Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) may be at increased risk of adverse COVID‐19 outcomes, due to prevalent comorbidities and immunosuppressed status. Given the global differences in COVID‐19 policies ...and treatments, a robust assessment of all evidence is necessary to evaluate the clinical course of COVID‐19 in KTR. Studies on mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI) in KTR in the World Health Organization COVID‐19 database were systematically reviewed. We selected studies published between March 2020 and January 18th 2021, including at least five KTR with COVID‐19. Random‐effects meta‐analyses were performed to calculate overall proportions, including 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Subgroup analyses were performed on time of submission, geographical region, sex, age, time after transplantation, comorbidities, and treatments. We included 74 studies with 5559 KTR with COVID‐19 (64.0% males, mean age 58.2 years, mean 73 months after transplantation) in total. The risk of mortality, 23% (95% CI: 21%–27%), and AKI, 50% (95% CI: 44%–56%), is high among KTR with COVID‐19, regardless of sex, age and comorbidities, underlining the call to accelerate vaccination programs for KTR. Given the suboptimal reporting across the identified studies, we urge researchers to consistently report anthropometrics, kidney function at baseline and discharge, (changes in) immunosuppressive therapy, AKI, and renal outcome among KTR.
This systematic review and meta‐analysis on COVID‐19 in kidney transplant recipients reveals high global mortality rates and provides recommendations for reporting of studies in future pandemics.
Deceased donor kidneys are preserved in cold hypoxic conditions. Providing oxygen during preservation might improve post-transplant outcomes, particularly for kidneys subjected to greater degrees of ...preservation injury. This study aimed to investigate whether supplemental oxygen during hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) could improve the outcome of kidneys donated after circulatory death.
This randomised, double-blind, paired, phase 3 trial was done in 19 European transplant centres. Kidney pairs from donors aged 50 years or older, donated after circulatory death, were eligible if both kidneys were transplanted into two different recipients. One kidney from each donor was randomly assigned using permuted blocks to oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (HMPO2), the other to HMP without oxygenation. Perfusion was maintained from organ retrieval to implantation. The primary outcome was 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation in pairs of donated kidneys in which both transplanted kidneys were functioning at the end of follow-up. Safety outcomes were reported for all transplanted kidneys. Intention-to-treat analyses were done. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN32967929, and is now closed.
Between March 15, 2015, and April 11, 2017, 197 kidney pairs were randomised with 106 pairs transplanted into eligible recipients. 23 kidney pairs were excluded from the primary analysis because of kidney failure or patient death. Mean eGFR at 12 months was 50·5 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (SD 19·3) in the HMPO2 group versus 46·7 mL/min per 1·73m2 (17·1) in HMP (mean difference 3·7 mL/min per 1·73m2, 95% CI −1·0 to 8·4; p=0·12). Fewer severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or more) were reported in the HMPO2 group (46 of 417, 11%, 95% CI 8% to 14%) than in the HMP group (76 of 474, 16%, 13% to 20%; p=0·032). Graft failure was lower with HMPO2 (three 3% of 106) compared with HMP (11 10% of 106; hazard ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·07 to 0·95; p=0·028).
HMPO2 of kidneys donated after circulatory death is safe and reduces post-transplant complications (grade IIIb or more). The 12-month difference in eGFR between the HMPO2 and HMP groups was not significant when both kidneys from the same donor were still functioning 1-year post-transplant, but potential beneficial effects of HMPO2 were suggested by analysis of secondary outcomes.
European Commission 7th Framework Programme.
Antibodies against Rho GDP‐dissociation inhibitor 2 (RhoGDI2) are associated with inferior graft survival in transplant patients receiving a kidney from deceased donors. Although this suggests that ...these antibodies contribute to graft injury because of ischemia, it remains unknown whether they are also pathogenically involved in the process of graft loss. To study this, we firstly analyzed the IgG subclass profile of anti‐RhoGDI2 antibodies in kidney transplant recipients, and whether antibody titers change over time or because of acute rejection. Next, we investigated the expression of RhoGDI2 on primary kidney and lung endothelial cells (ECs) upon hypoxia reperfusion. In addition, the complement‐fixing properties of anti‐RhoGDI2 antibodies were studied using imaging flow cytometry. Anti‐RhoGDI2 antibodies in patients are mainly IgG1, and titers remained stable and seemed not be changed because of rejection. Antibodies against RhoGDI2, which surface expression seemed to increase upon hypoxia reperfusion, co‐localized with C3 on ECs. Binding of human IgG1 monoclonal anti‐RhoGDI2 antibodies as well as patient derived antibodies, resulted in complement activation, suggesting that these antibodies are complement fixing. This study suggested a potential pathogenic role of anti‐RhoGDI2 antibodies in kidney graft loss. During ischemia reperfusion, the ability of these antibodies to fix complement could be one of the mechanisms resulting in tissue injury.
