Četiri meðunarodna ugovora sklopljena izmeðu Svete Stolice i Republike Hrvatske kao nadzakonski akti, a posebice Ugovor izmeðu Svete Stolice i Republike Hrvatske o pravnim pitanjima, u znatno se ...većoj mjeri referiraju na kanonsko pravo (ius canonicum) kao pravni sustav mjerodavan za ureðenje pojedinih pravnih odnosa nego što je to slučaj s tuzemnim ugovorima izmeðu Vlade Republike Hrvatske i pojedinih vjerskih zajednica. Štoviše, već u samom uvodu spomenutog ugovora navodi se i kanonsko pravo kao jedan od njegovih pravnih temelja. Sami tekstovi spomenutih ugovora govore o "kanonskom pravu", "crkvenom zakonodavstvu", "crkvenim zakonima" ili "crkvenim propisima", odnosno pojedinim institutima kanonskog prava ("kanonska ženidba", "kanonske kaznene mjere", "kanonski mandat"). Sukladno navedenim činjenicama, autor istražuje u kojoj mjeri Zakonik kanonskog prava (Codex Iuris Canonici, CIC) iz 1983., ta nedvojbeno najvažnija religijska pravna kodifikacija u svjetskim razmjerima, predstavlja kao cjelina relevantan konceptualni i normativni zajednički okvir za sve odredbe spomenutih meðunarodnih ugovora koje se pozivaju na kanonsko pravo ili na pojedine njegove institute. Slijedeći sustav CIC-a po pojedinim knjigama, autor raščlanjuje pojedinačne odredbe navedenih meðunarodnih ugovora koje su uvele u hrvatski pravni sustav čitav niz instituta kanonskog prava kao normativno relevantan. Pri tome se upućuje i na temeljnu hrvatsku kanonističku literaturu o problematici koja će se prikazati te se posebice istražuje postojeća praksa hrvatskih državnih sudova glede primjene pojedinih kanona CIC-a, ističući kako dobre primjere takve primjene odredaba kanonskog prava, tako i kritički raščlanjujući pojedine slučajeve u kojima sudovi nisu ponajbolje shvatili te primijenili pojedine aspekte kanonskog prava.
This article analyzes the relationship between canon law as the legal system of the Catholic Church, to which a majority of Croatian citizens belong, and the Croatian legal system, focusing on the ...issue of canon law (ius canonicum) as a source of law in the Croatian legal system on the basis of concordatarian law (ius concordatarium), i.e. the four international treaties between the Holy See and the Republic of Croatia. As regards canon law, in this contribution the author takes into account only its most important source: the Code of Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici – CIC) of 1983, the undoubtedly most important codification of religious law in the world. Following the systematization of CIC into seven books, the author highlights particular provisions of the said treaties, which introduced into the Croatian legal system a series of institutes and provisions of canon law as binding normative contents. In addition, the author concludes that the Code represents a relevant conceptual and normative common framework for all provisions of the international treaties between the Holy See and the Republic of Croatia based on canon law or its institutes. To be more precise, a closer analysis of the provisions of the treaties between the Holy See and the Republic of Croatia leads to the conclusion that CIC has, in its totality, become a relevant source of law in the Croatian legal system. The author also refers to relevant Croatian scholarly literature on canon law, and in particular to the case-law of Croatian state courts which involves the application of certain canons of the Code, pointing out good examples of such application, and providing a critical view of particular cases in which, in the author's opinion, the courts made certain errors in the interpretation and application of some aspects of canon law. Finally, the research suggests that the significance of canon law, particularly Codex iuris canonici as its primary source, in the Croatian legal system is undoubtedly increasing, which is why its deeper understanding both by legal doctrine and by the legal practice is becoming a necessity.
Quale ulteriore progresso nella formalizzazlone tecnico-giuridica della natura diaconale di servizio del governo ecclesiastico e quindi per consolidare il diritto-dovere al buon governo nella Chiesa, ...nel presente studio proponiamo de iure condendo il riconoscimento esplicito del diritto-dovere dei fedeli di attivarsi in prima persona 'denunciando' la mancanza di idoneita dei titolari di uffici ecclesiastici: e questo sia durante la fase previa di designazione, con opportuni interventi nel procedimento amministrativo di nomina, sia soprattutto una volta che la provvista sia avvenuta, quale reazione nei confronti della sua non congruita. .'itinerario giuridico per fondare siffatta pretesa, articolata a piu livelli, e complesso e per compierlo abbiamo esaminato in via euristica vari istituti giuridici contemplati dal diritto canonico: si tratta di una sfida da affrontare e che non puo piu essere differita.
LO JUS EXIGENDI NEL PONTIFICATO DI INNOCENZO III Simone Rosati
Vergentis. Revista de Investigación de la Cátedra Internacional Conjunta Inocencio III,
06/2016, Letnik:
2, Številka:
1
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
The aim of this study is to analyze the system of taxation developed by the papal government at the time of the fourth crusade, which is one of the main aspects of the political and juridical policy ...enacted by pope Innocentius III. As will be shown, a special tax, designed by Lotario di Segni continued to be part of the canonical and juridical organization long after the extinction of the peculiar circumstances that originated it. This particular tax in fact, transcending its original purpose of securing economic support, ultimately became a symbol of freedom and independence of the church from any secular power.
El autor pone de manifiesto cómo el primer Código de Derecho Canónico, del que ahora se celebra el centenario, es una piedra miliar en la bimilenaria historia jurídica de la Iglesia. Con el Código de ...1917 se pasó de un modo de producción del Derecho de corte preponderantemente ?jurisprudencial? a otro de tipo ?legislativo?: la autoridad del Código no proviene ya de sus contenidos jurídicos en cuanto tales sino de su promulgación por el Legislador. Se asignaba así el puesto central en el Derecho canónico a la Ley, al Legislador. Sin embargo, por la aportación de concepciones integradoras de la doctrina científica y por las enseñanzas del magisterio eclesial, esa centralidad de la Ley va cediendo el primado a la persona a su dignidad y libertad, a sus derechos y deberes fundamentales. Proclamar ese primado continúa siendo un objetivo de la ciencia del Derecho canónico contemporánea.
Das allgemeine Leistungsstörungsrecht gehört zum Kern des Schuldrechts und ist damit einer der wichtigsten Teile des Zivilrechts. Das vorliegende Handbuch gibt eine vollständige und aktuelle ...Darstellung des allgemeinen Leistungsstörungsrechts.Die rechtsfolgenorientierte Darstellung ermöglicht eine für die Fallbearbeitung schnelle Orientierung.
PDF
