Periprosthetic joint infection can be a devastating complication following total hip arthroplasty, which often requires a lengthy treatment course that is fraught with complications. There are ...various types of antibiotic-impregnated spacers that can be used to treat periprosthetic hip infections, with articulating spacers being utilized frequently with the goal of preserving patient range of motion and functionality. Many of these articulating spacers have pre-set sizes and stem options, which accommodate the majority of patients. However, when significant femoral bone loss is evident at the time of revision surgery, many articulating spacer options are not sufficient to provide stability, and custom modifications of available spacer constructs may be needed to fill the bony void. The goal of this article is to report a surgical technique that can be used in the salvage of failed antibiotic-impregnated spacers where severe femoral bone loss is present.
Abstract Traditionally, periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) due to gram-negative organisms are considered more difficult to manage; however, little literature exists with regard to outcome of PJI ...caused by gram-negative organisms. We identified 277 patients with 282 culture-positive PJI receiving surgical treatment. Thirty-one joints were treated for gram-negative PJI. The gram-negative group was then compared with the gram-positive and polymicrobial PJI. A single debridement and retention of prosthesis were successful in 70% (7/10) of isolated gram negative compared with 33.3% (13/39) of methicillin-sensitive gram positive, 48.9% (23/47) of methicillin-resistant gram positive, and 57.1% (4/7) of polymicrobial. Of those patients undergoing a planned 2-stage exchange, a successful reimplantation was performed in 52% (12/23) of gram-negative, 51% (52/103) of methicillin-resistant gram-positive, 69% (65/94) of methicillin-sensitive gram-positive, and 0% (0/8) of polymicrobial PJI cases. These results indicate that PJI due to gram-negative pathogens, although less common, is difficult to treat and is associated with limited success.
This study aimed to identify the success rate of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a large prospective cohort of patients undergoing total ...knee arthroplasty (TKA). The ability for different PJI classification systems to predict success was assessed.
Prospective data recorded in the Prosthetic Joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational study were analyzed. One hundred eighty-nine newly diagnosed knee PJIs were managed with DAIR between July 2014 and December 2017. Patients were prospectively followed up for 2 years. A strict definition of success was used, requiring the patient being alive with documented absence of infection, no ongoing antibiotics and the index prosthesis in place. Success was compared against the Coventry (early PJI ≤1 month), International Consensus Meeting (early ≤90 days), Auckland (early <1 year), and Tsukayama (early ≤1 month, hematogenous >1 month with <7 days symptoms, chronic >1 month with >7 days symptoms) classifications.
DAIR success was 45% (85/189) and was highest in early PJIs defined according to the Coventry (adjusted odds ratio aOR = 3.9, P = .01), the International Consensus Meeting (aOR = 3.1, P = .01), and the Auckland classifications (aOR = 2.6, P = .01). Success was lower in both hematogenous (aOR = 0.4, P = .03) and chronic infections (aOR = 0.1, P = .003).
Time since primary TKA is an important predictor of DAIR success. Success was highest in infections occurring <1 month of the primary TKA and progressively decreased as time since the primary TKA increased.
While implant-related infections continue to play a relevant role in failure of implantable biomaterials in orthopaedic and trauma there is a lack of standardised microbiological procedures to ...identify the pathogen(s). The microbiological diagnosis of implant-related infections is challenging due to the following factors: the presence of bacterial biofilm(s), often associated with slow-growing microorganisms, low bacterial loads, previous antibiotic treatments and, possible intra-operative contamination. Therefore, diagnosis requires a specific set of procedures. Based on the Guidelines of the Italian Association of the Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI), the World Association against Infection in Orthopaedics and Trauma has drafted the present document. This document includes guidance on the basic principles for sampling and processing for implant-related infections based on the most relevant literature. These procedures outline the main microbiological approaches, including sampling and processing methodologies for diagnostic assessment and confirmation of implant-related infections. Biofilm dislodgement techniques, incubation time and the role of molecular approaches are addressed in specific sections. The aim of this paper is to ensure a standardised approach to the main microbiological methods for implant-related infections, as well as to promote multidisciplinary collaboration between clinicians and microbiologists.