Abstract
Background
Accurate risk prediction is needed in order to provide personalized healthcare for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. An overload of prognosis studies is being published, ...ranging from individual biomarker studies to full prediction studies. We aim to systematically appraise published prognosis studies investigating multiple biomarkers and their role in risk predictions. Our primary objective was to investigate if the prognostic models that are reported in the literature were of sufficient quality and to externally validate them.
Methods
We undertook a systematic review and appraised the quality of studies reporting multivariable prognosis models for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality in CKD patients. We subsequently externally validated these models in a randomized trial that included patients from a broad CKD population.
Results
We identified 91 papers describing 36 multivariable models for prognosis of ESRD, 50 for CV events, 46 for mortality and 17 for a composite outcome. Most studies were deemed of moderate quality. Moreover, they often adopted different definitions for the primary outcome and rarely reported full model equations (21% of the included studies). External validation was performed in the Multifactorial Approach and Superior Treatment Efficacy in Renal Patients with the Aid of Nurse Practitioners trial (n = 788, with 160 events for ESRD, 79 for CV and 102 for mortality). The 24 models that reported full model equations showed a great variability in their performance, although calibration remained fairly adequate for most models, except when predicting mortality (calibration slope >1.5).
Conclusions
This review shows that there is an abundance of multivariable prognosis models for the CKD population. Most studies were considered of moderate quality, and they were reported and analysed in such a manner that their results cannot directly be used in follow-up research or in clinical practice.
The clinical significance of non‐HLA antibodies on renal allograft survival is a matter of debate, due to differences in reported results and lack of large‐scale studies incorporating analysis of ...multiple non‐HLA antibodies simultaneously. We developed a multiplex non‐HLA antibody assay against 14 proteins highly expressed in the kidney. In this study, the presence of pretransplant non‐HLA antibodies was correlated to renal allograft survival in a nationwide cohort of 4770 recipients transplanted between 1995 and 2006. Autoantibodies against Rho GDP‐dissociation inhibitor 2 (ARHGDIB) were significantly associated with graft loss in recipients transplanted with a deceased‐donor kidney (N = 3276) but not in recipients of a living‐donor kidney (N = 1496). At 10 years after deceased‐donor transplantation, recipients with anti‐ARHGDIB antibodies (94/3276 = 2.9%) had a 13% lower death‐censored covariate‐adjusted graft survival compared to the anti‐ARHGDIB‐negative (3182/3276 = 97.1%) population (hazard ratio 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.32‐2.53; P = .0003). These antibodies occur independently from donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA) or other non‐HLA antibodies investigated. No significant relations with graft loss were found for the other 13 non‐HLA antibodies. We suggest that pretransplant risk assessment can be improved by measuring anti‐ARHGDIB antibodies in all patients awaiting deceased‐donor transplantation.
From a multicenter evaluation of kidney transplants, the authors report that the pretransplant presence of autoantibodies against ARHGDIB are associated with long‐term graft loss in recipients transplanted with a deceased donor kidney, independent from donor‐specific HLA antibodies.
To date, over 150 possible uremic solutes have been listed, but their role in the progression of CKD is largely unknown. Here, the association between a selected panel of uremic solutes and ...progression in CKD patients was investigated.
Patients from the MASTERPLAN study, a randomized controlled trial in CKD patients with a creatinine clearance between 20 and 70 ml/min per 1.73m2, were selected based on their rate of eGFR decline during the first five years of follow-up. They were categorized as rapid (decline >5 ml/min per year) or slow progressors. Concentrations of eleven uremic solutes were obtained at baseline and after one year of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds for rapid to slow progression by uremic solute concentrations at baseline. Variability in uremic solute levels was assessed using scatter plots, and limits of variability were calculated.
In total, 40 rapidly and 40 slowly progressing patients were included. Uremic solutes were elevated in all patients compared to reference values for healthy persons. The serum levels of uremic solutes were not associated with rapid progression. Moreover, we observed substantial variability in solute levels over time.
