Summary Background Patients with melanoma harbouring Val600 BRAF mutations benefit from treatment with BRAF inhibitors. However, no targeted treatments exist for patients with BRAF wild-type tumours, ...including those with NRAS mutations. We aimed to assess the use of MEK162, a small-molecule MEK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with NRAS -mutated or Val600 BRAF -mutated advanced melanoma. Methods In our open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 study, we assigned patients with NRAS -mutated or BRAF -mutated advanced melanoma to one of three treatment arms on the basis of mutation status. Patients were enrolled at university hospitals or private cancer centres in Europe and the USA. The three arms were: twice-daily MEK162 45 mg for NRAS -mutated melanoma, twice-daily MEK162 45 mg for BRAF -mutated melanoma, and twice-daily MEK162 60 mg for BRAF -mutated melanoma. Previous treatment with BRAF inhibitors was permitted, but previous MEK inhibitor therapy was not allowed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had an objective response (ie, a complete response or confirmed partial response). We report data for the 45 mg groups. We assessed clinical activity in all patients who received at least one dose of MEK162 and in patients assessable for response (with two available CT scans). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01320085 , and is currently recruiting additional patients with NRAS mutations (based on a protocol amendment). Findings Between March 31, 2011, and Jan 17, 2012, we enrolled 71 patients who received at least one dose of MEK162 45 mg. By Feb 29, 2012 (data cutoff), median follow-up was 3·3 months (range 0·6–8·7; IQR 2·2–5·0). No patients had a complete response. Six (20%) of 30 patients with NRAS -mutated melanoma had a partial response (three confirmed) as did eight (20%) of 41 patients with BRAF -mutated melanoma (two confirmed). The most frequent adverse events were acneiform dermatitis (18 60% patients with NRAS -mutated melanoma and 15 37% patients with the BRAF -mutated melanoma), rash (six 20% and 16 39%), peripheral oedema (ten 33% and 14 34%), facial oedema (nine 30% and seven 17%), diarrhoea (eight 27% and 15 37%), and creatine phosphokinase increases (11 37% and nine 22%). Increased creatine phosphokinase was the most common grade 3–4 adverse event (seven 23% and seven 17%). Four patients had serious adverse events (two per arm), which included diarrhoea, dehydration, acneiform dermatitis, general physical deterioration, irregular heart rate, malaise, and small intestinal perforation. No deaths occurred from treatment-related causes. Interpretation To our knowledge, MEK162 is the first targeted therapy to show activity in patients with NRAS -mutated melanoma and might offer a new option for a cancer with few effective treatments. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
People with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at high risk for cardiovascular disease. In some studies, the mortality rate among people with this condition has been equivalent to that among people with ...cardiovascular disease. We compared cardiovascular mortality between incident cases of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
The study population was part of a random sample of 4376 men from Quebec, Canada, aged 35 to 64 years, who did not have cardiovascular disease in 1974 and who were followed until 1998. Three groups of incident cases were identified: diabetes without cardiovascular disease, first cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, unstable angina or stroke) without diabetes, and both cardiovascular disease and diabetes. These cases were age-matched to a control group without diabetes or cardiovascular disease.
During the 24-year follow-up period, new diabetes without cardiovascular disease was documented in 137 men. A first cardiovascular event without diabetes was documented in 527 men. Relative to the 627 controls, men with 1 of the 2 diseases of interest had higher cardiovascular mortality (age-adjusted relative risk RR 3.11, 95% confidence interval CI 1.96-4.92) for those with diabetes and 4.46 (95% CI 3.15-6.30) for those with cardiovascular disease). However, within the first 5 years after diagnosis, men with cardiovascular disease had higher cardiovascular mortality than men with diabetes (age-adjusted RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.01-4.08).
Men with isolated type 2 diabetes and men with isolated cardiovascular disease had similar cardiovascular mortality rates several years after initial diagnosis of either condition. These findings reinforce the need to prevent and optimally manage diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Background The natural history of intermittent claudication, from its risk factors to its cardiovascular prognosis, has been reported in few prospective studies. Objective To assess incident ...intermittent claudication, as well as its risk factors and long-term prognosis in men. Methods A random sample of 4376 men 35 to 64 years of age from Quebec City (Quebec), who were free of cardiovascular disease (CVD), was evaluated in 1974 for CVD risk factors and followed until 1998. To assess the prognosis, the event rates between 1985 and 1998 were computed among men with incident claudication without other CVD, incident survivors of a first myocardial infarction (MI) without other CVD and men free of CVD between 1974 and 1985. Results From 1974 to 1998, 300 men developed intermittent claudication. Tobacco consumption, high systolic blood pressure and diabetes at least doubled the adjusted RR (aRR) of intermittent claudication. In 1985, there were 80 claudicants, 2868 men free of CVD and 68 survivors of a first MI. During the 13-year follow-up, a new CVD occurred in 48.8% of the claudicants, in 18.9% of men without CVD (aRR 2.08; 95% CI 1.48 to 2.90) and in 45.6% of MI survivors (aRR compared with claudicants 1.12; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.79). There was also no significant difference between claudicants and MI survivors for fatal CVD, nonfatal CVD and total mortality. Conclusions Men with intermittent claudication are at high risk for CVD that may be equivalent to men with previous MI.
PDF
