E-viri
Recenzirano
-
Morton, Justin
Australasian journal of philosophy, 04/2019, Letnik: 97, Številka: 2Journal Article
Some proponents of the evolutionary debunking argument against moral realism believe that replies that assume substantive moral claims beg the question. In this paper, I give a new account of what's wrong with such replies. On this account, many realists beg the question when they rely on substantive moral claims in their replies to the argument, but naturalists do not. While this account generalizes to some other domains, it allows perceptual and inductive realism to remain undebunked.
