Much of the plastic waste entering the sea is thought to be transported from land by rivers, yet little is known about the distances over which rivers transport plastic. To address this knowledge ...gap, we collected surface water samples from the Orange-Vaal River at the end of the wet and dry seasons. The Vaal River drains South Africa's main urban-industrial centre, whereas the upper Orange River is sparsely populated. Below their confluence, the river flows through increasingly arid regions with very low human populations before entering the Atlantic Ocean. We collected bulk water samples from 33 bridges to test for microplastic and microfibre (0.025–1 mm) pollution and conducted observations for macrodebris (>50 mm). Where possible, we sampled for plastic fragments (>1 mm) using a neuston net. Microfibres and microplastics were found at every site (1.7 ± 5.1 L−1, >99% fibres) and accounted for 99% of the number of items recorded. Microfibres and microplastics were particularly abundant in the lower reaches during the period of low flow prior to the wet season flush. Macrodebris and larger microplastics were orders of magnitude less abundant (observations: 0.0002 ± 0.0007 items·m−2; neuston net: 0.34 ± 0.93 items·m−2). However, at sites where larger items were found, they comprised most of the mass of plastic. Larger plastics were found mostly at sites in the upper reaches of the Vaal River. Our results suggest that, while the Orange-Vaal River system may be a source of microfibres to the Atlantic Ocean, larger plastic items typically only travel short distances. The Orange-Vaal River system therefore does not appear to be a major source of plastics into the Atlantic Ocean, at least under regular flow conditions.
Display omitted
•Microfibres found at all sites and in 90% of replicates•Macroplastics and larger microplastics retained close to point sources•Mostly microfibres found at the Orange River mouth•Estimated annual export of 1.7 (1.1–3.1) t of microfibres to the Atlantic Ocean
Rivers can be major sources of plastics into coastal seas, but it is unclear whether dams retain floating plastics, thus reducing the amount reaching the sea. To test if dams trap microplastics, we ...collected bulk water and neuston net samples from five dams on the Orange–Vaal River system, South Africa. Most manufactured items were microfibres and densities of microplastics were modest (bulk water: 0.21 ± 0.27 items·L−1; net: 0.04 ± 0.16 items·m−2). There was an interaction between dam and season: dams on the densely populated Vaal River had higher microplastic concentrations during dry than wet conditions, whereas the opposite pattern occurred on the less industrialised Orange River. Overall there was no difference in microplastic concentration at sites above vs below dam walls nor was there a strong correlation between microplastic concentration and distance to the wall. Our results therefore suggest that dams do not trap floating microplastics or microfibres.
•Concentrations of microplastics and microfibres were low.•Most manufactured items were microfibres.•There was no difference in plastic and microfibre concentrations at sites above versus below dam walls.•Dams do not appear to trap floating microplastics and microfibres.
To implement effective mitigation measures to stop the flow of litter from land-based sources into the sea, it is important to identify key pollution sources and to monitor litter trends over time. ...We sampled plastic and other anthropogenic debris in urban stormwater run-off in Cape Town, South Africa, from three catchment areas representing different land-use types: residential, industrial and a mixed commercial/residential area. Sampling was conducted in 2018–19 by placing nets over stormwater outlets during rain events. Organic matter constituted 79% of material by dry mass (industrial: 51 ± 22%, commercial/residential: 86 ± 4%, residential: 88 ± 13%). The nets caught 5–576 anthropogenic litter items·ha−1·day−1 (2–377 g·ha−1·day−1) with significantly higher densities in the industrial and commercial/residential areas than the residential area. Among anthropogenic litter items, 40–78% were made of plastic (52–64% by mass). Most plastic items were single-use packaging, but industrial pellets washed out of the industrial outlet during every rain event. Compared to a similar study conducted in 1996, the number of litter items decreased by ~20% in the industrial and residential areas but tripled in the commercial/residential area. The proportion of plastics in the litter stream was broadly similar to 1996. We extrapolate that some 60–570 t of plastic are released from Cape Town stormwater outlets annually, which is orders of magnitude less than predicted by global models. It is nevertheless clear that stormwater outlets are a significant source of litter into the sea. Intercepting this waste before it reaches the sea would greatly reduce litter loads in coastal waters around Cape Town.
