•The incidence of secondary hip fractures (SHFs) after nailing fixations for femoral fractures was 0.7%.•The absence of femoral head fixation was significantly associated with SHF following ...intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures.•There were two reoperations (16.7%) following management of secondary femoral neck fractures.•Secondary trochanteric fracture patients were less likely to regain walking ability than secondary femoral neck fracture patients.
Proximal peri-implant femoral fractures occur following intramedullary nailing (IMN) fixation for trochanteric, femoral shaft, and distal femoral fractures. However, analyses of secondary hip fractures (SHFs) using large clinical samples are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to report the incidence and clinical outcomes of SHF after nailing fixation (IMN or cephalomedullary nailing CMN) for overall femoral fractures. In addition, we focused on IMN for femoral shaft fractures and investigated the risk factors for SHF.
This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 2,293 patients aged > 60 years who underwent nailing fixation for femoral fractures. The primary outcome was the incidence of SHF. In the assessment of clinical outcomes, we evaluated reoperation and the regaining of walking ability following SHF management. In addition, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between risk factors and SHF.
Seventeen (0.7%) patients had SHFs, including 12 femoral neck fractures and 5 trochanteric fractures. Antegrade IMN was the most common type of nailing fixation. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the absence of femoral head fixation was significantly associated with the incidence of SHF following IMN for femoral shaft fractures (odds ratio, 17.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.9–2265.7; p=0.006). In the assessment of clinical outcomes, there were two reoperations (16.7%) in the secondary femoral neck fracture group. Patients with secondary trochanteric fractures tended to have a lower probability of regaining walking ability than those with secondary femoral neck fractures (20% vs. 50%).
In this multicenter study, the incidence of SHF after nail fixation for femoral fractures was 0.7%. The absence of femoral head fixation was significantly associated with SHF, and the clinical outcomes were poor. Therefore, femoral head fixation at the initial IMN fixation for femoral fractures may be a fixation option for surgeons to consider as an SHF prevention measure.
Large bone defects require complex treatment, multidisciplinary resources, and expert input, with surgical procedures ranging from reconstruction and salvage to amputation. The aim of this study was ...to provide the results of a case series of open comminuted intra-articular distal femoral fractures with significant bone loss that were managed by early fixation using anatomical plates and a modified Masquelet technique with the addition of surgical propylene mesh.
This retrospective study included all patients referred to our institution with OTA/AO C3 distal femur open fractures and meta-diaphyseal large bone loss between April 2019 and February 2021. We treated the fractures with irrigation and debridement, acute primary screw and plate fixation in the second look operation, and Masquelet method using shell-shaped antibiotic beads supplemented by propylene surgical mesh to keep the cements in place. The second step of the procedure was conducted six to eight weeks later with bone grafting and mesh augmentation to contain bone grafts. Surprisingly, hard callus formation was observed in all patients at the time of the second stage of Masquelet procedure.
All five patients' articular and meta-diaphyseal fractures with bone loss healed without major complications. The average union time was 159 days. The mean knee range of motion was 5-95 degrees. The average Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS) was 49 out of 80.
Combination of early plate fixation and the modified Masquelet technique with polypropylene mesh is an effective method for managing large bone defects in open intra-articular distal femoral fractures with bone loss, resulting in shorter union time possibly associated with the callus formation process. This technique may also be applicable to the management of other similar fractures specially in low-income and developing areas.
This case-control study evaluated the incidences and outcomes of interprosthetic femoral fracture (IPFF) (Group I) and performed comparisons with Vancouver type C (Group II) and Rorabeck type II ...(Group III) periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF) occurring at similar anatomic sites.
A retrospective analysis was performed for all patients who had a previously implanted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), who lived in the hospital district and had undergone surgery due to PPFF. A total of 153 PPFFs Group I (n = 31), Group II (n = 21), and Group III (n = 108) were included. The annual incidences of PPFFs were summarized per 100,000 individuals. The risks of complications, reoperations, and mortalities were evaluated for all groups.
The mean population-based annual incidence was 0.9 per 100,000 person years for Group I, 0.7 per 100,000 person years for Group II, and 3.1 per 100,000 person years for Group III. A total of 25 of 153 (16%) major complications were found and 23 of 153 (13%) cases resulted in a revision surgery. The cumulative incidence of death in Group I was 50.4% at 10 years, in Group II it was 63.8% at 10 years, and in Group III it was 74.9% at 10 years.
The annual incidence of the IPFF almost doubled while the incidence of Vancouver type C stayed stable and Rorabeck type II incidence increased 5-fold. Most of the major complications occurred in IPFF group, while Rorabeck type II patients had the worst survival.
