Selective inhibition of overexpressed ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters is an attractive approach to enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapeutics in multidrug resistant cancers. Previously, we ...reported that the cancer sensitizing effect of deazaflavin analogs, an important chemotype for developing combination treatments with topoisomerase II (TOP2) poisons, is associated with increased intracellular drug accumulation. Here we report the characterization of ZW-1226, a deazaflavin analog, as a potent inhibitor of multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1). Specifically, ZW-1226 inhibited MRP1 with a 16-fold higher potency than the most widely used positive control MK-571 in vesicular transport assay and displayed excellent selectivity indices exceeding 100 over other major ABC transporters, including P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), MRP2 and MRP3. Mechanistically, we revealed that its MRP1 inhibitory action requires the participation of GSH. In chemo-sensitization test, ZW-1226 fully reversed the MRP1-mediated drug resistance to TOP2 poisons etoposide (ETP) and doxorubicin (DOX) in H69AR cells and conferred CC50s comparable to those in the sensitive parental NCI-H69 cells. The sensitization was associated with boosted intracellular accumulation of ETP and DOX and elevated endogenous GSH. Moreover, ZW-1226 showed potential to occupy the leukotriene C4 binding site in molecular docking with bovine MRP1, presumably with the help of GSH. Lastly, ZW-1226 exhibited high tissue to plasma partitions in mice but did not alter ETP distribution to normal tissues, suggesting it could be a viable lead with desirable pharmacokinetic properties to warrant further investigation.
Display omitted
•Deazaflavin analog ZW-1226 is 16 times more potent than the known MRP1 inhibitor MK-571 in vesicular transport assay.•ZW-1226 showed good selectivity for MRP1 over other major ABC transporters, including P-gp, BCRP, MRP2 and MRP3.•The inhibition of MRP1 by ZW-1226 is GSH dependent.•ZW-1226 effectively reversed MRP1-mediated drug resistance to TOP2 poisons etoposide and doxorubicin in H69AR cells.•ZW-1226 exhibited high tissue to plasma partitioning in mice without altering etoposide distribution to normal tissues.
Summary
Primary mediastinal (thymic) large B‐cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is an uncommon subtype of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that presents with a mediastinal mass and has unique clinicopathological ...features. Historically, patients with PMBCL were treated with R‐CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy ± involved field radiation. Since a phase II trial, published in April 2013, demonstrated excellent results using dose‐adjusted (DA) R‐EPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin), this treatment has gained popularity. We performed a retrospective, multicentre analysis of patients aged ≥18 years with PMBCL since January 2011. Patients were stratified by frontline regimen, R‐CHOP versus DA‐R‐EPOCH. 132 patients were identified from 11 contributing centres (56 R‐CHOP and 76 DA‐R‐EPOCH). The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included progression‐free survival, complete response (CR) rate, and rates of treatment‐related complications. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. DA‐R‐EPOCH use increased after April 2013 (79% vs. 45%, P < 0·001), and there was less radiation use after DA‐R‐EPOCH (13% vs. 59%, P < 0·001). While CR rates were higher with DA‐R‐EPOCH (84% vs. 70%, P = 0·046), these patients were more likely to experience treatment‐related toxicities. At 2 years, 89% of R‐CHOP patients and 91% of DA‐R‐EPOCH patients were alive. To our knowledge, this represents the largest series comparing outcomes of R‐CHOP to DA‐R‐EPOCH for PMBCL.
Veliparib, a poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitor, potentiated standard chemotherapy against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in preclinical studies. We evaluated the combination of veliparib with ...cisplatin and etoposide (CE; CE+V) doublet in untreated, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).
Patients with ES-SCLC, stratified by sex and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, were randomly assigned to receive four 3-week cycles of CE (75 mg/m
intravenously on day 1 and 100 mg/m
on days 1 through 3) along with veliparib (100 mg orally twice per day on days 1 through 7) or placebo (CE+P). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Using an overall one-sided 0.10-level log-rank test, the study had 88% power to demonstrate a 37.5% reduction in the PFS hazard rate.
