O delu Družbe in njenih knjigah za leto 1893: F. Lampe, Jeruzalemski romar; A. M. Slomšek, Življenja srečen pot; J. Stare, Kitajci in Japonci; M. Cilenšek, Naše škodljive rastline v podobi in besedi; ...Žaljski = F. Zbašnik, Na krivih potih; Koledar za leto 1894
Pospeševanje je konstitutivni del moderne družbe, ki ga družboslovci opažajo že od devetnajstega stoletja. V prispevku se pri holistični opredelitvi pospeševanja opiram na teoretski model Hartmuta ...Rose, ki razlikuje med analitično ločenimi, a vzajemno povezanimi dimenzijami pospeševanja. Med njimi je tehnološko pospeševanje, pri katerem sta na področju komuniciranja k njemu najočitneje prispevala telegraf in digitalizacija. Med najaktualnejše tehnologije s potencialom za velik družbeni vpliv lahko štejemo tudi algoritme. Njihove značilnosti v digitalnem kapitalizmu so (1) netransparentnost, (2) avtomatizacija, (3) podatkovljenje in (4) instrumentalna racionalizacija. Posledice teh značilnosti so večplastne, med njimi pa je tudi nadaljnja krepitev pospeševanja zaradi avtomatizacije. V nadaljevanju je obravnavan odnos med novinarstvom in časom, ki je neločljivo povezan z novinarskim delom. Potreba po takojšnjosti, naglici in aktualnosti ni le del novinarske prakse, temveč spada med temeljne ideološke kamne novinarske profesije. To ima posledice za normativno poslanstvo novinarstva, na katero bodo vplivali tudi algoritmi. Podana sta dva spekulativna scenarija: pesimistični, z dodatnim pospeševanjem novinarskega dela in množičnim odpuščanjem, kjer bi bili algoritmi zamenjava za novinarje, ter optimistični, kjer bi algoritmi lahko prevzeli najbolj rutinizirane oblike dela in dopolnjevali delo novinarjev, kar bi zaradi upočasnjevanja prispevalo k zviševanju kakovosti novinarstva.
Antropologi, ki želimo rahljati kapitalistični koncept dela, se običajno opremo na geografsko in zgodovinsko raznolikost ljudstev po svetu. Kot nakaže zbornik How Nature Works: Rethinking Labor on a ...Troubled Planet (University of New Mexico Press, 2019, Sarah Besky in Alex Blanchette, ur.), pa je morda smiselno v času ekološke krize in razmaha posthumanistične teorije stopiti še korak dlje. Avtorji namreč razpirajo vrsto načinov, na katere se človeško delo prepleta z delom drugih živih bitij in na katere so torej živali, bakterije ali pa glive vsaj posredno vključene v kapitalistični sistem proizvodnje. Na ta način zbornik spretno nagovarja trenutek »ekonomske in ekološke prekarnosti«, saj se po eni strani vklaplja v kontekst aktualnih razmislekov o večvrstni družbi in podnebni krizi, po drugi pa ponuja nekatere uporabne sveže iztočnice antropološkemu preučevanju dela.
Namen članka je ponuditi vpogled v koncept večjezičnosti, prikazati dinamike, ki so pomembne za razumevanje večjezičnosti, in preučiti dejavnike, ki oblikujejo večjezične posameznike in družbo. Po ...začetni opredelitvi večjezičnosti kot individualnega in družbenega fenomena so v nadaljevanju predstavljeni različni dejavniki, ki vplivajo na večjezični razvoj posameznika. Pri tem sledi avtorica logiki koncentričnih krogov – posameznik, družina, družba/okolje, izobraževalne institucije – in življenjskim obdobjem – zgodnje otroštvo, obdobje šolanja, odraslost. Razumevanje dejavnikov in dinamik je ključna premisa za spoštovanje večjezičnosti in razvijanje medkulturnih kompetenc. Današnja družba je potencialno večjezična, vprašanje pa je, ali bomo znali ta potencial razviti in ovrednotiti. Zato je zavedanje specifičnih okoliščin in dinamik, ki spodbujajo oziroma zavirajo večjezični razvoj posameznikov in družbe, odločilnega pomena.
U radu su autori temom „Od Gradske bolnice do Gradskoga ubožišta“ dali prilog za proučavanje bolničkih i socijalnih ustanova u gradu Osijeku od druge polovice 18. stoljeća do sredine 20. stoljeća. Na ...temelju arhivskoga gradiva pohranjenoga u Državnom arhivu u Osijeku i malobrojne relevantne literature prikazali su značenje Gradskoga ubožišta za zbrinjavanje starih i nemoćnih građana grada Osijeka te golemo značenje brige Družbe sestara milosrdnica sv. Vinka de Paulo iz Zagreba. Naglašena je i uloga Gradskoga poglavarstva i pojedinih zaklada nastalih krajem 19. stoljeća oko financiranja skrbi i dogradnje postojeće zgrade Gradske ubožnice u Novom gradu. Autori rad zaključuju sa zabranom rada navedene Družbe i promjenom naziva ustanove sredinom 20. stoljeća.
