Članak na primjeru hrvatskih novina u Australiji i Novom Zelandu prikazuje mogućnosti istraživanja publikacija hrvatskih iseljenika. Objašnjava se cilj projekta Hrvatski iseljenički tisak, način ...izrade bibliografija unutar projekta i metodologija istraživanja. Posebno se objašnjava uloga arhiva kao baštinskih ustanova koje su nezaobilazne u istraživanju publikacija. Daju se primjeri novozelandskih i australskih novina za koje su jedini sačuvani izvori upravo oni arhivski. Jedne novozelandske novine nisu sačuvane ni u jednom primjerku, ali dokumenti sačuvani u novozelandskom arhivu dokazuju da su izlazile. Sličan je primjer jednih australskih novina. U radu su i slike dokumenata povezanih s istraživanjem hrvatskih novina. Jedan od tih dokumenata povezan je s provođenjem cenzure u Australiji 1930-ih godina i ukazuje na to kako su upravo hrvatske novine utjecale na izmjene podzakonskih akata. Ukazuje se na važnost privatnih arhiva i arhiva pri hrvatskim udrugama te ističu nove mogućnosti istraživanja hrvatskih publikacija u arhivima u zemljama u kojima žive iseljeni Hrvati.
Uz stručne poslove u svezi sa zaštitom, obradom i dostupnošću gradiva, rad arhiva
danas uvelike oblikuju i suvremeni društveni procesi, ponajviše brzi razvoj
tehnologija i društva znanja te kulturne, ...gospodarske i socijalne promjene
izazvane migracijskim i globalizacijskim trendovima. Iz perspektive arhiva kao
informacijskih servisa podrazumijeva se njihovo djelovanje kao otvorenih
ustanova dostupnih svim korisnicima, koje aktivno pridonose kulturnom životu i
oblikovanju identiteta svojih osnivača i zajednice u kojoj djeluju te privlače
raznoliku publiku. U radu se predstavljaju međunarodne arhivske stručne prakse i aktivnosti u svezi s digitalizacijom i dostupnošću arhivskih izvora te tekući europski arhivski projekti i programi u svezi s novim arhivskim konceptima i širenjem
informacijskih funkcija i usluga arhiva te najznačajnije europske suradničke
arhivske platforme.
In addition to professional work related to the protection, processing and accessibility of archival material, the work of archives today is largely shaped by modern
social processes, especially the rapid development of technology and knowledge
society as well as cultural, economic and social changes caused by migration
and globalization trends. From the perspective of archives as information
services, it is understood that they operate as open institutions which are
accessible to all users and which actively contribute to the cultural life and to
the formation of identity of their founders and the community in which they
operate and attract a diverse audience. The paper presents
international archival professional practices and activities related to
digitization and accessibility of archival sources as well as current European
archival projects and programmes related to new archival concepts, expansion of
information functions and services of archives and the most important European
collaborative archival platform.
Le attività di un archivio oggi non
consistono solo nei lavori tecnici relativi alla tutela, all'elaborazione e
all'accessibilità del materiale ma dipendono, in modo significativo, anche dai
processi sociali contemporanei, soprattutto dal veloce sviluppo delle
tecnologie e della società basata sulla conoscenza nonché dai cambiamenti
culturali, economici e sociali dovuti alle tendenze migratorie e della
globalizzazione. Dall'ottica degli archivi, in quanto servizi informatici, si
presuppone che gli archivi rappresentino delle istituzioni aperte accessibili a
tutti gli utenti che contribuiscono in modo attivo alla vita culturale e alla
formazione dell'identità dei propri fondatori e della comunità in cui operano
attirando un pubblico diversificato. Nel lavoro vengono presentate le prassi
archivistiche professionali internazionali e le attività relative alla
digitalizzazione e all'accessibilità delle fonti archivistiche nonché i
progetti e i programmi archivistici europei attuali relativi ai nuovi concetti
archivistici e alla diffusione delle funzioni e dei servizi informatici degli
archivi e le più importanti piattaforme archivistiche collaborative in Europa.