A total of 128 eligible patients received treatment on protocol. The median age was 66 years, 52% of patients were men, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 for 29% of patients and 1 for 71%. The respective median PFS for the CE+V arm versus the CE+P arm was 6.1 versus 5.5 months (unstratified hazard ratio HR, 0.75 one-sided P = .06; stratified HR, 0.63 one-sided P = .01), favoring CE+V. The median overall survival was 10.3 versus 8.9 months (stratified HR, 0.83; 80% CI, 0.64 to 1.07; one-sided P = .17) for the CE+V and CE+P arms, respectively. The overall response rate was 71.9% versus 65.6% (two-sided P = .57) for CE+V and CE+P, respectively. There was a significant treatment-by-strata interaction in PFS: Male patients with high lactate dehydrogenase levels derived significant benefit (PFS HR, 0.34; 80% CI, 0.22 to 0.51) but there was no evidence of benefit among patients in other strata (PFS HR, 0.81; 80% CI, 0.60 to 1.09). The following grade ≥ 3 hematology toxicities were more frequent in the CE+V arm than the CE+P arm: CD4 lymphopenia (8% v 0%; P = .06) and neutropenia (49% v 32%; P = .08), but treatment delivery was comparable.
The addition of veliparib to frontline chemotherapy showed signal of efficacy in patients with ES-SCLC and the study met its prespecified end point.
Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone are closely related, highly malignant tumors of children, adolescents, and young adults. A new drug combination, ifosfamide and etoposide, ...was highly effective in patients with Ewing's sarcoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone who had a relapse after standard therapy. We designed a study to test whether the addition of these drugs to a standard regimen would improve the survival of patients with newly diagnosed disease.
Patients 30 years old or younger with Ewing's sarcoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone, or primitive sarcoma of bone were eligible. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 49 weeks of standard chemotherapy with doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin or experimental therapy with these four drugs alternating with courses of ifosfamide and etoposide.
A total of 518 patients met the eligibility requirements. Of 120 patients with metastatic disease, 62 were randomly assigned to the standard-therapy group and 58 to the experimental-therapy group. There was no significant difference in five-year event-free survival between the treatment groups (P=0.81). Among the 398 patients with nonmetastatic disease, the mean (+/-SE) five-year event-free survival among the 198 patients in the experimental-therapy group was 69+/-3 percent, as compared with 54+/-4 percent among the 200 patients in the standard-therapy group (P=0.005). Overall survival was also significantly better among patients in the experimental-therapy group (72+/-3.4 percent vs. 61+/-3.6 percent in the standard-therapy group, P=0.01).
The addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to a standard regimen does not affect the outcome for patients with metastatic disease, but it significantly improves the outcome for patients with nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone, or primitive sarcoma of bone.
Optimal treatment regimens for AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma, a frequent contributor to morbidity and mortality among people with HIV, have not been systematically evaluated in low-income and ...middle-income countries, where the disease is most common. In this study, we aimed to investigate optimal treatment strategies for advanced stage disease in areas of high prevalence and limited resources.
In this open-label, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled people with HIV and advanced stage AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma attending 11 AIDS Clinical Trials Group sites in Brazil, Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) with a centralised computer system to receive either intravenous bleomycin and vincristine or oral etoposide (the investigational arms), or intravenous paclitaxel (the control arm), together with antiretroviral therapy (ART; combined efavirenz, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and emtricitabine). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) at week 48, using a 15% non-inferiority margin to compare the investigational groups against the active control group. Safety was assessed in all eligible treated study participants. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01435018.
334 participants were enrolled between Oct 1, 2013, and March 8, 2018, when the study was closed early due to inferiority of the bleomycin and vincristine plus ART arm, as per the recommendations of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The etoposide plus ART arm also closed due to inferiority in March, 2016, following a DSMB recommendation. Week-48 PFS rates were higher in the paclitaxel plus ART arm than in both investigational arms. The absolute differences in PFS were −30% (95% CI −52 to −8) for the comparison of paclitaxel plus ART (week 48 PFS 50%, 32 to 67; n=59) and etoposide plus ART (20%, 6 to 33; n=59), and −20% (−33% to −7%) for the comparison of paclitaxel plus ART (64%, 55 to 73; n=138) and bleomycin and vincristine plus ART (44%, 35 to 53; n=132). Both CIs overlapped the non-inferiority margin. The most common adverse events, in 329 eligible participants who began treatment, were neutropenia (48 15%), low serum albumin (33 10%), weight loss (29 9%), and anaemia (28 9%), occurring at similar frequency across treatment arms.
