Hypothesis and background The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of patient-specific guides for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with traditional instrumentation in arthritic cadaver ...shoulders. We hypothesized that the patient-specific guides would place components more accurately than standard instrumentation. Materials and methods Seventy cadaver shoulders with radiographically confirmed arthritis were randomized in equal groups to 5 surgeons of varying experience levels who were not involved in development of the patient-specific guidance system. Specimens were then randomized to patient-specific guides based off of computed tomography scanning, standard instrumentation, and anatomic TSA or reverse TSA. Variances in version or inclination of more than 10° and more than 4 mm in starting point were considered indications of significant component malposition. Results TSA glenoid components placed with patient-specific guides averaged 5° of deviation from the intended position in version and 3° in inclination; those with standard instrumentation averaged 8° of deviation in version and 7° in inclination. These differences were significant for version ( P = .04) and inclination ( P = .01). Multivariate analysis of variance to compare the overall accuracy for the entire cohort (TSA and reverse TSA) revealed patient-specific guides to be significantly more accurate ( P = .01) for the combined vectors of version and inclination. Patient-specific guides also had fewer instances of significant component malposition than standard instrumentation did. Conclusion Patient-specific targeting guides were more accurate than traditional instrumentation and had fewer instances of component malposition for glenoid component placement in this multi-surgeon cadaver study of arthritic shoulders. Long-term clinical studies are needed to determine if these improvements produce improved functional outcomes.
Background Recent emphasis on safe and efficient delivery of high-quality health care has increased interest in outpatient total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ...safety of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) by comparing episode-of-care complications in matched cohorts of patients with anatomic TSA as an outpatient or inpatient procedure. Methods Thirty patients with outpatient TSA at a freestanding ambulatory surgery center (ASC) were compared with an age- and comorbidities-matched cohort of 30 patients with traditional inpatient TSA to evaluate 90-day episode-of-care complications, including hospital admissions or readmissions and reoperations. Two-tailed t -tests were used to evaluate differences, and differences of P < .05 were considered statistically significant. Results No significant differences were found between the ASC and hospital cohorts regarding average age, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score, operative indications, or body mass index. No patient required reoperation. There were no hospital admissions from the ASC cohort and no readmissions from the hospital cohort. Minor complications in the ASC cohort were arthrofibrosis in 2 patients and mild asymptomatic anterior subluxation in 1 patient; the only major complication was in an outpatient who fell 11 weeks after surgery and disrupted his subscapularis repair. Three minor complications in the hospital cohort were mild asymptomatic anterior subluxation, blood transfusion, and superficial venous thrombosis. The complication rates (13% vs. 10%) were not significantly different. Conclusions Outpatient TSA is a safe alternative to hospital admission in appropriately selected patients. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate the longer term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of outpatient TSA.
Abstract Background The efficacy and costs of indwelling interscalene catheter (ISC) and liposomal bupivacaine (LBC), with and without adjunctive medications, in patients with primary shoulder ...arthroplasty are a source of current debate. Methods In 214 arthroplasties, 156 patients had ISC and 58 had LBC injections that were mixed with morphine, ketorolac, and 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine. Charts were reviewed for visual analog scale pain scores, oral morphine equivalent (OME) usage, major complications, and costs. Results Visual analog scale scores were not significantly different at 24 hours or at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Average OME consumption at 24 hours was significantly more with LBC, but was not significantly different at 12 weeks. Relative risk of a major complication was nearly 4 times higher with ISC than with LBC. The average cost for the LBC mixture was $289.04, and for ISC, including equipment and anesthesia fees, was $1559.42. Conclusion The intraoperative LBC mixture provided equivalent pain relief with significantly fewer major complications and at markedly lower cost than ISC. LBC required almost twice as much OME to attain the same level of pain relief at 24 hours, but there was no significant difference in the cumulative amount of outpatient narcotic use.