Cilj je ovoga rada analizirati povijesni razvoj nakladničke djelatnosti državnih arhiva u Hrvatskoj te suvremeni proces upravljanja arhivskim izdavaštvom u kontekstu promotivnoga alata i odnosa s ...javnošću. Analiza povijesnoga razvoja nakladničke djelatnosti provedena je na temelju dostupne literature te dokumentacije pojedinih arhiva i Ministarstva kulture i medija. Istraživanje o suvremenom upravljanju nakladničkom djelatnošću provedeno je jednokratno putem upitnika u razdoblju od 2. do 7. ožujka 2022. godine. Analiza povijesnoga razvoja nakladničke djelatnosti rezultirala je ključnom spoznajom da su državni arhivi u Hrvatskoj prepoznali tehnike ranih modela odnosa s javnošću (tiskovne agenture i agenture javnoga informiranja) te ih pokušali implementirati u organizaciju vlastite nakladničke djelatnosti. Rezultati istraživanja suvremenoga procesa upravljanja izdavaštvom državnih arhiva u kontekstu promotivnoga alata i odnosa s javnošću ukazuju na potrebu njegove reorganizacije, posebice u fazi strateškoga planiranja i evaluacije, te daljnjega stimuliranja razvoja digitalnih inačica arhivskih publikacija.
Archival public relations are defined as a complex communicational pro-cess (by focusing on the coordination of the public and private interests) whose purpose is supposed to manage the archives’ public image and, depending on the possibilities, support its marketing (advertising) activities. The special emphasis within analysing possibilities of the applicability of public relations in the activi-ties of contemporary archives is put on publications, since they are one of the best known and most popular archival programs. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the historical development of publishing activities of Croatian archives, as well as the contemporary managerial process of archival publishing as a pro-motional tool and in the context of the public relations. The analysis of the his-torical development of the publishing activities of Croatian archives had been based on the available literature, as well as documents of the individual archives and Ministry of Culture and Media of the Republic of Croatia. The research in the network of the state archives (regional archives and the Croatian State Archives) on managing the publishing activities had been conducted on a one-time basis via the questionnaire in the period from the 2nd to 7th March 2022. The main finding of the analysis is that the Croatian archives soon became aware of the techniques of early public relations’ models and tried to implement them to the publishing activities. The strategic planning of their publishing activities, including the analysis of preferences of archival public based on the continuing interpersonal communication between archives and users, as well as the analysis of the communication with potential media and wider general public, can be considered as the important segment of public relations, whose purpose ought to be part of the archival management. The specified models imply a two-way sym-metry of the public relations. Due to the fact that already in the mid-20th century the planning of publishing activities included interpersonal communication with actual users of archival services, it implies an early implementation of informational-communicational aspects in the strategic planning of archival program activities meant for their users i.e. the attempt of integration of the discipline of the public relations in archival project management. The publishing activities within the primary tasks of the archival network of state archives in independent Republic of Croatia formally kept continuity based on the existing Archives and Archival Institutions Act. Publishing of archival publications is stimulated by users’ needs for better understanding and finding of archival records, as well as by archives’ endeavours to increase as much as possible the sales of their services. According to the available information on the websites of the Croatian archives, and catalogues of the National and University Library in Zagreb on their publi-cations from 1991 to 2022 (published on their own or co-published with other institutions), it can be concluded that archival publishing activities have gone into full swing after democratic changes. Still, the publishing policy did not undergo major changes compared to the earlier period. After 1991 the publishing activities are still mostly focused on publication of archival sources with the aim of increasing their availability. Apart from that, the results of research concerning the contemporary archival publishing activities in Croatia as promotional tools and in the context of the public relations indicate the need for their reorganisa-tion, especially in the phase of strategic planning and evaluation, with additional stimulation of the development of digital versions of archival publications.
Jedna od novina u pretvorbi dokumentarnoga i arhivskoga gradiva u digitalni oblik provjera je sukladnosti pravila, tehnologija i postupaka pretvorbe gradiva, koju provodi Hrvatski državni arhiv kao ...središnji i matični državni arhiv u Hrvatskoj. Riječ je o složenom postupku provjere određenoga informacijskoga sustava za digitalizaciju koji od tijela javne vlasti i drugih pravnih, ali i fizičkih osoba zahtijeva prihvaćanje i implementaciju odgovarajućih standarda i normi kako bi gradivo u digitalnom obliku na odgovarajući način moglo biti preuzeto u nadležne arhive, a samim time i dugoročno zaštićeno. Riječ je o jednoj od mjera u sustavu primjerene zaštite, trajnoga očuvanja i iskoristivosti gradiva u digitalnom obliku koja predstavlja velik izazov u poslovanju organizacija čijom djelatnošću gradivo nastaje, ali i arhivske službe koja im u tom segmentu mora pružiti adekvatnu stručnu podršku.
