Alt-EJ is an error-prone DNA double-strand break (DSBs) repair pathway coming to the fore when first-line repair pathways, c-NHEJ and HR, are defective or fail. It is thought to benefit from DNA ...end-resection—a process whereby 3′ single-stranded DNA-tails are generated—initiated by the CtIP/MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex and extended by EXO1 or the BLM/DNA2 complex. The connection between alt-EJ and resection remains incompletely characterized. Alt-EJ depends on the cell cycle phase, is at maximum in G2-phase, substantially reduced in G1-phase and almost undetectable in quiescent, G0-phase cells. The mechanism underpinning this regulation remains uncharacterized. Here, we compare alt-EJ in G1- and G0-phase cells exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) and identify CtIP-dependent resection as the key regulator. Low levels of CtIP in G1-phase cells allow modest resection and alt-EJ, as compared to G2-phase cells. Strikingly, CtIP is undetectable in G0-phase cells owing to APC/C-mediated degradation. The suppression of CtIP degradation with bortezomib or CDH1-depletion rescues CtIP and alt-EJ in G0-phase cells. CtIP activation in G0-phase cells also requires CDK-dependent phosphorylation by any available CDK but is restricted to CDK4/6 at the early stages of the normal cell cycle. We suggest that suppression of mutagenic alt-EJ in G0-phase is a mechanism by which cells of higher eukaryotes maintain genomic stability in a large fraction of non-cycling cells in their organisms.
The load of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced in the genome of higher eukaryotes by different doses of ionizing radiation (IR) is a key determinant of DSB repair pathway choice, with homologous ...recombination (HR) and ATR substantially gaining ground at doses below 0.5 Gy. Increased resection and HR engagement with decreasing DSB-load generate a conundrum in a classical non-homologous end-joining (c-NHEJ)-dominated cell and suggest a mechanism adaptively facilitating resection. We report that ablation of DNA-PKcs causes hyper-resection, implicating DNA-PK in the underpinning mechanism. However, hyper-resection in DNA-PKcs-deficient cells can also be an indirect consequence of their c-NHEJ defect. Here, we report that all tested DNA-PKcs mutants show hyper-resection, while mutants with defects in all other factors of c-NHEJ fail to do so. This result rules out the model of c-NHEJ versus HR competition and the passive shift from c-NHEJ to HR as the causes of the increased resection and suggests the integration of DNA-PKcs into resection regulation. We develop a model, compatible with the results of others, which integrates DNA-PKcs into resection regulation and HR for a subset of DSBs. For these DSBs, we propose that the kinase remains at the break site, rather than the commonly assumed autophosphorylation-mediated removal from DNA ends.
Abstract Eukaryotic cells respond to DNA damage by activating a comprehensive network of biochemical pathways that enable damage recognition and initiate responses leading to repair, ...apoptosis/autophagy or senescence. This network of responses is commonly described as the “DNA damage response” (DDR). Among the plethora of lesions generated in the DNA from various physical and chemical agents in the environment and in the cell, DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and DNA replication stress (RS) are the most severe and induce strong DDR, as they bear high risk for cell death, or genomic alterations ultimately causing cancer. Here, we focus on DSBs and provide a state-of-the-art review of the molecular underpinnings of repair pathways that process DSBs in higher eukaryotes, their strengths and limitations, as well as aspects of repair pathway choice and hierarchy. Furthermore, we discuss the regulation of DSB repair pathways throughout the cell cycle and by processes affecting the proliferative state of the cell. We review the role of growth factors and their receptors in the regulation of each DSB repair pathway and discuss aspects of systemic regulation of DNA repair.
