Rethinking the Theatre of the Absurd is an innovative collection of essays, written by leading scholars in the fields of theatre, performance and eco-criticism, which reconfigures absurdist theatre ...through the optics of ecology and environment. As well as offering strikingly new interpretations of the work of canonical playwrights such as Beckett, Genet, Ionesco, Adamov, Albee, Kafka, Pinter, Shephard and Churchill, the book playfully mimics the structure of Martin Esslin's classic text The Theatre of the Absurd, which is commonly recognised as one of the most important scholarly publications of the 20th century. By reading absurdist drama, for the first time, as an emergent form of ecological theatre, Rethinking the Theatre of the Absurd interrogates afresh the very meaning of absurdism for 21st-century audiences, while at the same time making a significant contribution to the development of theatre and performance studies as a whole. The collection's interdisciplinary approach, accessibility, and ecological focus will appeal to students and academics in a number of different fields, including theatre, performance, English, French, geography and philosophy. It will also have a major impact on the new cross disciplinary paradigm of eco-criticism.
Legal systems across the world contain the obligation to prevent ‘absurd interpretations’ of law. In international law, an instruction to avoid ‘manifestly absurd’ interpretations can be found in ...Article 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. This gives rise to at least two questions that I will take up in this article. First, what is meant by the ‘absurd’ that is to be avoided in legal interpretation. The short answer to this question is: no one knows exactly. The absurd, by its very nature, resists definition in pre-given categories, as I will argue on the basis of four core thinkers on the absurd: Søren Kierkegaard, Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, and Thomas Nagel. The second question is more technical and easier to answer: how should lawyers try to avoid absurd interpretations? Here, I turn to absurdist writing and the theatre of the absurd for assistance. Absurdist writing and theatre have developed a number of techniques to make the absurd appear, to let the audience experience that something is fundamentally out of tune. Lawyers use similar techniques, but in reverse and with an opposite purpose: they add exposition, narrative, reasonable language, and stable, rational legal personae. In this way, they boost the rationality and reasonableness of the legal order. However, to come full circle, it is exactly the pretension of rationality and reasonableness that makes the law vulnerable to manifestations of the absurd. The rationality of law is the springboard for the very same absurdity it tries to suppress.
A ética da revolta de Albert Camus e o ato de jogar Orenga Sandoval, Gabriel; Leonardo, Lucas; Nogueira Silva, Luis Felipe ...
Cuadernos de filosofía latinoamericana,
09/2023, Letnik:
44, Številka:
129
Journal Article
Odprti dostop
O jogo é entendido enquanto um fenômeno complexo, em que a ação do jogador se caracteriza pela eticidade, uma vez que, além de expressar sua subjetividade, visa à boa vida (no caso do jogo, o prazer ...e a vitória). Assim, o caráter ético da ação do jogador se constitui em um ambiente de jogo, local que a imprevisibilidade, a dinâmica e as novas organizações estão presentes. Dessa maneira, faz parte da função do jogador compreender o ambiente em que ele se encontra, ou seja, entender como as organizações do jogo ocorrem. De modo semelhante, o conceito chamado de “absurdo”, criado por Albert Camus, filósofo franco-argelino, assemelha-se a essa demanda do entendimento do meio em que se vive, ao exaltar a tomada de consciência. Como consequência, segundo ele, o único movimento possível, posterior à compreensão do absurdo é a revolta, ação pautada na expressão do sujeito, com vistas à justiça, à coletividade e à unidade, baseando-se em limites que não devem ser ultrapassados. A partir disso, portanto, pensa-se na possibilidade de entender o jogador enquanto um homem revoltado no jogo, buscando, dada a identificação do meio em que se está, o sucesso de sua equipe, através de suas ações.
There is no doubt that one of the cruelest and incomprehensible events of humanity has been the Shoa, since it makes us reflect on the great uncertainty of the human being that lies in the problem of ...evil and the suffering of the Other. When verifying the testimonies of Primo Levi in Si esto es un hombre, we observe the crudeness and brutality to the point of nonsense. Thus, the objective of this work is to propose a closer approximation about the human behaviors and attitudes using some concepts of Emmanuel Levinas. From some fragments of Levi’s testimonies, the paradox posed by the philosopher regarding the Other is perceived, that is, how the author-protagonist faces a revelation of himself when considering the responsibility of the Me towards his neighbor. Levi’s texts, therefore, explain the human being from an alternative perspective, in which, following Levinas, the proximity or the event of face-to-face relationships is necessary to perceive the epiphany of the Infinite. In this way, some forms of intersubjectivity interpreted under the gaze of the Face will be addressed.
Es indudable que uno de los acontecimientos más crueles e incomprensibles de la humanidad ha sido la Shoa, ya que nos hace reflexionar en torno a la gran incertidumbre del ser humano que radica en el problema del mal y del sufrimiento del Otro. Al constatar los testimonios de Primo Levi en Si esto es un hombre observamos la crudeza y la brutalidad hasta el sinsentido. Así, el objetivo de este trabajo es plantear una aproximación más acerca de los comportamientos y actitudes del ser humano utilizando algunos conceptos de Emmanuel Levinas. A partir de algunos fragmentos de los testimonios de Levi, se percibe la paradoja planteada por el filósofo en torno al Otro, es decir, cómo el autor-protagonista enfrenta una revelación de sí mismo al considerar la responsabilidad del Yo frente a su prójimo. Los textos de Levi, por tanto, explican al ser desde una mirada alternativa, en la que, siguiendo a Levinas, es necesaria la proximidad o el acontecimiento de las relaciones humanas cara-a-cara para percibir la epifanía del Infinito. De esta manera, se abordarán algunas formas de intersubjetividad interpretadas bajo la mirada del Rostro.
