The major increase of incarcerated individuals in the United States has led to a variety of issues. The experience of incarceration has an impact on not only the individual but the entire family ...system. However, the impact on the sibling relationship has yet to be explored in the literature. The current study examined the lived experience of sisters with an incarcerated brother. In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews with five sisters with an incarcerated brother were conducted. The results displayed five themes that emerged from the interviews: emotional impact, adjustment, prison experience, family impact, and stigma. The results informed clinical implications for marriage and family therapists working within the incarcerated population. In addition, specific suggestions are provided in how to best advocate for this population through research and clinical work. Moreover, the current study punctuates the specific and dire need for therapeutic intervention and broader policy change among many other efforts.
Family members of people with mental illness (MI) may experience a host of psychological adversities such as increased stress, burden, and reduced wellbeing. However, relatively little is known about ...siblings. This study aimed to characterise the experience of distress (viz. depressive and anxiety symptoms), burden, and wellbeing in siblings of people with MI.
Studies reporting on quantitative measures of depression, anxiety, burden, or wellbeing in siblings; and/or qualitative findings on siblings' experience were eligible. The literature search was conducted up until 20th October 2022.
Sixty-two studies comprising data from 3744 siblings were included. The pooled mean percentage of depressive symptoms fell in the mild range at 15.71 (
= 28,
= 2187, 95% CI 12.99-18.43) and anxiety symptoms fell in the minimal range at 22.45 (
= 16,
= 1122, 95% CI 17.09-27.80). Moderator analyses indicate that siblings of people with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder experience greater depressive symptoms than siblings of people with other types of MI (
= -16.38,
< 0.001). Qualitative findings suggest that individuals may be particularly vulnerable during their siblings' illness onset and times of relapse. Limited communication, confusion about MI, and the need to compensate may contribute to siblings' distress and/or burden. Siblings' experience of wellbeing and caregiving were closely related.
This review highlights the complex psychological experience of siblings and the need for greater research and clinical support for this important yet often overlooked cohort.
To illuminate processes that contribute to the development of sibling differences, this study examined cross-lagged links between parents' beliefs about sibling differences in academic ability and ...differences between siblings' grade point averages (GPAs), and cross-lagged links between differences in siblings' GPAs and sibling differences in academic interests. Data were collected from mothers, fathers, firstborn youth (M age at Time 1 = 15.71, SD = 1.07), and secondborn youth (M age at Time 1 = 13.18, SD = 1.29) from 388 European American families on 3 annual occasions. Findings revealed that, after controlling for siblings' average grades and prior differences in performance, parents' beliefs about sibling differences in academic ability predicted differences in performance such that youth rated by parents as relatively more competent than their sibling earned relatively higher grades the following year. Siblings' relative school performance, however, did not predict parents' beliefs about differences between siblings' competencies. Further, after controlling for average interests and grades, sibling differences in GPA predicted differences in siblings' interests such that youth who had better grades than their siblings reported relatively stronger academic interests the following year. Differences in interest, however, did not predict sibling differences in GPA. Findings are discussed in terms the role of sibling dynamics in family socialization.
Background: Recent models of the early emergence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) propose that infant intrinsic risk susceptibilities in behaviour may be amplified by interaction within the early ...social environment into an increasingly atypical developmental trajectory. This study examines whether 6‐ and 12‐month parent–infant interactions in at‐risk siblings differ from those with low‐risk and whether – in at‐risk siblings – such interactions predict later 3‐year classification of ASD or no ASD.
Method: Within the British Autism Study of Infant Siblings (BASIS), 6‐min videotaped episodes of parent–infant free play in infants at 6–10 months (45 at‐risk siblings and 47 low‐risk siblings) and 12–15 months (43 at‐risk siblings and 48 low‐risk siblings) in a laboratory setting were rated on the Manchester Assessment of Caregiver‐Infant Interaction (MACI), blind to participant information. Standard tests were administered for concurrent behavioural signs of ASD features and developmental level. Systematic consensus diagnostic classification of ASD was made at 3 years for the at‐risk siblings.
Results: Parent nondirectiveness and sensitive responsiveness differed in relation to ASD/risk status (at‐risk ASD, at‐risk no‐ASD and low‐risk) at both 6 and 12 months. At 6 months, infant liveliness was lower in the at‐risk groups; at 12 months, infant attentiveness to parent and positive affect were lower in the at‐risk group later diagnosed with ASD. Dyadic mutuality and intensity of engagement showed a group effect at 12 months. Dyadic mutuality, infant positive affect and infant attentiveness to parent at 12 months (but not 6 months) predicted 3‐year ASD outcome, whereas infant ASD‐related behavioural atypicality did not.
Conclusions: This is the first prospective evidence that early dyadic interaction between at‐risk infants and their parents is associated with later diagnostic outcome in ASD. Possible explanations for these findings and their theoretical implications are considered.
Background
Although providing sibling psychosocial services is a standard of care in pediatric oncology, initial survey research suggests that this standard is rarely achieved and siblings’ support ...needs remain unmet. Which sibling psychosocial services are available and how centers provide such services is unknown. To identify targetable services gaps, this qualitative study characterizes current sibling psychosocial care practices at select pediatric cancer centers across the United States.
