Stoma formation is a commonly performed procedure in colorectal surgery as a part of operations performed for malignant‐ and inflammatory bowel disease. Stoma formation is a simple, but not trivial, ...undertaking. When performed badly, it can leave the patients with a legacy of complications such as leakage, prolapse, parastomal hernia and retraction. Various studies have reported a complication rate of 21–70%. We performed a literature search using the Medline, Ovid and Google scholar database for all the articles published between January 1980 and December 2008. The search terms used were colostomy, ileostomy, stoma, parastomal hernia, stenosis, prolapse, necrosis and complications. The following article summarizes the common complications associated with stomas.
Aim
The involvement of surgeons in major adverse outcomes can have a negative impact on their personal and professional lives, as well as on patient outcomes. Healthcare professionals involved in ...such incidents have been referred to as ‘second victims’. We designed an online survey to study the impact of operative complications on surgeons’ professional and personal lives.
Method
An online survey of general, gastrointestinal, hepato‐pancreato‐biliary and vascular surgeons was conducted using the Twitter feed of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland and the European Society of Coloproctology over an 8‐week period.
Results
Questionnaires were completed by 82 participants. Ninety‐one per cent of respondents were consultant surgeons, 37% with more than 15 years’ experience. Eighty‐three per cent were colorectal surgeons. The majority of surgeons (95%) reported that their practice had been affected as a result of serious complications and 54% suggested that it had had a negative impact on their family life. Fifty‐five per cent of respondents mentioned lack of support in their institution for healthcare professionals involved in adverse outcomes and an existing blame culture. Suggestions for improvement included mentoring (41%), counselling (38%), openness (66%), peer support groups (52%) and human factors training (32%).
Conclusion
This survey highlights that the majority of surgeons involved in serious complications are adversely affected. Those involved in the running of surgical services need to improve support for surgeons in the aftermath of such events.
Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) are responsible for a significant economic burden as well as intangible costs suffered by the patient, with up to 60% deemed preventable. Colorectal patients are ...disproportionally affected by SSI due the risk of wound contamination with bowel content. We aimed to reduce the rate of superficial SSI after elective colorectal surgery using a bundle of evidence-based interventions.
An SSI prevention bundle was implemented in elective colorectal surgery, comprised of triclosan-coated sutures, 2% chlorhexidine skin preparation and use of warmed carbon dioxide (CO2) during laparoscopic procedures. The SSI reduction strategy was prospectively implemented and compared with historical controls. Our primary outcome measure was the overall rate of superficial SSI. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, which use microbiological evidence in conjunction with clinical features were used as the definition of SSI.
The overall SSI rate was 27.4% in the pre-bundle group (N = 208) and 12.5% in the patients who received the SSI prevention bundle (N = 184) (adjusted odds ratio 0.38; confidence interval 0.21–0.67; P<0.001). The median time to SSI diagnosis was postoperative day 8. Overall patient length of stay (LOS) was unchanged from six days at baseline following implementation of the bundle.
We have shown successful implementation of an SSI prevention bundle which has reduced superficial SSI rate. We recommend this SSI prevention bundle becomes standard practice in elective colorectal surgery and plan to extend the bundle to emergency general surgery.
The spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has resulted in millions of confirmed cases and hundreds of thousands of deaths. Despite all efforts to contain the ...spread of the disease, the number of infections and deaths continue to rise, particularly in some regions. Given its presence in the salivary secretions of affected patients, and the presence of many reported asymptomatic cases that have tested positive for COVID‐19, dental professionals, including Endodontists, are at high risk of becoming infected if they do not take appropriate precautions. As of today, there are no predictable treatments or approved vaccines that can protect the public and healthcare professionals from the virus; however, there is speculation that a vaccine might be available sometime in 2021. Until then, general dentists and Endodontist will need to be able to treat emergency patients in order to relieve pressure on emergency clinics in hospitals or local community hubs. In addition, as the pandemic continues, strategies to manage patients will need to evolve from a palliative to a more permanent/definitive treatment approach. In this article, an update on the treatment considerations for dental care in general is provided, as well as a discussion on the available endodontic guidelines reported in the literature. Recommendations on clinical management of endodontic emergencies are proposed.
