Phase 3 trials of direct acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) excluded patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). After approval, small trials were done in ...HIV-HCV coinfected patients. The status quo results in delayed access to DAAs for HIV coinfected patients, a group with more rapid progression of liver disease. This article reviews all approved DAAs and compares sustained virological response (SVR) rates in the HIV coinfected with those in the HCV monoinfected treated with the same regimen for the same HCV genotype. SVR rates in HCV genotype 1 to 4 are virtually identical in the HIV co-infected as in the HCV monoinfected, regardless of whether the regimens contain interferon. Because HIV coinfection does not affect SVR rates or toxicity with DAA-containing therapy, excluding HIV coinfected patients from clinical trials of DAA-containing anti-HCV therapy is discriminatory and unnecessary. Rather, HIV coinfection is one of many comorbidities that occur in some patients with HCV infection.
Display omitted
•Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is approved for patients with HCV infection.•There is no dosing recommendation for SOF-based regimens for HCV-infected patients on dialysis.•We ...evaluated SOF/VEL for 12 weeks in HCV-infected patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis.•SOF/VEL was safe and well tolerated, with a cure rate of 95% in our study.
Although off-label use of sofosbuvir-containing regimens occurs regularly in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection undergoing dialysis for severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease (ESRD), these regimens are not licensed for this indication, and there is an absence of dosing recommendations in this population. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir in patients with HCV infection with ESRD undergoing dialysis.
In this phase II, single-arm study, 59 patients with genotype 1–6 HCV infection with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis received open-label sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (400 mg/100 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. Patients were HCV treatment naive or treatment experienced without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis. Patients previously treated with any HCV NS5A inhibitor were not eligible. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 weeks after discontinuation of treatment (SVR12). The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of patients who discontinued study drug due to adverse events.
Overall, 56 of 59 patients achieved SVR12 (95%; 95% CI 86–99%). Of the 3 patients who did not achieve SVR12, 2 patients had virologic relapse determined at post-treatment Week 4 (including 1 who prematurely discontinued study treatment), and 1 patient died from suicide after achieving SVR through post-treatment Week 4. The most common adverse events were headache (17%), fatigue (14%), nausea (14%), and vomiting (14%). Serious adverse events were reported for 11 patients (19%), and all were deemed to be unrelated to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir.
Treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks was safe and effective in patients with ESRD undergoing dialysis.
Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir is a combination direct-acting antiviral that is approved for treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Despite the lack of dosing recommendations, sofosbuvir-containing regimens (including sofosbuvir/velpatasvir) are frequently used for HCV-infected patients undergoing dialysis. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks in patients with HCV infection who were undergoing dialysis. Treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir was safe and well tolerated, resulting in a cure rate of 95% in patients with HCV infection and end-stage renal disease.
Clinical Trial Number: NCT03036852.
Background and aims
Achieving sustained virological response (SVR; cure) in hepatitis C patients using a simple regimen is key to making elimination by 2030 possible. In the largest real‐world ...analysis to date, the effectiveness of pangenotypic, panfibrotic, single‐tablet, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) once‐daily for 12 weeks was assessed in 12 clinical real‐world cohorts from various geographical areas, settings and treatment practices. Factors affecting risk of not achieving SVR were assessed.
Methods
Adults treated with SOF/VEL 400/100 mg, without ribavirin, were included. All HCV patients reaching Week 12 or 24 post‐treatment were assessed for SVR12/24. Factors associated with not achieving SVR12/24 for virological reasons were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.
Results
Overall, 5552 patients were included: 13.3% treatment‐experienced; 20.7% compensated cirrhotic; 30.2% genotype 1; 29.5% genotype 2; 32.9% genotype 3; 4.7% genotype 4; 3.7% HIV coinfection; 13.4% current/former intravenous drug use. Of the 5196 patients evaluated for effectiveness, 98.9% achieved SVR12/24. High SVR12/24 rates occurred in all genotypes including genotype 3 (98.3%; 1649/1677) and in those with compensated cirrhosis (97.9; 1055/1078). Only 55 patients did not achieve SVR12/24 due to a virological reason; the only factor statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of not achieving SVR12/24 was compensated cirrhosis (P = .002). Overall, 6% (332/5552) of patients did not achieve SVR12/24 for non‐virological reasons (67% lost to follow‐up; 26.5% early treatment discontinuation).