Display omitted
•Litter loads highest in industrial and mixed commercial/residential catchments•Most common types of litter were single-use plastic and cigarette butts•Industrial pellets found in the industrial catchment during every rain event•Estimated output is 1–2 orders of magnitude lower than global model predictions
Beaches are key attractions for tourism and recreation, and considerable effort is made to keep beaches clean, yet many beaches still have substantial litter loads. Lasting solutions to reduce the ...amounts of marine litter require an understanding of litter sources. We collected bottles and other single-use containers at 32 sites around the South African coast to infer their sources based on their age and country of manufacture. Bottle densities varied greatly among beaches (8–450 bottles·km−1), depending on proximity to local urban centres and beach cleaning frequency. Most bottles were plastic, despite well-developed recycling initiatives for PET and HDPE bottles in South Africa. Street litter was dominated by bottles made in South Africa (99%), but foreign-manufactured bottles comprised up to 74% of bottles at some beaches, with an increase from urban (4%) through semi-urban (24%) to remote beaches (45%). Most foreign bottles were PET drink bottles from China and other Asian countries, followed by South America and Europe, with little regional variation in the contribution from these sources. This fact, coupled with their recent manufacture dates (mainly <2 years old), indicates that most foreign PET drink bottles are dumped illegally from ships. By comparison, foreign HDPE bottles were more common along the southeast coast of South Africa than along the west coast, consistent with many of these bottles arriving by long-distance drift across the Indian Ocean from southeast Asia. The most common country of origin for these bottles was Indonesia, and most newly-arrived HDPE bottles were 4–6 years old. To tackle beach litter in South Africa we need to greatly reduce plastic leakage from land-based sources, both locally and in southeast Asia, as well as improve measures to prevent the illegal dumping of plastics and other persistent wastes from ships.
Display omitted
•Bottles from 78 countries were found on South African beaches.•Proportions of foreign bottles increase from urban (4%) to remote beaches (45%).•Most foreign PET bottles are dumped illegally from ships and come from Asia (China).•Many foreign HDPE bottles have drifted from southeast Asia, mainly Indonesia.•By knowing litter sources, we can better target mitigation measures.
Bottles indicate that South African beach litter comes from diverse sources, including local, land-based sources, long-distance drift and illegal dumping from ships.
Rivers are a major source of litter entering the sea but our understanding of the transport and fate of plastics in estuarine environments is poor. Marked blocks of varying buoyancy were released at ...three river mouths in South Africa. Of the 1400 blocks released, 80% were recovered on nearby beaches, with a higher recovery rate for more buoyant blocks. Dispersal distances increased with decreasing buoyancy at all sites; median dispersal distance of stranded items ranged from 20 to 90 m for expanded polystyrene (EPS) to 70–90 m for wood and 60–1042 m for high density polyethylene (HDPE) blocks. Floating litter in estuaries is subject to bidirectional flow and export is largely controlled by hydrodynamic conditions such as tides, winds, and wave action, as well as coastal structure and vegetation. Cleaning beaches around river mouths will help to reduce leakage of plastic and other litter into the sea.
•Most floating litter washes ashore rather than dispersing out to sea.•Tides, winds and currents all affect stranding rates and dispersal distances.•The structure of the coast and associated waves are crucial.•Some litter items move from the sea into estuaries.
The lockdowns instigated to slow the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic offered a unique opportunity to assess how restrictions on human activity affect street litter. We recorded daily litter arrival ...rates for 50 days in two South African cities from the time of strictest lockdown through two successive easings in regulations. The strict lockdown had no marked impact on litter composition, which was dominated by convenience foods and beverages (29% by number, 34% by mass) and tobacco products (33% by number, 3% by mass). The ban on the sale of tobacco products during the lockdown did not greatly reduce the number of cigarette butts and associated packaging. Vehicle parts accounted for <1% of litter items (2% by mass) whereas household waste spilled from bins prior to or during collection accounted for 3% of litter items (14% by mass). Street litter loads decreased roughly by a factor of three during the strict lockdown. The increase in litter was gradual, suggesting a reduction in compliance with regulations as the lockdown continued. Our results show a clear link between human activity levels and littering.
Highlights
• Street litter loads increased three-fold in two cities as C
ovid
lockdowns eased.
• Cigarette butts made up 33% of litter by number despite a ban on tobacco sales.
• There is a clear link between human activity levels and littering.