While technological advances in radiation oncology have led to a more precise delivery of radiation dose and a decreased risk of side effects, there is still a need to better understand the ...mechanisms underlying DNA damage response (DDR) at the DNA and cytogenetic levels, and to overcome tumor resistance. To maintain genomic stability, cells have developed sophisticated signaling pathways enabling cell cycle arrest to facilitate DNA repair via the DDR-related kinases and their downstream targets, so that DNA damage or DNA replication stress induced by genotoxic therapies can be resolved. ATM, ATR, and Chk1 kinases are key mediators in DDR activation and crucial factors in treatment resistance. It is of importance, therefore, as an alternative to the conventional clonogenic assay, to establish a cytogenetic assay enabling reliable and time-efficient results in evaluating the potency of DDR inhibitors for radiosensitization. Toward this goal, the present study aims at the development and optimization of a chromosomal radiosensitivity assay using the DDR and G2-checkpoint inhibitors as a novel modification compared to the classical G2-assay. Also, it aims at investigating the strengths of this assay for rapid radiosensitivity assessments in cultured cells, and potentially, in tumor cells obtained from biopsies. Specifically, exponentially growing RPE and 82-6 hTERT human cells are irradiated during the G2/M-phase transition in the presence or absence of Caffeine, VE-821, and UCN-1 inhibitors of ATM/ATR, ATR, and Chk1, respectively, and the induced chromatid breaks are used to evaluate cell radiosensitivity and their potency for radiosensitization. The increased yield of chromatid breaks in the presence of DDR inhibitors, which underpins radiosensitization, is similar to that observed in cells from highly radiosensitive AT-patients, and is considered here as 100% radiosensitive internal control. The results highlight the potential of our modified G2-assay using VE-821 to evaluate cell radiosensitivity, the efficacy of DDR inhibitors in radiosensitization, and reinforce the concept that ATM, ATR, and Chk1 represent attractive anticancer drug targets in radiation oncology.
•Proficient HRR is prerequisite for activation of G2-checkpoint at clinically relevant IR doses.•Engagement of ATM and ATR on checkpoint regulation at low IR doses requires functional HRR.•HRR ...deficient cells activate a weak but readily detectable ATM/ATR dependent G2-checkpoint at higher IR doses.
Pathways of repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) cooperate with DNA damage cell cycle checkpoints to safeguard genomic stability when cells are exposed to ionizing radiation (IR). It is widely accepted that checkpoints facilitate the function of DSB repair pathways. Whether DSB repair proficiency feeds back into checkpoint activation is less well investigated. Here, we study activation of the G2-checkpoint in cells deficient in homologous recombination repair (HRR) after exposure to low IR doses (∼1 Gy) in the G2-phase. We report that in the absence of functional HRR, activation of the G2-checkpoint is severely impaired. This response is specific for HRR, as cells deficient in classical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ) develop a similar or stronger G2-checkpoint than wild-type (WT) cells. Inhibition of ATM or ATR leaves largely unaffected residual G2-checkpoint in HRR-deficient cells, suggesting that the G2-checkpoint engagement of ATM/ATR is coupled to HRR. HRR-deficient cells show in G2-phase reduced DSB-end-resection, as compared to WT-cells or c-NHEJ mutants, confirming the reported link between resection and G2-checkpoint activation. Strikingly, at higher IR doses (≥4 Gy) HRR-deficient cells irradiated in G2-phase activate a weak but readily detectable ATM/ATR-dependent G2-checkpoint, whereas HRR-deficient cells irradiated in S-phase develop a stronger G2-checkpoint than WT-cells. We conclude that HRR and the ATM/ATR-dependent G2-checkpoint are closely intertwined in cells exposed to low IR-doses in G2-phase, where HRR dominates; they uncouple as HRR becomes suppressed at higher IR doses. Notably, this coupling is specific for cells irradiated in G2-phase, and cells irradiated in S-phase utilize a different mechanistic setup.
