UP - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • van Eijk, Ruben P A; Jones, Ashley R; Sproviero, William; Shatunov, Aleksey; Shaw, Pamela J; Leigh, P Nigel; Young, Carolyn A; Shaw, Christopher E; Mora, Gabriele; Mandrioli, Jessica; Borghero, Giuseppe; Volanti, Paolo; Diekstra, Frank P; van Rheenen, Wouter; Verstraete, Esther; Eijkemans, Marinus J C; Veldink, Jan H; Chio, Adriano; Al-Chalabi, Ammar; van den Berg, Leonard H; van Es, Michael A

    Neurology, 10/2017, Letnik: 89, Številka: 18
    Journal Article

    To assess whether genetic subgroups in recent amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) trials responded to treatment with lithium carbonate, but that the treatment effect was lost in a large cohort of nonresponders. Individual participant data were obtained from 3 randomized trials investigating the efficacy of lithium carbonate. We matched clinical data with data regarding the and genotype. Our primary outcome was survival at 12 months. On an exploratory basis, we assessed whether the effect of lithium depended on the genotype. Clinical data were available for 518 of the 606 participants. Overall, treatment with lithium carbonate did not improve 12-month survival (hazard ratio HR 1.0, 95% confidence interval CI 0.7-1.4; = 0.96). Both the and genotype were independent predictors of survival (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.3; = 0.006 and HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.2; = 0.032, respectively). The effect of lithium was different for carriers ( = 0.027), but not for carriers ( = 0.22). The 12-month survival probability for carriers treated with lithium carbonate improved from 40.1% (95% CI 23.2-69.1) to 69.7% (95% CI 50.4-96.3). This study incorporated genetic data into past ALS trials to determine treatment effects in a genetic post hoc analysis. Our results suggest that we should reorient our strategies toward finding treatments for ALS, start focusing on genotype-targeted treatments, and standardize genotyping in order to optimize randomization and analysis for future clinical trials.