Ingestion of anthropogenic litter has been well documented in marine vertebrates, but comparatively little is known about marine invertebrates. We report macrolitter ingestion by the sandy anemone ...Bunodactis reynaudi at Muizenberg beach in False Bay, South Africa. Monthly surveys from May 2015 to August 2019 collected 491 ingested litter items (9.4 ± 14.9 items·month-1, 39.8 ± 71.5 g·month-1), of which >99% were plastic. The number of ingested items was correlated with the abundance of stranded items and ingestion peaked in autumn when seasonal rains washed more litter into the bay. Most ingested litter was clear (39%), white (16%) and black/purple (15%). Comparison with environmental litter showed selection for flexible plastics, particularly bags/packets and food packaging. Experimental feeding trials found that B. reynaudi selected for pieces of HDPE bag suspended in seawater for 2–20 days, suggesting that biofilms enhance the palatability of flexible plastics. Studies are needed to assess the possible impacts of plastic ingestion on B. reynaudi. While only a small proportion of the population currently ingest litter, ingestion might become more common if environmental litter loads increase. This might negatively affect the anemone’s ability to respond to other environmental changes such as increasing levels of heavy metal pollution.
Display omitted
•We report the first record of macroplastic ingestion by a sessile anemone.•Approximately 1% of Bunodactis reynaudi ingested litter items each month.•B. reynaudi preferred flexible plastics (bags/packets and food packaging).•The incidence of ingestion was linked to litter abundance in the environment.•Feeding trials suggest that biofilms enhance the palatability of HDPE bags.
Floating anthropogenic litter occurs in all ocean basins, yet little is known about their distribution and abundance in the coastal waters off east Africa. Neuston net and bulk water sampling shows ...that meso- and micro-litter (8567 ± 19,684 items∙km−2, 44 ± 195 g∙km−2) and microfibres (2.4 ± 2.6 fibres∙L−1) are pervasive pollutants off the coasts of Tanzania and northern Mozambique, with higher litter loads off Tanzania. Densities of meso- and micro-litter at the start of the rainy season were greater close to the coast and to major river mouths, suggesting that much litter likely originates on land. However, the mass of litter increased with distance from the six major coastal cities. By number, 95% of meso- and micro-litter was plastic, but only 6% of microfibres. Our results highlight the need to reduce plastic use and improve solid waste management in the region.
•Higher litter and fibre densities off Tanzania than Mozambique.•Higher litter densities close to river mouths and coast.•Most (95 %) of meso- and micro-litter items were plastic.•Only 6 % of microfibres were synthetic.
Most monitoring studies of marine anthropogenic debris have focused on sandy beaches, so little is known about litter on rocky shorelines. We surveyed litter trapped on a rocky intertidal shore in ...False Bay, South Africa, between May 2015 and March 2018. An exceptional upwelling of seabed litter occurred in November 2017 (70 items∙m−1). Excluding this event, monthly clean-ups at spring low tide collected 2 (1.3–3.1) items∙m−1∙month−1 and 31 (19.4–49.4) g∙m−1∙month−1 of which 74% was plastic (31% by mass). Litter loads peaked in autumn when seasonal rains washed litter into False Bay, suggesting that most litter comes from local land-based sources. Litter composition differed from that on a nearby sandy beach, with more glass and other dense items on the rocky shore, but 60% of plastic items floated in water. Sand inundation and biotic interactions helped to trap buoyant plastics in the intertidal zone.
•One of few studies to monitor litter trapped on a rocky intertidal shore•Plastics made up 74% of litter by count but only 31% by mass.•Most plastic was disposable flexible packaging (bags and food packaging).•Litter loads 1–2 orders of magnitude higher than average during an upwelling event.•Rocky shore trapped more bags/packets, but less rigid plastics, than nearby sandy beach.
Using seabirds as bioindicators of marine plastic pollution requires an understanding of how the plastic retained in each species compares with that found in their environment. We show that brown ...skua Catharacta antarctica regurgitated pellets can be used to characterise plastics in four seabird taxa breeding in the central South Atlantic, even though skua pellets might underrepresent the smallest plastic items in their prey. Fregetta storm petrels ingested more thread-like plastics and white-faced storm petrels Pelagodroma marina more industrial pellets than broad-billed prions Pachyptila vittata and great shearwaters Ardenna gravis. Ingested plastic composition (type, colour and polymer) was similar to floating plastics in the region sampled with a 200 μm net, but storm petrels were better indicators of the size of plastics than prions and shearwaters. Given this information, plastics in skua pellets containing the remains of seabirds can be used to track long-term changes in floating marine plastics.
•Seabird species differ in the types and colours of plastics they ingest at sea.•As a community, seabirds ingest plastics similar to those sampled at sea with surface nets.•Storm petrels are better indicators of the size of environmental plastics than prions and shearwaters.•Skua pellets containing the remains of seabirds can be used as biomonitors of marine plastics.
PDF