Background
Complete revascularization (CR) of nonculprit lesions (NCL) is strongly recommended in patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease ...(MVD), but no definitive evidence is available regarding which diagnostic strategy should be preferred. Instantaneous wave‐free ratio (iFR) has never been investigated in this setting. We aimed to describe clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients undergoing iFR‐guided CR.
Methods
Following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), consecutive patients with STEMI and intermediate NCL were enrolled and destinated to an iFR‐guided CR. NCL with iFR ≤ 0.89 underwent PCI while NCL with iFR > 0.89 were deferred. The primary endpoint was NC target lesion failure (NC‐TLF) and the secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), at 1‐year follow‐up.
Results
Overall, 209 patients were enrolled (ischemic iFR = 83; nonischemic iFR = 126). Patients with ischemic iFR showed a higher prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and angiographically determined three‐vessel disease. In the entire cohort, NC‐TLF and MACE occurred in 6.7% and 10.5% of patients, respectively. Compared to the deferred group, patients with ischemic iFR experienced significantly higher rates of both NC‐TLF (3.2% vs. 12.1%; p = 0.021) and MACE (7.1% vs. 16.9%; p = 0.041). These results were mostly driven by increased rates of NC‐TLF PCI and further revascularizations in this latter group, while no differences were evident in terms of nonfatal myocardial infarction or death. At multivariable analysis, the strongest predictor of MACE was symptom onset to balloon time (HR = 1.17 95% CI: 1.04–1.31, p = 0.008).
Conclusions
In our study enrolling STEMI patients with MVD, iFR assessment was feasible and safe. PCI‐deferring according to iFR evaluation of NCL was associated with low rates of adverse events. Further randomized studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness of iFR‐guided revascularization compared to current practice in this setting.
The objective of this study is to compare a reloading dose of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin administered within 24h before coronary angioplasty (PCI) in reducing the rate of periprocedural ...myonecrosis and major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients on chronic statin treatment undergoing elective PCI.
Elective PCI may be complicated with elevation of cardiac biomarkers. Several studies suggested that pretreatment with statins may be associated with a reduction in periprocedural myocardial necrosis.
Three hundred and fifty patients with stable angina who underwent elective PCI were randomly assigned to receive a pre-procedural reloading dose of Rosuvastatin (40mg) (Rosuvastatin Group—RG n=175) or Atorvastatin (80mg) (Atorvastatin Group—AG n=175) and a control group on chronic statin therapy without reloading (Control-Group—CG). The primary end-point was periprocedural myocardial necrosis and the occurrence of MACCE at 30-day,6–12month follow-up. Also we evaluate the rise of periprocedural Troponin T serum levels >3× the upper limit of normal.
Twelve and 24-hour post-PCI Creatine Kinase Muscle and Brain (CK-MB) elevation >3× occurred more frequently in the CG than in the RG and in the AG (at 24-h: 25.0 vs 7.1; p=0.003 and 25.0 vs 6.1; p=0.001). At 30-day, 6-and 12-month follow-up the incidence of cumulative MACCE was higher in CG than in the RG or AG (at 12-month: 41.0% vs 11.4% vs 12.0%; p=0.001). There was no difference between the RG and AG in terms of myocardial post-procedural necrosis and MACCE occurrence at follow-up.
High-dose statin reloading improves procedural and long term clinical outcomes in stable patients on chronic statin therapy. Both Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin showed similar beneficial effects on procedural and long-term outcomes.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a highly effective therapy for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Adjunctive therapy with platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor can result ...in increased vessel patency and improved outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing PCI. The investigation of novel dosing and delivery strategies of this therapy may help to further improve outcomes.