Conclusions
In this large cohort, representative of clinical practice, a simple 12‐week regimen of SOF/VEL without ribavirin resulted in high SVR12/24 rates in diverse patient populations, even among those with compensated cirrhosis.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) exhibits great genetic diversity and is classified into 7 genotypes (GTs), with varied geographic prevalence. Until the recent development of pangenotypic direct-acting ...antiviral regimens, the determination of HCV GT was necessary to inform optimal treatment.
Plasma samples with unresolved GT using standard commercial genotyping methods were subjected to HCV full-genome sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis was performed to assign GT.
Four patients, previously classified as GT5 by LiPA or Abbott RealTime polymerase chain reaction assays, were identified as infected with a novel HCV GT. This novel HCV GT, GT8, is genetically distinct from previously identified HCV GT1-7 with >30% nucleotide sequence divergence to the established HCV subtypes. All 4 patients were originally from Punjab, India, but now reside in Canada and are epidemiologically unlinked. Despite presence of baseline resistance-associated substitutions within the GT8 virus of all 4 patients (NS3: V36L, Q80K/R; NS5A: Q30S, Y93S), all patients achieved a sustained virologic response; 2 treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir for 8 weeks, 1 with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks and 1 with sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir for 12 weeks.
The discovery of a novel HCV GT8 confirms the circulation of this newly identified lineage in the human population.
Background
Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) is approved for treatment of HIV without known resistance to its components. Several studies have demonstrated efficacy of B/F/TAF ...in patients with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance‐associated mutations (RAMs), mainly identified by proviral DNA testing, but data on the efficacy of B/F/TAF in patients with NRTI RAMs identified in viraemic plasma are limited.
Methods
We used a retrospective analysis of patients receiving B/F/TAF identified by searching electronic health records with eligibility confirmed by review of individual patient records. Patients included were ≥ 18 years, had 2019 International Antiviral Socitey‐USA (IAS‐USA) major RAMs affecting NRTIs detected in viraemic plasma prior to starting B/F/TAF and one or more HIV viral load (VL) after starting B/F/TAF.
Results
In all, 50 patients met the study criteria: mean age of 54 years, mean proximal CD4 count of 609 cells/μL, 64% male. A total of 46 were virologically suppressed (< 200 copies/mL) when B/F/TAF was initiated, two were treatment‐naïve, one stopped prior antiretroviral therapy (ART) and one had a VL of 961 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL on ART. Twenty‐nine had one NRTI RAM (24 were M184V/I), nine had two NRTI RAMs, three had three NRTI RAMs, four had four NRTI RAMs, two had five NRTI RAMs, one had six NRTI RAMs, one had seven RAMs and one had eight NRTI RAMs. At the last VL on B/F/TAF, a mean of 18.6 months after starting B/F/TAF, 49 out of 50 had VL < 100 copies/mL and one had a VL of 208 copies/mL at 11 months but only filled 5 months of B/F/TAF.
Conclusions
B/F/TAF was effective in maintaining HIV VL suppression in patients with previously documented NRTI RAMs without integrase resistance.
Display omitted
•In patients with GT1-6 HCV infection, 28% had detectable NS5A class RASs at baseline.•High SVR rate was observed in patients treated with SOF/VEL irrespective of baseline NS5A ...RASs.•Single NS5A class resistance was observed at virologic failure post SOF/VEL treatment.
The fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir was highly efficacious in patients infected with genotype (GT)1–6 hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the ASTRAL studies. This analysis evaluated the impact of baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) on treatment outcome and emergence of RASs in patients infected with HCV GT1-6 who were treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir.
