Background Patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria/chronic spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) often continue to experience symptoms despite receiving standard-of-care therapy with H1 -antihistamines ...along with 1 or more add-on therapies. Objectives We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 24 weeks of treatment with omalizumab in patients with persistent CIU/CSU despite treatment with H1 -antihistamines at up to 4 times the approved dose plus H2 -antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, or both. Methods In this phase III study patients were randomized to receive 6 subcutaneous injections at 4-week intervals of either 300 mg of omalizumab or placebo, followed by a 16-week observation period. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the overall safety of omalizumab compared with placebo. Efficacy (itch severity, hive, and urticaria activity scores) was evaluated at weeks 12 and 24. Results The overall incidence and severity of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between omalizumab and placebo recipients; the safety profile was consistent with omalizumab in patients with allergic asthma. At week 12, the mean change from baseline in weekly itch severity score was −8.6 (95% CI, −9.3 to −7.8) in the omalizumab group compared with −4.0 (95% CI, −5.3 to −2.7) in the placebo group ( P < .001). Significant improvements were seen for additional efficacy end points at week 12; these benefits were sustained to week 24. Conclusion Omalizumab was well tolerated and reduced the signs and symptoms of CIU/CSU in patients who remained symptomatic despite the use of H1 -antihistamines (up to 4 times the approved dose) plus H2 -antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, or both.
Background Few data are available that describe response patterns in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU)/chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) treated with omalizumab. Objective We sought ...to describe response patterns by using data from the 3 pivotal omalizumab CIU/CSU trials. Methods Every 4 weeks, randomized patients received dosing with placebo or 75, 150, or 300 mg of omalizumab (ASTERIA I: n = 318, 24 weeks; ASTERIA II: n = 322, 12 weeks) or placebo or 300 mg of omalizumab (GLACIAL: n = 335, 24 weeks). Response was defined as well-controlled urticaria (weekly Urticaria Activity Score UAS7 ≤ 6) or complete response (UAS7 = 0). Results Response rates were dose dependent and highest with 300 mg of omalizumab. Some patients responded early (before week 4). At week 12, a higher proportion of patients treated with 300 mg of omalizumab reported a UAS7 ≤ 6 (26.0% 75 mg of omalizumab, 40.0% 150 mg of omalizumab, 51.9% 300 mg of omalizumab, and 11.3% placebo for ASTERIA I; 26.8% 75 mg of omalizumab, 42.7% 150 mg of omalizumab, 65.8% 300 mg of omalizumab, and 19.0% placebo for ASTERIA II; and 52.4% 300 mg of omalizumab and 12.0% placebo for GLACIAL) or a UAS7 = 0 (11.7% 75 mg of omalizumab, 15.0% 150 mg of omalizumab, 35.8% 300 mg of omalizumab, and 8.8% placebo for ASTERIA I; 15.9% 75 mg of omalizumab, 22.0% 150 mg of omalizumab, 44.3% 300 mg of omalizumab, and 5.1% placebo for ASTERIA II; and 33.7% 300 mg of omalizumab and 4.8% placebo for GLACIAL). In patients receiving 300 mg of omalizumab with 24 weeks of treatment, median time to achieve a UAS7 ≤ 6 was 6 weeks (ASTERIA I and GLACIAL) and median time to achieve a UAS7 = 0 was 12 or 13 weeks (ASTERIA I and GLACIAL, respectively). Some patients who achieved well-controlled urticaria or complete response sustained response throughout the treatment period. Conclusion Benefits of omalizumab treatment were evident early (before week 4) in some patients and persisted to week 24. Use of 300 mg of omalizumab demonstrated best results in controlling CIU/CSU symptoms.
The Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure for patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) that includes 2 items: intensity of pruritus and number of ...hives. Items are scored individually, and the UAS7 is calculated as the sum of pruritus and number of hives over 1 week. Recently, its instructions were enhanced.
To assess the measurement properties of the enhanced UAS.