Abstract
Background
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence of unsuspected PJI when prosthetic revisions are thoroughly evaluated by PJI dedicated orthopedic surgeon before ...surgery. The hypothesis is that the incidence of unsuspected PJI is reduced by applying this protocol.
Methods
This is a historical cohort study carried out in one university hospital. The prosthetic revision assessment was carried out in January 2019. From that date on, all patients that were programmed for hip or knee revision (either by an orthopedic surgeon specialized or not in septic revisions) were scheduled for a preoperative visit with the same orthopedic surgeon specialized in septic revisions. The diagnostic algorithm applied was based on the Pro-Implant Foundation diagnostic criteria. Prior to the revision assessment, the indication for joint aspiration was done at the surgeons’ discretion (non-specialized in septic revisions) and the preoperative identification of PJI was also done by a hip or knee surgeon (not specialized in septic surgery).
Results
Based on the PIF criteria, there were 15 infections among the revisions in group 1 and 18 PJI in group 2 (
p
> 0.05). The most interesting finding was that there were 7 patients with unsuspected positive cultures in group 1. That represents 11% of all revisions. No patient in group 2 was found with unsuspected positive cultures (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusion
A thorough PJI diagnostic algorithm should be implemented before prosthetic revision to avoid unsuspected positive cultures.
Early periprosthetic joint infection constitutes one of the most frightening complications of joint replacement. Recently, some evidence has highlighted the potential link between dysregulation of ...the gut microbiota and degenerative diseases of joints. It has been hypothesized that microbiome dysbiosis may increase the risk of periprosthetic joint infection by facilitating bacterial translocation from these sites to the bloodstream or by impairing local or systemic immune responses. Although the processes tying the gut microbiome to infection susceptibility are still unknown, new research suggests that the presurgical gut microbiota—a previously unconsidered component—may influence the patient's ability to resist infection. Exploring the potential impact of the microbiome on periprosthetic joint infections may therefore bring new insights into the pathogenesis and therapy of these disorders. For a successful therapy, a proper surgical procedure in conjunction with an antibacterial concept is essential. As per the surgical approach, different treatment strategies include surgical irrigation, debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention with or without polyethylene exchange. Other alternatives could be one-stage or two-stage revisions surgery. Interventions that either directly target gut microbes as well as interventions that modify the composition and/or function of the commensal microbes represent an innovative and potentially successful field to be explored. In recent times, innovative therapeutic methods have arisen in the realm of microbiome restoration and the management of gut-related ailments. These progressive approaches offer fresh perspectives on tackling intricate microbial imbalances in the gastrointestinal tract. These emerging therapies signify a shift towards more precise and individualized approaches to microbiome restoration and the management of gut-related disorders. Once a more advanced knowledge of the pathways linking the gut microbiota to musculoskeletal tissues is gained, relevant microbiome-based therapies can be developed. If dysbiosis is proven to be a significant contributor, developing treatments for dysbiosis may represent a new frontier in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infections.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) mortality rate is approximately 20%. The etiology for high mortality remains unknown. The objective of this study was to determine whether mortality was ...associated with preoperative morbidity (frailty), sequalae of treatment, or the PJI disease process itself.
A multicenter observational study was completed comparing 184 patients treated with septic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to a control group of 38 patients treated with aseptic revision TKA. Primary outcomes included time and the cause of death. Secondary outcomes included preoperative comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCMI) measured preoperatively and at various postoperative timepoints.
The septic revision TKA cohort experienced earlier mortality compared to the aseptic cohort, with a higher mortality rate at 90 days, 1, 2, and 3 years after index revision surgery (P = .01). There was no significant difference for any single cause of death (P > .05 for each). The mean preoperative CCMI was higher (P = .005) in the septic revision TKA cohort. Both septic and aseptic cohorts experienced a significant increase in CCMI from the preoperative to 3 years postoperative (P < .0001 and P = .002) and time of death (P < .0001 both) timepoints. The septic revision TKA cohort had a higher CCMI 3 years postoperatively (P = .001) and at time of death (P = .046), but not one year postoperatively (P = .119).
Compared to mortality from aseptic revision surgery, septic revision TKA is associated with earlier mortality, but there is no single specific etiology. As quantified by changes in CCMI, PJI mortality was associated with both frailty and the PJI disease process, but not treatment.