Non-structural protein 5A and 5B (NS5A and NS5B) deep sequencing was performed at baseline and at the time of relapse for all patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks (n = 1,778) in the ASTRAL-1–3, ASTRAL-5 and POLARIS-2–3 studies.
Patients with 37 known and 19 novel HCV subtypes were included in these analyses. Overall, 28% (range 9% to 61% depending on genotype) had detectable NS5A class RASs at baseline, using a 15% sequencing assay cut-off. There was no significant effect of baseline NS5A class RASs on sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir; the SVR12 rate in the presence of NS5A class RASs was 100% and 97%, in patients with GT1a and GT1b infection, respectively, and 100% in patients with GT2 and GT4–6 infections. In GT3 infection, the SVR rate was 93% and 98% in patients with and without baseline NS5A class RASs, respectively. The overall virologic failure rate was low (20/1,778 = 1.1%) in patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. Single NS5A class resistance was observed at virologic failure in 17 of the 20 patients.
Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir taken for 12 weeks once daily resulted in high SVR rates in patients infected with GT1–6 HCV, irrespective of baseline NS5A RASs. NS5A inhibitor resistance, but not sofosbuvir resistance, was detected in the few patients with virologic failure. These data highlight the high barrier to resistance of this regimen for the treatment of chronic HCV across all genotypes in the vast majority of patients.
Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir taken once daily for 12 weeks resulted in high sustained virologic response rates in patients infected with HCV, irrespective of the presence of NS5A resistance-associated variants prior to treatment. Single class NS5A inhibitor resistance, but not sofosbuvir resistance, was detected in the few patients with virologic failure. These data highlight the high barrier to resistance of this regimen for the treatment of chronic HCV across all genotypes in the vast majority of patients.
Abstract Background & Aims Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) following 12 weeks of treatment with the nucleotide polymerase ...inhibitor sofosbuvir combined with the NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir. We assessed the efficacy of 8 weeks of treatment with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir plus the pangenotypic NS3/4A protease inhibitor voxilaprevir (sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir). Methods In 2 phase 3, open-label trials, patients with HCV infection who had not previously been treated with a direct-acting antiviral agent were randomly assigned to groups given sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for 8 weeks or sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for 12 weeks. POLARIS-2, which enrolled patients infected with all HCV genotypes with or without cirrhosis, except patients with genotype 3 and cirrhosis, was designed to test the non-inferiority of 8 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir to 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir using a non-inferiority margin of 5%. POLARIS-3, which enrolled patients infected with HCV genotype 3 who had cirrhosis, compared rates of SVR in both groups to a performance goal of 83%. Results In POLARIS-2, 95% (95% CI, 93%–97%) of patients had an SVR to 8 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir; this did not meet the criterion to establish non-inferiority to 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir, which produced an SVR in 98% of patients (95% CI, 96%–99%; difference in the stratum-adjusted Mantel-Haenszel proportions of 3.4%; 95% CI, –6.2% to –0.6%). The difference in the efficacy was primarily due to a lower rate of SVR (92%) among patients with HCV genotype 1a infection receiving 8 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir. In POLARIS-3, 96% of patients (95% CI, 91%–99%) achieved an SVR in both treatment groups, which was significantly superior to the performance goal. Overall, the most common adverse events were headache, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea; diarrhea and nausea were reported more frequently by patients receiving voxilaprevir. In both trials, the proportions of patients who discontinued treatment owing to adverse events were low (0–1%). Conclusions In phase 3 trials of patients with HCV infection, we did not establish that sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for 8 weeks was non-inferior to sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for 12 weeks, but the 2 regimens had similar rates of SVR in patients with HCV genotype 3 and cirrhosis. Mild gastrointestinal adverse events were associated with treatment regimens that included voxilaprevir. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: POLARIS-2, NCT02607800 and POLARIS-3, NCT02639338
PDF
