommendations, mainly for “hematological improvement” criteria used for lower-risk MDSs, based on recent practical and reported experience in clinical trials. Most suggestions relate to erythroid response assessment, which are refined in an overall more stringent manner. Two major proposed changes are the differentiation between “procedures” and “criteria” for hematologic improvement–erythroid assessment and a new categorization of transfusion-burden subgroups.
The nucleoside analog azacitidine (AZA) is used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but 30-40% of patients fail to respond or relapse after treatment. Hence, to identify new ...molecular alterations that allow for identification of patients unlikely to respond to AZA could impact the utility of this therapy. We determined the expression levels of genes involved in AZA metabolism: UCK1, UCK2, DCK, hENT1, RRM1 and RRM2 using quantitative PCR in samples from 57 patients with MDS who received AZA. Lower expression of UCK1 was seen in patients without a response to AZA (median 0.2 vs 0.49 for patients with response to AZA, P=0.07). This difference in UCK1 expression was not influenced by aberrant methylation of the UCK1 promoter. In addition, the seven polymorphic loci found in the coding sequence were not associated with UCK1 gene expression nor AZA response. Silencing of UCK1 by siRNA leads to blunted response to AZA in vitro. The univariate analysis revealed that patients expressing lower than median levels of UCK1 had a shorter overall survival (P=0.049). Our results suggest that expression level of UCK1 is correlated with clinical outcome and may influence the clinical response to AZA treatment in patients with MDS.
Essentials
Thrombocytopenia 2 (THC2) is an inherited thrombocytopenia (IT) with dysmegakaryopoiesis.
Physicians often do not suspect the genetic origin of thrombocytopenia in patients with THC2.
We ...report two THC2 patients misdiagnosed with myelodysplasia and treated with chemotherapy.
IT should be always considered in patients with isolated thrombocytopenia and dysmegakaryopoiesis.
Summary
Thrombocytopenia 2 (THC2) is an autosomal‐dominant disorder caused by point substitutions in the 5′UTR of the ANKRD26 gene. Patients have congenital thrombocytopenia, normal platelet morphology and function, and dysmegakaryopoiesis. Thrombocytopenia is frequently discovered only in adulthood and physicians often do not suspect its genetic origin. We describe two unrelated patients referred to two different institutions for investigation of thrombocytopenia. Based on the finding of dysmegakaryopoiesis at bone marrow examination, patients were diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (refractory thrombocytopenia) and treated with several courses of 5‐azacytidine. Subsequently, demonstration of thrombocytopenia in their relatives eventually led to molecular diagnosis of THC2 in both families. These cases highlight that patients with THC2 are at risk of being misdiagnosed with MDS and receiving undue myelosuppressive treatments. Because dysmegakaryopoiesis is a feature also of other forms of inherited thrombocytopenia, a genetic disorder must always be considered when a patient presents with isolated thrombocytopenia and dysmegakaryopoiesis.
Epigenetic modifications are reversible chromatin rearrangements that in normal cells modulate gene expression, without changing DNA sequence. Alterations of this equilibrium, mainly affecting the ...two interdependent mechanisms of DNA methylation and histone acetylation, are frequently involved in the genesis of cancer. The histone code, regulating gene expression, is constituted by the combination of different acetylated lysine residues of histones. In neoplastic cells, the abundance of deacetylated histones is usually associated with DNA hypermethylation and gene silencing. Several compounds, known to have in vitro antineoplastic activity, have been eventually shown to act as histone deacetylase inhibitors. Thus, HDAC inhibitors have been successfully introduced in clinical trials as antitumour agents. They are classified according to their chemical structures and are endowed with different specificity and affinity for the HDACs of classes 1, 2, 4. Among HDAC inhibitors, the most potent are the hydroxamic acid derivatives, like SAHA, which has been recently approved for therapy of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Other classes of HDAC inhibitors are short chain fatty acids (SCFA), benzamides, epoxyketone and non-epoxyketone containing cyclic tetrapeptides, and hybrid molecules. SCFA, although widely used (especially valproic acid) and clinically efficacious, have weak HDAC inhibition constants. Benzamides, like MS-275, and cyclic peptides, like depsipeptide, have been studied in numerous clinical trials and demonstrated low toxicity and activity in solid and haematological neoplasms. HDAC inhibitors are also potent radiation sensitizers. Their future in oncology may thus be based on their activity as single agents and on their synergy with the hypomethylating drugs and with chemo- and radiotherapeutics.
The phase III AZA-001 study established that azacitidine significantly improves overall survival compared with conventional care regimens (hazard ratio 0.58 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.77, ...P<0.001). This analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between treatment response and overall survival. AZA-001 data were analyzed in a multivariate Cox regression analysis with response as a time-varying covariate. Response categories were "Overall Response" (defined as complete remission, partial remission, or any hematologic improvement) and "Stable Disease" (no complete or partial remission, hematologic improvement, or progression) or "Other" (e.g. disease progression). Achieving an Overall Response with azacitidine reduced risk of death by 95% compared with achieving an Overall Response with the conventional care regimens (hazard ratio 0.05 95%CI: 0.01-0.43, P=0.006). Sensitivity analyses indicated that significantly improved overall survival remained manifest for patients with a hematologic improvement who had never achieved complete or partial remission (hazard ratio 0.19 95%CI: 0.08-0.46, P<0.001). Stable Disease in both azacitidine-treated and conventional care-treated patients was also associated with a significantly reduced risk of death (hazard ratio 0.09, 95%CI: 0.06-0.15; P<0.001). These results demonstrate azacitidine benefit on overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who achieve hematologic response but never attain complete or partial remission, in addition to the survival advantage conferred by achievement of complete or partial remission.
PDF