Osteoporosis (OP) is a bone disease which affects a number of post‐menopausal females and puts many at risk for fractures. A large number of patients are taking bisphosphonates (BPs) to treat their ...OP and a rare complication is the development of atypical femoral fractures (AFF). No real explanations for the mechanisms underlying the basis for development of where AFF develop while on BPs has emerged. The present hypothesis will discuss the possibility that part of the risk for an AFF is a secondary effect of BPs on a subset of vascular cells in a genetically at‐risk population, leading to localized deregulation of the endothelial cell (EC)‐bone cell‐matrix units in nutrient channels/canals of the femur and increased risk for AFF. This concept of targeting ECs is consistent with location of AFF in the femur, the bilateral risk for occurrence of AFF, and the requirement for long term exposure to the drugs.
Use of certain bisphosphonates (BPs) is effective in treating osteoporosis. However, with prolonged use of some, side‐effects arise and risk for atypical femoral fractures increases. A hypothesis is presented that proposes that this risk is due in part to BP effects on vascular elements of the nutrient canals leading to disruption of the integrity of the associated bone matrix with prolonged use of the drugs (figure created in BioRender.com).
The mechanisms underlying AFF remain unclear, with hypotheses including bone turnover suppression and morphological variation. Recent studies have suggested a potential genetic susceptibility to AFF. ...A scoping review was conducted using PubMed to identify studies published since 2016. Twenty-one studies were identified, focusing on histological and genetic analysis of AFF patients and Bisphosphonates users. Biopsies and imaging modalities were used to assess histological and morphometric parameters, while genetic sequencing was performed to identify variants in target genes.
Genetic studies identified variants in geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase 1 (GGPS1) and CYP1A1 genes, which play roles in osteoclast function and drug metabolism, respectively. Functional analysis revealed reduced enzymatic activity in mutant variants of these genes, which could be further inhibited by BP use. Other genes, such as ATRAID, ALPL, and COL1A2, were also associated with AFF. Histomorphometric studies supported the hypothesis of bone turnover suppression in AFF, with alterations in tissue mechanical properties and microarchitecture observed, particularly in cortical bone.
The findings suggest a potential genetic susceptibility to AFF, with variants in GGPS1 and CYP1A1 genes affecting osteoblast and osteoclast function. Bone turnover suppression and altered tissue properties contribute to the pathogenesis of AFF.
To determine the reliability of the Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia (RUST) score and a new modified RUST score in quantifying healing and to define a value for radiographic union in a large series ...of metadiaphyseal fractures treated with plates or intramedullary nails.
Healing was evaluated using 2 methods: (1) evaluation of interrater agreement in a series of radiographs and (2) analysis of prospectively gathered data from 2 previous large multicenter trials to define thresholds for radiographic union.
Part 1: 12 orthopedic trauma surgeons evaluated a series of radiographs of 27 distal femur fractures treated with either plate or retrograde nail fixation at various stages of healing in random order using a modified RUST score. For each radiographic set, the reviewer indicated if the fracture was radiographically healed. Part 2: The radiographic results of 2 multicenter randomized trials comparing plate versus nail fixation of 81 distal femur and 46 proximal tibia fractures were reviewed. Orthopaedic surgeons at 24 trauma centers scored radiographs at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using the modified RUST score above. Additionally, investigators indicated if the fracture was healed or not healed.
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals was determined for each cortex, the standard and modified RUST score, and the assignment of union for part 1 data. The RUST and modified RUST that defined "union" were determined for both parts of the study.
ICC: The modified RUST score demonstrated slightly higher ICCs than the standard RUST (0.68 vs. 0.63). Nails had substantial agreement, whereas plates had moderate agreement using both modified and standard RUST (0.74 and 0.67 vs. 0.59 and 0.53).
The average standard and modified RUST at union among all fractures was 8.5 and 11.4. Nails had higher standard and modified RUST scores than plates at union. The ICC for union was 0.53 (nails: 0.58; plates: 0.51), which indicates moderate agreement. However, the majority of reviewers assigned union for a standard RUST of 9 and a modified RUST of 11, and >90% considered a score of 10 on the RUST and 13 on the modified RUST united.
The ICC for the modified RUST is slightly higher than the standard RUST in metadiaphyseal fractures and had substantial agreement. The ICC for the assessment of union was moderate agreement; however, definite union would be 10 and 13 with over 90% of reviewers assigning union. These are the first data-driven estimates of radiographic union for these scores.
