UP - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano
  • Effects of the chymase inhi...
    Duengen, Hans-Dirk; Kim, Raymond J.; Zahger, Doron; Orvin, Katia; Kornowski, Ran; Admon, Dan; Kettner, Jiri; Shimony, Avraham; Otto, Christiane; Becka, Michael; Kanefendt, Friederike; Romo, Andres Iniguez; Hasin, Tal; Ostadal, Petr; Rojas, Gonzalo Calvo; Senni, Michele; Podpera, Ivo; Linkova, Hana; Hajek, Petr; Bauersachs, Johann; Menck, Niels; Fuisting, Jan; Oumbe Tiam, Sadrack; Martinez Selles, Manuel; Miro Palau, Vicente; Roque, Mercedes; Ibanez, Borja; Arbel, Yaron; Nikolsky, Eugenia; Nodari, Savina; Silvio Marenzi, Gian Carlo; Achilli, Felice; Reimers, Bernhard

    The American heart journal, 06/2020, Letnik: 224
    Journal Article

    Adverse cardiac remodeling is a major risk factor for the development of post myocardial infarction (MI) heart failure (HF). This study investigates the effects of the chymase inhibitor fulacimstat on adverse cardiac remodeling after acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial patients with first STEMI were eligible. To preferentially enrich patients at high risk of adverse remodeling, main inclusion criteria were a left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% and an infarct size >10% on day 5 to 9 post MI as measured by cardiac MRI. Patients were then randomized to 6 months treatment with either 25 mg fulacimstat (n = 54) or placebo (n = 53) twice daily on top of standard of care starting day 6 to 12 post MI. The changes in LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) from baseline to 6 months were analyzed by a central blinded cardiac MRI core laboratory. Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated and achieved mean total trough concentrations that were approximately tenfold higher than those predicted to be required for minimal therapeutic activity. Comparable changes in LVEF (fulacimstat: 3.5% ± 5.4%, placebo: 4.0% ± 5.0%, P = .69), LVEDVI (fulacimstat: 7.3 ± 13.3 mL/m2, placebo: 5.1 ± 18.9 mL/m2, P = .54), and LVESVI (fulacimstat: 2.3 ± 11.2 mL/m2, placebo: 0.6 ± 14.8 mL/m2, P = .56) were observed in both treatment arms. Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction (LVD) after first STEMI but had no effect on cardiac remodeling.