Seventy-three subjects with CIU completed the UAS with enhanced instructions, other measures of disease activity including the size of the largest hive, and collateral measures during a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of omalizumab for the treatment of CIU. The minimal important difference (MID) was estimated through distribution- and anchor-based approaches. Test-retest reliability was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); internal consistency reliability was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha; 3 responsiveness coefficients were calculated; known groups validity was assessed based on physician in-clinic UAS scores; and construct validity was assessed through Spearman correlation coefficients with collateral measures.
The MID ranged from 9.5 to 10.5 for the UAS7, 5.0 to 5.5 for number of hives (weekly average), and 4.5 to 5.0 for pruritus and size of largest hive (weekly average). Internal consistency was supported by alpha coefficients greater than 0.80. The ICC values for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.602 to 0.884. For subjects on active treatment, responsiveness coefficients were greater than 0.80. Known-groups validity was supported for most UAS scores; and construct validity was demonstrated by relationships with collateral measures.
The enhanced UAS has adequate measurement properties to support its use in clinical research.
This study describes the baseline characteristics and treatment patterns of US patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and pulmonary involvement. Patients ...hospitalized with pulmonary involvement due to COVID‐19 (first hospitalization) were identified in the IBM Explorys® electronic health records database. Demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, and in‐hospital medications were assessed. For evaluation of in‐hospital medications, results were stratified by race, geographic region, age, and month of admission. Of 6564 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19‐related pulmonary involvement, 50.4% were male, and mean (SD) age was 62.6 (16.4) years; 75.2% and 23.6% of patients were from the South and Midwest, respectively, and 50.2% of patients were African American. Compared with African American patients, a numerically higher proportion of White patients received dexamethasone (19.7% vs. 31.8%, respectively), nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 27.1% vs. 34.9%), bronchodilators (19.8% vs. 29.5%), and remdesivir (9.3% vs. 21.0%). Numerically higher proportions of White patients than African American patients received select medications in the South but not in the Midwest. Compared with patients in the South, a numerically higher proportion of patients in the Midwest received dexamethasone (20.1% vs. 34.5%, respectively), NSAIDs (19.6% vs. 55.7%), bronchodilators (15.9% vs. 41.3%), and remdesivir (10.6% vs. 23.1%). Inpatient use of hydroxychloroquine decreased over time, whereas the use of dexamethasone and remdesivir increased over time. Among US patients predominantly from the South and Midwest hospitalized with COVID‐19 and pulmonary involvement, differences were seen in medication use between different races, geographic regions, and months of hospitalization.
Research Highlights
In this retrospective, electronic health records study, including US patients hospitalized with COVID‐19 and pulmonary involvement, a numerically higher proportion of patients in the Midwest received dexamethasone, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, bronchodilators, and remdesivir than patients in the South.
Analysis of select medication use by the US region showed that, in the South, numerically higher proportions of White patients than African American patients received multiple select medications, including dexamethasone and remdesivir; however, in the Midwest, select medication use was generally comparable among White and African American patients.
These study results demonstrating differences in rates of medication use between different geographic regions, in addition to differences in the race within some regions and among different age groups, warrant further study.
Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are a mainstay of asthma treatment. Their use increases the risk of various corticosteroid-related adverse events, but the extent of risk is poorly characterized.
To ...determine the incremental risk of possible corticosteroid-related adverse events (AE) in asthma among patients with high OCS use compared with patients who do not use OCS.
Patients with asthma in a commercial health care claims data base who were high-OCS users (≥30 days of OCS use annually) were matched to no-OCS users by age, sex, and geographic region, and the presence or absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as a comorbidity. We examined bone-related conditions, pneumonia, opportunistic infections, diabetes mellitus, and other disorders as potential AEs by using χ(2) tests to compare potential AE prevalence between the cohorts, with and without stratification by a COPD diagnosis. We controlled for the number of inhaled steroids (ICS) canisters filled.