A traumatic femur fracture is a significant cause of morbidity, affecting one to three million individuals annually. The present is the first study investigated the epidemiological characteristics, ...risk factors, classification, mechanisms of injury, and early management of femoral fractures in Somalia. This retrospective epidemiological study included all patients with a femur fracture who were admitted for four years between November 2018 and December 2022 to the orthopedic and trauma surgery department. We reviewed patient demographic characteristics, including age and gender, the mechanism of injury, injury characteristics, and the type of fixation performed. We reviewed the radiographs and classified the fracture using the AO/OTA classification system. During the study period, a total of 402 patients were treated for femur fractures; 256 (64%) were males, and 144 (36%) were females. The mean patient age was 47.7 ± 8.5 years. Regarding the anatomical location of femur fractures, the proximal (31A, 31B) was the most common, accounting for 50% of the patients. Femur neck fracture (31B) was the most common in the proximal femur fractures. Gunshot 82 (59.42%) was the leading cause of femur shaft fractures. Most patients with femur shaft fractures were males; 150 (86.20%) and 152 (64.47%) were young patients between 19 and 40 years old. Almost half of the patients (86) with femur shaft fractures had open fractures. The distribution of the mechanism of injury significantly differed according to age (p < 0.001). Younger patients (< 40 years) were predominantly injured due to gunshot injuries compared to elderly cases (> 60 years), where falls from standing height were the primary mechanism of injuries. There was a statistically significant difference between the mechanism of injury and gender categories (p < 0.001). Male patients were injured mainly by gunshots in about 40%, while 80% of fractures in female patients were due to falls from standing height. Female fractures occurred primarily in the proximal, while the males had an equal fracture rate for proximal and shaft fractures. Femur fracture causes significant morbidity and mortality. The study findings revealed that the most common femur fracture type was femur neck fracture, and low-energy injuries were the most common mode of injury in the elderly. Proximal femur fractures occur in older age and mainly in females. Gunshots were the most common cause of femur shaft fractures in Somalia, a country that has struggled with wars for over 30 years.
Bisphosphonates are commonly prescribed to mitigate the effects of osteoporosis, a condition associated with an increased risk of fracture. However, despite their success, there has been growing ...concern regarding the long-term use of bisphosphonates because of the increased risk of atypical subtrochanteric fractures of the femur (AFFs). The objective of this study was to describe a cohort of patients with AFFs and evaluate the risk of evolving to non-union, the time of consolidation associated with the location of the fracture, the time of use of the drug, and the implant involved in its treatment.
This retrospective study recruited patients between June 2008 and May 2018. We identified patients with AFFs according to the task force criteria and a history of bisphosphonate use. We included all patients older than 65 years, with long-term use of bisphosphonates, AFF criteria according to the task force, and a follow-up of 12 months or longer. We studied the following variables: the time of use of bisphosphonates, localization of the fracture according to Hyodo et al., implant use, and fracture healing time, considering the presence of bone callus observed in two radiologic projections, which were measured in weeks.
Between June 2008 and May 2018, 72 patients met the task force criteria for AFFs. A total of 67 patients were included in this study. From this total, 37 were in the proximal region of the femur and 31 corresponded to the diaphyseal region. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed statistical significance in the time of bone healing compared with the different locations of the fracture along the femur.
According to our study, the localization of AFFs in patients with a history of bisphosphonate use influences the duration of bone healing.
Background and purpose - To continuously assess the incidence of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) in the population is important, to allow the evaluation of the risks and benefits associated with ...osteoporosis treatment. Therefore, we investigated the possibility to use the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) as a surveillance tool for AFFs in the population and to explore means of improvement. Patients and methods - All AFF registrations in the SFR from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018 were enrolled in the study. For these patients, radiographs were obtained and combined with radiographs from 176 patients with normal femoral fractures, to form the study cohort. All images were reviewed and classified into AFFs or normal femur fractures by 2 experts in the field (gold-standard classification) and 1 orthopedic resident educated on the specific radiographic features of AFF (educated-user classification). Furthermore, we estimated the incidence rate of AFFs in the population captured by the register through comparison with a previous cohort and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) and, where possible, the inter-observer agreement (Cohen's kappa) between the different classifications. Results - Of the 178 available patients with AFF in the SFR, 104 patients were classified as AFF using the goldstandard classification, and 89 using the educated-user classification. The PPV increased from 0.58 in the SFR classification to 0.93 in the educated-user classification. The interobserver agreement between the gold-standard classification and the educated-user classification was 0.81. Interpretation - With a positive predictive value of 0.58 the Swedish Fracture Register outperforms radiology reports and reports to the Swedish Medical Products Agency on adverse drug reactions as a diagnostic tool to identify atypical femoral fractures.
Atypical fractures of the femur below the lesser trochanter have been reported in patients treated with bisphosphonates. We performed a systematic literature search of case/case series studies to ...better define the clinical presentation and to identify characteristics that may predispose patients to such fractures. We considered only women treated with a bisphosphonate at a dosing regimen used for the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis and we included also eight own unpublished cases. We identified 141 women with atypical fractures of the femur, mean age of 67.8+/-11.0 years, who were treated with bisphosphonate for 71.5+/-40.0 months (range=3-192 months). The results of this analysis allow identification of patients on bisphosphonate treatment at risk of developing atypical fractures, define fractures better as predominantly insufficiency fractures, illustrate that long-term bisphosphonate treatment is not a prerequisite for their development, recognize the use of glucocorticoids and proton pump inhibitors as important risk factors, but do not provide insights in the pathogenesis of these fractures and raise questions that need to be addressed in properly designed studies.
PDF
