Chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. For a decade, the combination regimen of methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin has been considered the ...standard for these patients. The need for improved efficacy and reduced toxicity of a predominantly palliative therapy has propelled efforts for new drug development. Of the newly identified agents with documented activity, both gemcitabine and paclitaxel have been evaluated with a platinum and have been incorporated into multiagent chemotherapy combinations. Phase II data from two gemcitabine-based triplets are currently available. Combination gemcitabine/paclitaxel/cisplatin and gemcitabine/paclitaxel/carboplatin have high levels of activity with overall and complete response rates of 76% and 26%, respectively, for the former and 68% and 32%, respectively, for the latter combination. The role of gemcitabine-based multiagent combinations compared with standard therapy awaits evaluation in prospectively randomized trials.
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is an invaluable tumor marker in the detection of early prostate cancer as well as a predictor of recurrence after treatment of localized disease. Current practice ...entails the use of factors such as pretherapy grade, stage and PSA, PSA doubling time, nature of previous therapy and patient age and functional status for a treatment recommendation. For a PSA relapse post radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy to the prostatic fossa is a primary therapeutic consideration. With careful patient selection, about 30 to 40% of patients are rendered disease free using this approach. For patients with radiation therapy as the primary treatment for their prostate cancer, salvage prostatectomy can be considered, but is rarely feasible.
Systemic therapy with hormones is standard if patients are not candidates for the above mentioned salvage local therapies or if they relapse after exhaustive local therapies. Unfortunately androgen suppressive therapy is unlikely to induce cure, or prolonged remissions in PSA relapse prostate cancer. The strategy of addition of chemotherapy or biologic therapy to androgen suppressive therapy is under active investigation. The goal of this therapy is to make an impact on the time to progression to metastatic prostate cancer and correspondingly decrease prostate cancer related mortality. Preliminary results of studies incorporating early chemotherapy in combination with androgen suppressive therapy are encouraging, with improvement in time to progression and overall survival. The evaluation of biologic agents and agents with better toxicity profiles is ongoing. This is very important to make therapy widely applicable and to enable prolonged administration especially in a disease such as prostate cancer with a relatively long natural history. Strategies of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer are exploring the possibility of reducing the chance of PSA relapse by treating micrometastatic disease. This review discusses the current practices in risk stratification and management of PSA relapse prostate cancer. It also highlights the major clinical trials and areas of active investigation in this field.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine differences in survival after diagnosis with distant stage prostate cancer by decade of diagnosis. Methods: Subjects are 3337 Caucasian and 1947 ...African-American men with newly diagnosed primary distant stage prostate cancer between 1973 and 1997, with follow-up through 2001, from the Detroit SEER registry. The proportion of men within each category of each variable of interest is calculated. Relative survival is used to examine survival patterns over time. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models are also used to examine the relationship between decade of diagnosis and survival between short term (≤24 months) and long term (>24 months) survivors. Results: Relative survival has increased over the past three decades although this trend is not statistically significant. Relative survival is similar by race and decreases with increasing grade of tumor. Survival for men living ≤24 months after diagnosis is similar over time. However, for men living >24 months after diagnosis, there is a significant difference over time (p < 0.0001). Conclusion(s): In general, relative survival has been improving over the past three decades. However, it is the long term survivors (>24 months) that are the primary contributors to this difference in survival by decade of diagnosis.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel and estramustine in patients with high-risk, newly diagnosed, prostate cancer.
Eligible patients had prostate cancer with one or more of ...the following criteria: clinical Stage T2b or greater, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 15 ng/mL or greater, and/or Gleason score of 8 to 10. Chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel (70 mg/m
2) on day 1 and estramustine (280 mg three times daily) on days 1 to 3 every 21 days for three to six courses. This was followed by local therapy, as deemed appropriate.
Twenty-one patients with a median age of 60 years, median PSA level of 16.1 ng/mL (range 2.4 to 175), and median baseline testosterone of 3.4 ng/mL were enrolled. Seven patients met one of the inclusion criteria, 10 met two, and 4 met three. The Gleason score was 8 or greater in 14 patients. A median of five cycles of chemotherapy was delivered. The most frequent high-grade toxicities were grade 3 (8 patients) and 4 (1 patient) neutropenia and deep venous thrombosis (grade 3 in 2 patients) before institution of low-dose warfarin. All patients responded as determined by protocol-defined criteria. Ten patients underwent radical prostatectomy, with negative surgical margins in 7 patients, and 11 received radiotherapy with negative preradiotherapy biopsies in 2.
Induction docetaxel and estramustine is well tolerated and feasible in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer. This combination is active; however, its efficacy relative to hormonal therapy will require a controlled randomized trial.
A retrospective review of 58 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) relapse or progression after autologous bone marrow transplantation (auto BMT), peripheral stem cell transplantation (PSCT), or ...allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo BMT) between November 1988 and December 1997 was performed. Forty-six (79%) patients had autologous transplant and 12 (21%) patients had allogeneic transplant. Median time to relapse post-transplant was 4.8 months with 49 relapses within 12 months after transplant. Overall 5-year survival was 22% (auto BMT or PSCT 25%, allo BMT 18%, p=0.38) with a median survival of 10 months (auto BMT or PSCT 10.2 months, allo BMT 7 months, p=0.38). Thirty-five patients received salvage therapy and, of these, 13 demonstrated objective response. The 3-year survival of responders and non-responders was 55 and 14% and median survivals were 27.8 and 8 months, respectively (p=0.02). Interval between BMT and relapse (p=0.0001), and response to salvage therapy (p=0.02) were the only significant predictors of survival.
Patients with clinical or pathologic locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) are at risk for systemic and local disease progression or relapse. Pre- and post-therapy predictors of risk include ...prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, clinical and pathologic stage, Gleason's score (GS) of the biopsy and prostatectomy specimens, positive margins, and post-therapy PSA kinetics. Combined modality trials have been done predominantly in LAPC patients treated with radiation. The data indicate a local control and disease-free survival advantage to the use of androgen deprivation. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy with radical prostatectomy (RP) has no proven role thus far; however, recent data on adjuvant hormonal therapy in patients with pathologic D1 disease treated with radical prostatectomy suggest a potential benefit. Chemotherapy trials are still in their infancy but present exciting opportunities for future research. The heterogeneity in the hormone responsiveness of prostate cancer, the availability of several active chemotherapy combinations, and the refinement in risk prediction have stimulated a series of adjuvant therapy trials which constitute the subject of this discussion. Emphasis on enrollment in clinical trials is thus imperative in LAPC.
PDF