A total of 3604 patients with asthma and high OCS use were matched to 3604 patients who did not use OCS (mean age, 54.4; 68.1% female; 44.9% with COPD). Patients with high OCS use had statistically significantly higher rates of any potential AE compared with patients who did not use OCS (83.5% versus 78.1%), (p < 0.001). Rates of individual potential AEs were also higher in patients who used higher doses of OCS. Patterns of AEs were similar in patients with and those without COPD, with statistically significantly higher overall AE risk and individual risks in high-OCS users. The number of ICS canisters filled was not a significant predictor of AE.
Patients with asthma who were treated with OCS for ≥30 days per year have a greater overall risk of possible corticosteroid-related AEs compared with those patients with no OCS use, whether or not they had COPD.
Angioedema, present in some patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU), may have a negative effect on patient quality of life.
To describe patient-reported angioedema and its ...management in the pivotal omalizumab studies (ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II, GLACIAL).
Enrolled patients with CIU/CSU remained symptomatic despite treatment with histamine1 (H1)-antihistamines at licensed doses (ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II) or H1-antihistamines at up to 4 times the approved dose plus H2-antihistamines and/or a leukotriene receptor antagonist (GLACIAL). All studies administered omalizumab (75, 150, or 300 mg in ASTERIA I and ASTERIA II; 300 mg in GLACIAL) or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for at least 12 weeks. Urticaria Patient Daily Diary entries were completed by patients and summarized.
At baseline, angioedema prevalence was higher in GLACIAL (53.1%) than in ASTERIA I (47.5%) or ASTERIA II (40.7%). The mean proportion of angioedema-free days during weeks 4 to 12 was greater for patients treated with 300 mg of omalizumab than placebo in ASTERIA I (96.1% vs 88.2%, P < .001), ASTERIA II (95.5% vs 89.2%, P < .001), and GLACIAL (91.0% vs 88.7%, P = .006). Most patient-reported angioedema was managed by low-intensity interventions (doing nothing or taking medication).
Treatment with 300 mg of omalizumab was efficacious in reducing patient-reported angioedema. Low-intensity interventions were generally used to manage angioedema episodes.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01287117 (ASTERIA I), NCT01292473 (ASTERIA II), and NCT01264939 (GLACIAL).
The literature on chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) lacks large-scale population-based studies.
To characterize an insured population with CIU, including their demographic characteristics and ...comorbidities.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using insurance claims. We included patients with 1 outpatient claim with an International Classification of Diseases, 9(th)Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code for idiopathic, other specified, or unspecified urticaria (ICD-9-CM 708.1, 708.8, or 708.9) and either (1) another of these claims 6 or more weeks later; (2) a claim for angioedema (ICD-9-CM 995.1) 6 or more weeks from the urticaria diagnosis; or (3) overlapping claims for 2 prescription medications commonly used for CIU.
We identified 6,019 patients who had claims consistent with CIU. The mean age was 36 years. Fifty-six percent of patients had primary care physicians as their usual source of care, 14% had allergists, and 5% had dermatologists. Allergic rhinitis was diagnosed in 48%, asthma in 21%, other allergy in 19%, and atopic dermatitis in 8%. Sixty-seven percent of patients used prescription antihistamines, 54% used oral corticosteroids (OCSs), 24% used montelukast, and 9% used oral doxepin. Antihistamine users received a mean of 152 days of prescription antihistamines, OCS users 30 days of OCSs, montelukast users 190 days of montelukast, and oral doxepin users 94 days of doxepin.
Primary care physicians managed most patients with CIU. Antihistamines were the most common treatment for CIU, although OCSs were frequently prescribed. Thirty days of OCS supply among users may represent multiple steroid bursts each year. Given the known risks of OCSs, identifying other CIU treatments with more favorable safety profiles may be beneficial.
Adherence to omalizumab is not well characterized and its association with asthma control has not been well established.
To evaluate adherence in patients initiating omalizumab in the Epidemiologic ...Study of Xolair (omalizumab): Evaluating Clinical Effectiveness and Long-term Safety in Patients with Moderate to Severe Asthma (EXCELS) observational study.