Croatian archival regulations (Archives and Archival Institutions Act and Ordinance on the Management of Records Outside the Archival Institutions) prescribe the procedure of the verification of compatibility of rules, technologies and procedures for conversion of archival materials into digital form. The proce-dure is carried out by the Croatian State Archives as the central state archives in the Republic of Croatia. It concerns a complex procedure of verification of a specific IT system for digitization which requires acceptance and implementation of appropriate standards and norms from the public authorities, other bodies or individuals in order for digitized records to be transferred in a certain way to authorised archives and consequently ensure their long-term protection. The paper provides answers to several current issues from conformity check proce-dures that can help public authorities and other interested parties in reconcilia-tion of business processes and preparing documentation necessary for obtaining a certificate of conformity.
U članku su prezentirani rezultati istraživanja o strukturi komentara sudionika e-savjetovanja o arhivskim propisima i planskim dokumentima u Hrvatskoj. Podatci su prikupljeni metodom kvantitativne ...analize sadržaja pojedinačnih izvješća o provedenim savjetovanjima od 2017. do 2020. godine dostupnih na portalu e-Savjetovanja i popratnih dokumenata. Nakon uvoda i opisa metodologije istraživanja, prezentirani su rezultati istraživanja te se o njima raspravlja. U obliku tabličnih i grafičkih prikaza prezentirani su podatci o statusu komentara (prihvaćeno, djelomično prihvaćeno, neprihvaćeno, primljeno na znanje, neodgovoreno) po pojedinom e-savjetovanju, te prema dvjema skupinama sudionika: stručna arhivska zajednica i stala zainteresirana javnost (prema broju i u postotku). Prihvaćeni i djelomično prihvaćeni komentari analizirani su i sadržajno te pritom razvrstani u dvije osnovne kategorije: tehnički i stručni komentari. S jedne strane, rezultati takve analize mogu se tumačiti kao pokazatelj stupnja kompetentnosti sudionika e-savjetovanja. S druge strane, može ih se smatrati važnim čimbenikom u objašnjavanju ishoda e-savjetovanja, tj. sklonosti zakonodavca da (ne)uvaži zaprimljene prijedloge.
The Bulletin d’ archives from 2021 published the results of a survey on participants in public consultations (e-counsellings) on regulations and planning documents on public archival service in Croatia. The subject was suited for a complete elaboration, since in the period from 2017 to 2020 the competent Ministry of Culture (renamed in July 2020 into Ministry of Culture and Media) had carried out counsellings via the central internet portal on eight legal acts (two laws, five ordinances and one planning document). Apart from the new ordi-nance on registers and other official archival documentation that has yet to be regulated, this constitutes a comprehensive normative and planning framework of the public archival service. Inter alia, the results of that research indicated a rather low level of interest of the general public, as well as the professional archi-val community for the normative infrastructure of the public archival service. The lower turnout was put into context of influences of the e-counsellings that had so far taken place, regarding the formation of the final proposals of legal acts in terms of the level of acceptance of the sent suggestions (comments). Analysis of this segment, i.e. the status with which the comments were marked after the e-counsellings (accepted, partially accepted, not accepted, duly noted, unan-swered) are presented in this paper. This seeks to encourage scientific interest in further research on this topic, especially within the ALM community (archives, libraries, museums). The results of the research show that the Ministry of Culture and Media, as the competent state administration institution, fully or partially accepted 79 or 19.1 % of the total of 412 sent comments. This percentage is slightly lower than the average percentage of accepted and partially accepted comments on e-counsellings at the state level (24 %). Analysis of the structure of comments by two groups of participants (professional archival community, gen-eral public) showed an equal share of accepted and partially accepted comments in the total number of comments submitted by each group (18.8 % of comments of the professional archival community and 20 % of comments of the general public). Accepted and partially accepted comments were also analysed according to their content and classified into two basic categories: technical and profes-sional comments. The share of unaccepted comments turned out to be very high (201 comments or 48.8 %). Nevertheless, as a kind of incentive for participation on future e-counsellings, it should be noted that two thirds of the accepted com-ments are related to professional comments. Although modest in terms of num-ber or percentage (53 comments or 13 % of the total of 412 comments sent to the analysed e-counsellings), this data still reflects the valuable contribution of participants in shaping the normative infrastructure of the archival service, i.e. respect for their competence by the legislator.