Procedure
Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of psychosocial care providers (N = 27) working across the United States in pediatric oncology centers of varied sizes. Interviews queried providers regarding sibling‐focused parent psychoeducation, psychosocial screening, comprehensive assessment, and psychosocial support offerings. Interview data were analyzed using Applied Thematic Analysis.
Results
Across cancer centers, sibling care practices did not align with consensus‐based recommendations. The nature and availability of sibling‐focused psychoeducation, screening, assessment, and support were variable between and within centers. Siblings themselves were largely absent from sibling psychosocial care, and care was rarely sibling‐specific. The flow of information about siblings was discontinuous and uncoordinated across the care continuum, resulting in psychosocial care provided reactively, typically in response to parental concerns.
Conclusions
Sibling psychosocial care provision falls short of established care recommendations, leaving sibling psychosocial needs unmet. Findings highlight the need for tools and strategies to facilitate the implementation of sibling psychosocial care across the care continuum, to support siblings’ psychosocial functioning across the life course.
Naturalistic dyadic sequences of teaching and learning involving older and younger siblings were investigated in 39 middle-class dyads over a 2-year period in early childhood. Siblings were observed ...during ongoing interactions in the home setting for 6 90-min sessions at both Time 1 (older sibling M age = 4.4 years; younger sibling M age = 2.4 years) and Time 2 (older sibling M age = 6.3 years; younger sibling M age = 4.4 years). Sequences of sibling-directed teaching (T1 n = 353; T2 n = 1,039) were identified from the observation transcripts and coded for teacher/learner roles, initiation of teaching, teaching strategies, and learner response. Older siblings were more likely to engage in teaching at both time points, but the proportion of younger sibling teaching increased significantly from T1 to T2, partially because older siblings requested teaching more often from their younger siblings at T2. Siblings' use of teaching strategies varied across time points, while both older and younger sibling learners generally accepted or complied with the teaching. A final set of analyses examined birth-order effects while controlling for age by comparing older sibling teachers at age 4 (T1) to younger sibling teachers at age 4 (T2). At T1 firstborn older siblings (age 4) engaged in a wider range and more sophisticated teaching strategies than secondborn younger siblings (age 4) at T2. Findings highlight the bidirectional nature of teacher-learner interactions and are discussed in light of recent theory and research indicating that the sibling relationship is a rich context for children's learning and development.
The purpose of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the parent-report version of the Sibling Perception Questionnaire (SPQ) in well-siblings. Participants were 200 caregivers of ...healthy children ages 9-17 years who had a sibling (ages 0-18 years) diagnosed with cancer, diabetes, cystic fibrosis, epilepsy, spina bifida, or congenital heart disease. The SPQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability for the total score (α = 0.83) and displayed acceptable convergent validity as evidenced by medium to large positive correlations with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (
's ranged from 0.39 to 0.56). The original four-factor model displayed a poor model fit (CFI = 0.6, RMSEA = 0.11, TLI = 0.55, SRMR = 0.14) in comparison to a revised, 14-item four-factor model (CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.07, TLI = 0.90, SRMR = 0.06). The shortened, 14-item parent-report version of the SPQ largely demonstrated good psychometric properties and has the potential to reduce the burden of caregivers filling out the measure.
This study examined longitudinal growth in gestures and words in infants at heightened (HR) versus low risk (LR) for ASD. The MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory was administered ...monthly from 8 to 14 months and at 18 and 24 months to caregivers of 14 HR infants diagnosed with ASD (HR-ASD), 27 HR infants with language delay (HR-LD), 51 HR infants with no diagnosis (HR-ND), and 28 LR infants. Few differences were obtained between LR and HR-ND infants, but HR-LD and HR-ASD groups differed in initial skill levels and growth patterns. While HR-LD infants grew at rates comparable to LR and HR-ND infants, growth was attenuated in the HR-ASD group, with trajectories progressively diverging from all other groups.
The onset of deafblindness profoundly impacts both the individual with this condition and the individual's family, including siblings. While current studies have primarily focused on the impact felt ...by parents or spouses, the distinct experiences of siblings have received comparatively less attention. This systematic review addresses the existing research gap regarding the psychological and social consequences experienced by siblings of individuals with deafblindness. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Dissertations & Theses (on ProQuest), ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS), Sociological Abstracts, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Cairn Info. Seven studies were identified as meeting the eligibility criteria for inclusion. The review revealed that siblings of individuals with deafblindness face psychological and social challenges, including emotions such as feelings of neglect, resentment, embarrassment, jealousy, and anxiety. Siblings also grapple with communication difficulties, contributing to feelings of exclusion and insecurity. In addition, these siblings take on significant responsibilities within the family and encounter obstacles in forming relationships outside the family. These findings underscore the need of interventions to improve the well-being of siblings of individuals with deafblindness by addressing their psycho-emotional needs and promoting positive social interactions. These findings align with studies conducted on siblings of children with other disabilities. However, additional research is crucial to investigate overlooked dimensions, particularly positive factors like coping mechanisms and resilience, that may influence the mental health and social experiences of these siblings.
PDF