Adherence was assessed over 5 years using the proportion of patients who missed any dose, rates of doses missed, and proportions of patients with good (<10% doses missed) or poor (≥30% doses missed) adherence. Multivariable analyses identified independent predictors of good adherence. Associations between adherence and asthma control were assessed using the minimum important difference for the Asthma Control Test at various time points.
A total of 289 patients newly initiated on omalizumab completed 5 years of EXCELS. Of these, 83.0% on the 2-week dosing regimen (n = 152) and 65.0% on the 4-week dosing regimen (n = 137) missed at least 1 dose. More frequent dosing was associated with a larger number of missed doses. Older age (odds ratio per year 1.02, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.03) and lower prebronchodilator percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (<76; odds ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.24) were independent predictors of good adherence.
Adherence to omalizumab is characterized by distinct factors. Patients receiving the 4-week dosing regimen achieved better adherence than those treated every 2 weeks. Improved adherence could be associated with better asthma control. Age and lung function could interact with dosing frequency to affect patient adherence, thus warranting prospective planning at the time of prescribing to support long-term adherence.
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), also known as chronic idiopathic urticaria, may produce hives, itch, and angioedema. The Urticaria Activity and Impact Measure (U-AIM) is a newly developed 9-item ...patient-reported measure designed for use in routine clinical practice to assess CSU activity and impact during the previous 7 days.
To evaluate validity, responsiveness, and clinically meaningful change of the U-AIM.
Data from a 24-week, open-label, single-arm period of a randomized, placebo-controlled study of omalizumab were used to assess the psychometric properties of U-AIM items for itch, hives, and angioedema.
A total of 206 patients (75% female; mean age, 44.6 years) were enrolled. At baseline, U-AIM results included prevalent severe itch (55%) and more than 12 hives (67%), angioedema (15%), and bother by itch (84%), hives (84%), and angioedema (49%). The Urticaria Patient Daily Diary (UPDD) mean weekly scores were 15.4 (itch severity), 16.8 (number of hives), and 32.2 (Urticaria Activity Score UAS7). At baseline, week 12, and week 24, U-AIM itch and hives items and UAS7 proxy scores (the sum of itch severity and number of hives during 7 days) demonstrated strong correlation coefficients with their corresponding measures from the UPDD (itch severity: 0.634-0.806; hives number: 0.735-0.843; UAS7 proxy: 0.724-0.852). Changes in U-AIM scores differentiated patients by their perspective of symptom improvement. Meaningful change thresholds were established for itch severity and number of hives scores (range, 0.8-1.0 for both) and the UAS7 proxy score (range, 10.5-12.5).
The U-AIM is valid and responsive to change and may help clinicians monitor CSU activity and track treatment effectiveness.
Neurocognitive decline is a frequent adverse effect of glioblastoma. Antitumor therapies that are efficacious, as measured by traditional endpoints such as objective response (OR) and ...progression-free survival (PFS), and have beneficial effects on neurocognitive function (NCF) are of clinical benefit to these patients. We evaluated neurocognitive changes across time in 167 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab-based therapy in BRAIN, a phase II, randomized, multicenter trial. All patients underwent MRI and neurocognitive testing at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter. Memory, visuomotor scanning speed, and executive function were evaluated using the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, the Trail Making Test, and the Controlled Oral Word Association test, respectively. NCF relative to baseline for patients with an OR, PFS >6 months, or disease progression was evaluated at time of OR, 24 weeks, and time of progression, respectively. For patients with an OR or PFS >6 months, median standardized test scores were examined from baseline to week 24. Most patients with an OR or PFS >6 months had poorer NCF performance compared to the general population at baseline and had improved or stable NCF at the time of response or at the 24-week assessment, respectively; most patients with progressive disease had neurocognitive decline at the time of progression. For patients with an OR or PFS >6 months, median standardized test scores were largely stable across the first 24 weeks on study. Neurocognitive testing was an objective, valid, and feasible method of monitoring NCF in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
PDF