The variation of plasma d-dimer, an inflammatory marker, from pre-explantation to pre-reimplantation in two-stage revision remains unclear. Our objective was to evaluate delta-changes (Δ) in d-dimer, ...erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive-protein (CRP), to ascertain whether these delta-changes are associated with the outcome of reimplantation. We hypothesized a decrease in d-dimer before reimplantation.
A retrospective review was performed on a consecutive series of 95 two-stage revisions indicated for periprosthetic joint infection. Surgeries were performed by 3 surgeons at a single institution (2018-2020). The minimum follow-up was 1 year. The inclusion criteria comprised availability of d-dimer results at pre-explantation and pre-reimplantation. As a result, only 30 reimplantations were included. Success of reimplantation was defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society outcome reporting tool: Tier 1/Tier 2 vs Tier 3/Tier 4. Nonparametric tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests were conducted to compare Δd-dimer% (pre-explantation value − pre-reimplantation value/pre-explantation value × 100). The bootstrapped receiver operating characteristic curve analyses with 2,000 replicates of 30 cases were conducted.
The median time between explantation and reimplantation was 86 days (interquartile range IQR = 77.7-138.5 days). Overall, a paradoxical median percent increase (Δd-Dimer% INCREMENT = 12.6%) in d-dimer was found from pre-explantation to pre-reimplantation (IQR = −28.06% to 77.3%). However, there was a percentage decrease in ESR (ΔESR% DECREMENT = −40%; IQR = −70.52% to 3.85%) and CRP (ΔCRP% DECREMENT = −75%; IQR = −87.43% to −61.34%). The changes in all these markers were not different between Musculoskeletal Infection Society Tier 1/2 and 3/4 outcomes (Δd-Dimer%, P = .146; ΔESR%, P = .946; ΔCRP%, P = .463). With area under curve of 0.676, Δd-dimer% (INCREMENT) appeared to be performing best in diagnosing infection control, which was nonexplanatory.
Plasma d-dimer paradoxically increases before reimplantation while other inflammatory markers (ESR/CRP) decrease, emphasizing that surgeons shall adopt caution using d-dimer to make clinical decisions.
To investigate the application value of next‐generation sequencing (NGS) technology in the detection of pathogenic bacteria in the periprosthetic joint infection after arthroplasty. Twenty‐two cases ...of patients with joint infection after arthroplasty in our hospital from March 2020 to March 2021 were selected, with 11 cases of knee and 11 cases of hip, including 8 cases of male and 14 cases of female, and an average age of 63.55 ± 13.11 years old (range from 28 to 85). Microbiological culture results of synovial fluid and periprosthetic joint tissue and NGS results of periprosthetic joint tissue were collected. The detection rate of NGS and microbiological culture were calculated and statistically analysed by paired χ2 test. Among the 22 patients with joint infection after arthroplasty, the positive rate of NGS was 90.91% (20/22), whereas the positive rate of bacterial culture was 50.00% (11/22). Paired chi‐square test showed a statistically significant difference in the detection rate between the two groups (P = .0029). In the detection of pathogenic microorganism, NGS detected 12 kinds of bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus in 3 patients, Staphylococcus epidermidis in 5 cases, Streptococcus 1 case, Streptococcus dysgalactiae 1 case, Xanthomonas campestris 3 cases, Escherichia coli 2 cases, Bacillus cereus 2 cases, Klebsiella pneumoniae 1 case, Finegoldia magna 1 case, Corynebacterium klopensteriella in 1 case, Brucella 1 case, and Aspergillus flavus 1 case. Bacterial culture detected 6 kinds of bacteria, included 5 cases of Staphylococcus epidermis (including 3 cases of Methicillin‐resistant coagulase‐negative Staphylococcus, (MRSCoN)), 2 cases of Staphylococcus aureus (both Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus, (MRSA)), 1 case of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 1 case of Staphylococcus hominis (MRSCoN), 1 case of G+ bacillus, and 1 case of Brucella. Compared with bacterial culture, NGS technology has some advantages in the detection efficiency, detection rate, and comprehensiveness, which might be greater diagnostic value in the joint fluid of infection after arthroplasty.
PDF
