UP - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Unveiling the impact of int...
    He, Qing; Dizon, John Ian Wilzon T; Ganotice, Fraide A; Zheng, Binbin; Yeung, Pauline Pui Ning; Shen, Xiaoai; Ho, Lily Yuen Wah; Wong, Arkers Kwan Ching; Cheng, Franco Wing Tak; Chan, Karen Man Kei; Chan, Linda; Chan, Sarah So Ching; Chow, Amy Yin Man; Chu, Jody Kwok Pui; Chua, Denise Mae; Dung, Edwin Chung-Hin; Lee, Wei-Ning; Leung, Feona Chung Yin; Wang, Qun; Tsia, Kevin K; Vackova, Dana; Jen, Julienne; Tipoe, George L

    BMC medical education, 08/2024, Letnik: 24, Številka: 1
    Journal Article

    Abstract Background Interprofessional education (IPE) has the potential to shape students’ collaboration perception and interprofessional identity but remains understudied. This study aims to understand the effects of the IPE program as a contextual trigger to promote collaboration perception change and interprofessional identity formation among healthcare professional students. Methods Using concurrent triangulation mixed-methods, we examined the relationship between collaboration perception and interprofessional identity change among health profession students ( N = 263), and explored their perspectives on how their IPE experiences influenced their perception and identity. Participants completed the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale and Extended Professional Identity Scale and responded to open-ended questions before and after the IPE intervention. Pearson’s correlation, t-tests, regression (quantitative), and thematic analysis (qualitative) were conducted. Results Teams with initially lower collaboration perception (M = 3.59) and lower interprofessional identity (M = 3.59) showed a significant increase in collaboration perception (M = 3.76, t = 2.63; p = .02) and interprofessional identity (M = 3.97, t = 4.86; p < .001) after participating in IPE. The positive relationship between collaboration perception and interprofessional identity strengthened after participating in IPE, as evident from the correlation (Time 1: r = .69; p < .001; Time 2: r = .79; p < .001). Furthermore, collaboration perception in Time 1 significantly predicted the variance in interprofessional identity at Time 2 (β = 0.347, p < .001). Qualitative findings indicated that 85.2% of students expressed that IPE played a role in promoting their interprofessional identity and collaboration attitudes. Conclusions Incorporating the IPE program into the curriculum can effectively enhance students’ collaboration perception and interprofessional identity, ultimately preparing them for collaborative practice in the healthcare system. By engaging students in interprofessional teamwork, communication, and joint decision-making processes, the IPE program provides a valuable context for students to develop a sense of belonging and commitment to interprofessional collaboration.