U članku su prezentirani rezultati istraživanja o sudionicima savjetovanja s javnošću (e-savjetovanja) o propisima i planskim dokumentima kojima se uređuju organizacija i obavljanje javne arhivske ...službe u Hrvatskoj. Podatci su prikupljeni metodom kvantitativne analize sadržaja pojedinačnih izvješća o provedenim savjetovanjima od 2017. do 2020. godine dostupnih na središnjem mrežnom portalu e-Savjetovanja i popratnih dokumenata. Nakon uvoda slijedi teorijski dio, u kojem je ukratko opisan normativni okvir provedbe e-savjetovanja u Hrvatskoj, arhivski propisi i planski dokument, o kojima je provedeno e-savjetovanje te metodologija istraživanja. Potom su prezentirani rezultati istraživanja te se o njima raspravlja. Prezentirani podatci o broju i strukturi sudionika (fizičke osobe, razne kategorije pravnih osoba) te broju komentara koje upućuju (ukupno i po pojedinom e-savjetovanju) interpretirani su kao važan pokazatelj zainteresiranosti društvene okoline za javnu arhivsku službu, odnosno rad državnih arhiva kojima je njezino obavljanje povjereno. S druge strane, sudjelovanje u e-savjetovanjima pojedinih strukovnih arhivističkih društava, državnih arhiva i njihovih administrativnih i stručnih djelatnika interpretirano je kao pokazatelj zainteresiranosti za jačanje normativne infrastrukture vlastite službe.
Counsellings with the public are in the Croatian context a relatively new instrument of public participation in legislating regulations and other general acts whose characteristics and effects have not been scientifically researched in practice to a greater extent. The aim of the paper is to contribute to these perceptions by the elaboration of a subject i.e. analysing the participants of e-counsellings on regulations and planning documents that concern organizing and performance of the public archival service in Croatia. The subject is suited for a complete elaboration, since in the period from 2017 to 2020 the competent Ministry of Culture (renamed in July 2020 Ministry of Culture and Media) had carried out counsellings via the central internet portal on 8 such legal acts (two laws, five ordinances and one planning document). Apart from the new ordinance on evidences that has yet to be regulated, this constitutes a comprehensive normative and planning framework of the public archival service coordinated with changes in the surroundings where public archives work. The data had been gathered by the method of quantitative analysing of the content of individual reports on conducted counsellings available on e-Counselling portal, as well as additional documents. The Data on the number and structure of participants (natural persons, various categories of corporations) and amount of comments they sent (in total and for each e-counselling) are interpreted as an important indicator of the public interest for the public archival service i.e. the work of the state archives who are intrusted with performing it. On the other hand, the participation of individual professional archival societies, state archives and their administrative and professional employees on e-counsellings is interpreted as the indicator of interest for strengthening of normative infrastructure pertaining to their own service. The total of 412 comments was sent to the analysed e-counsellings, submitted by 56 participants. Since individual procedure of e-counselling is conducted for each legal act, the same natural person or corporation can appear as a participant in several counsellings. Therefore, in the total number of 56 participants individual natural persons or corporations were counted more than once, depending on the number of e-counsellings they participated in. Further analysis established that 40 different natural persons and coorporations participated in e-counsellings. The largest number of participants, as far as 30 or 75 %, participated in just one e-counselling. Six participants took part in two counsellings (15 %), whereas three counsellings had three participants (7.5 %). Four counsellings had no participants, whereas only one person (2.5 %) took part in five of them, which is also the largest number of noted participations by the same participant. Research results further show that from the total of 40 various participants of e-councellings 30 of them are natural persons and only 10 corporations. In the process, the natural persons had 43 and the corporations 13 participations. The same number of persons from the professional archival community (administrative and professional employees in archives, state archives and professional archival associations) and persons from social environment i.e. interested public in the broad sense participated in e-counsellings. The former comprises of 21 participants and the latter has 19 of them. The biggest difference between the two groups concerns the number of participations. The professional archival community had 35, whereas other interested public 21 participations. The presented results indicate a rather low level of interest of the general public, as well as the professional archival community, for the normative infrastructure of the public archival service. This conclusion is supported by the comparison of the number of participants from both groups with other relevant data, such as the number of creators of documental and archival records under the jurisdiction of state archives i.e. the number of employees in state archives. The authorised ministry and state archives should use this as the basis for re-examination of the current approach in implementing e-counsellings i.e. encourage them to further motivate the professional community and the general public to participate in this segment of their work. The lower turnout can certainly be put into context of influences of the e-counsellings that had so far taken place, regarding the formation of the final proposals of legal acts in terms of the level of acceptance of the sent suggestions (comments). Analysis of this segment, including the content and types of comments (without arguments, with arguments, technical, professional etc.), is only pointed out in this paper as a subject that warrants separate research.
