Summary Background Dupilumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-4 receptor α monoclonal antibody, inhibits interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signalling, key drivers of type-2-mediated inflammation. ...Adults with uncontrolled persistent asthma who are receiving medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist require additional treatment options as add-on therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of dupilumab as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma on medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist, irrespective of baseline eosinophil count. Methods We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pivotal phase 2b clinical trial at 174 study sites across 16 countries or regions. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with an asthma diagnosis for 12 months or more based on the Global Initiative for Asthma 2009 Guidelines receiving treatment with medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist were eligible for participation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous dupilumab 200 mg or 300 mg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks, or placebo, over a 24-week period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline at week 12 in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 in L) in patients with baseline blood eosinophil counts of at least 300 eosinophils per μL assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients that received at least one dose or part of a dose of study drug. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01854047 , and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT number 2013-000856-16. Findings 769 patients (158 in the placebo group and 611 in the dupilumab groups) received at least one dose of study drug. In the subgroup with at least 300 eosinophils per μL, the greatest increases (200 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0008; 300 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0063) in FEV1 compared with placebo were observed at week 12 with doses every 2 weeks in the 300 mg group (mean change 0·39 L SE 0·05; mean difference 0·21 95% CI 0·06–0·36; p=0·0063) and in the 200 mg group (mean change 0·43 L SE 0·05; mean difference 0·26 0·11–0·40; p=0·0008) compared with placebo (0·18 L SE 0·05). Similar significant increases were observed in the overall population and in the fewer than 300 eosinophils per μL subgroup (overall population: 200 mg every 2 weeks, p<0·0001; 300 mg every 2 weeks, p<0·0001; <300 eosinophils per μL: 200 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0034; 300 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0086), and were maintained to week 24. Likewise, dupilumab every 2 weeks produced the greatest reductions in annualised rates of exacerbation in the overall population (70–70·5%), the subgroup with at least 300 eosinophils per μL (71·2–80·7%), and the subgroup with fewer than 300 eosinophils per μL (59·9–67·6%). The most common adverse events with dupilumab compared with placebo were upper respiratory tract infections (33–41% vs 35%) and injection-site reactions (13–26% vs 13%). Interpretation Dupilumab increased lung function and reduced severe exacerbations in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma irrespective of baseline eosinophil count and had a favourable safety profile, and hence in addition to inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β2 -agonist therapy could improve the lives of patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma compared with standard therapy alone. Funding Sanofi-Genzyme and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.
Persistent eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma increases the risk of exacerbations. In a phase 2b dose-ranging study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, an ...anti-interleukin 5 receptor α monoclonal antibody that depletes blood and airway eosinophils, in adults with uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma.
We did a randomised, controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging phase 2b study. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-75 years with uncontrolled asthma using medium-dose or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and longacting β agonists, with two to six exacerbations in the past year. Current or former smokers were excluded. We used the ELEN index (an algorithm to predict elevated sputum eosinophils) or baseline fraction of exhaled nitric oxide to stratify patients by eosinophilic status, and with an interactive web-voice response system randomly assigned eosinophilic individuals in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo, 2 mg benralizumab, 20 mg benralizumab, or 100 mg benralizumab, and non-eosinophilic individuals in a 1:1 ratio to receive placebo or 100 mg benralizumab. Study drugs were given as two subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks for the first three doses, then every 8 weeks, for 1 year. Patients, treating physicians, and study investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was annual exacerbation rate in eosinophilic individuals after 1 year of follow-up. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. This study was designed with a two-sided α of 0·2 and powered at 78% for the primary outcome in the eosinophilic population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01238861.
Between Jan 3, 2011, and March 6, 2012, we randomly assigned 324 eosinophilic individuals to placebo (n=80) or benralizumab 2 mg dose (n=81), 20 mg dose, (n=81), or 100 mg dose (n=82), and 285 non-eosinophilic individuals to 100 mg benralizumab (n=142, 140 included in analysis) or placebo (n=143, 142 included in analysis). In eosinophilic individuals, benralizumab reduced exacerbation rates compared with placebo in the 100 mg group (0·34 vs 0·57, reduction 41%, 80% CI 11 to 60, p=0·096) but not in the 2 mg group (0·65 vs 0·57, difference -9%, 80% CI -59 to 26, p=0·781) or the 20 mg group (0·37 vs 0·57, reduction 36%, 80% CI 3 to 58, p=0·173). In patients with a baseline blood eosinophil cutoff of at least 300 cells per μL, exacerbation rates in the benralizumab 20 mg group (n=70) and 100 mg group (n=97) were lower than in the placebo group (n=83; 0·30 vs 0·68, reduction 57%, 80% CI 33 to 72, p=0·015 for 20 mg dose; 0·38 vs 0·68, difference 43%, 80% CI 18 to 60, p=0·049 for 100 mg dose). Our findings suggested that benralizumab 20 mg and 100 mg resided at the dose-response plateau. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 277 (72%) of 385 participants receiving any benralizumab dose compared with 143 (65%) of 221 receiving placebo. Nasopharyngitis (44 11% patients receiving benralizumab vs 13 6% patients receiving placebo) and injection site reactions (60 16% vs eight 4%) occurred more frequently with benralizumab than with placebo.