In vertebrates, genomic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are removed by non-homologous end-joining processes: classical non-homologous end-joining (c-NHEJ) and alternative end-joining (alt-EJ); or by ...homology-dependent processes: gene-conversion (GC) and single-strand annealing (SSA). Surprisingly, these repair pathways are not real alternative options restoring genome integrity with equal efficiency, but show instead striking differences in speed, accuracy and cell-cycle-phase dependence. As a consequence, engagement of one pathway may be associated with processing-risks for the genome absent from another pathway. Characterization of engagement-parameters and their consequences is, therefore, essential for understanding effects on the genome of DSB-inducing agents, such as ionizing-radiation (IR). Here, by addressing pathway selection in G2-phase, we discover regulatory confinements in GC with consequences for SSA- and c-NHEJ-engagement. We show pronounced suppression of GC with increasing DSB-load that is not due to RAD51 availability and which is delimited but not defined by 53BP1 and RAD52. Strikingly, at low DSB-loads, GC repairs ∼50% of DSBs, whereas at high DSB-loads its contribution is undetectable. Notably, with increasing DSB-load and the associated suppression of GC, SSA gains ground, while alt-EJ is suppressed. These observations explain earlier, apparently contradictory results and advance our understanding of logic and mechanisms underpinning the wiring between DSB repair pathways.
•IR dose-dependent DSB repair pathway switch from HR to c-NHEJ in G2-phase.•HR is functional at clinically relevant IR doses.•c-NHEJ becomes crucial with increasing DSB loads at high IR doses.
We ...recently reported that when low doses of ionizing radiation induce low numbers of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in G2-phase cells, about 50 % of them are repaired by homologous recombination (HR) and the remaining by classical non-homologous end-joining (c-NHEJ). However, with increasing DSB-load, the contribution of HR drops to undetectable (at ∼10 Gy) as c-NHEJ dominates. It remains unknown whether the approximately equal shunting of DSBs between HR and c-NHEJ at low radiation doses and the predominant shunting to c-NHEJ at high doses, applies to every DSB, or whether the individual characteristics of each DSB generate processing preferences. When G2-phase cells are irradiated, only about 10 % of the induced DSBs break the chromatids. This breakage allows analysis of the processing of this specific subset of DSBs using cytogenetic methods. Notably, at low radiation doses, these DSBs are almost exclusively processed by HR, suggesting that chromatin characteristics awaiting characterization underpin chromatid breakage and determine the preferential engagement of HR. Strikingly, we also discovered that with increasing radiation dose, a pathway switch to c-NHEJ occurs in the processing of this subset of DSBs. Here, we confirm and substantially extend our initial observations using additional methodologies. Wild-type cells, as well as HR and c-NHEJ mutants, are exposed to a broad spectrum of radiation doses and their response analyzed specifically in G2 phase. Our results further consolidate the observation that at doses <2 Gy, HR is the main option in the processing of the subset of DSBs generating chromatid breaks and that a pathway switch at doses between 4–6 Gy allows the progressive engagement of c-NHEJ. PARP1 inhibition, irrespective of radiation dose, leaves chromatid break repair unaffected suggesting that the contribution of alternative end-joining is undetectable under these experimental conditions.
In mammalian cells, ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired in all phases of the cell cycle predominantly by classical, DNA-PK-dependent nonhomologous end joining ...(D-NHEJ). Homologous recombination repair (HRR) is functional during the S- and G2-phases, when a sister chromatid becomes available. An error-prone, alternative form of end joining, operating as backup (B-NHEJ) functions robustly throughout the cell cycle and particularly in the G2-phase and is thought to backup predominantly D-NHEJ. Parp-1, DNA-ligases 1 (Lig1) and 3 (Lig3), and Xrcc1 are implicated in B-NHEJ. Chromosome and chromatid translocations are manifestations of erroneous DSB repair and are crucial culprits in malignant transformation and IR-induced cell lethality. We analyzed shifts in translocation formation deriving from defects in D-NHEJ or HRR in cells irradiated in the G2-phase and identify B-NHEJ as the main DSB repair pathway backing up both of these defects at the cost of a large increase in translocation formation. Our results identify Parp-1 and Lig1 and 3 as factors involved in translocation formation and show that Xrcc1 reinforces the function of Lig3 in the process without being required for it. Finally, we demonstrate intriguing connections between B-NHEJ and DNA end resection in translocation formation and show that, as for D-NHEJ and HRR, the function of B-NHEJ facilitates the recovery from the G2-checkpoint. These observations advance our understanding of chromosome aberration formation and have implications for the mechanism of action of Parp inhibitors.
