E-viri
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
-
Lain, Corinna Barrett
University of Pennsylvania law review, 04/2004, Letnik: 152, Številka: 4Journal Article
When one thinks about judicial review, one tends to envision the Supreme Court as a "countermajoritarian hero," protector of minorities from tyrannical majority rule. It is hardly surprising, then, that as today's top constitutional scholars debate the merits of judicial review, its defenders have returned to the notion that the Court's involvement is necessary to protect minority rights. For some, the Supreme Court's role as countermajoritarian hero is theoretically appealing, but a nagging question remains: How much does the Court actually play it? Lain examines whether the Warren Court was truly deserving of its countermajoritarian image in its criminal procedure rulings.
Avtor
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.