Tijekom jedanaest godina rada Hrvatski memorijalno-dokumentacijski centar Domovinskog rata prikupio je veliku količinu arhivskoga gradiva nastalog djelovanjem pojedinaca, odnosno javnog arhivskoga ...gradiva nastalog tijekom Domovinskog rata, a koje je završilo u posjedu privatnih osoba ili raznih udruga te kao takvo ustupljeno Centru. Riječ je o raznolikom gradivu, konvencionalnog i nekonvencionalnog karaktera, vojne i civilne provenijencije, čiji su stvaratelji bili pripadnici hrvatskih snaga, snaga Jugoslavenske narodne armije i pobunjenih Srba, civilne osobe, državni i vojni dužnosnici ili zainteresirani pojedinci. U radu će se prikazati osnovne značajke i vrste takvoga gradiva, načini akvizicije, postupak vrednovanja i pohrane te njegova dostupnost, historiografska vrijednost te sumirati stečena iskustva.
U radu se bavimo fra Jurom Božitkovićem u ulozi istraživača i povjesničara hrvatske filozofske baštine. Uz uvodna i zaključna promišljaja rad ima tri poglavlja. U prvom poglavlju donose se osnovni ...podatci o životu i radu fra Jure Božitkovića. Drugo poglavlje bavi se njegovim filozofskim stvaralaštvom u kojem smo popisali sve njegove bibliografske jedinice iz područja filozofije. Treće poglavlje sadrži razvrstavanje te kratak prikaz i analizu Božitkovićeva filozofskog opusa u cjelini, s posebnim naglaskom na istraživanje hrvatske filozofske baštine. Iz analize proizlazi da se Božitković najviše bavio starijom hrvatskom filozofijom, istraživao arhive franjevačkih samostana Franjevačke provincije Presvetog Otkupitelja te analizirao i predstavio filozofiju našeg znamenitog filozofa Ante Petrića, koji je sve svoje radove iz filozofije napisao i objavio na talijanskom jeziku. Zaključno se može reći da je Božitkovićevo značenje u sustavnom istraživanju i opisivanju rukopisne filozofske građe po franjevačkim samostanskim knjižnicama te u sustavnom bavljenju filozofijom Ante Petrića.
Tko se god bavi lokalnom poviješću zna da su crkveni arhivi bogat i nenadomjestiv izvor za proučavanje mjesta u kojem je gradivo nastalo. Treba znati da su crkveni arhivi strogo zaštićeni kanonskim ...propisima Katoličke crkve. Često se događa da su upravo crkveni dokumenti jedini izvor za lokalnu povijest, u slučajevima kada su arhivi nastali djelovanjem državnih i inih civilnih organa uništeni. Godine 1970., dogovorom između Historijskoga arhiva u Pazinu (danas: Državni arhiv u Pazinu – DAPA) i Porečke i Pulske biskupije i Pazinske apostolske administrature, započelo je popisivanje svih crkvenih arhiva na području navedenih crkvenih organizacija. Dvojica su arhivskih djelatnika, jedan imenovan s crkvene strane (svećenik Ivan Grah), a drugi sa strane Arhiva (profesor Jakov Jelinčić, arhivist), u vrijeme sređivanja i popisivanja navedenih crkvenih arhiva vodili Dnevnik koji je predmet ovoga rada. Vremenski je raspon Dnevnika od 18. prosinca 1970. do 28. listopada 1980. godine. Jakov Jelinčić prepisao je Dnevnik sa svim pogreškama i osobitostima te je priredio i »Kazalo« sjedišta u kojima su se u vrijeme njihova rada nalazili crkveni arhivski fondovi, s naznakom dana kada je fond bio u obradi, sati utrošenih za sređivanje i popisivanje svakoga pojedinog djelatnika, potom rednoga broja pojedinoga mjesta i stranice Dnevnika na kojoj se izvješće o radu nalazi. Zaključno je poglavlje ovoga rada napisao mr. sc. Ilija Jakovljević. Jakov Jelinčić u »Uvodu«, pored isticanja uloge velečasnoga Graha, posebno naglašava zasluge blagopokojnoga porečkog i pulskog biskupa dr. Dragutina Nežića, zatim tadašnjega direktora Arhiva Hrvatske (danas: Hrvatski državni arhiv) Bernarda Stullija i tadašnjega direktora Historijskog arhiva u Pazinu (danas: Državni arhiv u Pazinu) profesora Dražena Vlahova. Ilija Jakovljević u zaključnom poglavlju govori o Grahovim i Jelinčićevim zaslugama, naglašavajući posebno ulogu mons. Graha kao povjesničara i arhivista.