IC-Clearly is a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial, with the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of an intracoronary bolus dose of abciximab delivered using the ClearWay RX catheter vs. an intravenous bolus of abciximab for ST-elevation myocardial infarction with angiographically visible thrombus (thrombus grade >or=2). A total of 150 patients will be randomized 1: 1 to treatment of the culprit artery with intracoronary abciximab (75 patients) or intravenous abciximab (75 patients) in addition to a maintenance infusion regimen of abciximab administered intravenously for 12 h after PCI. The number of patients included in this study is based on the estimation of sample size needed to identify a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoints between the two groups. The primary endpoint chosen to evaluate this hypothesis is infarct size assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. Clinical outcomes will be assessed for each patient through hospital discharge and at 30-day follow-up.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether an intracoronary bolus of abciximab delivered with the ClearWay RX catheter prior to the 12 h post-PCI intravenous infusion regimen of abciximab will result in significant additional clot resolution in vivo and improved myocardial perfusion when compared with an intravenous bolus of abciximab on top of the 12 h post-PCI intravenous infusion regimen of abciximab as per standard practice. The primary endpoint chosen to evaluate this hypothesis is infarct size as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance.
Abstract Objectives The objective of this study is to compare a reloading dose of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin administered within 24 h before coronary angioplasty (PCI) in reducing the rate of ...periprocedural myonecrosis and major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients on chronic statin treatment undergoing elective PCI. Background Elective PCI may be complicated with elevation of cardiac biomarkers. Several studies suggested that pretreatment with statins may be associated with a reduction in periprocedural myocardial necrosis. Methods Three hundred and fifty patients with stable angina who underwent elective PCI were randomly assigned to receive a pre-procedural reloading dose of Rosuvastatin (40 mg) (Rosuvastatin Group—RG n = 175) or Atorvastatin (80 mg) (Atorvastatin Group—AG n = 175) and a control group on chronic statin therapy without reloading (Control-Group—CG). The primary end-point was periprocedural myocardial necrosis and the occurrence of MACCE at 30-day,6–12 month follow-up. Also we evaluate the rise of periprocedural Troponin T serum levels > 3 × the upper limit of normal. Results Twelve and 24-hour post-PCI Creatine Kinase Muscle and Brain (CK-MB) elevation > 3 × occurred more frequently in the CG than in the RG and in the AG (at 24-h: 25.0 vs 7.1; p = 0.003 and 25.0 vs 6.1; p = 0.001). At 30-day, 6-and 12-month follow-up the incidence of cumulative MACCE was higher in CG than in the RG or AG (at 12-month: 41.0% vs 11.4% vs 12.0%; p = 0.001). There was no difference between the RG and AG in terms of myocardial post-procedural necrosis and MACCE occurrence at follow-up. Conclusions High-dose statin reloading improves procedural and long term clinical outcomes in stable patients on chronic statin therapy. Both Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin showed similar beneficial effects on procedural and long-term outcomes.
Background:
Twelve‐month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) with aspirin and clopidogrel after drug‐eluting stent (DES) implantation is routinely recommended. It is unclear if prolonged (>12‐month) DAT ...is also favorable. We compared the outcome of patients discontinuing DAT 12 months after off‐label DES implantation versus those with DAT for >12 months.
Methods:
Baseline, treatment, and outcome data of patients undergoing off‐label DES implantation and free from events 11.5 months after index procedure were retrospectively retrieved. Those discontinuing DAT between 11.5 and 12.5 months (12‐month DAT group) were compared to those discontinuing DAT after 12.5 months (>12‐month DAT group). The primary end‐point was the long‐term (>24‐month) rate of major adverse cerebro‐cardiovascular events (MACCE).
Results:
Two hundred seventy‐two patients met study inclusion criteria: 133 (48.9%) in the 12‐month DAT group and 139 (51.1%) in the >12‐month DAT group (who were on DAT for an average of 24 months). After an average of 36 months after DES implantation, 14 patients (5.1%) developed MACCE, with 6 (3.5%) cardiac deaths, 7 (2.2%) myocardial infarctions, no stroke, and 5 (1.8%) repeat revascularizations. The >12‐month DAT group had a significantly lower risk of MACCE (1 0.7% vs. 13 9.8% in the 12‐month DAT group, P < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (0 vs. 7 5.3%, P = 0.006), with such differences confirmed at multivariable propensity‐adjusted analyses. No significant differences in terms of minor or major bleedings occurred.
Conclusions:
In this retrospective registry, patients with off‐label DES implantation receiving prolonged (>12 months) DAT presented with lower rates of MACCE and myocardial infarction. (J Interven Cardiol 2012;25:596–603)
PDF