Benralizumab at 20 mg and 100 mg doses seemed to reduce asthma exacerbations in adults with uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma and baseline blood eosinophils of at least 300 cells per μL, possibly due to targeting of the interleukin 5 receptor rather than interleukin 5 ligand. Further investigation of benralizumab treatment in phase 3 studies is warranted.
MedImmune.
Severe adverse life-threatening events associated with longacting β agonist (LABA) use have caused the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to review the safety of these drugs, resulting in a boxed ...warning and a mandatory safety study in 46 800 patients with asthma. Identification of an at-risk, susceptible subpopulation on the basis of predictive biomarkers is crucial for understanding LABA safety. The β2-adrenergic receptor gene (ADRB2) contains a common, non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism, Gly16Arg, that is unlikely to account for the rare, life-threatening events seen with LABA use. We hypothesise that rare ADRB2 variants modulate therapeutic responses to LABA therapy and contribute to rare, severe adverse events.
In this genetic study, ADRB2 was sequenced in 197 African American, 191 non-Hispanic white, and 73 Puerto Rican patients. Sequencing identified six rare variants, which were genotyped in 1165 patients with asthma. The primary hypothesis was that severe asthma exacerbations requiring hospital admission were associated with rare ADRB2 variants in patients receiving LABA therapy. This outcome was assessed overall and by ethnic group. Replication was done in 659 non-Hispanic white patients with asthma.
Patients receiving LABA with a rare ADRB2 variant had increased asthma-related hospital admissions (15 44% of 34 patients with rare variant vs 121 22% of 553 patients with common ADRB2 alleles admitted to hospital in past 12 months; meta-analysis for all ethnic groups, p=0·0003). Specifically, increases in hospital admission rates were recorded in LABA-treated non-Hispanic white patients with the rare Ile 164 allele compared with non-Hispanic white patients with the common allele (odds ratio OR 4·48, 95% CI 1·40-13·96, p=0·01) and African American patients with a 25 bp promoter polynucleotide insertion, -376ins, compared with African American patients with the common allele (OR 13·43, 95% CI 2·02-265·42, p=0·006). The subset of non-Hispanic white and African American patients receiving LABAs with these rare variants had increased exacerbations requiring urgent outpatient health-care visits (non-Hispanic white patients with or without the rare Ile 164 allele, 2·6 SD 3·5 vs 1·1 2·1 visits, p<0·0001; and African American patients with or without the rare insertion, 3·7 4·6 vs 2·4 3·4 visits, p=0·01), and more frequently were treated with chronic systemic corticosteroids (OR 4·25, 95% CI 1·38-14·41, p=0·01, and 12·83, 1·96-251·93, p=0·006). Non-Hispanic white patients from the primary and replication cohorts with the rare Ile 164 allele were more than twice as likely as Thr 164 homozygotes to have uncontrolled, persistent symptoms during LABA treatment (p=0·008-0·04).
The rare ADRB2 variants Ile164 and -376ins are associated with adverse events during LABA therapy and should be evaluated in large clinical trials including the current FDA-mandated safety study.
US National Institutes of Health.
Elevated sputum eosinophil counts predict asthma exacerbations and responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids but are impractical to measure in primary care. We investigated the relation between blood ...eosinophil count and prospective annual asthma outcomes for a large UK cohort.
This historical cohort study used anonymised medical record data to identify primary care patients with asthma aged 12-80 years with 2 years of continuous records, including 1 year before (baseline) and 1 year after (outcome) their most recent eosinophil count. Negative binomial regression was used to compare outcome exacerbation rates and logistic regression to compare odds of asthma control for patients with blood eosinophil counts of 400 cells per μL or less versus greater than 400 cells per μL, adjusting for age, sex, body-mass index, smoking status, and Charlson comorbidity index. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02140541.
Overall, 20 929 (16%) of 130 248 patients had blood eosinophil counts greater than 400 cells per μL. During the outcome year, these patients experienced significantly more severe exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio RR 1·42, 95% CI 1·36-1·47) and acute respiratory events (RR 1·28, 1·24-1·33) than those with counts of 400 cells per μL or less. They also had significantly lower odds of achieving overall asthma control (OR 0·74, 95% CI 0·72-0·77), defined as limited reliever use and no asthma-related hospital attendance or admission, acute course of oral corticosteroids, or prescription for antibiotics. Exacerbation rates increased progressively with nine ascending categories of blood eosinophil count as compared with a reference category of 200 cells per μL or less.
Patients with asthma and blood eosinophil counts greater than 400 cells per μL experience more severe exacerbations and have poorer asthma control. Furthermore, a count-response relation exists between blood eosinophil counts and asthma-related outcomes. Blood eosinophil counts could add predictive value to Global Initiative for Asthma control-based risk assessment.
Teva Pharmaceuticals.
PDF