Non-inferiority of either investigational intervention was not shown, with paclitaxel plus ART showing superiority to both oral etoposide plus ART and bleomycin and vincristine plus ART, supporting its use in treating advanced AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma in resource-limited settings.
US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.
Etoposide, a DNA damage-inducing agent, is widely used to treat neuroblastoma. Etoposide binds to and inhibits topoisomerase II, thereby inducing the DNA damage response. However, the underlying ...mechanism of etoposide resistance in neuroblastoma remains unclear. The results of the present study revealed that etoposide upregulated growth hormone receptor (GHR) expression levels in etoposide-resistant neuroblastoma cells, suggesting that GHR upregulation may be involved in the underlying mechanism of etoposide resistance. Thus, the combined effect of GHR knockdown and etoposide treatment on cell viability, apoptosis and migration in vitro, as well as tumor growth in mouse xenograft models in vivo, was subsequently analyzed. The results of cell viability and colony formation assays demonstrated that GHR knockdown enhanced the inhibitory effects of etoposide on cell viability and sensitized cells to etoposide. The enhanced cell viability was discovered to be, at least in part, due to the increase in etoposide-induced apoptosis following GHR knockdown. Moreover, the knockdown of GHR enhanced the inhibitory effect of etoposide on cell migration. Mouse xenograft studies confirmed the effects of GHR silencing in etoposide-resistant neuroblastoma progression in vivo. Furthermore, the effects of GHR knockdown in etoposide resistance were hypothesized to occur via the inactivation of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway. In conclusion, the results of the present study provided novel insight into the underlying mechanism of etoposide resistance and a potential target for the treatment of etoposide-resistant neuroblastoma.
•Etoposide upregulates the expression levels of GHR in etoposide-resistant neuroblastoma cell lines.•GHR knockdown enhances the inhibitory effect of etoposide on neuroblastoma cell viability.•Combined GHR knockdown and etoposide treatment significantly inhibits the activation of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway.•Combined GHR knockdown and etoposide treatment enhances cell apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells.•GHR knockdown enhances etoposide-induced inhibition of tumor inhibition in vivo.
Summary Background Previous trials from our group suggested an overall survival benefit with five cycles of adjuvant full-dose epirubicin plus ifosfamide in localised high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma of ...the extremities or trunk wall, and no difference in overall survival benefit between three cycles versus five cycles of the same neoadjuvant regimen. We aimed to show the superiority of the neoadjuvant administration of histotype-tailored regimen to standard chemotherapy. Methods For this international, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, multicentre trial, patients were enrolled from 32 hospitals in Italy, Spain, France, and Poland. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with localised, high-risk (high malignancy grade, 5 cm or longer in diameter, and deeply located according to the investing fascia), soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities or trunk wall and belonging to one of five histological subtypes: high-grade myxoid liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive three cycles of full-dose standard chemotherapy (epirubicin 60 mg/m2 per day short infusion, days 1 and 2 plus ifosfamide 3 g/m2 per day days 1, 2, and 3, repeated every 21 days) or histotype-tailored chemotherapy: for high-grade myxoid liposarcoma, trabectedin 1·3 mg/m2 via 24-h continuous infusion, repeated every 21 days; for leiomyosarcoma, gemcitabine 1800 mg/m2 on day 1 intravenously over 180 min plus dacarbazine 500 mg/m2 on day 1 intravenously over 20 min, repeated every 14 days; for synovial sarcoma, high-dose ifosfamide 14 g/m2 , given over 14 days via an external infusion pump, every 28 days; for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, intravenous etoposide 150 mg/m2 per day (days 1, 2, and 3) plus intravenous ifosfamide 3 g/m2 per day (days 1, 2, and 3), repeated every 21 days; and for undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 intravenously over 90 min plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 8 intravenously over 1 h, repeated every 21 days. Randomisation was stratified by administration of preoperative radiotherapy and by country of enrolment. Computer-generated random lists were prepared by use of permuted balanced blocks of size 4 and 6 in random sequence. An internet-based randomisation system ensured concealment of the treatment assignment until the patient had been registered into the system. No masking of treatment assignments was done. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. The primary and safety analyses were planned in the intention-to-treat population. We did yearly futility analyses on an intention-to-treat basis. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01710176 , and with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials, number EUDRACT 2010–023484–17, and is closed to patient entry. Findings Between May 19, 2011, and May 13, 2016, 287 patients were randomly assigned to a group (145 to standard chemotherapy and 142 to histotype-tailored chemotherapy), all of whom, except one patient assigned to standard chemotherapy, were included in the efficacy analysis (97 34% with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma; 64 22% with high-grade myxoid liposarcoma; 70 24% with synovial sarcoma; 27 9% with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour; and 28 10% with leiomyosarcoma). At the third futility analysis, with a median follow-up of 12·3 months (IQR 2·75–28·20), the projected disease-free survival at 46 months was 62% (95% CI 48–77) in the standard chemotherapy group and 38% (22–55) in the histotype-tailored chemotherapy group (stratified log-rank p=0·004; hazard ratio 2·00, 95% CI 1·22–3·26; p=0·006). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events in the standard chemotherapy group (n=125) were neutropenia (107 86%), anaemia (24 19%), and thrombocytopenia (21 17%); the most common grade 3 or higher adverse event in the histotype-tailored chemotherapy group (n=114) was neutropenia (30 26%). No treatment-related deaths were reported in both groups. In agreement with the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, the study was closed to patient entry after the third futility analysis. Interpretation In a population of patients with high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma, we did not show any benefit of a neoadjuvant histotype-tailored chemotherapy regimen over the standard chemotherapy regimen. The benefit seen with the standard chemotherapy regimen suggests that this benefit might be the added value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy itself in patients with high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma. Funding European Union grant (Eurosarc FP7 278472).
Because of promising efficacy signals in single-arm studies, a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to ...first-line standard chemotherapy for treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).
Patients with SCLC were randomly assigned to receive bevacizumab or placebo, with cisplatin or carboplatin plus etoposide, for four cycles followed by single-agent bevacizumab or placebo until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).
Fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to the bevacizumab group and 50 to the placebo group; 69% versus 66%, respectively, completed four cycles of therapy. Median PFS was higher in the bevacizumab group (5.5 months) than in the placebo group (4.4 months; hazard ratio HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.86). Median overall survival (OS) was similar for both groups (9.4 v 10.9 months for bevacizumab and placebo groups, respectively), with an HR of 1.16 (95% CI, 0.66 to 2.04). Overall response rates were 58% (95% CI, 43% to 71%) for the bevacizumab group and 48% (95% CI, 34% to 62%) for the placebo group. Median duration of response was 4.7 months for the bevacizumab group and 3.2 months for the placebo group. In the bevacizumab and placebo groups, 75% versus 60% of patients, respectively, experienced one or more grade 3 or higher adverse events. No new or unexpected safety signals for bevacizumab were observed.
The addition of bevacizumab to cisplatin or carboplatin plus etoposide for treatment of extensive-stage SCLC improved PFS, with an acceptable toxicity profile. However, no improvement in OS was observed.
Summary
This prospective multi‐institutional phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of dose‐adjusted EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and ...doxorubicin) plus rituximab (DA‐EPOCH‐R) in untreated patients with poor prognosis large B‐cell lymphomas. Eighty‐one patients diagnosed with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n = 68), primary mediastinal DLBCL (n = 6) and follicular lymphoma Grade 3b (n = 7), with an age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index >1, were eligible for analysis. Median age was 60 years (range: 21–77). Sixty‐five patients (80·2%) achieved complete response. After a median follow‐up time of 64 months, 10‐year event‐free survival and overall survival (OS) were 47·8% and 63·6%, respectively. None of the studied clinical and biological characteristics were associated with poorer outcome. Interestingly, patients with BCL6 rearrangement achieved a 10‐year OS of 100%, while patients with BCL2 rearrangement exhibited a poorer outcome compared to activated B‐cell tumours and germinal centre B‐cell without BCL2 rearranged tumours. Results achieved with DA‐EPOCH‐R showed a good long‐term outcome and a tolerable toxicity profile in high‐risk large B cell lymphoma patients. Outcome was not affected by tumour cell proliferation or by cell of origin, highlighting the requirement of new biological markers for patient subclassification of high‐risk DLBCL patients.
PDF