The realisation that health care is one of the most significant aspects within the concerns of governance was awakened in the mid-18th century. A
health and welfare institution, that is to say the Civic Hospital, was established in Osijek in 1741; one of its functions was to provide health care to the poor of the town which implies that it operated as an
almshouse right from the start. The work of the Civic Hospital in the New Town stopped in 1874 with the construction of the new hospital building in the Lower Town and the opening of the General and Public Huttler Kohlhoffer Monsperger Foundation Hospital. From then on, the Civic Hospital facility was converted into the City Almshouse where old women and men were accommodated so that they should not perish from becoming homeless. From September 1, 1890 up until 1952 the care for the
poor and those in need of care was provided by the Association of Sisters of Mercy of St. Vincent de Paul from Zagreb. Since year after year the numbers of the indigent increased, in 1902, built to the western courtyard side was the building in which was located the Mijo Cseh Institution for the Care of the Mentally Ill located in the Civic Almshouse. The City Almshouse was a ground floor building and in the first decades of the 20th century it did not meet the spatial requirements, hence in 1936 a first floor was built on and a large number of the poor and infirm were cared for. As in 1952 the work and care of the Association of Sisters of Mercy of St. Vincent de Paul in the City Almshouse was prohibited, the Peoples Committee of the town of Osijek registered the pre-war City Almshouse on May 20, 1954 in Martin Divald Street 2 as the Nursing Home for the Elderly and Infirm.
Draconic heraldry is a term applied to coats of arms and other heraldic insignia of the ‘Brotherhood of the Croatian Dragon’ Society and the draconic coats of arms as personal symbols of the ...Society’s members. The Society, established in 1905, is a cultural association that strives to preserve and renew Croatian cultural heritage and promote the identity and achievements of Croatian culture.From its establishment until today, the Society has granted its members personal coats of arms in accordance with prescribed heraldic standards and under the professional supervision of the Draconic Heraldic Office, thus being one of three realms of living heraldry in Croatia (the other two being municipal and ecclesiastic heraldry). The paper positions draconic heraldry within the Croatian heraldic heritage, and presents its development and the activities of heraldists and other participants in its shaping. Prior to the ban of the Society in 1946 by the Communist regime, the heraldic office was implemented through the work of Emilij Laszowski, a co-founder of the Society and renowned heraldic expert, who hired a distinguished artist, Vjera Bojničić Zamola, to produce coats of arms under his guidance. Together they produced over 200 draconic coats of arms (and recreated some hundred historical Croatian noble coats of arms), today mostly preserved in the Native Collection in Ozalj. The ‘Genealogy’ of the Society, painted by Stjepan Kukec for its 35th anniversary, includes over a thousand of its members, among which more than 800 are presented with individual draconic coats of arms. After the renewal of the Society in 1990, the office was first led by Milovan Petković, who re-established the tradition and established cooperation with heraldic experts and artists. During his leadership and mostly with the help of Maja Bejdić as expert adviser and Mladen Stojić as graphical artist, some fifty draconic coats of arms were designed for Society members. The office has been held by Zvonimir Gerber since 2006. He continued the practice and cooperation, introducing armorial patents to go with designed coats of arms. Around 20 draconic members were granted coats of arms in this period. He photographically documented the entire heraldic collection of draconic and other coats of arms in the Ozalj Native Collection. In 2017, he was succeeded by Mislav Grgić, who introduced a ceremonial grant of armorial patents at the most solemn occasions of the Society and reorganised heraldic regulations with the help of his future successor. Blazons (formalised heraldic descriptions of coats of arms) were included in the 13 new armorial patents granted, as the essential element of an armorial grant. Finally, the office was entrusted to Željko Heimer, who started gathering materials on draconic coats of arms, collected and systematized material collected by Gerber and the material produced after 1990, and initiated the creation of Draconic Armorial Books in two volumes: Vol. I. Prior to the 1946 Ban, with currently 246 coats of arms, and Vol. II. After the 1990 Renewal, with 82; both are being actively updated as research progresses.Furthermore, the paper classifies types of draconic coats of arms according to the outer characteristics of their design, forming chronologically successive, clearly divided types: four prior to ban of the Society in 1946, and four after its renewal in 1990. As the first published research concerning this matter, it presents theses and formulates questions, which can be answered only through further research.
The book brings several essays on objects, atmospheres, moods, flavors and scents that marked the everyday life in the socialist Yugoslavia. The authors of individual chapters in Made in YU use these ...objects, atmospheres, moods, flavors and scents as lenses through which they observe practices and processes of significant restructurings and reframings of everyday, cultural, political and affective worlds in the post-Yugoslav societies.
Namen prispevka je proučiti in jasno opredeliti pojme javno dobro, skupni viri in skupno. V članku smo na podlagi prostorsko-časovne analize, intervjujev in delavnic med splošno in strokovno ...javnostjo osvetlili dojemanje javnega dobra in skupnega v Sloveniji kot tranzicijski družbi. Analiza je pokazala, da na razumevanje teh pojmov med splošno javnostjo še vedno močno vpliva poudarjanje socialne pravičnosti, enakosti in dostopnosti dobrin za vse iz obdobja socializma, kar je lahko v nasprotju s pravico do zasebne lastnine. Neustrezno upravljanje dobrin, ki so dojete kot javno dobro, v resnici pa so skupni viri, lahko vodi v konflikte in razvrednotenje skupnih virov, s čimer bomo izgubili prednosti, ki nam omogočajo kakovostnejše življenje. Ker smo od omejenih naravnih virov življenjsko odvisni, je treba o njih nujno ozavestiti splošno in strokovno javnost, izpostaviti ranljivost teh virov in pojasniti, dane morejo biti dostopni vsem v neomejenih količinah. V mednarodnem okolju želimo s predstavljenim slovenskim primerom prispevati k boljšemu razumevanju človeškega vedenja in pričakovanj do javnega dobra in skupnih virov v postsocialističnih tranzicijskih družbah.
PDF