Aim Despite advances in surgical technique, parastomal herniation is common. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of prophylactic mesh at primary operation in reducing the incidence of ...parastomal hernia.
Method Medline, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched for relevant publications between January 1980 and January 2010. The search strategy included text terms and MESH headings for parastomal hernia, mesh and prevention and/or prophylaxis of hernia. No language restrictions were applied. Bibliographies from the papers requested in full were manually checked. All randomized controlled trials were included regardless of the language of publication. Results were extracted from the papers by two observers independently on a predefined data sheet. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. REVMAN 5 was used for statistical analysis.
Results Of 27 possible studies three randomized controlled trials fulfilled the criteria for systematic review, with a total of 128 patients (mesh 64, no mesh 64). The two study groups were well matched demographically. The incidence of parastomal hernia in the mesh group was 12.5% (8/64) compared with 53% (34/64) in the control group (P < 0.0001). There was no difference in mesh related morbidity in the two groups.
Conclusion Although only three trials with 128 patients fulfilled the criteria for this systematic review, the data suggest that the use of prophylactic prosthetic mesh at the time of primary stoma formation reduces the incidence of parastomal hernia.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer, accounting for approximately 10% of all cancer deaths. The incidence of CRC in young adults and the adolescent population is increasing. This ...study aims to highlight short-term outcomes for young patients with CRC.
Data were collected retrospectively for all patients aged less than 50 years diagnosed with CRC at a university teaching hospital between October 2012 and June 2018. The primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
A total of 120 patients (65 males, 55 females) with CRC aged under 50 years were initially included; 20 did not receive surgical treatment (12 metastatic adenocarcinoma, 5 metastatic squamous cell cancer (SCC), 3 neuroendocrine tumours (NET)), and 13 patients had insufficient data for analysis and were excluded. A total of 87 patients underwent surgical intervention and 66 with diagnosis of adenocarcinoma were included in survival analysis. Median age of patients was 42 years (19-49 years). Cancer recurrence was seen in 14 patients, 10 showing local, 3 liver and 1 lung metastasis. The median OS was 28 months (3-156 months). The median DFS was 13 months (3-85 months). Overall 5-year survival and DFS were 72% and 59%, respectively. Median survival in the group who did not undergo surgery was 4.5 months (1-15 months).
CRC is often more advanced and aggressive in younger patients. Current guidelines can result in young patients being investigated/treated for other gastrointestinal conditions before referral for CRC investigation.
The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the current literature on the use of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC) as an alternative to major surgery and endoscopic decompression alone ...for treating sigmoid volvulus in frail, comorbid patients.
A systematic literature search of literature published between April 2000 and January 2017 was carried out using the MEDLINE
, Embase™ and CINAHL
(Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases. The search terms were "percutaneous endoscopic colostomy", "PEC", "sigmoidopexy", "sigmoidostomy" and "sigmoid volvulus". The studies identified were screened and those that did not fulfil the inclusion criteria were excluded.
Seven observational studies and seven case reports (comprising eighty-one patients) were found to match our inclusion criteria. All patients had recurrent sigmoid volvulus and were treated with PEC either with a single PEC tube or with two PEC tubes inserted. Sigmoid volvulus recurred in 10 of the 81 patients; 3 of these individuals developed recurrence with PEC tubes in situ and 7 following tube removal. There were seven deaths after the procedure. The most frequent morbidity associated with PEC tube insertion was site infection (
=6).
Our systematic review highlights the use of PEC as an alternative in managing recurrent sigmoid volvulus in frail, comorbid patients unfit for or refusing surgery, with the best outcomes seen in those patients where two PEC tubes were inserted and remained in situ indefinitely. Further studies are needed to improve the safety and efficacy of the procedure as well as post-procedure care.