Purpose To test the reliability of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and compare it with a validated outcomes instrument, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Methods A total ...of 42 patients with the chief problem of elbow dysfunction formed the study cohort. Patients with an immediate surgical indication or treatment at the index visit were excluded. The others completed an MEPS questionnaire; at a second visit 2 to 3 weeks later, they completed another MEPS questionnaire and were evaluated with the ASES elbow assessment. Reliability and accuracy were calculated using 2-tailed Pearson correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals. Pearson coefficients greater than 0.8 indicated strong agreement. Results The average MEPS score at the initial visit was 58. At the second visit, the average MEPS score was 69 and the average ASES score was 78. The Pearson coefficient for MEPS scores at the 2 time points averaged 0.82, and between the MEPS and ASES scores averaged 0.83. Both coefficients indicated strong agreement. Conclusions The MEPS has strong reliability when assessed at different times and when compared with a validated elbow outcomes instrument. Differences in compared scores of approximately 10 points indicate some patient improvement between time points; however, 95% confidence intervals, standard deviations, and ranges were essentially equivalent between and among tests, indicating similar accuracy. Clinical relevance The MEPS is a reliable outcomes instrument for clinical studies of elbow function that is used to assess nonsurgical treatment.
Hypothesis Loosening of the glenoid component is a common complication in shoulder arthroplasty. We proposed to radiographically and clinically investigate the outcomes of keeled and pegged glenoid ...components to test the hypothesis that these implants would have equivalent performance. Materials and methods One hundred patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were reviewed. Fifty patients had pegged glenoid components, and fifty had keeled components. Standardized radiographs were taken. Preoperative films classified the severity of degenerative change. The postoperative films were analyzed for radiolucent lines and shift in component position—at-risk signs for loosening. Results Mean radiographic follow-up was 51.3 months (range, 24-90 months) for the keeled group and 45.7 months (range, 27-98 months) for the pegged group. There were no differences in the degree of preoperative arthritic change between groups. Both groups had significant improvement in motion and pain ( P < .001) postoperatively, with no differences in clinical outcome between cohorts ( P ≥ .20). Initial radiographs showed no radiolucencies around the pegs in 46 implants or around the keel in 49 components. At final follow-up, 10 glenoid implants were found to be at risk for loosening, 6 (12%) in the pegged group and 4 (8%) in the keeled group ( P = .74). Conclusions Initial postoperative radiographs with pegged and keeled components show a low rate of radiolucent lines. These radiolucencies develop over time. However, there is no difference in clinical or radiographic outcomes between pegged and keeled components at intermediate-term follow-up.
Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty Brolin, Tyler J., MD; Throckmorton, Thomas W., MD
The Orthopedic clinics of North America,
01/2018, Letnik:
49, Številka:
1
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Health care policy makers have placed increased attention on the cost of health care making outpatient joint arthroplasty an attractive alternative to routine hospital admission. Recent studies have ...shown outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and cost-effective alternative to inpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Proper patient selection, patient education, effective pain management strategies, and attention to intraoperative blood loss are keys in the success of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty.
Background Younger patients who have undergone reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are believed to have higher activity levels that place higher stresses across the prosthesis, increasing the ...risk of failure, but there is little information to support or refute this supposition. The purposes of this study were to define the patient-reported activity levels of patients younger than 65 years and older than 65 years who underwent RTSA and to evaluate any differences between the groups. Methods Forty-six patients who underwent primary RTSA answered a questionnaire regarding their activity levels. Data were categorized and tabulated according to pain, range of motion, strength, and activity level (low, medium, and high demand). Statistical analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test, χ2 test, and independent t test. Differences with P < .05 were considered statistically significant. Results Seventeen patients younger than 65 years (mean age, 57.7 years) and 29 patients older than 65 years (mean age, 75.2 years) were included. No significant differences were found for range of motion, strength, or number of activities; 47% of younger patients and 44% of older patients reported high-demand activities ( P = .64); 24% of younger patients and 37% of older patients reported medium-demand use ( P = .30). Patients younger than 65 years were more likely to require narcotic pain medication ( P = .03) and to have disability ( P = .0001). Conclusion These data provide initial evidence that commonly held concerns about higher activity levels among younger patients placing excessive demands on the RTSA prosthesis may not be as important as currently thought. Rather, patients seem to self-regulate their activities to minimize pain and maximize essential functions after surgery.
