E-viri
Recenzirano
-
Krege, Susanne; Beyer, Jörg; Souchon, Rainer; Albers, Peter; Albrecht, Walter; Algaba, Ferran; Bamberg, Michael; Bodrogi, István; Bokemeyer, Carsten; Cavallin-Ståhl, Eva; Classen, Johannes; Clemm, Christoph; Cohn-Cedermark, Gabriella; Culine, Stéphane; Daugaard, Gedske; De Mulder, Pieter H.M; De Santis, Maria; de Wit, Maike; de Wit, Ronald; Derigs, Hans Günter; Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter; Dieing, Annette; Droz, Jean-Pierre; Fenner, Martin; Fizazi, Karim; Flechon, Aude; Fosså, Sophie D; Garcia del Muro, Xavier; Gauler, Thomas; Geczi, Lajos; Gerl, Arthur; Germa-Lluch, Jose Ramon; Gillessen, Silke; Hartmann, Jörg T; Hartmann, Michael; Heidenreich, Axel; Hoeltl, Wolfgang; Horwich, Alan; Huddart, Robert; Jewett, Michael; Joffe, Johnathan; Jones, William G; Kisbenedek, László; Klepp, Olbjørn; Kliesch, Sabine; Koehrmann, Kai Uwe; Kollmannsberger, Christian; Kuczyk, Markus; Laguna, Pilar; Leiva Galvis, Oscar; Loy, Volker; Mason, Malcolm D; Mead, Graham M; Mueller, Rolf; Nichols, Craig; Nicolai, Nicola; Oliver, Tim; Ondrus, Dalibor; Oosterhof, Gosse O.N; Paz-Ares, Luis; Pizzocaro, Giorgio; Pont, Jörg; Pottek, Tobias; Powles, Tom; Rick, Oliver; Rosti, Giovanni; Salvioni, Roberto; Scheiderbauer, Jutta; Schmelz, Hans-Ulrich; Schmidberger, Heinz; Schmoll, Hans-Joachim; Schrader, Mark; Sedlmayer, Felix; Skakkebaek, Niels E; Sohaib, Aslam; Tjulandin, Sergei; Warde, Padraig; Weinknecht, Stefan; Weissbach, Lothar; Wittekind, Christian; Winter, Eva; Wood, Lori; von der Maase, Hans
European urology, 03/2008, Letnik: 53, Številka: 3Journal Article
Abstract Objectives The first consensus report that had been presented by the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG) in 2004 has found widespread approval by many colleagues throughout the world. In November 2006, the group met a second time under the auspices of the Department of Urology of the Amsterdam Medical Center, The Netherlands. Methods Medical oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiation oncologists as well as pathologists from several European countries reviewed and discussed the data that had emerged since the 2002 conference and incorporated the new data into updated and revised guidelines. As for the first meeting the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was applied. The results of the discussion were compiled by the writing committee. All participants have agreed to this final update. Results The second part of the consensus paper includes the treatment of metastasised disease, residual tumour resection, salvage therapy, follow-up, and late toxicities. Conclusions Whereas the vast majority of the recommendations made in 2004 remain valid 3 yr later, refinements in the treatment of early-stage as well as of advanced-stage testicular cancer have emerged from clinical trials. Despite technical improvements, expert clinical skills will continue to be one of the major determinants for the prognosis of patients with germ cell cancer. In addition, the particular needs of testicular cancer survivors have been acknowledged.