Whoever deals with local history knows that church archives are abundant and irreplaceable sources for studying the place where the archival material was created. It should be noted that the church archives are strictly protected by the canonical regulations of the Catholic Church. It is often the case that church documents are the only source for local history, in cases where archives created by the activity of state and other civilian organisations were destroyed. In 1970, following the agreement made between the Historical Archives in Pazin (today: the Pazin State Archives - DAPA) and the Diocese of Poreč and Pula and the Pazin Apostolic Administration, the listing of all church archives in the area of the two church organizations commenced. Two archival workers, one named by the Church (Ivan Grah, priest), and the other by the Archives (Jakov Jelinčić, archivist), during the time they were active organising and listing the church archives maintained the Logbook, which is the subject of this paper. The time span of the Logbook ranges from 18 December 1970 to 28 October 1980. Jakov Jelinčić copied the Logbook with all the mistakes and peculiarities and prepared the “Index” of the offices where, at the time of their work, church archival fonds were housed, with the indication of the day the fonds was being processed, the hours spent arranging and listing by every employee, followed by the number of individual places and pages of the Logbook where an activity report is located. The closing chapter of this paper was written by Ilija Jakovljević. In the “Introduction”, in addition to emphasizing the role of Reverend Grah, Jakov Jelinčić underlines the merits of the late Bishop of Poreč and Pula Dragutin Nežić, of the then manager of the Archives of Croatia (now Croatian State Archives) Bernard Stulli and the then manager of the Croatian Historical Archives in Pazin (today: The State Archives in Pazin) Dražen Vlahov. In the closing chapter, Ilija Jakovljević speaks about Grah’s and Jelinčić’s merits, emphasizing in particular the role of Msgr. Grah as a historian and archivist.
Chiunque si occupi della storia locale sa che gli archivi ecclesiastici sono una fonte ricca e insostituibile per lo studio del luogo in cui è stato prodotto il materiale. Bisogna sapere che gli archivi ecclesiastici sono rigorosamente protetti dalle norme canoniche della Chiesa cattolica. Succede spesso che proprio i documenti ecclesiastici siano la fonte unica per la storia locale, nei casi in cui gli archivi vengono distrutti tramite l’azione di autorità statali e civili. Nell’anno 1970, con l’accordo tra l’Archivio storico di Pisino (oggi: Archivio di Stato di Pisino – DAPA/ASP) e la Diocesi di Parenzo e Pola e l’Amministrazione apostolica di Pisino, è iniziata la registrazione di tutti gli archivi ecclesiastici sul territorio delle citate organizzazioni ecclesiali. Due operatori archivistici, uno nominato da parte della chiesa (il sacerdote Ivan Grah), e l’altro da parte dell’Archivio (il professore Jakov Jelinčić, archivista), durante l’ordinamento e la registrazione dei citati archivi ecclesiastici, hanno redatto il Registro, oggetto del presente testo. L’arco temporale del Registro va dal 18 dicembre del 1970 al 28 ottobre del 1980. Jakov Jelinčić ha trascritto il Registro con tutti gli errori e particolarità ed ha inoltre redatto l’ “Indice“ delle sedi in cui si trovavano i fondi archivistici ecclesiastici nel periodo del loro lavoro con l’indicazione del giorno in cui il fondo era in elaborazione, delle ore impiegate da parte di ogni operatore per l’ordinamento e la registrazione, poi del numero d’ordine di ogni parte e di pagina del Registro sulla quale si trova il rapporto sul lavoro. Il capitolo finale di questo testo è stato scritto da Dott. Ilija Jakovljević. Jakov Jelinčić nell’ “Introduzione“, oltre a sottolineare l’importante ruolo del venerabile Grah, sottolinea in particolare i meriti del compianto vescovo di Parenzo e Pola, Dott. Dragutin Nežić, di Bernard Stulli, direttore dell’epoca dell’Archivio della Croazia (oggi Archivio di Stato croato), e del professor Dražen Vlahov, direttore dell’epoca dell’Archivio storico di Pisino (oggi: Archivio di Stato di Pisino). Ilija Jakovljević nel capitolo finale parla dei meriti di Grah e Jelinčić, sottolineando in particolar modo il ruolo del Monsignor Grah in quanto storico e archivista.
PDF