Background Baseplate loosening in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) remains a concern. Placing peripheral screws into the 3 pillars of the densest scapular bone is believed to optimize ...baseplate fixation. Using a 3-dimensional computer-aided design (3D CAD) program, we investigated the optimal rotational baseplate alignment to maximize peripheral locking-screw purchase. Methods Seventy-three arthritic scapulae were reconstructed from computed tomography images and imported into a 3D CAD software program along with representations of an RTSA baseplate that uses 4 fixed-angle peripheral locking screws. The baseplate position was standardized, and the baseplate was rotated to maximize individual and combined peripheral locking-screw purchase in each of the 3 scapular pillars. Results The mean ± standard error of the mean positions for optimal individual peripheral locking-screw placement (referenced in internal rotation) were 6° ± 2° for the coracoid pillar, 198° ± 2° for the inferior pillar, and 295° ± 3° for the scapular spine pillar. Of note, 78% (57 of 73) of the screws attempting to obtain purchase in the scapular spine pillar could not be placed without an in-out-in configuration. In contrast, 100% of coracoid and 99% of inferior pillar screws achieved full purchase. The position of combined maximal fixation was 11° ± 1°. Conclusions These results suggest that approximately 11° of internal rotation is the ideal baseplate position for maximal peripheral locking-screw fixation in RTSA. In addition, these results highlight the difficulty in obtaining optimal purchase in the scapular spine.
Hypothesis Classification systems for glenohumeral instability (GHI) are opinion based, not validated, and poorly defined. The hypothesis driving this investigation is that a classification system ...with content validity will have high inter-observer and intra-observer agreement. Materials and methods The classification system was developed by first conducting systematic literature review that identified 18 systems for classifying GHI. The frequency of characteristics used was recorded. Additionally, 31 members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons responded to a survey to identify features important to characterize GHI. Frequency, etiology, direction, and severity (FEDS) were most important. Frequency was defined as solitary (1 episode), occasional (2 to 5 times/y), or frequent (>5 times/year). Etiology was defined as traumatic or atraumatic. Direction referred to the primary direction of instability (anterior, posterior, or inferior). Severity was subluxation or dislocation. For reliability testing, 50 GHI patients completed a questionnaire at their initial visit. One of 6 sports medicine fellowship-trained physicians completed a similar questionnaire after examining the patient. Patients returned after 2 weeks and were examined by the original physician and 2 other physicians. Interrater and intrarater agreement for the FEDS classification system was calculated. Results Agreement between patients and physicians was lowest for frequency (39%; κ = 0.130) and highest for direction (82%; κ = 0.636). Physician intrarater agreement was 84% to 97% for the individual FEDS characteristics (κ = 0.69-0.87), and interrater agreement was 82% to 90% (κ = 0.44-0.76). Conclusions The FEDS system has content validity and is highly reliable for classifying GHI. Physical examination using provocative testing to determine the primary direction of instability produces very high levels of interrater and intrarater agreement.
Background Two popular systems for classifying rheumatoid arthritis affecting the elbow are the Larsen and Sharp schemes. To our knowledge, no study has investigated the reliability of these 2 ...systems. We compared the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the 2 systems to determine whether one is more reliable than the other. Methods The radiographs of 45 patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis affecting the elbow were evaluated. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were deidentified and distributed to 6 evaluators (4 fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons and 2 orthopedic trainees). Each evaluator graded all 45 radiographs according to the Larsen and Sharp scoring methods on 2 occasions, at least 2 weeks apart. Results Overall intraobserver reliability was 0.93 (95% confidence interval CI, 0.90-0.95) for the Larsen system and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96) for the Sharp classification, both indicating substantial agreement. Overall interobserver reliability was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.60-0.80) for the Larsen classification and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.54-0.81) for the Sharp system, both indicating good agreement. There were no significant differences in the intraobserver or interobserver reliability of the systems overall and no significant differences in reliability between attending surgeons and trainees for either classification system. Conclusion The Larsen and Sharp systems both show substantial intraobserver reliability and good interobserver agreement for the radiographic classification of rheumatoid arthritis affecting the elbow. Differences in training level did not result in substantial variances in reliability for either system. We conclude that both systems can be reliably used to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow by observers of varying training levels.
PDF