Elevated concentrations of uremic solutes measured in this study did not explain differences in rate of eGFR decline in CKD patients, possibly due to lack of power as a result of the small sample size, substantial between patient variability, and variability in solute concentrations over time. The etiology of intra-individual variation in uremic solute levels remains to be elucidated.
Whereas regular allocation avoids unacceptable mismatches on the donor organ, allocation to highly sensitized patients within the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch (AM) program is based on the ...patient's HLA phenotype plus acceptable antigens. These are HLA antigens to which the patient never made antibodies, as determined by extensive laboratory testing. AM patients have superior long‐term graft survival compared with highly sensitized patients in regular allocation. Here, we questioned whether the AM program also results in lower rejection rates. From the PROCARE cohort, consisting of all Dutch kidney transplants in 1995‐2005, we selected deceased donor single transplants with a minimum of 1 HLA mismatch and determined the cumulative 6‐month rejection incidence for patients in AM or regular allocation. Additionally, we determined the effect of minimal matching criteria of 1 HLA‐B plus 1 HLA‐DR, or 2 HLA‐DR antigens on rejection incidence. AM patients showed significantly lower rejection rates than highly immunized patients in regular allocation, comparable to nonsensitized patients, independent of other risk factors for rejection. In contrast to highly sensitized patients in regular allocation, minimal matching criteria did not affect rejection rates in AM patients. Allocation based on acceptable antigens leads to relatively low‐risk transplants for highly sensitized patients with rejection rates similar to those of nonimmunized individuals.
The authors show that kidney allocation to highly sensitized patients based on proven acceptable HLA antigens results in a significantly lower incidence of rejection episodes when compared to allocation based on the avoidance of unacceptable HLA antigens only.
Often only chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with high likelihood of genetic disease are offered genetic testing. Early genetic testing could obviate the need for kidney biopsies, allowing for ...adequate prognostication and treatment. To test the viability of a 'genetics-first' approach for CKD, we performed genetic testing in a group of kidney transplant recipients aged <50 years, irrespective of cause of transplant.
From a cohort of 273 transplant patients, we selected 110 that were in care in the University Medical Center Utrecht, had DNA available and were without clear-cut non-genetic disease. Forty patients had been diagnosed with a genetic disease prior to enrollment; in 70 patients, we performed a whole-exome sequencing-based 379 gene panel analysis.
Genetic analysis yielded a diagnosis in 51%. Extrapolated to the 273 patient cohort, who did not all fit the inclusion criteria, the diagnostic yield was still 21%. Retrospectively, in 43% of biopsied patients, the kidney biopsy would not have had added diagnostic value if genetic testing had been performed as a first-tier diagnostic.
The burden of monogenic disease in transplant patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) of any cause prior to the age of 50 years is between 21% and 51%. Early genetic testing can provide a non-invasive diagnostic, impacting prognostication and treatment, and obviating the need for an invasive biopsy. We conclude that in patients who expect to develop ESKD prior to the age of 50 years, genetic testing should be considered as first mode of diagnostics.
COVID-19 vaccination has been associated with rare but severe complications characterized by thrombosis and thrombocytopenia.
Here we present three patients who developed
or relapse atypical ...hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in native kidneys, a median of 3 days (range 2-15) after mRNA-based (Pfizer/BioNTech's, BNT162b2) or adenoviral (AstraZeneca, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) COVID-19 vaccination. All three patients presented with evident hematological signs of TMA and AKI, and other aHUS triggering or explanatory events were absent. After eculizumab treatment, kidney function fully recovered in 2/3 patients. In addition, we describe two patients with dubious aHUS relapse after COVID-19 vaccination. To assess the risks of vaccination, we retrospectively evaluated 29 aHUS patients (n=8 with native kidneys) without complement-inhibitory treatment, who received a total of 73 COVID-19 vaccinations. None developed aHUS relapse after vaccination.
In conclusion, aHUS should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia, especially if co-occuring with mechanical hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Still, the overall risk is limited and we clearly advise continuation of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with a previous episode of aHUS, yet conditional upon clear patient instruction on how to recognize symptoms of recurrence. At last, we suggest monitoring serum creatinine (sCr), proteinuria, MAHA parameters, and blood pressure days after vaccination.
PDF