Abstract
We previously reported that cells exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation (IR) in the G
2
-phase of the cell cycle activate a checkpoint that is epistatically regulated by ATM and ATR ...operating as an integrated module. In this module, ATR interphases exclusively with the cell cycle to implement the checkpoint, mainly using CHK1. The ATM/ATR module similarly regulates DNA end-resection at low IR-doses. Strikingly, at high IR-doses, the ATM/ATR coupling relaxes and each kinase exerts independent contributions to resection and the G
2
-checkpoint. DNA-PKcs links to the ATM/ATR module and defects cause hyper-resection and hyperactivation of G
2
-checkpoint at all doses examined. Surprisingly, our present report reveals that cells irradiated in S-phase utilize a different form of wiring between DNA-PKcs/ATM/ATR: The checkpoint activated in G
2
-phase is regulated exclusively by ATR/CHK1; similarly at high and low IR-doses. DNA end-resection supports ATR-activation, but inhibition of ATR leaves resection unchanged. DNA-PKcs and ATM link now epistatically to resection and their inhibition causes hyper-resection and ATR-dependent G
2
-checkpoint hyperactivation at all IR-doses. We propose that DNA-PKcs, ATM and ATR form a modular unit to regulate DSB processing with their crosstalk distinctly organized in S- and G
2
- phase, with strong dependence on DSB load only in G
2
-phase.
•Gene conversion is required for the processing of DSBs that break chromosomes in G2-phase.•This preference requires low DSB loads in the genome.•Classical non-homologous end joining is unable to ...back-up this function.•DSB management in higher eukaryotes utilizes mechanisms that channel defined DSB subsets to error free pathways leaving no choice to alternative pathways.
Four repair pathways process DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Among these pathways the homologous recombination repair (HRR) subpathway of gene conversion (GC) affords error-free processing, but functions only in S- and G2-phases of the cell cycle. Classical non-homologous end-joining (c-NHEJ) operates throughout the cell cycle, but causes small deletions and translocations. Similar deficiencies in exaggerated form, combined with reduced efficiency, are associated with alternative end-joining (alt-EJ). Finally, single-strand annealing (SSA) causes large deletions and possibly translocations. Thus, processing of a DSB by any pathway, except GC, poses significant risks to the genome, making the mechanisms navigating pathway-engagement critical to genome stability. Logically, the cell ought to attempt engagement of the pathway ensuring preservation of the genome, while accommodating necessities generated by the types of DSBs induced. Thereby, inception of DNA end-resection will be key determinant for GC, SSA and alt-EJ engagement. We reported that during G2-phase, where all pathways are active, GC engages in the processing of almost 50 % of DSBs, at low DSB-loads in the genome, and that this contribution rapidly drops to nearly zero with increasing DSB-loads. At the transition between these two extremes, SSA and alt-EJ compensate, but at extremely high DSB-loads resection-dependent pathways are suppressed and c-NHEJ remains mainly active. We inquired whether in this processing framework all DSBs have similar fates. Here, we analyze in G2-phase the processing of a subset of DSBs defined by their ability to break chromosomes. Our results reveal an absolute requirement for GC in the processing of chromatid breaks at doses in the range of 1 Gy. Defects in c-NHEJ delay significantly the inception of processing by GC, but leave processing kinetics unchanged. These results delineate the essential role of GC in chromatid break repair before mitosis and classify DSBs that underpin this breakage as the exclusive substrate of GC.
PDF