The article deals with the definitions of the term «absurd», the paradigm of commedia dell’arte from a psychological point of view. It was shown that the role of the absurd in Shakespeare’s plays was ...outlined. It was noted that the term «absurd» came from the Latin: «absurdus» is «nonsignificance», «nonsense». The absurdity, on the one hand, is connected with the «skepticism» of Socrates (I know that I do not know anything), and, on the other hand, with Socratic irony (do not isolate anything completed, finished, forever given and unchanged). It was noted that already in the ancient art the absurd was used to reach the understanding of unknown things and actions. In particular, in the anthology, pantomime, the clown appears as moros or stupidus; his absurd behavior is a result of his inability to understand the simplest logical connections of things. It was stressed that thanked to the absurdity, W. Shakespeare opened new faces, new depths and, at the same time, the tragedy in Renaissance dualism. It was noted that the official status of the Person W. Shakespeare considered unreal, temporary; the negative characters in his drama were people who seek to conquer or strengthen their official status. Such a life goal is false, perverse, leads eventually to a vital defeat. In order to achieve their deceptive purpose, such people often have drown in natural feelings or sacrifice natural links, that is, in such a way, they are killing their natural essence. Given the absurd frames, explicated in the plays of W. Shakespeare, the article highlights the psychological mechanisms of the expression of the absurd meaning by a writer. These are such mechanisms as: the explication of absurd frames existing in the consciousness of the individual; the images of absurd in terms of random details, archetypes, metaphorical contexts; the explication of the absurdly hidden nature of causal relationships that appear to be evident as a result of the usage of certain lexical units by the author, lexicalstylistic means, etc.; the presentation of a play of an absurd tie by the author; the presentation of the context of deciphering the play by the author with an absurdly displaced center. The article emphasized that it was necessary to pay attention, first of all, to the fact that the understanding of the absurdity was arising as a result of unexpected for the reader transforming the tense context of the play into quite obvious semantic frames. According to such conditions, the witty absurdity will include the fact that the reader first perceives a play for the truth that misleads him, and then turns into persistent absurd frames that are fixed, fixed in the consciousness of the individual. Such frames, in turn, can be understood by the reader as containing nonsense, senselessness, can lead to the creation of stable cliches (built on the principle of «game of ideas»), which, in turn, become structural components of human consciousness
Resumen El presente artículo quiere reflexionar sobre el cómo diseccionando el panorama del arte actual, fundamentándonos en pensadores partidarios en instaurar su declive como poder cultural ...potencial, podemos recuperar de la manera más sensible el verdadero valor del arte contemporáneo e instaurarlo dentro del marco de la educación; recuperando lo utilitario y elevando su condición al grado de lo fundamental. El en lugar del arte, muchos son por tanto los creadores transformados en artistas lo que llevan a las aulas la pretensión por fomentar el pensamiento crítico, por querer enseñar arte. A este tenor, el método para enseñar las artes pasa entonces por desestimar las artes y situarlas en su contexto ideológico actual; enfrentar este absurdo -que tiene de creación y permutación fútil- al lugar en que la intención se transforma en un acto de reflexión creativa ligada a la nadería. Y de ese lugar de las cenizas, empoderar al arte y alumno en el proceso meramente creativo para esclarecer que el arte en la pedagogía, se transforma con el objetivo de (re)crear para explicar; y de esa flexibilidad se empodera lo inefable perdido del arte. Abstract This article wants to reflect on how to dissect the current art panorama, based on ourselves on party thinkers in establishing its decline as a potential cultural power, we can recover in the most sensitive way the true value of contemporary art and establish it within the framework of education; recovering the utilitarian and elevating its condition to the degree of the fundamental. In place of art, many are the creators transformed into artists that lead to the classroom the pretension to encourage critical thinking, for wanting to teachart. To this extent, the method to teach the arts then passes by rejecting the arts and placing them in their current ideological context; to confront this absurdity - which has a futile creation and permutation - to the place in which the intention is transformed into an act of creative reflection linked to the nudity. And from that place in the ashes, to empower art and student in the purely creative process to clarify that art in pedagogy is transformed with the aim of (re) creating to explain; and from that flexibility is empowered the ineffable lost of art.
Born to a French-Canadian mother and Algerian father, Ouanessa Younsi is a bold and unique voice in modern Francophone poetry. In this intensely personal recitation on identity and ethnicity, Younsi ...takes the reader on a surreal odyssey through a liminal world of belonging and unbelonging, absence and presence, mind and body. Her visionary work, first published in French and translated here by Rebecca Thompson, is unsettling, riveting and guaranteed to leave readers contemplating the existential mysteries of “self.”
In A Confession, a memoir of his philosophical midlife crisis, Tolstoy recounts falling into despair after coming to believe that his life, and for that matter all human life, is meaningless and ...absurd. Although Tolstoy's account of the origin and phenomenology of his crisis is widely regarded as illuminating, his response to the crisis, namely, embracing a religious tradition that he had previously dismissed as “irrational,” “incomprehensible,” and “mingled with falsehood” seems unpromising, at best. Nevertheless, I argue, Tolstoy's account of his response makes a valuable contribution to contemporary thought about the meaning and absurdity of life. I begin by drawing on classic discussions in the philosophical literature, and on Tolstoy's memoir, in order to characterize the problem of meaning and the problem of the absurd, and to clarify the relation between these problems. I then draw on Tolstoy's account of his response to his crisis in order to characterize a form of faith in our deepest values. I argue that such faith supplies one important part of the story concerning how we might respond to the problem of the absurd — a part that has been overlooked by more recent discussions of these issues.